Ahhh - she admits to being bad at budgeting! Finally a tiny victory!
You know what I’m going to do to celebrate? I’m going to have a nice tasty napkin sandwich!
Ahhh - she admits to being bad at budgeting! Finally a tiny victory!
You know what I’m going to do to celebrate? I’m going to have a nice tasty napkin sandwich!
(a propos of nothing, a Google search on “napkin sandwich” only leads to curlcoat’s insanity. Oh, and a variety of burger restaurants boasting theirs are “N napkin sandwiches”, N>2. Presumably this is a size boast, but who knows ? Maybe they’re advertising their handouts to poor folk. Come to burger king, home of the 5-stage napkin sandwich !)
That’s very funny, Kobal2.
But it’s Wendy’s that has the 5-stage napkin sandwich. Burger King’s is called the Wiper, but it’s really only a double-decker.
And Carl’s Jr. has the six-cent napkin sandwich, made with a cloth napkin (well, a Handi-Wipe).
I know. That was what I did when she first brought them up, to try and find out what the hell she was talking about. The way she stated it, it seemed like it should have been some well-known expression. But, nope, it’s apparently a native curlism, which she then just assumes everyone else understands, 'cause hey, she’s the center of the universe and the arbiter of all that is normal.
ETA: Napkin sandwiches.
It’s cute that you think you’re actually making a valid point. Wait, what am I saying? You know you’re full of shit, you’re just hoping we’ll have forgotten the subject at hand, which is that you said, “He says ‘can’t afford’, I hear ‘I have this car payment, I like to party on Fridays and Saturdays’, etc.” Note the distinct lack of the word “generally” in this quote (and in the entire post where you said it).
Ok, let’s go back and look at all of the words:
(emphasis mine)
How is this not you suggesting that helping people get an education fosters dependence? Is it the words “seem to”? If so, congratulations on crafting your words in such a way as to insinuate something that you don’t stand behind.
Missed the edit window, but I wanted to add:
It is astounding to me that there is a rule against misquoting someone, but there is not a rule against blatantly lying about what you yourself said earlier. Quit being a weasel and either back up what you say or correct yourself for having said something wrong, jerk.
Nice try, but there are still millions of liberty-minded folks who believe in individual freedom and responsibility. We believe is it wrong to force people at gunpoint to hand over their property to someone else for their individual consumption.
If you want to acquire a product such as education or healthcare, fine. Purchase it. It’s wholeheartedly immoral to use the police power of government to force your neighbor to buy it for you.
Right on, brother! Why should I pay to educate some lower-class kid; if he’d wanted an education, wasn’t he at liberty to pick parents who didn’t waste all their money on drugs and French wine? And when is the federal government gonna get its ugly hands off our highways anyway? Just give the roads to the highest bidder who will be at liberty to charge market price for tolls.
And what’s with all the frigging meat inspectors and drug regulations, anyway? Butchers and druggists should be at liberty to sell whatever they want. After all, the consumers are at liberty to shop elsewhere if they want to. And aren’t we all outraged to pay taxes for policemen to patrol someone else’s property?? They’re at liberty to hire private guards if they need them, aren’t they?
(I’d better say this was a parody. I’m not the one with social theories at a 4th-grade comic-book level. :rolleyes: )
Missed the edit window, but I wanted to add:
It is astounding to me that there is a rule against misquoting someone, but there is not a rule against blatantly lying about what you yourself said earlier.
Well, there kinda is, in a way. Difference is that the penalty for breaking it is, instead of getting warned or suspended or banned, you get your nose rubbed in it, for the amusement and pointing-and-laughter of all and sundry. And the GREATEST thing about that penalty is that anybody can carry it out. No need to report it to a mod.
Plus there’s no statute of limitations on it.
I like how curlcoat has admitted that when she too poor, it was because:
Unfortunately for me, at that time, [supporting myself] didn’t happen
So, that’s all the excuse she needs for being poor, for stealing, for not getting an education, etc. There is no actual reason, supporting herself properly just ‘didn’t happen’. But, she wants to know why anyone else would end up short of cash, and absolutely no reason is good enough for her.
I know she’s going to come along and say “but I didn’t ask the government to help me!” - well, what would have happened if she had broken her leg, needed her appendix out, or gotten pregnant? I bet someone would be looking for help. Or, what would have happened if she had availed herself of the opportunities available and gotten an education and kept herself healthy? - she could still be working or at least have more savings now.
Anyways, hopefully it will all be immaterial and universal health care will become a reality. People like curlcoat and Crafter_Man will hate that, but that’s democracy for you. No man is an island. Besides, we know at least curlcoat doesn’t even bother to vote anyways.
… gotten pregnant?
Please.
There are some areas of fantasy that are too repellent, to repugnant for this board. I beg of you not to do this again.
And you’ve just reminded me that somewhere out there, someone is furiously scribbling out a scenario of… Napkin Sandwich Porn.
And you’ve just reminded me that somewhere out there, someone is furiously scribbling out a scenario of… Napkin Sandwich Porn.
You just cannot escape Rule #34.
We start casting in June.
But it’s Wendy’s that has the 5-stage napkin sandwich. Burger King’s is called the Wiper, but it’s really only a double-decker.
But the Wendy’s sandwich uses a square napkin, while the Burger King napkin is… rectangular.
But the Wendy’s sandwich uses a square napkin, while the Burger King napkin is… rectangular.
You can get them Animal Style at In N Out.
Ahhh - she admits to being bad at budgeting! Finally a tiny victory!
Does anyone, anywhere, take you seriously? I said it was possible that I had been bad at budgeting when I was about 18. You come back with me “admitting” to being bad at budgeting. It’s no wonder half the people here think I lie, and the other half believe things that were made up by people like you. If it weren’t so pathetic, it would be even more funny than it is.
It’s cute that you think you’re actually making a valid point. Wait, what am I saying? You know you’re full of shit, you’re just hoping we’ll have forgotten the subject at hand, which is that you said, “He says ‘can’t afford’, I hear ‘I have this car payment, I like to party on Fridays and Saturdays’, etc.” Note the distinct lack of the word “generally” in this quote (and in the entire post where you said it).
Are you actually trying to prove yourself superior by pretending I am trying to avoid the subject at hand by - changing the subject? Or are you admitting that you were wrong on the ‘I have this car payment, I like to party on Fridays and Saturdays’, etc." thing and just hoping that I don’t notice you are moving on to something else?
How is this not you suggesting that helping people get an education fosters dependence? Is it the words “seem to”? If so, congratulations on crafting your words in such a way as to insinuate something that you don’t stand behind.
How about you ask someone what the difference is between “helping” people get an education, and providing public education, then come back.
So, that’s all the excuse she needs for being poor, for stealing, for not getting an education, etc. There is no actual reason, supporting herself properly just ‘didn’t happen’. But, she wants to know why anyone else would end up short of cash, and absolutely no reason is good enough for her.
Again I wonder if anyone ever takes you seriously. First you edit my post to create a completely different response from the one I actually made, then you try to link two things that have nothing to do with each other.
I know she’s going to come along and say “but I didn’t ask the government to help me!” - well, what would have happened if she had broken her leg, needed her appendix out, or gotten pregnant?
Your “what ifs” are fun too. How can anyone say what they would have done had something happened to them over 30 years ago? I can only guess, but I assume had I broken a leg or needed surgery, I’d have gone back to my parents and put up with the abuse and neglect. Pregnant? Abortion.
Or, what would have happened if she had availed herself of the opportunities available and gotten an education and kept herself healthy? - she could still be working or at least have more savings now.
Apparently, you also are unable to read, or retain what you do read. I did get an education and I do have more saved than the average person in this country does. (Dunno if it will be enough to cover all the new taxes tho) As for my health, how I lived from 18 to 23 had zero impact on that. It’s amazing how you think you know anything at all about that.
::snippitty::
ETA: Napkin Sandwiches.
You come back with me “admitting” to being bad at budgeting.
Don’t worry curly. Those of us who pay attention know that you don’t have to budget–your husband just puts it on his card. You know, the one with the blue thing.
ETA: Napkin sandwiches.
Does anyone, anywhere, take you seriously?
…
…
What a strange thing to read in a post from you…
Does anyone, anywhere, take you seriously?
I don’t know. I have an idea - shall I take a poll of who people take more seriously, you or me? Because so far I haven’t seen a single person agree with you in this thread, or ever, in fact.
Now, if you’ll excuse me, it’s lunch time, and I’m off to steal some napkins.