No way, one can just download it from the internet … [giggle] … just joking (I think).
There are actual gun control laws in the USA, that’s never been the problem … they’re just not enforced in any meaningful way.
I’d say the OP’s theme song can be sung to Rawhide “Trollin, trollin, trollin…”.
Let us takes his @ and reword it:
Question 2. What are your views on the First Amendment? Pick the response that comes closest.
(A) It’s similar to Leviticus 11:3. “You may eat any animal that has a divided hoof and that chews the cud.” Yes, my atheist and pagan friends tell me rabbit is delicious, but rabbits don’t have a divided hoof. It’s not mine to question why Jehovah doesn’t want me to eat it.
Similarly, the same Jehovah inspired the Constitution writers and encouraged us to have a free press and freedom of religion. It doesn’t matter why. If poeple write a book on how to make bombs or filled with racist viewpoints-, that’s just a price we happily pay for obeying Jehovah.
(B) Same as (A), but substitute “the ineffable wisdom of the Founding Fathers” for Jehovah. We Americans want and need our Free Press.
…
(D) People who think the First Amendment describes a “God given right” aren’t very smart. Humans are fallible and conditions change. If a free press, freedom of speech and freedom of religion are good, fine – debate them on their merits. Don’t just hide behind blither and blather that puts an 18th-century law on some special pedestal.
Probably because of this chart.
The racial and class contours of the gun debate are rather awkward. Liberals blame white Southern Republicans for America’s gun culture and gun crimes and testosterone poisoning and penis replacement and all that. But most gun crimes occur in big cities, usually run and populated by Democrats, and usually by poor black and hispanics. White Southerners aren’t responsible for gun violence in Oakland, Baltimore, Detroit, or Chiraq. The stereotypical white gun nut lives in a low population density rural area with low gun violence.
Except that white southern gun fetishists keep the gun culture alive and feed the guns to the rest of the country. Virginia is awash with guns and they bleed into DC.
Yeah, yeah, that’s always the excuse when tough gun laws dont work- “Well, the other guy is funneling guns into our gun-free zone!” :rolleyes: Or perhaps- **it’s gun control laws dont work. Never have.
**
Because it’s the truth. Lax gun law states allow for guns obtained illegally to be funneled to the blackmarket.
The fact is, our gun policy is driven by white fear of blacks. These sad little men with their fantasies of using their guns to save the day and finally get the respect of their families and bang that hot secretary at work and hurting our nation.
You gun fetishists do more harm to America than Al-Qaeda ever dreamed of; all because your deep seated self loathing and bigotry.
Sure they do. Inconsistent gun control laws don’t work, in the same way that non-smoking sections in restaurants were a joke - it took banning smoking in the building entirely for the policy to work.
Except for everywhere else.
So your logical end game is… again, something that will never work.
That’s a little confusing, where does one obtain a firearm illegally from anyplace other than the black market?
Check this out, shooting is an Olympic event. Looks like TEAM USA really cleans up on the Gold Medals there !!!
Are those European criminals willing to shoot people for pocket change, or to make a statement as in a drive-by shooting? If so, why aren’t they doing that? Because they’re not willing to violate the gun laws.
This is what scares me. Apparently there’s no IQ test for gun ownership.
Nope. Most Euro nations didnt have much violent crime before Gun Controls. or- many guns.
No, there is not … [hangs head in shame]
Or to drive a car. Or to vote. Or to become the President.
There used to be a written test to get a driver’s license, has this been done away with now?
But it’s hardly a IQ test. In any case, in CA, there’s a Hunters Safety test you have to take.
I’ve seen this repeated often by those wanting to ban guns, since it’s a fact as you stated you have a cite for it right?
No, it’s not much of an IQ test, but it will eliminate those of the lowest IQ from getting a driver’s license … whereas they can buy a gun (and vote). California requiring a Hunter’s Safety course seems to me a prudent and responsible process that doesn’t interfere with our 2[sup]nd[/sup] Amendment rights.