Ummm, isn’t it a federal crime to remove words from Amendments to the Constitution?
I tried to insert a link to Faggots into the ‘See Also’ section for Scrapple. It was reverted by some bloody bot or other as ‘suspected vandalism’.
I’ve edited a few times, and added a few new articles. Not recently, though. The pleasure of editing Wikipedia went out at around the same time that all the “[citation needed]” tags started getting added. (Not that I’m suggesting a relationship between the two.)
A similar recent thread is here.
I did once, to correct some egregiously wrong information about Rangsit, which is a community north of Bangkok. For one, it claimed Rangsit was one of Bangkok’s 50 districts, which was complete BS. Although a suburb of the city, it lies squarely inside Pathum Thani province and has never been one of the city of Bangkok’s 50 districts.
I correct spelling and grammatical errors when I see them. Also factual errors when I am certain that they are wrong.
Here and there. Usually I’m just reverting vandalism, or removing spam. On occasion, I’ve found errors and fixed them (after confirming) or removed unfounded, unsourced rumors.
Yes.
I also memorized Holy Grail really well; I can recite it right now and have you ROTFLOL.
Ever? Of course - but only for typos and vandalism, except in one case where I think I added a very short sentence to clarify something (I don’t even remember which article, so no idea whether it stuck).
I have made a fair number of small corrections and additions; I’ve created one new article (for the high school that I went to); and I’ve even made four changes in the Japanese Wikipedia, including creating a redirect page.