# Has there ever been a documented perfect NCAA tournament bracket? What are the odds?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-there-ever-been-a-documented-perfect-ncaa-tournament-bracket-what-are-the-odds/533398>\
**Category:** The Game Room\
**Created:** [March 22, 2010, 9:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-there-ever-been-a-documented-perfect-ncaa-tournament-bracket-what-are-the-odds/533398 "2010-03-22T21:59:08Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cyberhwk](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/7993a0/32.png) [@Cyberhwk](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cyberhwk)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2010, 5:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-there-ever-been-a-documented-perfect-ncaa-tournament-bracket-what-are-the-odds/533398/21 "2010-03-23T05:52:25Z")

</div>

Yeah, but couldn’t there be some fluke postseason where an unusual number of higher seeds win? Everybody’s brackets are balls this year because who would have predicted 8 10+ seeds winning the first round, but that’s not always going to be the case.

Maybe we have a season where there’s definitely Haves and Have-Nots. Very few first round upsets, and the Final Four ends up with a 1, 1, 1, & a 2. Out of millions of brackets submitted nobody randomly got there?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bootis](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/e8c25b/32.png) [@Bootis](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bootis)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2010, 6:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-there-ever-been-a-documented-perfect-ncaa-tournament-bracket-what-are-the-odds/533398/22 "2010-03-23T06:50:11Z")

</div>

1st round stats, since tournament expanded to 64 in '85:

1 seeds win 100%  
2 seeds win 96%  
3 seeds win 84%  
4 seeds win 79%  
5 seeds win 68%  
6 seeds win 69%  
7 seeds win 63%  
8 seeds win 42%

If you pick the favorites, in every game, (which statistically give you the best chance to be perfect), based on these numbers, if my math is right, you have around a 1 in 25,000 chance for a perfect first round.  
So, if you get that far, there’s still 32 games to go, likely half of them coin flips. calling 16 straight coinflips is about a 1 in 50,000 shot. combined with your 1 in 25,000 perfect first round, you’re already at over 1 in a billion, and you still got 16 more game you need to call. Easier games to guess, but even if you had an 80% chance of calling each of the other 16 games, your overall chance of a perfect bracket would still grow to around 1 in 50 billion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JohnT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnt/32/15048_2.png) [@JohnT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JohnT)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2010, 1:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-there-ever-been-a-documented-perfect-ncaa-tournament-bracket-what-are-the-odds/533398/23 "2010-03-23T13:29:00Z")

</div>

> [@Bootis](#):
>
> I’ll say. That _handily_ beats any winner in the history of Espn’s Tournament Challenge, which has gone for years, drawing millions of brackets every year. It quite probably stands alone as the most accurate NCAA bracket predicted by anyone on this planet, ever.

My dad was bizarrely good at picking these things - he won the office pool every year except one.

But even then he realized he had a fluke bracket. Had the thing framed (it was done on a newspaper sheet), but it was lost after his death a few years ago. ☹

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![notfrommensa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/f14d63/32.png) [@notfrommensa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/notfrommensa)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2010, 5:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-there-ever-been-a-documented-perfect-ncaa-tournament-bracket-what-are-the-odds/533398/24 "2010-03-23T17:54:30Z")

</div>

Harvard (a #16 seed) beat Stanford (a #1 Seed) in the 1998 NCAA Basketball tournament. Check that, Make it the 1998 NCAA _ **Womens** _ Basketball Tournament.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![garygnu](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/garygnu/32/2924_2.png) [@garygnu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/garygnu)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2010, 6:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-there-ever-been-a-documented-perfect-ncaa-tournament-bracket-what-are-the-odds/533398/25 "2010-03-23T18:36:16Z")

</div>

Come, now, silly. Wimmin don’t play basketball.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![brickbacon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/898d66/32.png) [@brickbacon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/brickbacon)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2010, 8:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-there-ever-been-a-documented-perfect-ncaa-tournament-bracket-what-are-the-odds/533398/26 "2010-03-23T20:12:12Z")

</div>

How much do you think “correct” ranking would factor in. According to the stats provided, #9 seeds beat #8s most of the time. If prognostication on the part of the ranking committee were better, how much would that matter?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![vinniepaz](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/b4bc9f/32.png) [@vinniepaz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/vinniepaz)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2010, 9:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-there-ever-been-a-documented-perfect-ncaa-tournament-bracket-what-are-the-odds/533398/27 "2010-03-23T21:36:12Z")

</div>

> **[Autistic Teen Picks First Two NCAA Rounds Perfectly](https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/autistic-teen-picks-first-two-ncaa-rounds-perfectly/1869981/)**
>
> Alex Hermann beat the odds and got every game correct, so far.

Article about autistic teenager from Chicago who has a perfect bracket through round 2

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SCSimmons](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e495f1/32.png) [@SCSimmons](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SCSimmons)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2010, 2:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-there-ever-been-a-documented-perfect-ncaa-tournament-bracket-what-are-the-odds/533398/28 "2010-03-24T02:18:59Z")

</div>

> [@ultrafilter](#):
>
> [That’s not necessarily as good a strategy as you might think it is.](http://www.news.illinois.edu/news/10/0315seedings.html)

Crap! I did that same analysis years ago, and came to the same conclusion: from the regional semifinals on, seedings are irrelevant. It kind of made sense, in retrospect–a team that gets that far in the tourney can’t do it on luck, they’ve really proved something. Eg. UNI maybe got lucky & caught Kansas on an off night and played the game of their lives, in which case you can expect MSU to crush them like a grape. Or, they’re really that good, in which case the Spartans are in trouble\*. And if that happens, and the Panthers advance to the Elite Eight, you can’t really think of them as an underdog in any of the subsequent games.

Who knew I could have gotten interviewed by a magazine for that (fairly simple) bit of math?

\*Not happening, of course. Go Spartans! 😛

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![3\_20\_59\_or\_bust](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/3/47e85d/32.png) [@3\_20\_59\_or\_bust](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/3_20_59_or_bust)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2010, 4:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-there-ever-been-a-documented-perfect-ncaa-tournament-bracket-what-are-the-odds/533398/29 "2010-03-24T04:49:40Z")

</div>

> [@vinniepaz](#):
>
> [Autistic Teen Picks First Two NCAA Rounds Perfectly – NBC Chicago](http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/sports/Autistic-Teen-Picks-First-Two-NCAA-Rounds-Perfectly-88916437.html)
> 
> Article about autistic teenager from Chicago who has a perfect bracket through round 2

Nice story, and as much as I’d like to buy it…I just can’t.

I’ve been filling out brackets for a long, long time, and I’ve never seen anyone do this. Ever. And with the upsets this year?

Rainman angle or not, I just can’t buy it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FoieGrasIsEvil](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/foiegrasisevil/32/16638_2.png) [@FoieGrasIsEvil](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FoieGrasIsEvil)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2010, 12:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-there-ever-been-a-documented-perfect-ncaa-tournament-bracket-what-are-the-odds/533398/30 "2010-03-24T12:45:08Z")

</div>

> [@3\_20\_59\_or\_bust](#):
>
> Nice story, and as much as I’d like to buy it…I just can’t.
> 
> I’ve been filling out brackets for a long, long time, and I’ve never seen anyone do this. Ever. And with the upsets this year?
> 
> Rainman angle or not, I just can’t buy it.

I can buy that he got all the picks right so far. What I’m not buying is him having Purdue to win it all!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mahaloth](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mahaloth/32/1079_2.png) [@Mahaloth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mahaloth)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2010, 12:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-there-ever-been-a-documented-perfect-ncaa-tournament-bracket-what-are-the-odds/533398/31 "2010-03-24T12:57:01Z")

</div>

> [@vinniepaz](#):
>
> [Autistic Teen Picks First Two NCAA Rounds Perfectly – NBC Chicago](http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/sports/Autistic-Teen-Picks-First-Two-NCAA-Rounds-Perfectly-88916437.html)
> 
> Article about autistic teenager from Chicago who has a perfect bracket through round 2

I heard his father on the radio this morning. He said it was a combination of being a fan of basketball and luck.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Robot\_Arm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/robot_arm/32/18280_2.png) [@Robot\_Arm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Robot_Arm)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2010, 1:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-there-ever-been-a-documented-perfect-ncaa-tournament-bracket-what-are-the-odds/533398/32 "2010-03-24T13:27:22Z")

</div>

Couldn’t someone write a computer program to figure out every possible bracket and save them to disks, and then after the tournament claim that one of them must be perfect?  
I have not done the math on how much processing time or disk space this would require. Probably a lot.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sachertorte](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sachertorte/32/3727_2.png) [@sachertorte](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sachertorte)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2010, 1:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-there-ever-been-a-documented-perfect-ncaa-tournament-bracket-what-are-the-odds/533398/33 "2010-03-24T13:47:33Z")

</div>

> [@ultrafilter](#):
>
> [That’s not necessarily as good a strategy as you might think it is.](http://www.news.illinois.edu/news/10/0315seedings.html)

Am I missing the point of that article? It doesn’t make sense to me. The NCAA tournament has 4 1-seeds, 4 2-seeds. At elite eight all teams either are a 1-seed, 2-seed or beat a high seed to get there (or beat someone who beat someone).

Essentially, isn’t he saying that all the 1-seeds and 2-seeds are about equal?  
How is this shocking?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Contrapuntal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e274bd/32.png) [@Contrapuntal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Contrapuntal)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2010, 1:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-there-ever-been-a-documented-perfect-ncaa-tournament-bracket-what-are-the-odds/533398/34 "2010-03-24T13:59:19Z")

</div>

> [@Robot\_Arm](#):
>
> Couldn’t someone write a computer program to figure out every possible bracket and save them to disks, and then after the tournament claim that one of them must be perfect?  
> I have not done the math on how much processing time or disk space this would require. Probably a lot.

According to an ESPN story, there are 9 quintillion possibilities, and filling out one bracket a second would take 3 billion years.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Robot\_Arm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/robot_arm/32/18280_2.png) [@Robot\_Arm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Robot_Arm)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2010, 2:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-there-ever-been-a-documented-perfect-ncaa-tournament-bracket-what-are-the-odds/533398/35 "2010-03-24T14:28:25Z")

</div>

> [@Contrapuntal](#):
>
> According to an ESPN story, there are 9 quintillion possibilities, and filling out one bracket a second would take 3 billion years.

A computer could do it faster than one per second, though. Once you decide on a format, the whole bracket can be represented by 63 bits. And it’s independent of the teams, so we could start work on our 3,000,002,011 bracket today.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Contrapuntal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e274bd/32.png) [@Contrapuntal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Contrapuntal)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2010, 2:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-there-ever-been-a-documented-perfect-ncaa-tournament-bracket-what-are-the-odds/533398/36 "2010-03-24T14:35:06Z")

</div>

> [@Robot\_Arm](#):
>
> A computer could do it faster than one per second, though. Once you decide on a format, the whole bracket can be represented by 63 bits. And it’s independent of the teams, so we could start work on our 3,000,002,011 bracket today.

Knock yourself out. 🙂

I have no idea how fast a computer could do it, or if in fact the information I gave is even correct. It was just something I saw on one of those ESPN March Madness specials.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Baracus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/2bfe46/32.png) [@Baracus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Baracus)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2010, 5:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-there-ever-been-a-documented-perfect-ncaa-tournament-bracket-what-are-the-odds/533398/37 "2010-03-24T17:36:49Z")

</div>

> [@anson2995](#):
>
> What makes the NCAA bracket so interesting from a game theory perspective is that it’s not simply about picking the results of 64 games. Since the scoring is cumulative, there’s a heavy penalty for missing a pick early. And when there’s a big upset early (like the Kansas loss this weekend), that knocks about a third of the bracketologists out of the running.
> 
> If the contest was to pick the winner of all 64 games, a lot more people would get perfect scores.

No, they wouldn’t. Scores in general would be higher because the penalty for missing in the earlier rounds would be less, but the rate of perfect scores would remain the same. It doesn’t matter whether I chose Kansas to win it all in a bracket format or merely to win that individual game, either way in terms of being “perfect”, I have lost.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spoke](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a88e57/32.png) [@Spoke](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spoke)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2010, 6:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-there-ever-been-a-documented-perfect-ncaa-tournament-bracket-what-are-the-odds/533398/38 "2010-03-24T18:34:16Z")

</div>

> [@vinniepaz](#):
>
> [Autistic Teen Picks First Two NCAA Rounds Perfectly – NBC Chicago](http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/sports/Autistic-Teen-Picks-First-Two-NCAA-Rounds-Perfectly-88916437.html)
> 
> Article about autistic teenager from Chicago who has a perfect bracket through round 2

It won’t hold. He has Duke losing to Purdue! 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ultrafilter](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/3d9bf3/32.png) [@ultrafilter](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ultrafilter)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2010, 9:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-there-ever-been-a-documented-perfect-ncaa-tournament-bracket-what-are-the-odds/533398/39 "2010-03-24T21:43:18Z")

</div>

> [@Robot\_Arm](#):
>
> A computer could do it faster than one per second, though. Once you decide on a format, the whole bracket can be represented by 63 bits. And it’s independent of the teams, so we could start work on our 3,000,002,011 bracket today.

Doesn’t matter, you’d still need about a billion terabyte drives to store them all (I did that in my head, so I’m not 100% sure on the order of magnitudes, but my basic point is correct).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [March 25, 2010, 12:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-there-ever-been-a-documented-perfect-ncaa-tournament-bracket-what-are-the-odds/533398/40 "2010-03-25T00:05:07Z")

</div>

But, see, the trick is that you store them in a compressed format. Then, after the tournament is over, you just uncompress the appropriate part of the file, and show it off.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-there-ever-been-a-documented-perfect-ncaa-tournament-bracket-what-are-the-odds/533398.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/has-there-ever-been-a-documented-perfect-ncaa-tournament-bracket-what-are-the-odds/533398.md?page=3)
