# Have you ever been involved in a threesome?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/have-you-ever-been-involved-in-a-threesome/514408>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [October 19, 2009, 11:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/have-you-ever-been-involved-in-a-threesome/514408 "2009-10-19T23:13:03Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e99b99/32.png) [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diogenes_the_Cynic)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2009, 6:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/have-you-ever-been-involved-in-a-threesome/514408/41 "2009-10-20T18:32:24Z")

</div>

> [@gaffa](#):
>
> No, this was two straight guys having sex with the same woman. And, while one guy had a pretty large woman sitting on his face, the other guy experimented.

Yiou had sex with th guy. I don’t care if you call it an experiment or not. Oral sex is sex. The fact that you had sex with the guy makes it sex.

> [@](#):
>
> Sexuality is not defined by bright lines. If two men are double-penetrating the same woman, does it suddenly become a “bisexual three-way” if their balls touch?

Kind of. I wouldn’t be willing to risk it (and I would never be willing to have another guy in the room in the first place). I do know that FOR SURE a guy sucking another guy’s dick is straight up homosexual sex.

> [@](#):
>
> Huh? This was his girlfriend. _I_ was the “extra guy”. She wanted to experience two men at once, I was available, we had fun.

Yes, but you guys also had sex with each other, so you weren’t in the way (and your buddy wasn’t straight. I’m sorry to break it to you. Straight guys don’t “experiment” with sucking dick).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bup](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/6bbea6/32.png) [@bup](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bup)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2009, 6:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/have-you-ever-been-involved-in-a-threesome/514408/42 "2009-10-20T18:44:04Z")

</div>

**Diogenes** , at this point all you’re doing is making a fun thread not fun.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gaffa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e68b1a/32.png) [@gaffa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gaffa)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2009, 6:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/have-you-ever-been-involved-in-a-threesome/514408/43 "2009-10-20T18:46:51Z")

</div>

> [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](#):
>
> I call it a spit roast. 2 guys does not a gang bang make.

“Spit roast” is every bit as misogynistic as “gang bang”, in my opinion, reducing the woman involved to the same status as the pig at a luau. “Threesome” is far less judgmental - it accurately describes the situation of three people having sex. All these other distinctions really do seem like panic about “catching teh ghey!!!1!!” “Me and my buddy had sex with this slut BUT WE’RE NOT GAY!”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gaffa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e68b1a/32.png) [@gaffa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gaffa)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2009, 6:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/have-you-ever-been-involved-in-a-threesome/514408/44 "2009-10-20T18:55:53Z")

</div>

> [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](#):
>
> Yiou had sex with th guy. I don’t care if you call it an experiment or not. Oral sex is sex. The fact that you had sex with the guy makes it sex.

Lissener had a great line about sexual identity - that it is defined by who you fall in love with rather than who you have sex with. Ships and prisons are filled with heterosexual men having sex with each other. I don’t deny I had sex with a man. Which is why I identified as a “1” on the Kinsey scale. Which describes a huge percentage of the population.

> [@](#):
>
> Yes, but you guys also had sex with each other, so you weren’t in the way (and your buddy wasn’t straight. I’m sorry to break it to you. Straight guys don’t “experiment” with sucking dick).

Damn, I really am surprised at seeing these kind of things coming from liberal you. If I had sucked his dick, I’d identify as bisexual and have no problem with it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2009, 6:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/have-you-ever-been-involved-in-a-threesome/514408/45 "2009-10-20T18:57:03Z")

</div>

> [@gaffa](#):
>
> Damn, I really am surprised at seeing these kind of things coming from liberal you.

Methinks **Dio** doth protest too much.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e99b99/32.png) [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diogenes_the_Cynic)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2009, 7:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/have-you-ever-been-involved-in-a-threesome/514408/46 "2009-10-20T19:07:22Z")

</div>

What am I protesting?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![furt](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/439d5e/32.png) [@furt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/furt)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2009, 7:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/have-you-ever-been-involved-in-a-threesome/514408/47 "2009-10-20T19:08:25Z")

</div>

> [@bup](#):
>
> **Diogenes** , at this point all you’re doing is making a fun thread not fun.

You’re surprised?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e99b99/32.png) [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diogenes_the_Cynic)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2009, 7:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/have-you-ever-been-involved-in-a-threesome/514408/48 "2009-10-20T19:16:21Z")

</div>

> [@gaffa](#):
>
> Lissener had a great line about sexual identity - that it is defined by who you fall in love with rather than who you have sex with. Ships and prisons are filled with heterosexual men having sex with each other. I don’t deny I had sex with a man. Which is why I identified as a “1” on the Kinsey scale. Which describes a huge percentage of the population.

That’s fine if you’re talking about orientation, which I was not. I was talking only about specific sexual activicty. Oral sex is specific, sexual activity. Male on male oral sex is specifically _homo_sexual activity, regardless of natural orientation.

> [@](#):
>
> Damn, I really am surprised at seeing these kind of things coming from liberal you. If I had sucked his dick, I’d identify as bisexual and have no problem with it.

What am I saying that isn’t liberal? A guy who wants to suck a dick is, by definition, not 100% straight. Orientation is defined by attraction. Being attracted to a cock is the _definition_ of homosexuality.

**Lissener** is wrong, by the way. Lots of people have lots of sex without falling in love. That doesn’t mean they don’t have sexual orientations.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Who\_me\_1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/958977/32.png) [@Who\_me\_1](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Who_me_1)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2009, 7:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/have-you-ever-been-involved-in-a-threesome/514408/49 "2009-10-20T19:19:33Z")

</div>

> [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](#):
>
> **Lissener** is wrong, by the way. Lots of people have lots of sex without falling in love. That doesn’t mean they don’t have sexual orientations.

I notice you claiming he’s wrong and I see nothing but your opinion backing you up.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MeanOldLady](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/meanoldlady/32/10737_2.png) [@MeanOldLady](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MeanOldLady)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2009, 7:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/have-you-ever-been-involved-in-a-threesome/514408/50 "2009-10-20T19:22:22Z")

</div>

I think we were talking about threesomes, and then it got into a purse fight about the distinction between a threesomes and a gang bang. Please replace “threesome” with “sexual activity that involved more than two people.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2009, 7:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/have-you-ever-been-involved-in-a-threesome/514408/51 "2009-10-20T19:25:28Z")

</div>

Let’s all get drunk and nekkid. That ought to sort things out.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lissener](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lissener/32/6139_2.png) [@lissener](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lissener)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2009, 8:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/have-you-ever-been-involved-in-a-threesome/514408/52 "2009-10-20T20:22:04Z")

</div>

> [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](#):
>
> **Lissener** is wrong, by the way. Lots of people have lots of sex without falling in love. That doesn’t mean they don’t have sexual orientations.

You either misunderstand the premise, or your logic is faulty.

“Lots of people have sex without falling in love” actually supports my assertion.

Here, from a real world perspective. Since I’ve been involved with recruiting male models for porn websites, I’ve gotten to know a lot of guys who keep a pretty clear dividing line between sex and love. Since 90%+ of the population is straight, 90%+ of the guys I work with are straight. But women don’t buy porn, so if a guy is going to make a living in adult work he has to appeal to a male audience. What all this means is that most of the actors in gay porn are actually straight guys, doing a job for money.

Here’s how it usually works: I see a guy I think has some potential as a model. I give him a business card. If he contacts me, I get him a gig doing a solo video shoot, like a male stripper/centerfold video. Basically a modeling job . . . with a money shot. Invariably, once a guy’s done that, he gets other offers: we’ll pay you $X,XXX to have sex with another guy on camera. About half the time, the guy needs the money enough that he’ll give it a try. I tell them to think of it as an episode of Fear Factor. Look at it this way: if someone bet you $50 to eat a worm, you’d probably do it. So, for $5,000 . . .

Most of them find it’s not that big a deal; it’s a job. There are people who get $15 an hour to work in a sewer or shovel elephant shit. Surely you can go through the motions of pretending to enjoy having sex with the “wrong” gender for a couple grand an hour, no?

True, some of the guys discover through this process that they’re bi. (So far I haven’t had anyone that I know personally decide they were all out gay, unless they already knew it.) But the vast majority of the guys that I’ve worked with in this context simply do it as a job, then go home to their girlfriend or wife. The most successful gay porn star that I personally know–a pretty big name, FWIW–has a wife and two kids. Not that that’s any kind of proof, but I’ve known him for 9 years. He’s still 100% straight, but he’s become a pretty good performer. An actor.

That’s the distinction I was trying to make: what you do with your genitals doesn’t determine your orientation. There are, as you yourself point out, more than reason to “share” your genitals with another person; it’s not always love. Who you share your love with, though, that’s what counts as far as orientation. If you have sex with guys for money, but you only fall in love with women–or you have to fantasize with women in order to fake sex with guys–then you, yourself, are straight, even if you perform gay sex for a living.

Bottom line: sexual orientation is about who you are, not what you do.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e99b99/32.png) [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diogenes_the_Cynic)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2009, 8:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/have-you-ever-been-involved-in-a-threesome/514408/53 "2009-10-20T20:57:39Z")

</div>

> [@Who\_me\_1](#):
>
> I notice you claiming he’s wrong and I see nothing but your opinion backing you up.

Have you never heard of sex without love? You need a cite that it happens?

Sexual orientation is defined by sexual attraction. It’s not behavior. It’s not love. It’s attraction.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lissener](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lissener/32/6139_2.png) [@lissener](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lissener)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2009, 9:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/have-you-ever-been-involved-in-a-threesome/514408/54 "2009-10-20T21:18:24Z")

</div>

> [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](#):
>
> Have you never heard of sex without love? You need a cite that it happens?
> 
> Sexual orientation is defined by sexual attraction. It’s not behavior. It’s not love. It’s attraction.

Agreed, 100%.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e99b99/32.png) [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diogenes_the_Cynic)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2009, 9:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/have-you-ever-been-involved-in-a-threesome/514408/55 "2009-10-20T21:46:32Z")

</div>

Ok, then.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gaffa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e68b1a/32.png) [@gaffa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gaffa)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2009, 10:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/have-you-ever-been-involved-in-a-threesome/514408/56 "2009-10-20T22:13:37Z")

</div>

> [@MeanOldLady](#):
>
> I think we were talking about threesomes, and then it got into a purse fight about the distinction between a threesomes and a gang bang. Please replace “threesome” with “sexual activity that involved more than two people.”

My point was that “threesome” or “ménage à trois” is far less sexist and degrading than “spitroast” or “gang bang”, and I think many people who have engaged in sex with more than one other person at a time would prefer the term. And defining the less offensive and more accurate term as being exclusively for one particular variation is silly.

As Lissener said, and as I pointed out earlier with the example of prisons and the Navy (and single sex schools - any enforced single sex institution), lots of people who identify as “straight” have had sex with people of the same gender. I fit perfectly on the Kinsey scale as a “1”. If I had sought out additional male sexual partners, I would have no problem identifying as bisexual. Hell, for some reason nearly every woman I’ve had sex with has been bisexual, so in my social circle it’s the default.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2009, 3:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/have-you-ever-been-involved-in-a-threesome/514408/57 "2009-10-21T03:11:57Z")

</div>

Gang bang and spit roast are perfectly cromulent words and not necessarily sexist. It’s just unfortunate that there’s no analogue for the male versions.

“Spit roast” is purely a descriptive phrase, incidentally. Think about it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tom\_Tildrum](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/e95f7d/32.png) [@Tom\_Tildrum](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tom_Tildrum)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2009, 3:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/have-you-ever-been-involved-in-a-threesome/514408/58 "2009-10-21T03:34:17Z")

</div>

Are we all agreed that a threesome with **Dio** would involve a lot of arguing?

😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lissener](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lissener/32/6139_2.png) [@lissener](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lissener)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2009, 4:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/have-you-ever-been-involved-in-a-threesome/514408/59 "2009-10-21T04:16:14Z")

</div>

> [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](#):
>
> Gang bang and spit roast are perfectly cromulent words and not necessarily sexist. It’s just unfortunate that there’s no analogue for the male versions.
> 
> “Spit roast” is purely a descriptive phrase, incidentally. Think about it.

Descriptive or not, it’s incredibly sexist.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DocCathode](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/doccathode/32/18773_2.png) [@DocCathode](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DocCathode)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2009, 4:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/have-you-ever-been-involved-in-a-threesome/514408/60 "2009-10-21T04:30:00Z")

</div>

I’m stunned so many people have voted ‘Not Interested’. Other than being in a committed, monogamous relationship, I cannot wrap my head around not wanting to be in a threesome.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/have-you-ever-been-involved-in-a-threesome/514408.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/have-you-ever-been-involved-in-a-threesome/514408.md?page=4)
