Don’t you mean, ETA: The Napkin??
Again, you are wrong. As I said, we discuss, meaning we exchange opinions, etc. No one is just sitting there smiling and nodding. If that happens to you when you attempt to discuss things, you are doing it wrong.
In real life, people rarely do their best to misunderstand, jump to bizarre conclusions and just flat lie about what has been said, as happens here. I have quite a few friends who don’t agree with me and none of them have, for example, made assumptions about the unhappiness of my husband. Perhaps I simply have friends with better manners.
Wow, way to come up with a perfect example right away! What you quoted had nothing to do with the topic of this thread.
Which of those had anything to do with “protest against people who fail to provide for every contingency that might befall them themselves without government help”? And that wasn’t “apologetic” for any insurance company, that was a reasonable possible solution to the OP’s FOF’s problem.
Check this out troll. Insurance covering childbirth and newborn care doesn’t necessarily cover highly expensive heroic measures for a baby that isn’t likely to live long anyway. It also sounds like they have an HMO, meaning there are very specific things they have to do to get coverage out of network, if they can at all. Presumably they knew all of this long before the baby was born, yet you seem to think that simply because it involves a baby it’s OK for them to ignore the contract they signed and perhaps demand payment for something not covered. I know you want to believe that all insurance companies are the product of the devil, but even you should realize that when there is an issue, it isn’t always the fault of the insurance company. And even when it is, there are still many things that can be done other than just sitting about complaining.
has been in response to what others have posted.
Oh the iron(y), it BURNS. 
I’m done with this thread. If by chance any of you see me posting to it again, please just shoot me, OK?
Unless of course Napkin Sandwiches happen to make a cameo again. In which case…nah, forget it. I’m bored now.
Over AND out!
Or perhaps they don’t need to make assumptions about the unhappiness of your husband, because they know of his misery first hand.
Napkin Sandwiches: The Napkining.
On Lifetime?
No (pause to gag at name), SyFy. The Lifetime one is My Mother Was a Napkin Sandwich.
I believe they have something to say about napkin sandwiches. Curlcoat you thief! Zero sandwiches = zero napkins.
You know, if you weren’t so typical of people in this country, this would continue to be funny. But, it’s just gotten sad (as well as boring). Your response to new and/or different opinions is to be insulting, and not just to the opinion. Or is it just that you don’t have an intelligent answer to what I said?
There you are, with all of that education you say you have, and all you can do is act like a preschooler. Again, if you weren’t so typical, it would be funny.
Wait - I thought people who had children without savings you deem appropriate were typical for this country? Or was it people who don’t want poor people to die in a gutter?
But no, it’s people who think your husband is miserable who are typical? Hmmm, okay.
And yes, I’m lying about my education. I am actually in preschool. Eating napkins with the other children.
Napkin Sandwich II: Napkin Day.
Napkin Sandwich III: The Wrath of Kleenex
Napkin Sandwich IV: The Search for Spork.
No, that’s Napkin Sandwich III. Napkin Sandwich *IV *is The Napkin Home.
Napkin Sandwich V: The Final Meal
Napkin Sandwich VI: The Undiscovered Condiment
Napkin Sandwich VII: Updates
I think after Napkin Sandwich VI it would roll over to Napkin: Generations, wouldn’t it?
Napkin Sandwich: Generations was an abomination and/or never happened. Move on, please.