Help me decide on a new computer.

See, this is what I’m talking about. I don’t understand Athlon nomenclature. 939 is a higher number than 754. Why is 754 better?! Hell, I’m not even sure what a “socket” is! Are we simply talking about the physical number of pins on the chip? Please explain this to me using really small words.

Also, could someone discuss 32bit vs. 64 bit applications? A friend told me that running 32bit apps (as most currently are) on a 64bit system will result in a loss of speed. True?

OK, I’m officially a moron.

939 is better. But I still don’t understand what we’re talking about in the first place.

:smack:

The socket number is just a code name for a specific architecture. It doesn’t quantify anything. It’s just a name.

As for 32 bit vs. 64 bit, Windows is a 32 bit operating system. So if you run Windows you won’t be able to take advantage of the 64 bit performance of the CPU. However, the Athlon 64 also has better 32 bit performance than any other processor, so you will only see a loss of speed relative to running 64 bit applications, which currently isn’t an option.

I don’t think that video card is very good. If you want to run games, the video card should be a higher priority than your CPU. Don’t get less than a Geforce 6600 or the ATI equivalent (I run linux as well, so I always buy NVidia and thus don’t know the ATI numbering). A 2 GHz pentium with a very good video card will run games significantly better than a 3 GHz pentium with a mediocre one.

Argh. HOW THE HELL do I know if it’s better or not? I can’t tell.

<throws up hands in frustration>

Okay. I’m looking at the ATI 128mb AGP 9800 pro. Might as well go all the way.

Now, how do I know if this will work in my new computer?

The number refers to the physical number of pins on the bottom of the chip - the 939 motherboards need an Athlon 64 with 939 pins on the bottom. The reason why AMD has two different types is that the 939 pin boards support dual-channel memory, which adds a small bit of performance, though it really isn’t that big of a deal.

$130 is seriously overpriced for a budget card like the 9250 - at Newegg
you can pick up the same card for $50 or so. Even with overnight shipping, you would save quite a bit of money.

I went over to HP and configured one of the a750e Athlon 64 machines with the following:

Total Cost: $749.99

Add in a good video card like the Geforce 6600GT and you will have a very good gaming machine.

The Radeon 9800 Pro is a good card, though I would go with the Geforce 6600GT AGP right now. It should work in any computer that has an AGP slot & a reasonably good power supply. (Note, this is one of the reason I don’t like large OEM computers- they ALL cheap out and us crappy power supplies.)

Anyways, the only way to tell the performance of a video card is by looking a various benchmarks.

The Tech Report is a nice place to start, lots of review, and they do a lot to make sure they get good numbers.

What do we think of this machine?

I’m referring to “The Widow” on that page.

But what’s with the Athlon 64 3400 processor operating at 3.4 ghz equivalent? How is that figured?

Swapping in the ATI Radeon X800 XT 256MB video card into that machine brings the price up to just over 2k. Worth it?

Seems overpriced to me. You could have Monarch Computer assemble a near identical system (Athlon 64 3400, better mobo, same size HD, Geforce 6800GT video card ect) for less than $1600.

The Athlon 64 3400+ actually runs at 2.4ghz. However, Athlon 64 processors are clock for clock much faster than Intel Pentium 4s. Thus, AMD uses an arcane formula to come up with model numbers, that on average match up to a Pentium 4 running at that speed. Usually, the Athlon 64’s (when comparing model number to Intel ghz) win gaming & certain scientific test, and lose in 3d rendering & media encoding. In gaming, that Athlon 64 3400 will outrun Intel’s 3.6ghz processors without much trouble.

While the x800 XT is argueablly the fastest video card around, the performance gain isn’t worth the extra $100. Personally, I would go with the Geforce 6800GT if you have lots of cash to spend; it cost the same as the x800 Pro, and generally edges it out in most benchmarks.

HP Pavilion a750e customizable Desktop PC

  • Microsoft® Windows® XP Home Edition with SP2
  • AMD Athlon™ 64 3400+ operating at 2.4GHz
  • 1 GB DDR / PC3200 (2 DIMM)
  • 160GB 7200 rpm SATA Hard Drive
  • 48x max. CD-RW/DVD-ROM combo drive (48x32x16x48x)
  • 1 USB 2.0, 1 Firewire, 9-in-1 card reader + WinDVD
  • 256MB DDR NVIDIA GeForceFX™ 5500, DVI & TV-Out
  • Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS with front audio ports
  • Altec-Lansing VS2121 2.1 Speakers
  • HP Wireless Internet Kybd, Wireless Optical Mouse
  • Microsoft® Works 7.0/Money 2004/MSN Encarta Plus
  • hpshopping in-box envelope

Here’s the one I’m getting (comes with a 15" flat panel monitor, space is an issue since it’s sharing a small desk with a mondo Apple CRT). $1459.97.

My god, I’m buying a new car in a few months and it won’t be this difficult.

Sounds good, though I would go with the cheap integrated graphics (saving $120) and use that cash to buy this Radeon 9600 Pro 256 MB separtly. The Radeon 9600 Pro will be quite a bit faster than the Geforce 5500.

You got it. :slight_smile:

Okay, above stuff with the newegg card mentioned. Total with shipping included: $1514.98.

I can live with that.

Thanks for your help, everyone. Mach Tuck, I hope your shopping goes well too.