I appreciate your points, Puzzlegal. And while I didn’t mean to imply that the first post itself was written in bad faith, I don’t see an earnest question at this point in the thread.
We’ve explained color temperature at length. The OP has rejected the entire concept of CRI because…reasons? Attempts to explain how to approximate the color temperature and emitted spectrum (“quality”) of incandescents are rejected with snarky non-sequiturs about how the OP still wants incandescent bulbs.
Along with several others, Gorsnak wrote a long, detailed and helpful response which the OP ignored except as a pretext to complain about the lighting decisions at their place of employment.
What question remains? I sincerely don’t see one.
Regarding what to do with buzzing bulbs, I admit I took the OP’s “Threw them out.” to be a pouty way of catastrophizing.
Frankly, I still do. Why not just return them to the store as defective like a normal human being? If that’s not appealing, one could chuck them in a drawer in case a bulb burns out someplace the buzzing doesn’t matter, like a storage room. The OP mentioned that happened just last week.
The OP seems to strongly dislike LED bulbs. That’s fine—everybody gets to like what they like.
But jeez—according to the OP, LEDs produce significantly worse light than fluorescents, they cause migraines, they die quickly—even faster if it’s cold—and they’re $20 each, at least until another poster gently points out how absurd that would be. Do LEDs also give puppies cancer?
Although I don’t see a question, it’s clear that the desired answer is “LEDs suck.” That’s a valid opinion, but it’s not a question. The only reason I commented was to ask if there was still a question.
But I did so in a way that was fairly cranky myself. If I could do it over, I’d phrase things differently and drop much of my snark—especially the plain-wrong bit about Kelvins. That was a doozy.