# Hari Seldon's warning in the Biden XO transgender sports thread

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hari-seldons-warning-in-the-biden-xo-transgender-sports-thread/931134>\
**Category:** About This Message Board\
**Created:** [January 21, 2021, 8:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hari-seldons-warning-in-the-biden-xo-transgender-sports-thread/931134 "2021-01-21T20:31:26Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [January 22, 2021, 8:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hari-seldons-warning-in-the-biden-xo-transgender-sports-thread/931134/42 "2021-01-22T08:22:16Z")

</div>

> [@madsircool](#):
>
> We really dont need an intolerant debate killer moderating Great Debates.

Naah, we need _more_ of it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [January 22, 2021, 8:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hari-seldons-warning-in-the-biden-xo-transgender-sports-thread/931134/43 "2021-01-22T08:25:08Z")

</div>

> [@DemonTree](#):
>
> I guess it’s just inevitable to get warnings if you have controversial opinions.

That’s funny, I don’t get warned for my controversial opinions (of which I have expressed plenty that most Dopers disagree with, like absolute pacifism and rejection of the fiction of free speech).

It’s not about having controversial opinions, it’s about how you argue them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DemonTree](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/demontree/32/8646_2.png) [@DemonTree](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DemonTree)\
**Post date:** [January 22, 2021, 8:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hari-seldons-warning-in-the-biden-xo-transgender-sports-thread/931134/44 "2021-01-22T08:31:23Z")

</div>

I still did nothing of the kind.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DemonTree](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/demontree/32/8646_2.png) [@DemonTree](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DemonTree)\
**Post date:** [January 22, 2021, 8:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hari-seldons-warning-in-the-biden-xo-transgender-sports-thread/931134/45 "2021-01-22T08:33:55Z")

</div>

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> That’s funny, I don’t get warned for my controversial opinions (of which I have expressed plenty that most Dopers disagree with, like absolute pacifism and rejection of the fiction of free speech).
> 
> It’s not about having controversial opinions, it’s about how you argue them.

Those views are barely controversial on this message board.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [January 22, 2021, 8:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hari-seldons-warning-in-the-biden-xo-transgender-sports-thread/931134/46 "2021-01-22T08:36:58Z")

</div>

> [@DemonTree](#):
>
> hose views are barely controversial on this message board.

Bullshit. You try debating the pro- merits of _absolute_ pacifism, _complete_ rejection of so-called free speech, or - another one of my views - anarchism. See how “noncontroversial” they are. I’d show you previous threads on this if the site search for old threads didn’t suck completely.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DemonTree](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/demontree/32/8646_2.png) [@DemonTree](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DemonTree)\
**Post date:** [January 22, 2021, 8:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hari-seldons-warning-in-the-biden-xo-transgender-sports-thread/931134/47 "2021-01-22T08:45:03Z")

</div>

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> @Hari_Seldon @What_Exit - We never did get a conclusion from the other ATMB thread about trangender topics, but it looks to me like it really should be added to the GD list of banned topics. Because this new GD thread just demonstrates again that the anti-transrights side apparently is incapable of arguing in good faith.

This is as good as saying that we are only permitted to debate a topic if we explicitly endorse the very views we are arguing against! That is an unreasonable position that conveniently serves to enforce one viewpoint and shut down all debate against it. Banning the use of insulting terms is reasonable, banning neutral ones is going too far.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [January 22, 2021, 8:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hari-seldons-warning-in-the-biden-xo-transgender-sports-thread/931134/48 "2021-01-22T08:47:30Z")

</div>

> [@DemonTree](#):
>
> This is as good as saying that we are only permitted to debate a topic if we explicitly endorse the very views we are arguing against!

No, it’s saying we should only debate topics that aren’t historically only started by trolls, disingenuous debaters and JAQers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [January 22, 2021, 8:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hari-seldons-warning-in-the-biden-xo-transgender-sports-thread/931134/49 "2021-01-22T08:53:20Z")

</div>

> [@DemonTree](#):
>
> Banning the use of insulting terms is reasonable,

What about banning disingenuous OPs?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [January 22, 2021, 12:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hari-seldons-warning-in-the-biden-xo-transgender-sports-thread/931134/50 "2021-01-22T12:56:13Z")

</div>

> [@DemonTree](#):
>
> banning neutral ones is going too far

Your use of “girls” to refer to everyone who isn’t trans in the context of a debate on the rights of trans girls is definitely not “neutral”, sorry. You aren’t the only one doing that crap, either.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DemonTree](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/demontree/32/8646_2.png) [@DemonTree](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DemonTree)\
**Post date:** [January 22, 2021, 1:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hari-seldons-warning-in-the-biden-xo-transgender-sports-thread/931134/51 "2021-01-22T13:19:07Z")

</div>

It _is_ pretty difficult to find neutral terms in this debate. Okay, I’ll stop using ‘girls’ in that context. Just need to find a suitable replacement.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![puzzlegal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/puzzlegal/32/3827_2.png) [@puzzlegal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/puzzlegal)\
**Post date:** [January 22, 2021, 1:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hari-seldons-warning-in-the-biden-xo-transgender-sports-thread/931134/52 "2021-01-22T13:27:16Z")

</div>

May I suggest “cis girls” or “cis women”, depending on their age? That’s exactly the right word for this context.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DemonTree](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/demontree/32/8646_2.png) [@DemonTree](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DemonTree)\
**Post date:** [January 22, 2021, 1:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hari-seldons-warning-in-the-biden-xo-transgender-sports-thread/931134/53 "2021-01-22T13:31:35Z")

</div>

I don’t like using cis because it doesn’t just mean not trans, it’s defined as requiring you to identify with a particular gender.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [January 22, 2021, 2:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hari-seldons-warning-in-the-biden-xo-transgender-sports-thread/931134/54 "2021-01-22T14:02:54Z")

</div>

AFAB (Assigned Female At Birth) girls, vs girls in general, vs trans girls specifically?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [January 22, 2021, 2:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hari-seldons-warning-in-the-biden-xo-transgender-sports-thread/931134/55 "2021-01-22T14:07:41Z")

</div>

> [@DemonTree](#):
>
> I don’t like using cis because it doesn’t just mean not trans, it’s defined as requiring you to identify with a particular gender.

Who are you wanting to include that’s not being included under this word? Are you worried about AFAB folks who don’t consider themselves girls and who want to play girls sports and don’t want transgirls to be able to play? I’m not sure this group exists.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![puzzlegal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/puzzlegal/32/3827_2.png) [@puzzlegal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/puzzlegal)\
**Post date:** [January 22, 2021, 2:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hari-seldons-warning-in-the-biden-xo-transgender-sports-thread/931134/56 "2021-01-22T14:35:29Z")

</div>

Yeah, the number of nonbinary (+genderqueer, pangender, whatever else non-cis you might be thinking of) people AFAB who want to play girl’s or women’s sports and would be upset to have to compete against a trans girl or trans woman is probably zero.

I personally find “AFAB” an awkward construction, and only use it when it’s the only word (phrase) that works in the context. I think “cis” is exactly the right word for this discussion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hari\_Seldon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hari_seldon/32/5173_2.png) [@Hari\_Seldon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hari_Seldon)\
**Post date:** [January 22, 2021, 3:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hari-seldons-warning-in-the-biden-xo-transgender-sports-thread/931134/57 "2021-01-22T15:52:03Z")

</div>

Since this has become controversial, let me go into more detail on my reasoning. Aside from the utterly gratuitous slur on women’s sports, that only added to my irritation to the OP. The OP’s claim was that Biden had issued an XO saying that transgender women had to be allowed to compete on Women’s teams. The XO said nothing of the sort. It was a general order that transgendered persons were essentially a protected class and could not be discriminated against on that basis. It is arguable that an unintended consequence of that order _might_ be that transgendered woman must be allowed to compete on women’s teams. Arguable. Sports federations are heatedly arguing this point. Right now they are trying out a rule that you cannot compete as a woman if you have too much testosterone, but there are obvious problems with that too. It is a difficult and fraught question that can be debated. But the way the OP presented is, IMHO, trolling.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [January 22, 2021, 3:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hari-seldons-warning-in-the-biden-xo-transgender-sports-thread/931134/58 "2021-01-22T15:56:17Z")

</div>

> [@Hari\_Seldon](#):
>
> But the way the OP presented is, IMHO, trolling.

I for one am very grateful that after years and years and years of complaining, this sort of disingenuous argument is finally being slapped down.

And if these sorts of arguments are made in good faith by people who are just bad debaters, this sort of warning might be the motivation to learn.

So, thank you Hari\_Seldon.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RitterSport](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/rittersport/32/6326_2.png) [@RitterSport](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RitterSport)\
**Post date:** [January 22, 2021, 5:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hari-seldons-warning-in-the-biden-xo-transgender-sports-thread/931134/59 "2021-01-22T17:02:01Z")

</div>

The original poster of that thread was misled by a hateful and bigoted op-ed piece and seems to be just wrong on the subject. However, being wrong shouldn’t be warnable on its own.

The gratuitous slur on women’s sports was obviously (to me) sarcasm.

I think the OP was so wrong as to warrant shutting down the thread (especially after no real cites were provided), but I don’t think it merited a warning.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![k9bfriender](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/k9bfriender/32/3283_2.png) [@k9bfriender](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/k9bfriender)\
**Post date:** [January 22, 2021, 5:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hari-seldons-warning-in-the-biden-xo-transgender-sports-thread/931134/60 "2021-01-22T17:13:42Z")

</div>

> [@RitterSport](#):
>
> The original poster of that thread was misled by a hateful and bigoted op-ed piece and seems to be just wrong on the subject.

There’s being misled, and then there is seeking out those perspective. The OP didn’t even bother to link to the op-ed, until it was linked by another poster and asked if that was where she got it from. She admitted that the reason that she didn’t link it, and instead just started her OP with a fallacious assertion was because the op-ed was inflammatory. She new the nature and the content of the piece she was pushing, there was no “misleading” there.

She did not cite the EO, she did not cite any analysis, she basically just repeated the exact inflammatory language that of the misleading op-ed.

> [@RitterSport](#):
>
> The gratuitous slur on women’s sports was obviously (to me) sarcasm.

It was less sarcastic and more passive aggressive. Just daring anyone to disagree with her, as that would mean that you don’t care about women.

If anything that thread should be preserved as a near perfect example of well poisoning.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DemonTree](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/demontree/32/8646_2.png) [@DemonTree](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DemonTree)\
**Post date:** [January 22, 2021, 6:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hari-seldons-warning-in-the-biden-xo-transgender-sports-thread/931134/61 "2021-01-22T18:20:15Z")

</div>

> [@Hari\_Seldon](#):
>
> Aside from the utterly gratuitous slur on women’s sports, that only added to my irritation to the OP.

Would you still have warned me if you’d realised that was sarcasm?

I believe this would not be happening if it affected men’s sports. Is expressing that opinion against the rules?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hari-seldons-warning-in-the-biden-xo-transgender-sports-thread/931134.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hari-seldons-warning-in-the-biden-xo-transgender-sports-thread/931134.md?page=4)
