# Help me demonstrate that Sarah Palin is worthy of being President

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-demonstrate-that-sarah-palin-is-worthy-of-being-president/551572>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [August 26, 2010, 7:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-demonstrate-that-sarah-palin-is-worthy-of-being-president/551572 "2010-08-26T19:30:04Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2010, 7:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-demonstrate-that-sarah-palin-is-worthy-of-being-president/551572/21 "2010-08-26T19:57:25Z")

</div>

She is certainly very good at getting and holding people’s attention, and of charming a significant fraction of the population.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2010, 7:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-demonstrate-that-sarah-palin-is-worthy-of-being-president/551572/22 "2010-08-26T19:57:48Z")

</div>

Well, she’d be the best-_looking_ president…  
I assume the “beltway outsider” stance has some merit; certainly it’s invoked often enough in American politics.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2010, 7:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-demonstrate-that-sarah-palin-is-worthy-of-being-president/551572/23 "2010-08-26T19:58:31Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> She is certainly very good at getting and holding people’s attention, and of charming a significant fraction of the population.

That’s nice. Why don’t you go start a thread on that topic?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ElvisL1ves](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/5daacb/32.png) [@ElvisL1ves](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ElvisL1ves)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2010, 8:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-demonstrate-that-sarah-palin-is-worthy-of-being-president/551572/24 "2010-08-26T20:06:04Z")

</div>

In fairness, that ability is a real job qualification.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2010, 8:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-demonstrate-that-sarah-palin-is-worthy-of-being-president/551572/25 "2010-08-26T20:07:25Z")

</div>

> [@Captain\_Amazing](#):
>
> Her inaugural speech as governor was pretty good. She turned on the folksy a little bit, but the speech had some good turns of phrase.

Was it stimulating intellectually, with hard facts and figures?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CurtC](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/ce73a5/32.png) [@CurtC](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CurtC)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2010, 8:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-demonstrate-that-sarah-palin-is-worthy-of-being-president/551572/26 "2010-08-26T20:20:31Z")

</div>

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> > [@CurtC](#):
> >
> > Well, she was crafty enough to dump that dead-end job of governor of a state with a tiny population and take a high-paying gig on national TV.
> 
> Not what I asked for, is it?

And she dresses nice.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2010, 8:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-demonstrate-that-sarah-palin-is-worthy-of-being-president/551572/27 "2010-08-26T20:23:55Z")

</div>

> [@ElvisL1ves](#):
>
> In fairness, that ability is a real job qualification.

In fairness, read the OP.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2010, 8:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-demonstrate-that-sarah-palin-is-worthy-of-being-president/551572/28 "2010-08-26T20:24:52Z")

</div>

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> **Help me demonstrate that Sarah Palin is worthy of being President**

\*“You canna break the laws of physics!” \*- Scotty

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rhythmdvl](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/85f322/32.png) [@Rhythmdvl](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rhythmdvl)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2010, 8:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-demonstrate-that-sarah-palin-is-worthy-of-being-president/551572/29 "2010-08-26T20:24:59Z")

</div>

Serious:  
She doesn’t need those types of intellectual chops. She needs intuition and a strong sense of direction—if that intuition and direction line up with your personal political beliefs, she’s amply demonstrated that she will pursue those goals and objectives without sidetracking or getting bogged down in research. The president sets broad policy guidelines and has people implement them; micro-managing is counterproductive.

Furthermore, she has demonstrated that she has a strong will and is not a mere puppet. Once in office, her administration will not be subject to a schism between the figurehead (her) and the puppetmaster behind the scenes. She has demonstrated that she cannot be easily cowed into conforming to a role. If she is in charge, she will use her authority as she sees fit, not to avoid angering or provoking someone lurking in the shadows. This kind of honesty will deliver clear policy goals.  
Not so serious:  
She’d only serve a year and a half before quitting.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Captain\_Amazing](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/6de8d8/32.png) [@Captain\_Amazing](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Captain_Amazing)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2010, 8:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-demonstrate-that-sarah-palin-is-worthy-of-being-president/551572/30 "2010-08-26T20:39:14Z")

</div>

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> > [@Captain\_Amazing](#):
> >
> > Her inaugural speech as governor was pretty good. She turned on the folksy a little bit, but the speech had some good turns of phrase.
> 
> Was it stimulating intellectually, with hard facts and figures?

No, not really, although inaugural speeches don’t really do that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![begbert2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/begbert2/32/3357_2.png) [@begbert2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/begbert2)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2010, 8:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-demonstrate-that-sarah-palin-is-worthy-of-being-president/551572/31 "2010-08-26T20:42:40Z")

</div>

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> > [@CurtC](#):
> >
> > Well, she was crafty enough to dump that dead-end job of governor of a state with a tiny population and take a high-paying gig on national TV.
> 
> Not what I asked for, is it?

Um, yes, it **is**. You asked for “intellectual and well-reasoned”. You did not ask for “responsible, loyal, or not-a-quitter”. There is _nothing_ stupid or unreasoned about dumping one job for another that brings in money by the shovelload.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Whack-a-Mole](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/whack-a-mole/32/141_2.png) [@Whack-a-Mole](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Whack-a-Mole)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2010, 8:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-demonstrate-that-sarah-palin-is-worthy-of-being-president/551572/32 "2010-08-26T20:50:12Z")

</div>

> [@begbert2](#):
>
> > [@Czarcasm](#):
> >
> > Not what I asked for, is it?
> 
> Um, yes, it **is**. You asked for “intellectual and well-reasoned”. You did not ask for “responsible, loyal, or not-a-quitter”. There is _nothing_ stupid or unreasoned about dumping one job for another that brings in money by the shovelload.

But quitting on the people you promised to represent does not work as well reasoned to become president. Sure for her personal gain it made sense. But would you want to vote for someone for president who might quit part way through because someone offered her a reality show that pays better?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![begbert2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/begbert2/32/3357_2.png) [@begbert2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/begbert2)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2010, 9:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-demonstrate-that-sarah-palin-is-worthy-of-being-president/551572/33 "2010-08-26T21:01:09Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> > [@begbert2](#):
> >
> > Um, yes, it **is**. You asked for “intellectual and well-reasoned”. You did not ask for “responsible, loyal, or not-a-quitter”. There is _nothing_ stupid or unreasoned about dumping one job for another that brings in money by the shovelload.
> 
> But quitting on the people you promised to represent does not work as well reasoned to become president. Sure for her personal gain it made sense. But would you want to vote for someone for president who might quit part way through because someone offered her a reality show that pays better?

(I can’t believe I’m arguing this…)

Actually, if you want to become president, becoming a television personality for the years prior to your targeted election is a much more well-reasoned course of action than sitting out the intervening time as a mere governor of a rather out-of-the-way state. Her chances of doing anything in the position of Governor that would actually _impress_ people were essentially nil; we wouldn’t even think to give her credit for not quitting, since that’s kind of expected anyway. Whereas by comparison as a TV personality she can stay in the news, retain a fanbase, and has a forum for any political opinions she may have.

Had she been in _Congress_ or something, such a move might have been less prudent, since Congress is seen as a somewhat natural and expected step on the way to presidency. But Governor? It’s not like any of us were impressed with her Governor creds when she _had_ them.

No, switching jobs was definitely the more prudent and intelligent move on any number of fronts. So much so that I find myself wondering if somebody else suggested it to her. 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2010, 9:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-demonstrate-that-sarah-palin-is-worthy-of-being-president/551572/34 "2010-08-26T21:03:02Z")

</div>

> [@begbert2](#):
>
> > [@Czarcasm](#):
> >
> > Not what I asked for, is it?
> 
> Um, yes, it **is**. You asked for “intellectual and well-reasoned”. You did not ask for “responsible, loyal, or not-a-quitter”. There is _nothing_ stupid or unreasoned about dumping one job for another that brings in money by the shovelload.

No, it is _not_.  
[QUOTE=Czarcasm]  
**I am looking for speeches she has made and papers that she has given** that show her to be intellectual and well-reasoned.  
[/QUOTE]  
bolding mine.  
It’s like I’ve walked into a shoe store and asked for some blue shoes. Half the clerks are showing me every shoe that isn’t blue, the other half are showing me blue socks.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bosda\_Di\_Chi\_of\_Tricor](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bosda_di_chi_of_tricor/32/16845_2.png) [@Bosda\_Di\_Chi\_of\_Tricor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bosda_Di_Chi_of_Tricor)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2010, 9:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-demonstrate-that-sarah-palin-is-worthy-of-being-president/551572/35 "2010-08-26T21:04:37Z")

</div>

Gadzooks, the vast emptiness of the Alaskan wilderness is so peaceful, so silent.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![begbert2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/begbert2/32/3357_2.png) [@begbert2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/begbert2)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2010, 9:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-demonstrate-that-sarah-palin-is-worthy-of-being-president/551572/36 "2010-08-26T21:08:47Z")

</div>

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> No, it is _not_.  
> [QUOTE=Czarcasm]  
> **I am looking for speeches she has made and papers that she has given** that show her to be intellectual and well-reasoned.

bolding mine.  
It’s like I’ve walked into a shoe store and asked for some blue shoes. Half the clerks are showing me every shoe that isn’t blue, the other half are showing me blue socks.  
[/QUOTE]  
Oh good grief.

I take it as a given that at some point she made a speech or wrote a paper mentioning that whe was qutting as governor, and also that at some point she made a speech or wrote a paper indicating that she was becoming a Television personality. (I will interpret a speech _as_ a television personality as counting for the latter.) I am in fact taking the existence of these things as _so_ given, that I’m not even going to bother looking them up.  
I’m debating the nominal topic of the thread. If this was supposed to be a parody thread instead (banning legitimate debate), then it’s in the wrong forum.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fotheringay-Phipps](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/d9b06d/32.png) [@Fotheringay-Phipps](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fotheringay-Phipps)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2010, 9:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-demonstrate-that-sarah-palin-is-worthy-of-being-president/551572/37 "2010-08-26T21:26:18Z")

</div>

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> I am looking for speeches she has made and papers that she has given that show her to be intellectual and well-reasoned.

You’re assuming that “worthy of being president” is necessarily based on speeches and papers. (Very convenient in case you happen to be an Obama fan.) But I don’t think history supports that. The real case for Palin being worthy of being president would have to rest primarily on her performance as governor of Alaska.

Make of that what you will.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![XT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/xt/32/456_2.png) [@XT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/XT)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2010, 9:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-demonstrate-that-sarah-palin-is-worthy-of-being-president/551572/38 "2010-08-26T21:31:07Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Help me demonstrate that Sarah Palin is worthy of being President

> [@](#):
>
> I am looking for speeches she has made and papers that she has given that show her to be intellectual and well-reasoned.

I realize (despite earnest protestations by the OP to stay on target) that this is a joke thread, but…well, why does ‘worthy of being President’ necessitate ‘papers’ or ‘speeches’ that are ‘intellectual and well-reasoned’?? Being President is simply about convincing a majority of voting American’s to vote for you. You don’t have to write papers (whatever that actually means), or even write the speeches you give (I’d say most politicians don’t do this in any case, though they obviously have input into what’s written)…hell, you don’t even have to be ‘worthy’ (or, in the case of Bush, particularly good at GIVING the speeches someone else wrote for you)…you simply have to be able to convince a majority of voters in the US to vote for you.

So…she will demonstrate her worthatude to be President if and when she gets herself elected. If she doesn’t, she lacks that certain worthalicious quality that Presidents need to be worthsected and worthlected.

-XT

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2010, 9:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-demonstrate-that-sarah-palin-is-worthy-of-being-president/551572/39 "2010-08-26T21:31:40Z")

</div>

> [@begbert2](#):
>
> > [@Czarcasm](#):
> >
> > No, it is _not_.bolding mine.  
> > It’s like I’ve walked into a shoe store and asked for some blue shoes. Half the clerks are showing me every shoe that isn’t blue, the other half are showing me blue socks.
> 
> Oh good grief.
> 
> I take it as a given that at some point she made a speech or wrote a paper mentioning that whe was qutting as governor, and also that at some point she made a speech or wrote a paper indicating that she was becoming a Television personality. (I will interpret a speech _as_ a television personality as counting for the latter.) I am in fact taking the existence of these things as _so_ given, that I’m not even going to bother looking them up.  
> I’m debating the nominal topic of the thread. If this was supposed to be a parody thread instead (banning legitimate debate), then it’s in the wrong forum.

You’ve seem to have mistaken this for a _televised_ debate, where the moderator asks a question and the respondee ignores the question asked and makes the point she/he came out to make. This is not a “parody thread”. This is a _focused_ thread dealing with a specific area of Sarah Palin’s expertise(or lack thereof, if examples asked for do not appear.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![XT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/xt/32/456_2.png) [@XT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/XT)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2010, 9:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-demonstrate-that-sarah-palin-is-worthy-of-being-president/551572/40 "2010-08-26T21:35:48Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Czarcasm]  
This is not a “parody thread”. This is a focused thread dealing with a specific area of Sarah Palin’s expertise(or lack thereof, if examples asked for do not appear.)  
[/QUOTE]

:dubious: This is the equivalent of starting a debate here on the 'dope asking (earnestly) for examples of why Intelligent Design is worthy of scientific study and funding on par with Evolution, in the hopeful expectation to get real responses.

I don’t believe that even the ‘conservatives’ (such as they are on this board) around here are fans of Palin, or think she can or will be President. Hell, I’m not even sure most actual conservatives NOT on this board really believe she has much of a chance to get elected to the top seat…certainly not going up against an incumbent Obama.

-XT

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-demonstrate-that-sarah-palin-is-worthy-of-being-president/551572.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-demonstrate-that-sarah-palin-is-worthy-of-being-president/551572.md?page=3)
