# Hearts & Minds update: Shooting wounded prisoners in a mosque.

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hearts-minds-update-shooting-wounded-prisoners-in-a-mosque/274974>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [November 16, 2004, 1:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hearts-minds-update-shooting-wounded-prisoners-in-a-mosque/274974 "2004-11-16T01:31:05Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![World\_Eater](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/f04885/32.png) [@World\_Eater](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/World_Eater)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2004, 8:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hearts-minds-update-shooting-wounded-prisoners-in-a-mosque/274974/121 "2004-11-16T20:34:57Z")

</div>

> [@duffer](#):
>
> I’ll just leave a soft hint about the UN scandal.

[http://www.truthout.org/docs\_01/02.03E.Hallib.Iraq.htm](http://www.truthout.org/docs_01/02.03E.Hallib.Iraq.htm)

> [@](#):
>
> UNITED NATIONS – During last year’s presidential campaign, Richard B. Cheney acknowledged that the oil-field supply corporation he headed, Halliburton Co., did business with Libya and Iran through foreign subsidiaries.

The point? I think you know the point. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BubbaDog](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bubbadog/32/333_2.png) [@BubbaDog](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BubbaDog)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2004, 8:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hearts-minds-update-shooting-wounded-prisoners-in-a-mosque/274974/122 "2004-11-16T20:46:45Z")

</div>

**Duffer**

Not sure why you quoted my post in that. Basically I’m against war but fully support our troops actions in having the means to conduct the military ops they are given.

So I’m definately not anywhere near Dio’s state of mind (thank God) because I’m capable of differentiating between the actions of soldiers from the actions of politicians. Politicians have the luxury of time to think about their actions with little consquence. A soldier has very little time to make life and death decisions which may cost him hs own life.

Where Dio would be pleased if the soldier was shot in the head as retribution I think that the only thing that soldier deserves is rest after a long ordeal.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BubbaDog](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bubbadog/32/333_2.png) [@BubbaDog](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BubbaDog)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2004, 8:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hearts-minds-update-shooting-wounded-prisoners-in-a-mosque/274974/123 "2004-11-16T20:58:30Z")

</div>

> [@wring](#):
>
> **Bubba** you’re frankly not worth much effort dogpile wise. but let me point out to you the niavite of believing that w/o things like reporters video taping that truth of what happened won’t be found out. There would be evidence, other witnesses etc. Allowing barbaric and wrongful acts to keep on occuring w/out consequences actually **increases** the liklihood of more acts, and that they will ultimately be discovered.[

You actually believe that this kind of stuff _isn’t_ happening on a day-to-day basis and call _me_ niave?

Barbaric and wrongful acts _will_ continue to happen because it \*is[i/] a war. Discovering and eliminating those things is most definately important. But taping it for Al-Jazeera’s next recruiting video is a guarentee for reprisals.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e99b99/32.png) [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diogenes_the_Cynic)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2004, 9:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hearts-minds-update-shooting-wounded-prisoners-in-a-mosque/274974/124 "2004-11-16T21:00:00Z")

</div>

> [@esquimalt](#):
>
> Shooting from, & storing ammunitions in Mosques are violations of the Geneva Convention.

Ah well…the GC still requires a minimim level of “humane treatment,” no matter what.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![smartini](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/22d042/32.png) [@smartini](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/smartini)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2004, 9:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hearts-minds-update-shooting-wounded-prisoners-in-a-mosque/274974/125 "2004-11-16T21:02:05Z")

</div>

**DtC** and **usar\_jag**

I’m trying to follow the Geneva Convention info/explanations you guys are posting and it appears to me you are saying the same thing:

**2 signatories** – all rules of GC apply

**signatory and non-signatory** – sig is bound to act within the rules, therefore the non-sig is protected by the GC and the sig is not protected, however if the non-sig acts outside the strictures of the GC then the sig is no longer bound to comply

**Current Application:** Our troops are bound but not protected; insurgent troops\* are protected but not bound. At the point insurgent army acts outside the strictures of the GC our troops are no longer bound.

\*for the sake of the example I assume these troops qualify as an army, I understand that to be another question.

Is this correct? It seems to me you are both saying this but in different terms. Sort of a weird double negative thing with the “sig v non-sig”. It’s a damn good chance it’s just me, in which case would one of you kindly correct my error?

Thanks,  
Sharron

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![minty\_green](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f6c823/32.png) [@minty\_green](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/minty_green)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2004, 9:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hearts-minds-update-shooting-wounded-prisoners-in-a-mosque/274974/126 "2004-11-16T21:33:06Z")

</div>

Here are the relevant provisions of the Geneva Convention, which do not depend on the status of the insurgents:

> [@](#):
>
> 1. Persons taking no active part in the hostilities, **including members of armed forces** who have laid down their arms and those **placed hors de combat by sickness, wounds** , detention, or any other cause, **shall in all circumstances be treated humanely** , without any adverse distinction founded on race, colour, religion or faith, sex, birth or wealth, or any other similar criteria.
> 
> **To this end the following acts are and shall remain prohibited at any time and in any place whatsoever with respect to the above-mentioned persons:**
> 
> **(a) Violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds**, mutilation, cruel treatment and torture;
> 
> (b) Taking of hostages;
> 
> © Outrages upon personal dignity, in particular, humiliating and degrading treatment;
> 
> (d) The passing of sentences and **the carrying out of executions without previous judgment pronounced by a regularly constituted court** affording all the judicial guarantees which are recognized as indispensable by civilized peoples.  
> 2. **The wounded and sick shall be collected and cared for**.
> 
> An impartial humanitarian body, such as the International Committee of the Red Cross, may offer its services to the Parties to the conflict.
> 
> The Parties to the conflict should further endeavour to bring into force, by means of special agreements, all or part of the other provisions of the present Convention.
> 
> The application of the preceding provisions shall not affect the legal status of the Parties to the conflict.

As for the soldier in question, two words: War Crime.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BubbaDog](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bubbadog/32/333_2.png) [@BubbaDog](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BubbaDog)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2004, 9:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hearts-minds-update-shooting-wounded-prisoners-in-a-mosque/274974/127 "2004-11-16T21:41:05Z")

</div>

> [@minty green](#):
>
> As for the soldier in question, two words: War Crime.

If that happens, hopefully he will be tried by people who understand more about the effects of battle on his mind than the pitchforked mob that shows up on this thread.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e99b99/32.png) [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diogenes_the_Cynic)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2004, 9:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hearts-minds-update-shooting-wounded-prisoners-in-a-mosque/274974/128 "2004-11-16T21:43:25Z")

</div>

FUCK his mind.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![minty\_green](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f6c823/32.png) [@minty\_green](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/minty_green)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2004, 9:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hearts-minds-update-shooting-wounded-prisoners-in-a-mosque/274974/129 "2004-11-16T21:47:29Z")

</div>

Dammit, I’m sorry, I fucked that up by not seeing the introduction to that quote, which is from Article 3 of the G.C.:

> [@](#):
>
> In the case of armed conflict not of an international character occurring in the territory of one of the High Contracting Parties, each party to the conflict shall be bound to apply, as a minimum, the following provisions:

I’m not clear whether the current clusterfuck falls into that category. While the conflict is solely within the territory of Iraq (which is a High Contracting Party to the Convention), I don’t know whether the conflict is “not of an international character.” It’s no longer nation vs. nation – it’s nation versus other nation’s rebels. But on the whole, I think Article 3 applies here. Even if it doesn’t, I’m willing to bet that there are other treaties outlawing summary execution of prisoners and battlefield casualties, and I’m even more willing to bet that murder and manslaughter are crimes under the UCMJ.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![minty\_green](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f6c823/32.png) [@minty\_green](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/minty_green)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2004, 9:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hearts-minds-update-shooting-wounded-prisoners-in-a-mosque/274974/130 "2004-11-16T21:50:57Z")

</div>

> [@BubbaDog](#):
>
> If that happens, hopefully he will be tried by people who understand more about the effects of battle on his mind than the pitchforked mob that shows up on this thread.

Hopefully he will be tried by a court that understands and applies the relevant law, and by a jury of officers and/or enlisted personnel who are willing to fairly evaluate the testimony and evidence and apply the facts as they find them to the law in delivering their verdict.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BubbaDog](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bubbadog/32/333_2.png) [@BubbaDog](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BubbaDog)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2004, 9:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hearts-minds-update-shooting-wounded-prisoners-in-a-mosque/274974/131 "2004-11-16T21:53:35Z")

</div>

> [@Diogenes the Cynic](#):
>
> FUCK his mind.

You’re too late

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![minty\_green](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f6c823/32.png) [@minty\_green](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/minty_green)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2004, 9:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hearts-minds-update-shooting-wounded-prisoners-in-a-mosque/274974/132 "2004-11-16T21:57:10Z")

</div>

Ah, here we go, the [UCMJ provisions outlawing murder and manslaughter](http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/ucmj2.htm#918.%20ART.%20118.%20MURDER). Looks to me like this guy had “a premeditated desire to kill,” and some people have certainly been arguing that he did it “in the heat of sudden passion caused by adequate provocation.” Can’t find any list of affirmative defenses available under the UCMJ, though I assume there’s some sort of justification or privilege defense that would ordinarily be available to persons engaged in combat with the enemy. Of course, whether such a defense could possibly apply in these circumstances is somewhat doubtful.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Brutus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/91b2a8/32.png) [@Brutus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Brutus)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2004, 10:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hearts-minds-update-shooting-wounded-prisoners-in-a-mosque/274974/133 "2004-11-16T22:16:02Z")

</div>

From what nugget of information did you glean his ‘premeditated desire to kill’? Mind you, not a bad thing for a Marine to have, but what are you basing your claim on?

Judging from some other reports, it looks like the Marine will be OK, perhaps a minimum of mickey-mouse bullshit to go through, but I would amazed if he served any time. Still, that this whole event is even an issue with some people is more than a bit disgusting. (Especially given the realities of warfare in Iraq.) How many Americans need to die or be wounded by fake surrenders and rigged dead/injured insurgents before some of you realize the the GC are fine in principle, but shouldn’t be a suicide pact that we force on our troops?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wring](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/838e76/32.png) [@wring](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wring)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2004, 10:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hearts-minds-update-shooting-wounded-prisoners-in-a-mosque/274974/134 "2004-11-16T22:28:09Z")

</div>

**Bubba** - My point **was exactly** that it happens, perhaps often. It is extremely unrealistic to the point of incredible to believe, as you apparently do, that merely by telling the reporter “don’t release that video” that word won’t get out.

**Yeticus** - I don’t recall saying the soldier in question was a murderer. perhaps you would be good enough to find it for me? I recall saying that I didn’t see it as radically different from any number of cop shootings/movie scenes we see/hear about from time to time. And I recall pointing out that we don’t know if he was able to see that both hands of the guy were empty. And I recall pointing out that the **prior** days’ marines who left folks wounded had things to answer for, and I recall saying that the Administration had started this war on the theory of pre-emptive strikes to protect yourself were perfectly okey dokey. But I honestly don’t recall saying that the soldier in question was a murderer.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![devilsknew](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/4da419/32.png) [@devilsknew](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/devilsknew)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2004, 10:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hearts-minds-update-shooting-wounded-prisoners-in-a-mosque/274974/135 "2004-11-16T22:39:12Z")

</div>

From the conversation that the soldier had with the troops that had taken up positions inside the mosque and met him outside the mosque as he approached, It appears to me that the Iraqis had been checked out as _wounded prisoners_.  
… No threat was apparent, they were unarmed. It was not in the heat of battle. It was murder. What other conclusion can be drawn?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![devilsknew](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/4da419/32.png) [@devilsknew](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/devilsknew)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2004, 10:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hearts-minds-update-shooting-wounded-prisoners-in-a-mosque/274974/136 "2004-11-16T22:44:05Z")

</div>

It sure wasn’t the ambiguous, fog of war, Full Metal Jacket climax/end scene. I’ll tell you that. No compunction or mercy in this soldiers act.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bup](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/6bbea6/32.png) [@bup](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bup)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2004, 10:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hearts-minds-update-shooting-wounded-prisoners-in-a-mosque/274974/137 "2004-11-16T22:47:27Z")

</div>

How come the embedded reporter knew immediately that the wounded Iraqi was an unarmed prisoner, but the soldier didn’t?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![El\_Cid\_Viscoso](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/41988e/32.png) [@El\_Cid\_Viscoso](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/El_Cid_Viscoso)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2004, 10:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hearts-minds-update-shooting-wounded-prisoners-in-a-mosque/274974/138 "2004-11-16T22:54:49Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> _by Brutus_
> 
> Judging from some other reports, it looks like the Marine will be OK, perhaps a minimum of mickey-mouse bullshit to go through, but I would amazed if he served any time.

Bad day for kids and guns. [Murder charges](http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/afp/20041115/pl_afp/iraq_us_justice_murder_041115085857) against an Army Lieutenant came in just yesterday. And he didn’t even pull the trigger:

> [@](#):
>
> **US officer charged with murder in shooting of Iraqi**
> 
> BAGHDAD (AFP) - A US officer was charged with murder and conspiracy to commit murder for his role in the shooting dead of a wounded Iraqi in a Baghdad slum, the US military said.
> 
> “Second Lieutenant Erick Anderson of Company C, 1st Battalion, 41st Infantry Regiment, Fort Riley, Kansas, has been charged with premeditated murder and conspiracy to commit premeditated murder,” a statement said.

I’m sure if _this_ story shakes out, some butterbar will fry here, too. And then there’ll be justice.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![irishgirl](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/8edcca/32.png) [@irishgirl](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/irishgirl)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2004, 11:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hearts-minds-update-shooting-wounded-prisoners-in-a-mosque/274974/139 "2004-11-16T23:03:06Z")

</div>

Anyone remember the Lancet article about civilian death rates in Iraq?

And how 53% of those who died were women or children?

Anyone making excuses for the marine seeing horrible things better make some about the insurgents having watched close family members die.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BubbaDog](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bubbadog/32/333_2.png) [@BubbaDog](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BubbaDog)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2004, 12:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hearts-minds-update-shooting-wounded-prisoners-in-a-mosque/274974/140 "2004-11-17T00:08:22Z")

</div>

> [@wring](#):
>
> **Bubba** - My point **was exactly** that it happens, perhaps often. It is extremely unrealistic to the point of \*\* incredible to believe, as you apparently do,\*\* that merely by telling the reporter “don’t release that video” that word won’t get out.

Well there’s your problem. You are mistaken in what I believe.  
I would be telling that reporter. Don’t release that video. Outside of a military trial it can only intensify the recruiting of more insurgents.

And just what is accomplished when “word gets out”? Justice? Or support for the enemy?

Consider the difference between the film being used by the military to investigate an infraction of protocol and the film being used by Zarkawi to recruit fresh human bombs.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hearts-minds-update-shooting-wounded-prisoners-in-a-mosque/274974.md?page=6)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hearts-minds-update-shooting-wounded-prisoners-in-a-mosque/274974.md?page=8)
