# Has Anyone Built a Car This Way?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-anyone-built-a-car-this-way/731665>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [September 18, 2015, 1:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-anyone-built-a-car-this-way/731665 "2015-09-18T13:00:14Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 12\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ftg](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ftg/32/2801_2.png) [@ftg](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ftg)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2015, 10:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-anyone-built-a-car-this-way/731665/41 "2015-09-18T22:07:06Z")

</div>

All this is talk of older cheap cars (like original Beetles), of course.

You can’t build a truly cheap engine now because of emissions requirements. The tolerances required to keep emissions in check are extremely fine. And cheapo components might have okay tolerances out of the door but won’t stay that way for very long.

Emissions+collision safety killed the old Beetle.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GreasyJack](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/df705f/32.png) [@GreasyJack](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GreasyJack)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2015, 10:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-anyone-built-a-car-this-way/731665/42 "2015-09-18T22:55:15Z")

</div>

> [@ftg](#):
>
> Emissions+collision safety killed the old Beetle.

Not true at all. Safety-wise, they obviously wouldn’t fly today but the Beetles weren’t any worse than the Japanese cars that replaced them in the 70’s. Emissions-wise, the Mexican Beetles were still able to pass the stringent emissions standards passed by Mexico City in the 90’s, which were comparable to the California ones, so they clearly could have hung on for a few more decades in the US at least.

What killed them in the US is simply that the Datsuns, Toyotas, and Hondas that came out in the 70’s were much better cars in most ways. Particularly in terms of them not requiring constant fiddling like the VW’s, but that’s less of an issue in countries with cheaper labor rates.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rick](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/9f8e36/32.png) [@Rick](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rick)\
**Post date:** [September 19, 2015, 2:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-anyone-built-a-car-this-way/731665/43 "2015-09-19T02:15:06Z")

</div>

> [@GreasyJack](#):
>
> Yeah, air-cooled VW’s suck in hot weather, that’s why they kept selling them in incredible numbers in Mexico and Brazil until the mid-2000’s.
> 
> Not to insinuate anything about your early career, but a big part of the problem with the old VWs _was_ that people took them to normal service stations where mechanics treated them just like an American car of the era. One of the big things was that mechanics tended to tune them by ear just like they would a Ford or Chevy, which resulted in them setting the idle way too low. The VW engine would idle just fine at 500 or so RPM, but it was supposed to be set closer to 1000 to keep the fan turning fast enough to keep it cool at idle. And of course you didn’t _know_ the thing was overheating until you started seeing the flickering oil light of doom, by which time the damage was largely done. The famously easy engine swap was also easy to screw up because if you didn’t get all the engine compartment seals and ductwork on correctly (including the often overlooked thermostat) you’d get overheating problems in hot weather (and no heat in the winter.)

This was an import car speciality shop. The air cooled guys knew their stuff.  
The problem is you have an engine that holds 3 quarts of oil, has no filter and when traveling at speed it won’t pick up the last quart and a half or so. On top of that the oil cooler sits right on top the #3 cylinder. In a vain attempt to keep #3 alive they modify the timing on #3 to lower the peak temps. This is why VW idle sounds so funny. They don’t idle even.  
Bottom line is if you are a quart low on oil in 100 degree weather and hauling ass down the freeway you are about a half a quart of oil away from God.  
Another interesting little gem about VWs. The carb inlet is brass pressed into aluminum. The inlet would rattle loose and gas would pour out. On most engines this isn’t a huge problem. Except VW who mounted the carb directly over the top of the generator which sparks as it turns. Can you say Kaboom?  
The reason that VW succeeded both in the U.S. And South America wasn’t based on reliability, it was based on ease of repair and parts availability.  
They blew up all the time, but the parts were on the shelf.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Throatwarbler\_Mangrove](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/8c91f0/32.png) [@Throatwarbler\_Mangrove](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Throatwarbler_Mangrove)\
**Post date:** [September 19, 2015, 3:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-anyone-built-a-car-this-way/731665/44 "2015-09-19T03:31:59Z")

</div>

What the Op is describing is essentially a motorcycle with an enclosed cargo and passenger area, and these are pretty prevalent in third world countries, called a variety of names, “tuk tuks”, etc… Even then, they only exist in third world countries that don’t have any pretense of caring for air quality. As an example, most domestic Chinese carmakers are being driven more or less over the edge in the Chinese car market, because Chinese emissions regulations are at a point where many of their cars are essentially banned in larger Chinese cities.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GreasyJack](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/df705f/32.png) [@GreasyJack](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GreasyJack)\
**Post date:** [September 19, 2015, 6:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-anyone-built-a-car-this-way/731665/45 "2015-09-19T18:24:26Z")

</div>

> [@Rick](#):
>
> This was an import car speciality shop. The air cooled guys knew their stuff.  
> The problem is you have an engine that holds 3 quarts of oil, has no filter and when traveling at speed it won’t pick up the last quart and a half or so. On top of that the oil cooler sits right on top the #3 cylinder. In a vain attempt to keep #3 alive they modify the timing on #3 to lower the peak temps. This is why VW idle sounds so funny. They don’t idle even.  
> Bottom line is if you are a quart low on oil in 100 degree weather and hauling ass down the freeway you are about a half a quart of oil away from God.  
> Another interesting little gem about VWs. The carb inlet is brass pressed into aluminum. The inlet would rattle loose and gas would pour out. On most engines this isn’t a huge problem. Except VW who mounted the carb directly over the top of the generator which sparks as it turns. Can you say Kaboom?  
> The reason that VW succeeded both in the U.S. And South America wasn’t based on reliability, it was based on ease of repair and parts availability.  
> They blew up all the time, but the parts were on the shelf.

Do you have cite for the timing being different on the #3 cylinder? How would that even be possible? The distributor caps terminals sure look like they’re all 90 degrees from each other, and the valve timing can’t be different (if that’s what you mean) because the valves on both sides run off a single 4-lobe camshaft. Cooling on the #3 cylinder was definitely an issue (the #3 exhaust valve was usually the one that would get burned out if you didn’t do the valve adjustments) but the “rough idle” was mostly just the boxer burble exhaust sound.

I certainly wouldn’t argue the VW was more dependable than the contemporary American land barges of the day, but it was significantly better than any other small cheap cars of the day. VW did have a good dealer network, but they were able to build it because their product was solid unlike most of the other also-ran pre-70’s imports. The reason why there were parts available all over the world was because they were popular cars, not the other way around.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Amateur\_Barbarian](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/59ef9b/32.png) [@Amateur\_Barbarian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Amateur_Barbarian)\
**Post date:** [September 19, 2015, 6:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-anyone-built-a-car-this-way/731665/46 "2015-09-19T18:49:08Z")

</div>

I don’t think the ignition timing could or needed to be different on a VW flat four, but the cam/valve timings might have been different. Since \*Rick \*has been at pains to correct my postings by the odd tenth of a volt here and there, I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt… but I will say that I’ve never heard this before (even with a sister who was a master veedub mechanic) and can’t find any cite (including performance cam angles) that bear it up. 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Amateur\_Barbarian](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/59ef9b/32.png) [@Amateur\_Barbarian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Amateur_Barbarian)\
**Post date:** [September 19, 2015, 7:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-anyone-built-a-car-this-way/731665/47 "2015-09-19T19:07:44Z")

</div>

(very small detail… that should be \*\*Rick \*\*up there, not _Rick_, which looks like some kind of taunt)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GreasyJack](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/df705f/32.png) [@GreasyJack](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GreasyJack)\
**Post date:** [September 19, 2015, 7:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-anyone-built-a-car-this-way/731665/48 "2015-09-19T19:21:36Z")

</div>

> [@Amateur\_Barbarian](#):
>
> I don’t think the ignition timing could or needed to be different on a VW flat four, but the cam/valve timings might have been different. Since \*Rick \*has been at pains to correct my postings by the odd tenth of a volt here and there, I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt… but I will say that I’ve never heard this before (even with a sister who was a master veedub mechanic) and can’t find any cite (including performance cam angles) that bear it up. 😃

The valve timing can’t be different because it only had a 4 lobe camshaft driving 8 valves. The same lobes that runs the #3 valves also runs the #1 valves.

I think the only way you could make the ignition timing different for one cylinder on an old points n’ distributor system is to have one of the terminals on the distributor cap slightly off. It could be that the #3 terminal is slightly off on a VW distributor cap and I just never noticed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Amateur\_Barbarian](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/59ef9b/32.png) [@Amateur\_Barbarian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Amateur_Barbarian)\
**Post date:** [September 19, 2015, 7:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-anyone-built-a-car-this-way/731665/49 "2015-09-19T19:44:40Z")

</div>

> [@GreasyJack](#):
>
> The valve timing can’t be different because it only had a 4 lobe camshaft driving 8 valves. The same lobes that runs the #3 valves also runs the #1 valves.

Oh.

_Not_ having any flat-four 'sperience, myself… I knew the VW engines were about as simple as things can get, but that’s a new… simpler.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rick](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/9f8e36/32.png) [@Rick](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rick)\
**Post date:** [September 19, 2015, 9:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-anyone-built-a-car-this-way/731665/50 "2015-09-19T21:32:49Z")

</div>

Not the valve timing the ignition timing. To alter that all you have to do not put all 4 distributor cam lobes not equal distance apart.  
So instead of 90-90-90-90 you have 90-85-95-90  
It shows up clearly on an ignition oscilloscope.  
A distributor for a 140 series Volvo ran about $120 back in the day. A 009 distributor for a bug with an identical body, and took the same distributor cap was $29. The only problem was your Volvo idled funny with a 009 installed. 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gatopescado](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gatopescado/32/5711_2.png) [@Gatopescado](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gatopescado)\
**Post date:** [September 19, 2015, 10:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-anyone-built-a-car-this-way/731665/51 "2015-09-19T22:41:02Z")

</div>

> [@Amateur\_Barbarian](#):
>
> _Not_ having any flat-four 'sperience, myself… I knew the VW engines were about as simple as things can get, but that’s a new… simpler.

Mind blown here as well. This is a fascinating thread.

I’ll take a guess at the question in the OP: Probably just as cheap/easy to build a good car to start with. 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Balthisar](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/balthisar/32/2825_2.png) [@Balthisar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Balthisar)\
**Post date:** [September 21, 2015, 1:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-anyone-built-a-car-this-way/731665/52 "2015-09-21T01:58:24Z")

</div>

> [@cornflakes](#):
>
> I didn’t realize or recall that the oil change interval was that short. I do remember the oil system and oil temp being the weak link. It seemed that oil coolers extended the engine life; recycled oil (the cheap stuff from the convenience store) could wind up as thick as Karo Syrup when the car was towed in for a rebuild.

I miss my '68. Keep in mind that these engines didn’t have an oil filter, which certainly impacted the change interval.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-anyone-built-a-car-this-way/731665.md?page=2)
