# Heart rate zone monitors?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heart-rate-zone-monitors/980165>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [February 22, 2023, 12:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heart-rate-zone-monitors/980165 "2023-02-22T00:48:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSeid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dseid/32/20194_2.png) [@DSeid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSeid)\
**Post date:** [February 22, 2023, 12:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heart-rate-zone-monitors/980165/1 "2023-02-22T00:48:40Z")

</div>

Typically I’ve managed my exercise intensity by the perceived exertion test (how hard am I breathing basically) but had once upon a time by had a Polar chest strap one. It came with an app that graphed time in different zones. Hated the hassle of the chest strap and gave it up.

Now there are new ones that slip on the forearm. Bought one, the Scosche Rhythm 24.

The app does diddly but connect to _other_ apps. And none of those give me graphs without membership fees?

Anyone with experience for a zone monitoring app they would recommend?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![crazyjoe](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f14d63/32.png) [@crazyjoe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/crazyjoe)\
**Post date:** [February 22, 2023, 2:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heart-rate-zone-monitors/980165/2 "2023-02-22T02:31:27Z")

</div>

I pay 12 dollars a year for an app called Fitiv Pulse. It will track and show your current zone while also showing calories, Mets, distance (for distance activities) and other measures.

I like it, and I connect the same heart monitor you are using.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSeid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dseid/32/20194_2.png) [@DSeid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSeid)\
**Post date:** [February 22, 2023, 2:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heart-rate-zone-monitors/980165/3 "2023-02-22T02:58:02Z")

</div>

Thanks!

I’ll give it a try!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![crazyjoe](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f14d63/32.png) [@crazyjoe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/crazyjoe)\
**Post date:** [February 22, 2023, 3:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heart-rate-zone-monitors/980165/4 "2023-02-22T03:00:42Z")

</div>

Just to note… I’m on Android. I’m not aware if it’s available or works the same for iPhone.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wolf333](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wolf333/32/3460_2.png) [@Wolf333](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Wolf333)\
**Post date:** [February 22, 2023, 11:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heart-rate-zone-monitors/980165/5 "2023-02-22T11:11:35Z")

</div>

I also recommend Fitiv, and I use it on an iPhone.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSeid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dseid/32/20194_2.png) [@DSeid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSeid)\
**Post date:** [February 22, 2023, 2:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heart-rate-zone-monitors/980165/6 "2023-02-22T14:52:34Z")

</div>

Y’all must get legacy pricing. They immediately push me to 7 day free trial then $60 a year to get the graphing stuff that is the play information I am wondering about. Too pricey for that. iCardio’s is $25. Strava $80!! Maybe they’ll push a promotion discount at some point.

Still it seems straight forward enough to get some minimal basics.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wguy123](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wguy123/32/3161_2.png) [@wguy123](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wguy123)\
**Post date:** [February 22, 2023, 4:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heart-rate-zone-monitors/980165/7 "2023-02-22T16:09:37Z")

</div>

I use Polar HR monitors and used to use it with the free Strava. I now pay for the premium, but I’m pretty sure the free version showed the standard heart rate zones. It’s been a couple years so things may have changed and my memory may not be correct 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Procrustus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/procrustus/32/2994_2.png) [@Procrustus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Procrustus)\
**Post date:** [February 22, 2023, 4:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heart-rate-zone-monitors/980165/8 "2023-02-22T16:15:38Z")

</div>

My apple watch (and Peloton bike) now tell me what zone I’m in, but they don’t give me any information about what zone I _should_ be in.

I’m in Zone 4 for most of my work out. Whatever that means.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wguy123](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wguy123/32/3161_2.png) [@wguy123](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wguy123)\
**Post date:** [February 22, 2023, 4:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heart-rate-zone-monitors/980165/9 "2023-02-22T16:49:37Z")

</div>

> [@Procrustus](#):
>
> I’m in Zone 4 for most of my work out. Whatever that means

That’s typically referred to as the “asleep zone” 😉

There are 5 zones, with 5 being the top (you can’t stay in it long unless you love lactic acid building up and having a heart attack). 4 is hitting it hard and if you can stay in there for very long, I tip my hat to you! I go into that zone when I’m doing training intervals, but for my longer rides, I’m usually in 2 and 3 with spikes into 4 on the hills.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Procrustus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/procrustus/32/2994_2.png) [@Procrustus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Procrustus)\
**Post date:** [February 22, 2023, 4:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heart-rate-zone-monitors/980165/10 "2023-02-22T16:57:37Z")

</div>

> [@wguy123](#):
>
> 4 is hitting it hard and if you can stay in there for very long, I tip my hat to you!

I just thought it meant I was out of shape. Last 30 minute ride: 84% in zone 4, 12% in zone 3. Never hit zone 5.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spiderman](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/spiderman/32/230_2.png) [@Spiderman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spiderman)\
**Post date:** [February 22, 2023, 6:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heart-rate-zone-monitors/980165/11 "2023-02-22T18:12:13Z")

</div>

Most of the sports watches out there have watch (wrist) based HR. Garmin shows HR zones; I believe the others do too but don’t have a Polar, I know that Garmin shows HR zones on their app/website & think all of the others do, too. Yes, you’d need to purchase a watch but then it’s free after that initial outlay. going for a used/refurb’d older model will bring down the cost even more.

> [@Procrustus](#):
>
> > [@wguy123](#):
> >
> > 4 is hitting it hard and if you can stay in there for very long, I tip my hat to you!
> 
> I just thought it meant I was out of shape. Last 30 minute ride: 84% in zone 4, 12% in zone 3. Never hit zone 5.

The general rule of thumb is your max HR is 220-(age); so if you’re 50, your max HR is 170; now being a rule of thumb, not everyone is _exactly_ 220-age. You were in a good zone but it wasn’t that long of a workout that someone in decent shape shouldn’t be able to hold that level for that length of time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSeid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dseid/32/20194_2.png) [@DSeid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSeid)\
**Post date:** [February 22, 2023, 8:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heart-rate-zone-monitors/980165/12 "2023-02-22T20:44:19Z")

</div>

FWIW there are multiple methods out there and that one, widely known, seems most off. For example it predicts that I at 63 should have a HRMax of 157. Given that I hit 155 on the rower this morning without going through a protocol aimed at testing HRMax, just regular intervals, I don’t think so. Other approaches would have me at 165. That makes more sense.

> **[Maximum Heart Rate](https://www.brianmac.co.uk/maxhr.htm)**
>
> To use a heart rate monitor you need to identify your maximum heart rate to determine your appropriate training zones

Where you SHOULD be is based on what you are trying to do that specific workout, and that is part of your overall plan based on your overall goals.

In general a portion of exercise being in 4 and 5 is good and too much risks overtraining.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![crazyjoe](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f14d63/32.png) [@crazyjoe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/crazyjoe)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2023, 4:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heart-rate-zone-monitors/980165/13 "2023-02-23T04:27:03Z")

</div>

Sorry for the terrible increase in price form Fitiv! I did some looking and found another android app called CardioMez that appears to be free:

> <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=co.kavanagh.cardiomez&hl=en_US&gl=US>
>
> Simple, effective heart rate monitoring for your workouts...

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![crazyjoe](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f14d63/32.png) [@crazyjoe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/crazyjoe)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2023, 4:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heart-rate-zone-monitors/980165/14 "2023-02-23T04:34:11Z")

</div>

Update: It’s not free, but it is either: 99 cents a month, 5.99 a year, or 11.99 lifetime subscription. And it seems to be VERY similar to the old Fitiv app, and from the reviews it looks like it migh tbe the old Fitiv developers after it was acquired by MotiFit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSeid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dseid/32/20194_2.png) [@DSeid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSeid)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2023, 2:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heart-rate-zone-monitors/980165/15 "2023-02-23T14:09:41Z")

</div>

Seems like the free FITIV version has the toys I want unless I accidentally signed up for the free trial …

Thanks again.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSeid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dseid/32/20194_2.png) [@DSeid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSeid)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2023, 3:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heart-rate-zone-monitors/980165/16 "2023-02-23T15:37:07Z")

</div>

> [@Procrustus](#):
>
> they don’t give me any information about what zone I _should_ be in.

So my request for help answered, thanks again, maybe some discussion about this?

How do you heart rate monitor users use your monitors? What are you aiming for? There are lots of philosophies out there.

I think for me I am wanting it to keep me more disciplined that my days that should be mostly zone two are not creeping up into more of three. I really don’t need the monitor to tell me that I am four or above (sprint interval or HIIT days); gasping tells me that! I was mildly surprised though this morning that lifting had me that much in four and five. 54% in four and 11% in five for an hour workout.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Procrustus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/procrustus/32/2994_2.png) [@Procrustus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Procrustus)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2023, 3:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heart-rate-zone-monitors/980165/17 "2023-02-23T15:39:36Z")

</div>

> [@DSeid](#):
>
> How do you heart rate monitor users use your monitors? What are you aiming for? There are lots of philosophies out there.

I would love more information about this. I googled around a bit and didn’t get a lot of guidance. For me, as an old (61) and overweight guy, I’m going to use the monitor to avoid zone 5, on the off chance it will kill me. Yesterday, I stayed in 3 and 4 the entire time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSeid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dseid/32/20194_2.png) [@DSeid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSeid)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2023, 5:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heart-rate-zone-monitors/980165/18 "2023-02-23T17:04:09Z")

</div>

I can tell you what I have concluded for myself and my goals.

I strength train two days a week and do aerobic four to five days a week. The information today confirms that strength training is a high intensity activity that needs recovery afterwards so that leaves me one other day to do high intensity aerobic. The other three or four should be primarily in zones two to briefly in three. Long slow on one of those is fine - a six mile jog with the dogs for example - but disciplining myself to not push the pace. Other days are shorter but I am aiming to keep my intensity at two to low three or a brief sprint at the end only. Maybe rowing with focus on technique going forward.

I want to force myself to value and stay true to those active recovery “endurance” level days.

The intense aerobic day can be sprint intervals, and sprints should get me up to high four or in five but then recovery longer than the sprint (don’t care about precision there, can be 1 to 2 or 4 whatever feels good that day) and I like to see that my HR can drop quickly after a sprint. Or something Tabata-esque, and should be four most of that if not five. Or something tempo style … which is what your day was … right around anaerobic threshold… can keep it up steady for half an hour but wouldn’t be able to handle a much longer distance at it … likely bordering between three and four.

The youngin’s can maybe handle more frequency of intensity. At our age I think some intensity is important but more frequency of intensity is more harm than good.

Oh I am 63 and not old.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSeid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dseid/32/20194_2.png) [@DSeid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSeid)\
**Post date:** [February 24, 2023, 4:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heart-rate-zone-monitors/980165/19 "2023-02-24T16:08:43Z")

</div>

So another bit that has come up playing with Fitiv.

I had been aware of the different methods of estimating HRMax. The two options on the app though are funny extremes. One gives me way low at 157, the other the highest I’ve seen of 179!

That’s fine. I’m content with my estimate of 165 through other tools and estimating from near max efforts.

But then there are different approaches to determining zones?

Just percent of HRMax gives one set of results, but then there is the [Karvonen formula based on heart rate reserve](https://www.verywellfit.com/heart-rate-reserve-3436584) …

> [@](#):
>
> the Karvonen Formula is Exercise HR = % of target intensity (HR Max – HR Rest) + HR Rest. The middle term is the heart rate reserve, which is then multiplied by the percentage of target intensity desired, and then the resting heart rate is added back in.

Which gives a very different set of numbers (I have a very low resting HR, 42). Using that method my strength training was much more zone three and none in five. And my active recovery can be a little bit less restrained.

Karvonen is more likely more appropriate, yes?

Which do y’all use?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSeid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dseid/32/20194_2.png) [@DSeid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSeid)\
**Post date:** [February 24, 2023, 5:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heart-rate-zone-monitors/980165/20 "2023-02-24T17:02:25Z")

</div>

> [@Procrustus](#):
>
> I would love more information about this. I googled around a bit and didn’t get a lot of guidance.

Apologies for multi posting but specific to that there is this.

> **[Does Polarized Training Really Work? | TrainingPeaks](https://www.trainingpeaks.com/blog/does-polarized-training-really-work/)**
>
> Polarized training is a proven training technique among the world's elite. But does this low-intensity approach work for recreational athletes, too?

Bottom line, at least for recreational endurance athletes, and I’d WAG that follows for those us interested in good functional health long term as our goal, not race times, between the pyramidal and polarized camps is

> [@](#):
>
> You don’t have to switch to polarized training unless desired but, it’s likely still worth spending 70-80% of your time training at easier intensities

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heart-rate-zone-monitors/980165.md?page=2)
