# Help me label these kinships

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-label-these-kinships/704975>\
**Category:** Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share\
**Created:** [November 18, 2014, 5:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-label-these-kinships/704975 "2014-11-18T17:44:50Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jayrey](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/47e85d/32.png) [@jayrey](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jayrey)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2014, 5:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-label-these-kinships/704975/1 "2014-11-18T17:44:50Z")

</div>

My brother’s daughters are my nieces. My mother’s sister’s daughter is my cousin. What are my cousin’s children to me? What are my cousin’s children’s children to me?\*

- Yeah, I know, I need to get a life.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Slash1972](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/slash1972/32/6461_2.png) [@Slash1972](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Slash1972)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2014, 5:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-label-these-kinships/704975/2 "2014-11-18T17:48:06Z")

</div>

Your (first) cousin’s children are your (first) cousins, once removed.

Your (first) cousin’s children’s children are your (first) cousins, twice removed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Smeghead](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/f1d935/32.png) [@Smeghead](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Smeghead)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2014, 7:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-label-these-kinships/704975/3 "2014-11-18T19:02:48Z")

</div>

And your children and the children of your first cousin are second cousins to each other.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mbh](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/a6a055/32.png) [@mbh](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mbh)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2014, 7:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-label-these-kinships/704975/4 "2014-11-18T19:55:14Z")

</div>

Children of a common ancestor are siblings.  
Grandchildren of a common ancestor are first cousins.  
Great-grandchildren of a common ancestor are second cousins.  
Great-great-grandchildren of a common ancestor are third cousins.  
Etc.

When you and your relative are different generations, it’s no longer symmetrical.

Descendants of oneself:  
child  
grandchild  
great grandchild  
great great grandchild  
etc.

Descendants of one’s parent:  
sibling  
niece/nephew  
grandniece/grandnephew  
great grandN  
great great grandN  
etc.

Descendants of one’s grandparent:  
uncle/aunt  
first cousin  
first cousin once removed  
first cousin twice removed  
first cousin thrice removed  
etc.

Descendants of one’s great grandparent:  
granduncle/grand aunt  
second cousin once removed  
second cousin  
second cousin once removed  
second cousin twice removed  
etc.

Descendants of one’s great great grandparent:  
third cousin twice removed  
third cousin once removed  
third cousin  
third cousin once removed  
third cousin twice removed  
etc.

“Nth cousin” tells you how far back is the nearest common ancestor. (And if you and your cousin are different generations, it will be different depending on whether it is being reckoned from your point of view, or your cousin’s point of view.)

“N times removed” tells how many generations apart you and your cousin are.

If you can find a copy of the _Encyclopedia Americana_, the article under “Genealogy” has a nice tree diagram that makes this much easier to remember.

Ah! I found one:  
[![](http://www.bellanti.org/cousin1.jpg) ](http://www.bellanti.org/cousin1.jpg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jayrey](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/47e85d/32.png) [@jayrey](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jayrey)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2014, 7:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-label-these-kinships/704975/5 "2014-11-18T19:59:04Z")

</div>

Very informative! Thanks, everyone.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mbh](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/a6a055/32.png) [@mbh](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mbh)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2014, 8:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-label-these-kinships/704975/6 "2014-11-18T20:18:48Z")

</div>

Oops! Forgot to put “great granduncle/great grand aunt” above the third cousins.

Also, with uncles and aunts, people often drop the “grand” and add another “great”. In my part of the country, you hear “great aunt” more often than “grand aunt”.

Parent’s sibling is uncle.  
Grandparent’s sibling is granduncle.  
Great grandparent’s sibling is great granduncle.

Grandparent’s child is uncle.  
Great grandparent’s child is great uncle.  
Great great grandparent’s child is great great uncle.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![That\_Don\_Guy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/that_don_guy/32/538_2.png) [@That\_Don\_Guy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/That_Don_Guy)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2014, 8:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-label-these-kinships/704975/7 "2014-11-18T20:30:05Z")

</div>

I have also heard terms like “second great uncle”, “second great grandfather”, and so on being used with increasing frequency recently.

On _Star Trek: Enterprise_, T’pol used the term “third grandmother” to refer to her great-great-grandmother - but of course, that’s probably just an English translation of Vulcan terminology.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mbh](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/a6a055/32.png) [@mbh](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mbh)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2014, 9:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-label-these-kinships/704975/8 "2014-11-18T21:32:55Z")

</div>

Oh, and before you try to seduce your cousin, check your state’s incest laws to see how many degrees of cosanguinity are off limits. (Also, what method your state uses to determine cosanguinity.) The most commonly used method is to count the number of generations from yourself back to the common ancestor, then count the number of generations from the ancestor to your cousin. The total is “N degrees of cosanguinity” or “the Nth degree of cosanguinity”.

If three degrees are forbidden, then you are allowed to marry a first cousin. If five degrees are forbidden, then you are allowed to marry a second cousin.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Baker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/bb73d2/32.png) [@Baker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Baker)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2014, 11:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-label-these-kinships/704975/9 "2014-11-18T23:46:33Z")

</div>

I once figured out the relationship name between me and this man, named John Adam Kasson.

> **[John A. Kasson](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_A._Kasson)**
>
> John Adam Kasson (January 11, 1822 – May 18, 1910) was a nineteenth-century lawyer, politician and diplomat from south-central Iowa. Elected to the U.S. House six times, he repeatedly interrupted his congressional service to serve in the Diplomatic service in many different capacities.
> He was born in Charlotte, Vermont, on January 11, 1822, to John Steele Kasson and Nancy Blackman. Kasson attended local school as a child and later graduated from the University of Vermont in 1842. He studied law ...

He is my third cousin, five times removed. In 1722 Adam Kasson emigrated to the US colonies with his wife and family, eight kids. I am descended from one of his sons, and John Adam Kasson was the descendant of another son. A distant relationship, but I used his name in a thread on this board, the first “Finish the Westen” story.

[http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=174740&highlight=Finish+Western](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=174740&highlight=Finish+Western)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Senegoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/senegoid/32/6606_2.png) [@Senegoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Senegoid)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2014, 2:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-label-these-kinships/704975/10 "2014-11-19T02:34:44Z")

</div>

Does anyone here happen to know how Teddy Roosevelt and Franklin Roosevelt were related? I vaguely remember reading somewhere that they had a common ancestor who immigrated to America, several generations before Teddy.

I also read in a college-level U. S. History book that Franklin Roosevelt and Winston Churchill were distantly related. :dubious: Does anyone here know anything about _that_?

_“I have a distant cousin in New York, many times removed. Every time I go to visit him, he always removes.”_[indent]-- [Joe Btfsplk](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Btfsplk)[/indent]

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kimble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kimble/32/19185_2.png) [@Kimble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kimble)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2014, 2:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-label-these-kinships/704975/11 "2014-11-19T02:41:35Z")

</div>

Teddy and FDR were 5th cousins, based on [Wikipedia](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodore_Roosevelt) saying TR’s dad and FDR’s dad were 4th cousins. [WGBH](http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/general-article/fdr-know/?flavour=mobile) says FDR and Churchill were 7th cousins once removed.

–Kimble, Gerald Ford’s 6th cousin 3x removed

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mbh](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/a6a055/32.png) [@mbh](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mbh)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2014, 10:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-label-these-kinships/704975/12 "2014-11-19T10:14:16Z")

</div>

> **[Mayflower Ancestry: The Case For and Against](https://winstonchurchill.org/resources/genealogy/mayflower-ancestry-the-case-for-and-against/)**
>
>     I am a member of the New England Historic and Genealogical Society, The New York Genealogical and Biographical Society, The Massachusetts Society of Mayflower Descendants and The Churchill Center. \[…\]

This site claims that Churchill and FDR were cousins twice removed.

> [@](#):
>
> Churchill, however is still related to Roosevelt: he is an eighth cousin, twice removed of FDR through their descent from Arthur Howland, brother of Mayflower passenger John Howland. Arthur did not, however, accompany John Howland on that famous voyage to America.

If Churchill was FDR’s 8th cousin twice removed, then FDR was either 6th cousin twice removed, or 10th cousin twice removed, from Churchill’s point of view.

The websites I am finding are all secondhand information, and none of them shows the lines of descent.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![septimus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/septimus/32/410_2.png) [@septimus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/septimus)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2014, 2:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-label-these-kinships/704975/13 "2014-11-19T14:30:20Z")

</div>

FDR and Churchill are 8th cousins twice removed due to their common ancestors: Henry Howland and wife:

1. Henry Howland and Margaret(?) Aires

2. Arthur Howland, immigrant to Plymouth, Mass.

3. Deborah Howland

4. Hasadiah Smith

5. Deborah Russell

6. Dorothy Allen

7. William Wilcox

8. David Wilcox

9. Clarissa Wilcox

10. Clarissa Hall

11. Jennie Jerome

12. Former Naval Person

13. Henry Howland and Margaret(?) Aires

14. John Howland, immigrant to Plymouth, Mass.

15. Joseph Howland

16. Nathaniel Howland

17. Nathaniel Howland

18. Joseph Howland

19. Susan Howland

20. Mary Aspinwall

21. James Roosevelt

22. Franklin D. Roosevelt

Of course they have other cousin relationships:  
[ul]  
[li]They are 10th cousins once removed, FDR being 8-great grandson of Thomas Temple, Baronet and Churchill being 8-great grandson of Thomas’ niece Susan.[/li][li]They are 11th cousins, both being 10-great grandsons of Anthony Browne Viscount Montagu and Lady Jane Radcliffe.[/li][li]They are 11th cousins, both being 10-great grandsons of William Clifton of Barrington Court and Elizabeth Blount.[/li][li]Other, more distant relationships[/li][/ul]

> [@mbh](#):
>
> If Churchill was FDR’s 8th cousin twice removed, then FDR was either 6th cousin twice removed, or 10th cousin twice removed, from Churchill’s point of view.

No. Because “removed” operates in either direction, a person is the 8th cousin twice removed of his own 8th cousin twice removed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mbh](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/a6a055/32.png) [@mbh](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mbh)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2014, 7:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-label-these-kinships/704975/14 "2014-11-19T19:37:23Z")

</div>

The relationship is only symmetrical if you and your cousin are the same generation. Churchill and Roosevelt were two generations apart. That wrecks the symmetry.

The common ancestors are Roosevelt’s 7-times-great-grandparents. Therefore Churchill is Roosevelt’s 8th cousin twice removed.

The common ancestors are Churchill’s 9-times-great-grandparents. therefore Roosevelt is Churchill’s 10th cousin twice removed.

Cite: _Encyclopedia Americana_.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Senegoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/senegoid/32/6606_2.png) [@Senegoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Senegoid)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2014, 9:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-label-these-kinships/704975/15 "2014-11-19T21:47:48Z")

</div>

Okay, various ignorances fought!

I’m a bit surprised that TR and FDR are (allegedly?) cousins of the same generation. I would have thought that FDR would be a generation or two later than TR.

So we have conflicting ideas, however, about the naming of asymmetric cousin relationships. One view is that, even though a relationship is asymmetric, the nomenclature is symmetric and thus ambiguous. The other view is that, when a cousin relation is asymmetric, the naming convention preserves and accurately describes that, with a different label in each direction. That actually makes a bit more sense.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![septimus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/septimus/32/410_2.png) [@septimus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/septimus)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2014, 5:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-label-these-kinships/704975/16 "2014-11-20T05:36:00Z")

</div>

> [@Senegoid](#):
>
> I’m a bit surprised that TR and FDR are (…?) cousins of the same generation.

Churchill was only seven years older than FDR. Generations are not constant size; my wife is younger than her cousin’s children. After many generations, such “discrepancies” can become quite large.

Given the mere 7-year age difference, the “twice removed” in FDR and WLSC’s closest cousinship may be more surprising. But note that the lines contain 2 and 6 females respectively. Fathers are, on average, about 5 years older than the corresponding mother.

> [@Senegoid](#):
>
> … are (allegedly?) …

Now you’re just getting personal. 😃 (Ancestries of FDR and WLSC happen to be well-studied.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![septimus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/septimus/32/410_2.png) [@septimus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/septimus)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2014, 6:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-label-these-kinships/704975/17 "2014-11-20T06:04:07Z")

</div>

> [@mbh](#):
>
> The relationship is only symmetrical if you and your cousin are the same generation. Churchill and Roosevelt were two generations apart. That wrecks the symmetry.
> 
> The common ancestors are Roosevelt’s 7-times-great-grandparents. Therefore Churchill is Roosevelt’s 8th cousin twice removed.
> 
> The common ancestors are Churchill’s 9-times-great-grandparents. therefore Roosevelt is Churchill’s 10th cousin twice removed.
> 
> Cite: _Encyclopedia Americana_.

You and I have given clear opinions, and I’d normally be happy to let the matter drop. Given the SDMB charter, however, I feel a duty to respond. 😉

Look at the table toward the end of [Wikipedia’s page on “Cousin.”](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cousin) It only goes up to, e.g. “2nd cousins thrice removed” but you can see a symmetry across the diagonal that supports my position.

By itself, that doesn’t prove anything. After Wikipedia and _Encyclopedia Americana_, the score is 1 to 1. There’s more than one correct way to pluralize “buffalo”; if your view of cousin removal were to become the majority view it would become correct. But I’ve playing with genealogy for decades and am confident that if you, say, examine the first 200 Google hits of “explain cousin 2x removed” the score will become much more lopsided. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kimble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kimble/32/19185_2.png) [@Kimble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kimble)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2014, 5:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-label-these-kinships/704975/18 "2014-11-20T17:31:04Z")

</div>

I’m also voting for **septimus** ’s interpretation – i.e., if X is my Nth cousin M times removed, then I am X’s Nth cousin M times removed. More cites:

OED: [UK](http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/english/cousin), [US](http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/cousin), [blog](http://blog.oxforddictionaries.com/2013/08/naming-of-cousins/)  
[Ancestry.com](http://help.ancestry.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/5226/~/understanding-first-cousin,-twice-removed-and-more)  
[the chart **mbh** linked to](http://www.bellanti.org/cousin1.jpg)– note that it says the parent of your 2nd cousin is your 1st cousin once removed

The OED blog does mention **mbh** ’s method as an “alternative system,” but I think it’s safe to say that it’s nonstandard, at least in current usage.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Baker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/bb73d2/32.png) [@Baker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Baker)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2014, 8:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-label-these-kinships/704975/19 "2014-11-20T20:08:29Z")

</div>

We had a family reunion at which, each year, it was tradition to take a picture of the oldest and youngest attendee together.

One year we had to take the picture again. My second cousin’s daughter was the youngest. But then one family arrived a little late, and their baby was a month younger than the first child. The two kids were from different generations though, we had a big family tree posted.

It started in the generation of my great grandmother, the mother of my maternal grandfather. She had a son who was about the same age as my grandfather, who was the child of my great grandmother’s oldest child, a daughter. So Grandpa’s uncle was the same age as he was. Kind of like in _Father of the Bride 2_.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mbh](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/a6a055/32.png) [@mbh](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mbh)\
**Post date:** [November 22, 2014, 5:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-label-these-kinships/704975/20 "2014-11-22T17:34:04Z")

</div>

In my opinion, the insistence on reciprocal titles introduces more complexity, and I don’t see that it conveys any more information.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/help-me-label-these-kinships/704975.md?page=2)
