# Handicap the Democrats next 11 days

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/handicap-the-democrats-next-11-days/434987>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [January 25, 2008, 6:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/handicap-the-democrats-next-11-days/434987 "2008-01-25T18:08:48Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BobLibDem](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/boblibdem/32/3149_2.png) [@BobLibDem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BobLibDem)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2008, 2:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/handicap-the-democrats-next-11-days/434987/141 "2008-01-31T14:55:31Z")

</div>

Unfortunately Obama doesn’t come across as well as Hillary in debates. Stump Obama is Superman, Debate Obama is Clark Kent. What I’d like to see maybe about Saturday is Edwards endorsing Obama. It seems a perfect storm may be about to sink the Good Ship Billary: McCain is the presumptive nominee and Democrats want someone who can beat him, backlash over Bill’s heavy-handed campaigning, the Kennedy endorsement, Obama fighting back with class. Add an Edwards endorsement and it may be enough.

Edwards was smart not to immediately endorse. If he does it Friday or Saturday, then it gets play all weekend. Better to have two news cycles than one.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spoke](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a88e57/32.png) [@Spoke](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spoke)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2008, 3:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/handicap-the-democrats-next-11-days/434987/142 "2008-01-31T15:30:33Z")

</div>

[New poll](http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/ga/georgia_democratic_primary-268.html) shows Obama with a commanding 16-point lead in Georgia.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spoke](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a88e57/32.png) [@Spoke](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spoke)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2008, 4:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/handicap-the-democrats-next-11-days/434987/143 "2008-01-31T16:50:13Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=spoke-]  
[New poll](http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/ga/georgia_democratic_primary-268.html) shows Obama with a commanding 16-point lead in Georgia.  
[/QUOTE]

Incidentally, that poll seems to give the lie to the conventional wisdom among media talking heads that Edwards supporters in the South would flock to Hillary as the “white” candidate. Instead, in a two-candidate poll they seem to be flocking to Obama as the “non-Hillary” candidate.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Richard\_Parker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/35a633/32.png) [@Richard\_Parker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Richard_Parker)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2008, 5:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/handicap-the-democrats-next-11-days/434987/144 "2008-01-31T17:47:42Z")

</div>

Obama has raised 32 million this month. That’s got to be considerably more than Clinton, right?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSeid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dseid/32/20194_2.png) [@DSeid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSeid)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2008, 6:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/handicap-the-democrats-next-11-days/434987/145 "2008-01-31T18:11:51Z")

</div>

Well it is at least considerably more than the slightly less than 25 million each of them raised the last 3 months of '07. Enough to spring for a Super Bowl ad I’m betting.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Richard\_Parker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/35a633/32.png) [@Richard\_Parker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Richard_Parker)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2008, 6:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/handicap-the-democrats-next-11-days/434987/146 "2008-01-31T18:13:24Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=DSeid]  
Well it is at least considerably more than the slightly less than 25 million each of them raised the last 3 months of '07. Enough to spring for a Super Bowl ad I’m betting.  
[/QUOTE]

Super Bowl won’t run political ads. Remember [MoveOn.org](http://MoveOn.org)?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSeid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dseid/32/20194_2.png) [@DSeid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSeid)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2008, 6:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/handicap-the-democrats-next-11-days/434987/147 "2008-01-31T18:19:28Z")

</div>

Didn’t know that.

So when will the last big endorsements drop?

[Gloria Molina](http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-molina17jan17,0,6468605.story) had said that she _would_ make an endorsement before Super Tuesday.

> [@](#):
>
> Molina said she would make up her mind before Feb. 5.

And if Richardson is going to endorse, today really should be the day already - it would make for an iintersting question at the debate tonight and get some air time. Of course I’ve been expecting one every day since SC so my handicapping the timing of these things obviously stinks.

The biggies want to have an impact. What timing maximizes it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BobLibDem](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/boblibdem/32/3149_2.png) [@BobLibDem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BobLibDem)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2008, 6:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/handicap-the-democrats-next-11-days/434987/148 "2008-01-31T18:26:42Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=DSeid]  
The biggies want to have an impact. What timing maximizes it?  
[/QUOTE]

I think Friday about 3pm or so. This gets you on all the talking head shows Friday night and if no fresher news comes in, you’re the talk of the Sunday talk shows too.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tds1273](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/df705f/32.png) [@tds1273](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tds1273)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2008, 6:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/handicap-the-democrats-next-11-days/434987/149 "2008-01-31T18:37:46Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Phlosphr]  
I’m really looking forward to the Debate tonight. The signs are all there that Obama is gaining speed. If he is the winner by any margin on Tuesday it’s going to be difficult for Hillary to catch him, if not impossible.  
[/QUOTE]

Unfortunately, and I think it is no small coincidence, they lined up the Democratic debate with the season premier of Lost. I think this will hurt Obama and play better for Hillary, not by a whole lot probably, but at this point every little bit counts. Far more people will tune in for Lost and rely on the post-debate spin, which on CNN will likely bend towards Clinton.

Incidentally did anyone catch A Daily Show last night? John had [Peggy Noonan](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peggy_Noonan) on, and after enough of her getting little digs in at Edwards and Obama, but more so at the theme of populism in their messages, Stewart seemed to have had it and went almost ‘Crossfire-esque’ on her. He also, I think, officially-unofficially endorsed John Edward’s endorsement of Barack Obama.  
Due to the writers’ strike I don’t want to link to the interview, but if you can catch it, say on the repeat today, it is worth it. For what it stood for and what it could potentially mean as far as influence goes, I think it was one of the better interviews I have seen on the show.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Phlosphr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/c68b51/32.png) [@Phlosphr](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Phlosphr)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2008, 7:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/handicap-the-democrats-next-11-days/434987/150 "2008-01-31T19:03:02Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=tds1273]  
Unfortunately, and I think it is no small coincidence, they lined up the Democratic debate with the season premier of Lost. I think this will hurt Obama and play better for Hillary, not by a whole lot probably, but at this point every little bit counts.  
[/QUOTE]

Like other hopefully like minded folk as myself, they will Tivo Lost and watch the debate. Or vice the verse. I’m really watching this one close as Obama is gaining a lot of ground and quickly…

[QUOTE=Richard Parker]  
Obama has raised 32 million this month. That’s got to be considerably more than Clinton, right?  
[/QUOTE]

Yep - Hillary has not said how much she has raised, we’ll see.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Richard\_Parker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/35a633/32.png) [@Richard\_Parker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Richard_Parker)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2008, 8:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/handicap-the-democrats-next-11-days/434987/151 "2008-01-31T20:17:55Z")

</div>

The National Journal has declared Obama the most liberal Senator. Conventional wisdom says this helps him in the primary and hurts him the general. I think that’s probably right, to an extent. But the Republicans are going to paint him as liberal no matter what happens. The National Journal imprimatur probably doesn’t matter that much. Thoughts?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Menocchio](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9de053/32.png) [@Menocchio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Menocchio)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2008, 8:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/handicap-the-democrats-next-11-days/434987/152 "2008-01-31T20:23:28Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=tds1273]  
Unfortunately, and I think it is no small coincidence, they lined up the Democratic debate with the season premier of Lost. I think this will hurt Obama and play better for Hillary, not by a whole lot probably, but at this point every little bit counts.  
[/QUOTE]

Why do you say that? Obama’s strengths are not in his debate performances.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RTFirefly](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/c77e96/32.png) [@RTFirefly](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RTFirefly)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2008, 9:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/handicap-the-democrats-next-11-days/434987/153 "2008-01-31T21:03:30Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Richard Parker]  
The National Journal has declared Obama the most liberal Senator. Conventional wisdom says this helps him in the primary and hurts him the general. I think that’s probably right, to an extent. But the Republicans are going to paint him as liberal no matter what happens. The National Journal imprimatur probably doesn’t matter that much. Thoughts?  
[/QUOTE]  
The GOP’s certain to use it against him in the fall.

And it looks to me like a bullshit [methodology](http://nj.nationaljournal.com/voteratings/methodology.htm). Two reasons: first, the weighting sucks, given the number of votes. By the time you take 99 votes, some are going to be a LOT more important than others. The most important vote out of a group that big is going to be _way_ more significant than the 99th most important. Ten or twenty times as important, I’d say. The NJ weightings only go from 1 to 3. So, for instance, the vote for fully funding a withdrawal from Iraq counts only 1.5 times as much as the bill that would keep Mexican trucks off U.S. roads.

Second, and more important in this instance, is that the methodology for dealing with missed votes sucks terribly. If you’re running for President, you’re going to miss more than a few votes. But the votes that you’re present for probably won’t be a random sample, but rather votes that were more important to take a stand on. And the votes you were absent from were more likely to be where your vote wasn’t needed.

When your party doesn’t have a huge majority, those votes you make are likely to be the ones where your vote was needed _for your party to have a chance to win the vote_.

Unless you come up with a way of dealing with this, um, nonresponse bias (to use a standard term in a very nonstandard sense :)), you’re going to come up with some weird results. And that’s how Obama went from 16th and 10th out of 45 Dems in 2005 and 2006, to 1st out of 51 in 2007. The NJ simply pretended that the sample of votes Obama was there for represented the whole, and came up with a screwy number.

Same thing happened to Kerry in 2003.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Richard\_Parker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/35a633/32.png) [@Richard\_Parker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Richard_Parker)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2008, 9:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/handicap-the-democrats-next-11-days/434987/154 "2008-01-31T21:07:49Z")

</div>

One way of putting the question is this: which is more damaging in the general election, the fact that you voted with Bush on Iran, or the fact that you are considered liberal by the National Journal?

(I don’t mean that as a rhetorical question.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tds1273](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/df705f/32.png) [@tds1273](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tds1273)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2008, 11:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/handicap-the-democrats-next-11-days/434987/155 "2008-01-31T23:38:15Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Menocchio]  
Why do you say that? Obama’s strengths are not in his debate performances.  
[/QUOTE]

Exactly that; well, aside from the way the networks seem to be trying to push for Hillary, particularly CNN and even Fox.

At least when you watch the debates though, you get the entire context of the question and answer. Obama also tends to reason out his answers more, which makes them not to useful when they are cut down to mere sound bites. The less people see of the actual debate the easier it is to get away with spinning it, which ever way, afterwards.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Phlosphr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/c68b51/32.png) [@Phlosphr](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Phlosphr)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2008, 11:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/handicap-the-democrats-next-11-days/434987/156 "2008-01-31T23:46:05Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=tds1273]  
Exactly that; well, aside from the way the networks seem to be trying to push for Hillary, particularly CNN and even Fox.

At least when you watch the debates though, you get the entire context of the question and answer. Obama also tends to reason out his answers more, which makes them not to useful when they are cut down to mere sound bites. The less people see of the actual debate the easier it is to get away with spinning it, which ever way, afterwards.  
[/QUOTE]

I agree, but the latest polls are indicating he’s doing quite well, so people are looking past those sound bites a bit. He’s stopping in CT brielfy on Monday - I’m planning on being there to listen to him,we’ve been rallying folks all week…and [it’s working](http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080131/pl_nm/usa_politics_money_dc).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tds1273](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/df705f/32.png) [@tds1273](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tds1273)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2008, 11:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/handicap-the-democrats-next-11-days/434987/157 "2008-01-31T23:58:16Z")

</div>

Lost vs Debate, might be a moot point. It looks like, at least on the left coast, the debate goes from 5-7 and Lost 8-10. It doesn’t say if/when CNN will repeat the debate, though they did last night’s, but at least for those that don’t have to fight traffic or work late, it might not be an issue. I don’t know what it is like for the other time zones though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wonky](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wonky/32/393_2.png) [@wonky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wonky)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2008, 2:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/handicap-the-democrats-next-11-days/434987/158 "2008-02-01T02:18:56Z")

</div>

Which of the Democratic primaries/caucuses on SuperDuperChaluper Tuesday are open?

If independents perceive the Republican race as settled, will they vote Democrat, and if so, who would they tend to favor?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SpartanDC](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b2d939/32.png) [@SpartanDC](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SpartanDC)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2008, 2:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/handicap-the-democrats-next-11-days/434987/159 "2008-02-01T02:37:27Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=jsgoddess]  
If independents perceive the Republican race as settled, will they vote Democrat, and if so, who would they tend to favor?  
[/QUOTE]

All evidence suggests Obama benefits. That said, I think the number of _true_ independents – i.e. ones who don’t even know what primary they’d vote in at this point – is smaller than some people believe. I think most independents probably lean clearly one way or the other, but resist party labels. That’s just my gut talking.

Oh, and I’m pretty sure 15 of the contests are open to independent voters. I can’t remember the specific states, but California is one of them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tds1273](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/df705f/32.png) [@tds1273](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tds1273)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2008, 2:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/handicap-the-democrats-next-11-days/434987/160 "2008-02-01T02:58:11Z")

</div>

I have to admit, I was wrong on both counts. The timing with Lost was a non-factor, hell, there is even a bonus episode of Countdown in between. Where I was really wrong though was CNN’s bias, Wolf Blitzer made a horrible moderater and asked Hillary some really stupid questions. It was nice to hear the audience actually boo him.

So even though there is a thread for the debate its self I just wanted to pop into this one right quick and say ‘my bad, I spoke too soon’.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/handicap-the-democrats-next-11-days/434987.md?page=7)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/handicap-the-democrats-next-11-days/434987.md?page=9)
