# Heat death of the universe looks like what?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heat-death-of-the-universe-looks-like-what/542226>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [June 7, 2010, 2:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heat-death-of-the-universe-looks-like-what/542226 "2010-06-07T02:21:20Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HMS\_Irruncible](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hms_irruncible/32/7394_2.png) [@HMS\_Irruncible](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/HMS_Irruncible)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2010, 2:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heat-death-of-the-universe-looks-like-what/542226/1 "2010-06-07T02:21:20Z")

</div>

Nobody really seems to elaborate much what what is expected to happen in the heat death of the universe. Is it basically that every galaxy collapses into the supermassive black holes at its center, then those black holes Hawking-radiate away until they’re gone?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SlowMindThinking](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/dc4da7/32.png) [@SlowMindThinking](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SlowMindThinking)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2010, 2:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heat-death-of-the-universe-looks-like-what/542226/2 "2010-06-07T02:36:18Z")

</div>

Everything that can decay, does decay. Including Black Holes, possibly protons, etc. Basically, everything reaches a minimum energy level.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2010, 7:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heat-death-of-the-universe-looks-like-what/542226/3 "2010-06-07T07:21:33Z")

</div>

The end result, after an unimaginably long time, would be nothing left but photons, neutrinos, and gravitons, all redshifting away into the next best thing to nothingness as the Universe continues to expand.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Petrobey\_Mavromihalis](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/bcef8e/32.png) [@Petrobey\_Mavromihalis](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Petrobey_Mavromihalis)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2010, 9:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heat-death-of-the-universe-looks-like-what/542226/4 "2010-06-07T09:34:51Z")

</div>

‘. . . [H]ere and there chaos may temporarily recede and quality flare up, as when cathedrals are built and symphonies are performed. But these are temporary and local deceits, for deeper in the world the spring inescapably unwinds. Everything is driven by decay. Everything is driven by motiveless, purposeless decay.’

Peter Atkins in _Creation Revisited_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Alka\_Seltzer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/c89c15/32.png) [@Alka\_Seltzer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Alka_Seltzer)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2010, 10:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heat-death-of-the-universe-looks-like-what/542226/5 "2010-06-07T10:53:24Z")

</div>

It will be duller than a party of depressed sloths.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jonathan\_Chance](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jonathan_chance/32/701_2.png) [@Jonathan\_Chance](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jonathan_Chance)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2010, 12:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heat-death-of-the-universe-looks-like-what/542226/6 "2010-06-07T12:16:14Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> The end result, after an unimaginably long time, would be nothing left but photons, neutrinos, and gravitons, all redshifting away into the next best thing to nothingness as the Universe continues to expand.

The single most depressing thing about the entire universe is this. It’s a terminal ‘this too, shall pass’.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HMS\_Irruncible](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hms_irruncible/32/7394_2.png) [@HMS\_Irruncible](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/HMS_Irruncible)\
**Post date:** [June 15, 2010, 3:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heat-death-of-the-universe-looks-like-what/542226/7 "2010-06-15T03:41:58Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> The end result, after an unimaginably long time, would be nothing left but photons, neutrinos, and gravitons, all redshifting away into the next best thing to nothingness as the Universe continues to expand.

I guess my main question is this: do these things necessarily have to go through the step of being consumed by a black hole and re-emitted as Hawking radiation, or are there other possible ways that they reach that end state?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CutterJohn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/91b2a8/32.png) [@CutterJohn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CutterJohn)\
**Post date:** [June 15, 2010, 4:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heat-death-of-the-universe-looks-like-what/542226/8 "2010-06-15T04:22:04Z")

</div>

> [@cosmic relief](#):
>
> is it basically that every galaxy collapses into the supermassive black holes at its center, then those black holes hawking-radiate away until they’re gone?

Insufficient Data For A Meaningful Answer

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [June 15, 2010, 4:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heat-death-of-the-universe-looks-like-what/542226/9 "2010-06-15T04:49:57Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> I guess my main question is this: do these things necessarily have to go through the step of being consumed by a black hole and re-emitted as Hawking radiation, or are there other possible ways that they reach that end state?

While that’s certainly one way for it to happen (and the only known way to convert other particles to gravitons), most grand unified theories (theories which unify the Strong and Weak Forces, not necessarily including gravity) predict that the proton is unstable even aside from black holes, and would eventually decay into a positron and some mix of photons and neutrinos. The positron, in turn, would eventually find an electron to annihilate with (it wouldn’t have to go far, if the decaying proton were part of a neutral atom), converting those, too, to photons. While nobody knows yet which grand unified theory is correct, I don’t think there’s much doubt that some one of them is, which means that proton decay is pretty likely (it’s just the details, like how long it takes, that remain to be worked out).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![toadspittle](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/c0e974/32.png) [@toadspittle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/toadspittle)\
**Post date:** [June 15, 2010, 4:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heat-death-of-the-universe-looks-like-what/542226/10 "2010-06-15T16:39:01Z")

</div>

> [@Cosmic Relief](#):
>
> I guess my main question is this: do these things necessarily have to go through the step of being consumed by a black hole and re-emitted as Hawking radiation, or are there other possible ways that they reach that end state?

Isn’t it quite unlikely that most of the matter/energy in the universe will ever get near a black hole? I thought current theory held that everything will grow farther and farther apart—first galactic clusters, the galaxies, then possibly even material within galaxies—and all of the matter will slowly cool… and eventually, just possibly, all those protons will even fall apart one day (not that there may be much for the products of their decay to run into by that point).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Excellent](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f19dbf/32.png) [@Mr.Excellent](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Excellent)\
**Post date:** [June 15, 2010, 5:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heat-death-of-the-universe-looks-like-what/542226/11 "2010-06-15T17:52:16Z")

</div>

> [@CutterJohn](#):
>
> Insufficient Data For A Meaningful Answer

[SPOILER]Let there be light!

Cite: [multivax.com&nbsp;-&nbsp;This website is for sale!&nbsp;-&nbsp;multivax Resources and Information.](http://www.multivax.com/last_question.html%5B/SPOILER%5D)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Yumblie](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/y/76d3ee/32.png) [@Yumblie](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Yumblie)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2010, 2:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heat-death-of-the-universe-looks-like-what/542226/12 "2010-06-16T02:48:27Z")

</div>

> [@toadspittle](#):
>
> Isn’t it quite unlikely that most of the matter/energy in the universe will ever get near a black hole? I thought current theory held that everything will grow farther and farther apart—first galactic clusters, the galaxies, then possibly even material within galaxies—and all of the matter will slowly cool… and eventually, just possibly, all those protons will even fall apart one day (not that there may be much for the products of their decay to run into by that point).

Unless dark energy kicks it up a notch at some point in the future, pretty much everything that’s reasonably gravitationally bound will stay that way despite the expansion of the universe. Eventually the galaxies in our local group will coalesce into one large galaxy, meanwhile galaxies outside the group will drift farther away and out of sight. But our local Pangaea-style galaxy will still remain intact.

[Here](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exasecond_and_longer)’s an interesting look at some of the very very long term processes that characterize the end of the universe.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bootis](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/e8c25b/32.png) [@Bootis](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bootis)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2010, 2:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heat-death-of-the-universe-looks-like-what/542226/13 "2010-06-16T02:56:48Z")

</div>

How can the energy disappear? Where does it go? How can the universe begin with mind boggling amounts of energy and end with none?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bootis](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/e8c25b/32.png) [@Bootis](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bootis)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2010, 3:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heat-death-of-the-universe-looks-like-what/542226/14 "2010-06-16T03:12:40Z")

</div>

> [@Yumblie](#):
>
> [Here](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exasecond_and_longer)’s an interesting look at some of the very very long term processes that characterize the end of the universe.

That _is_ an interesting chart. The last entries list an amount of time so unfathomly great, I think it could be reasonably assumed, that if a special chamber could exist for the that whole duration, consisting of an unaging , constantly typing monkey,that amonst the trillion, trillion, trillion, trillions of trillion trillion trillions…etc pages of gibberish he produced, would also be the entire collected works of writing ever written by any person in human history, as well as perfectly translated copies of each in every language that was ever spoken.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![j\_sum1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/8baadc/32.png) [@j\_sum1](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/j_sum1)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2010, 4:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heat-death-of-the-universe-looks-like-what/542226/15 "2010-06-16T04:04:19Z")

</div>

> [@Bootis](#):
>
> That _is_ an interesting chart. The last entries list an amount of time so unfathomly great, I think it could be reasonably assumed, that if a special chamber could exist for the that whole duration, consisting of an unaging , constantly typing monkey,that amonst the trillion, trillion, trillion, trillions of trillion trillion trillions…etc pages of gibberish he produced, would also be the entire collected works of writing ever written by any person in human history, as well as perfectly translated copies of each in every language that was ever spoken.

The probabilities of the monkeys typing at random scenario are fairly straightforward to compute. I think you will find that even with the large timeframes described you won’t get much more than a small length on non-gibberish text.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Triskadecamus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/b19c9b/32.png) [@Triskadecamus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Triskadecamus)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2010, 4:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heat-death-of-the-universe-looks-like-what/542226/16 "2010-06-16T04:17:47Z")

</div>

[This just in: Not so fast on the dark energy, and not on the dark matter a bit as well.](http://www.ras.org.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1773&Itemid=2)

Those pesky artifacts of observation might well be in our way again.

Tris

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2010, 6:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heat-death-of-the-universe-looks-like-what/542226/17 "2010-06-16T06:41:28Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> How can the energy disappear? Where does it go? How can the universe begin with mind boggling amounts of energy and end with none?

Conservation of energy is a local property, not a global one. If you draw a box anywhere in the Universe, then the change in the amount of energy inside the box is equal to the energy flow through the walls of the box. But the entire Universe is not a box.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EvilTOJ](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/ee59a6/32.png) [@EvilTOJ](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EvilTOJ)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2010, 7:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heat-death-of-the-universe-looks-like-what/542226/18 "2010-06-16T07:21:11Z")

</div>

> [@Cosmic Relief](#):
>
> I guess my main question is this: do these things necessarily have to go through the step of being consumed by a black hole and re-emitted as Hawking radiation, or are there other possible ways that they reach that end state?

> [@CutterJohn](#):
>
> Insufficient Data For A Meaningful Answer

Wolfram Alpha’s already been asked the last question;

> **[Can entropy be reversed? - Wolfram|Alpha](https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Can%2Bentropy%2Bbe%2Breversed%3F)**
>
> Wolfram|Alpha brings expert-level knowledge and capabilities to the broadest possible range of people—spanning all professions and education levels.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2010, 5:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heat-death-of-the-universe-looks-like-what/542226/19 "2010-06-16T17:14:04Z")

</div>

Oh, so they finally got around to fixing that. For all the many ways Alpha has of saying “I don’t know”, it took them long enough.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kimstu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/ecd19e/32.png) [@Kimstu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kimstu)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2010, 5:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heat-death-of-the-universe-looks-like-what/542226/20 "2010-06-16T17:25:18Z")

</div>

TheMorbidAtheist’s take on it:

[How the Universe Will End](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3cxw-UqPXE)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/heat-death-of-the-universe-looks-like-what/542226.md?page=2)
