Actually, all these “Cult Check Lists” are usually subjective hokum. I was struck by how much this list resembles getting heavily involved in a political party or campaign.
- The group displays excessively zealous and unquestioning commitment to its leader and (whether he is alive or dead) regards his belief system, ideology, and practices as the Truth, as law.
Yes, to the point of plastering his or her name on bumper stickers, t-shirts, yard signs, etc.
-Questioning, doubt, and dissent are discouraged or even punished.
Yep, try to go to a political convention and take a contrary position to the consensus.
Mind-altering practices (such as meditation, chanting, speaking in tongues, denunciation sessions, and debilitating work routines) are used in excess and serve to suppress doubts about the group and its leader(s).
“Four More Years” “Four More Years”
-The leadership dictates, sometimes in great detail, how members should think, act, and feel (for example, members must get permission to date, change jobs, marry—or leaders prescribe what types of clothes to wear, where to live, whether or not to have children, how to discipline children, and so forth).
OK,a little weak on this one, I admit. But when I was canvassing, I had a script and a required uniform. “Go clean for gene.”
-The group is elitist, claiming a special, exalted status for itself, its leader(s) and members (for example, the leader is considered the Messiah, a special being, an avatar—or the group and/or the leader is on a special mission to save humanity).
To many examples on both sides. Look at “Obama Girl” or the long lines at Sarah Palin book signings.
-The group has a polarized us-versus-them mentality, which may cause conflict with the wider society.
Oh, in spades. Both sides.
-The leader is not accountable to any authorities (unlike, for example, teachers, military commanders or ministers, priests, monks, and rabbis of mainstream religious denominations).
OK, you got me there, though some politicians try getting away with being above the law, with help of some die hard supporters.
-The leadership induces feelings of shame and/or guilt iin order to influence and/or control members. Often, this is done through peer pressure and subtle forms of persuasion.
Yep - all the phone calls I made to get people out to the polls, and the subtle suggestions that I could do more.
-Subservience to the leader or group requires members to cut ties with family and friends, and radically alter the personal goals and activities they had before joining the group.
Not really, except I was encouraged to spend less time with family to canvass.
-The group is preoccupied with bringing in new members.
Probably the biggest goal.
-The group is preoccupied with making money.
Unless this is the biggest goal.
-Members are expected to devote inordinate amounts of time to the group and group-related activities.
Oh, yeah
-Members are encouraged or required to live and/or socialize only with other group members.
OK, no.
-The most loyal members (the “true believers”) feel there can be no life outside the context of the group. They believe there is no other way to be, and often fear reprisals to themselves or others if they leave (or even consider leaving) the group.
I ran into plenty of “True Believers” like this from both sides of the aisle.
The same analysis could be used about my job, about my family, etc. “Cult” is mostly an adjective that means “A [religious] group the speaker doesn’t like.”