Have we ever had a free market?

Markets are always regulated. SOMEONE always has more leverage than the person they’re competing with, and uses it to their advantage.

In a pure laissez-faire market economy, the people who control the means of production have absolute domination over prices. This is no different from a pure socialist/communist society, where the state controls the means of production. It’s the nature of people to take as much as possible. Nobody cares about absolute wealth, but only about their own personal wealth in relation to the wealth of others. One function of government (and rightfully so!) is to regulate all of this pandemonium, and ensure that neither side of the production/consumption equation can dominate the other, and more people have room to prosper.

Free markets are not “free”. The only question is how much the government intervenes in the market. Even if the government doesn’t intervene at all, some group of people somewhere are using their influence to keep wealth away from one group of people and give it to another, which is the same thing a government does to a regulated market.

Even the idea of property itself is tied to the concept of government. Historically, land tenure has taken a number of forms: in medieval times it included obligations towards one’s serfs as well as rights to their labor.

Land might be donated to another (not transferred) by the king for a limited amount of time, including perhaps the life of the receiver. There might be a requirement to chip in when the donor’s offspring were married.

Much later, US governments would finance 3/4 of all canal investment during the early part of the 1800s. The Gallatin Plan in 1807 laid out a comprehensive system of land and water transport improvements for the US.
We have never lived in Libertaria.