Ditto, I suspect, for Gibraltar. And for the French, Martinique and French Guiana.
Concerning French Guiana, France has very strong interests to keep it. They have a considerable military presence there (Foreign Legion, with a training center for jungle warware).
And Kourou in French Guiana is also the site where the European rocket Ariane is launched into space.
The French tend to stick to their overseas territories (for instance St. Pierre & Miquelon off the coast of Canada).
The USA transferred to Panama the Panama Canal Zone which was a USA territory.
They do, for what purpose other than pride?
The Panama Canal Zone was never officially US territory. The Hay-Bunau-Varilla Treaty gave the US the right to the “use, occupation, and control” of the Zone, and the right to act as if it were sovereign there, but the area technically remained part of the Republic of Panama. Children born there to non-US citizens were regarded as Panamanian citizens.
That’s Samoa you’re thinking of there…
Is it? My apologies. It’s amazing what you can think you know if you don’t fact-check yourself. :eek:
So did I, but I wasn’t sure if I should give it a knowing smile. I should’ve.
This became an issue (sort of…) in 2008 with regards to Presidential candidate John McCain who was born in the Panama Canal Zone:
https://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/28/us/politics/28mccain.html
Many people assumed that McCain’s birth within territory that was controlled by the US was what made him a US citizen. It was actually his birth to US citizen parents that did so. However, because of a technicality in the law, at the time of his birth McCain would not have been a US citizen exactly because he was born in the Canal Zone. But because of a retroactive law passed shortly after he was born, he was considered to be have been a citizen from birth.