# Helpful U.S. Government Warned James Foley's Parents: Prosecution For Ransom Fundraising

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/helpful-u-s-government-warned-james-foleys-parents-prosecution-for-ransom-fundraising/698370>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [September 13, 2014, 4:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/helpful-u-s-government-warned-james-foleys-parents-prosecution-for-ransom-fundraising/698370 "2014-09-13T04:58:11Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PastTense](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pasttense/32/14550_2.png) [@PastTense](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/PastTense)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2014, 4:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/helpful-u-s-government-warned-james-foleys-parents-prosecution-for-ransom-fundraising/698370/1 "2014-09-13T04:58:11Z")

</div>

“The parents of a New Hampshire journalist slain by Islamic extremists in Syria said Friday that they never knew what the U.S. government was doing to help their son and were told they could be prosecuted if they tried to raise money for a ransom.”

> **[HuffPost - Breaking News, U.S. and World News](https://www.huffpost.com/?err_code=404&err_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.huffingtonpost.com%2F2014%2F09%2F12%2Fjames-foley-parents-ransom_n_5814176.html)**
>
> Read the latest headlines, news stories, and opinion from Politics, Entertainment, Life, Perspectives, and more.

Naturally I’m sure the more law-abiding members of this forum will think it is good the government provided this advice–but it rubbed me the wrong way.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MichaelEmouse](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/michaelemouse/32/101_2.png) [@MichaelEmouse](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MichaelEmouse)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2014, 5:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/helpful-u-s-government-warned-james-foleys-parents-prosecution-for-ransom-fundraising/698370/2 "2014-09-13T05:02:12Z")

</div>

Yes, there is something that feels quite unsavory about it, even if it’s a better policy than letting them pay the ransom.

It’s less about being attached to the law than that particular law being an effective policy tool that structures incentives in a way that reduces the harm done to Americans in the aggregate.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PastTense](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pasttense/32/14550_2.png) [@PastTense](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/PastTense)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2014, 5:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/helpful-u-s-government-warned-james-foleys-parents-prosecution-for-ransom-fundraising/698370/3 "2014-09-13T05:20:21Z")

</div>

Steven Sotloff’s parents were given the same warning:

> **[Sotloff's parents told they could be prosecuted for paying ransom to IS](https://news.yahoo.com/sotloff-s-parents-were-told-they-could-be-prosecuted-for-paying-ransom-to-is-234329991.html)**
>
> The parents of murdered journalist Steven Sotloff were told by a White House counterterrorism official at a meeting last May that they could face criminal prosecution if they paid ransom to try to free their son, a spokesman for the family told Yahoo...

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Grumman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/43a26b/32.png) [@Grumman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Grumman)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2014, 6:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/helpful-u-s-government-warned-james-foleys-parents-prosecution-for-ransom-fundraising/698370/4 "2014-09-13T06:50:35Z")

</div>

Most hostages that are killed come from the country that pays the most ransoms. Paying ransoms rewards ISIL for taking hostages, and encourages them to continue to do so.

Paying ransoms also means you are actively supporting their campaign of genocide and slavery, because that’s where your money would be going: to murder Shia children.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MichaelEmouse](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/michaelemouse/32/101_2.png) [@MichaelEmouse](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MichaelEmouse)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2014, 7:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/helpful-u-s-government-warned-james-foleys-parents-prosecution-for-ransom-fundraising/698370/5 "2014-09-13T07:02:37Z")

</div>

> [@Grumman](#):
>
> Most hostages that are killed come from the country that pays the most ransoms. Paying ransoms rewards ISIL for taking hostages, and encourages them to continue to do so.
> 
> Paying ransoms also means you are actively supporting their campaign of genocide and slavery, because that’s where your money would be going: to murder Shia children.

A kind of reverse children’s fund.

And yes, the English had a saying about Vikings who asked for tribute: Pay the Danegeld and never get rid of the Dane.

I am glad to see that the US and UK government have read the Tau Codex.  
It does depend on relative force. If some terrorists had a good shot at killing millions of people, it might be worth it to pay them off if the odds of it occurring again were low. That is not the case here.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Great\_Antibob](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e47c2d/32.png) [@Great\_Antibob](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Great_Antibob)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2014, 4:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/helpful-u-s-government-warned-james-foleys-parents-prosecution-for-ransom-fundraising/698370/6 "2014-09-13T16:01:35Z")

</div>

ISIS has essentially 0 capability to target large numbers of Americans. Paying ransom for American hostages will not reduce how many people they kill in Syria or Iraq. In fact, all it would do is improve their ability to do so.

Giving them any hope of ransom simply gives them incentive to kidnap more Americans. France, which does pay ransom, not coincidentally also has the most kidnap victims to Middle East terrorists. Countries that don’t pay ransoms don’t have many such hostages.

I feel for the family, but this is precisely why we shouldn’t base policy on emotion. Maybe the US government could have worded things differently to the family, but they were doing what was best overall for Americans by discouraging them from giving ISIS a single red cent. If the family had somehow collected a couple million for a personal ransom, that money would simply have gone to facilitating the kidnapping and ransom of even more Americans and giving those bastards the means to do so.

The fault of the government, if any, is not doing a good job sparing the feelings of the family, not in implementing this particular policy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Grumman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/43a26b/32.png) [@Grumman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Grumman)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2014, 5:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/helpful-u-s-government-warned-james-foleys-parents-prosecution-for-ransom-fundraising/698370/7 "2014-09-13T17:06:52Z")

</div>

While I disagree with the OP, this thread did lead me to discover how shitty the U.K. government’s response was.

> [@](#):
>
> A spokesman for the Metropolitan Police said specialists from the Counter Terrorism unit were continuing to examine the footage in order to look for clues as to the identity of the suspected British jihadist but said the public should refrain from viewing the video.
> 
> In a statement a spokesman said: “We would like to remind the public that viewing, downloading or disseminating extremist material within the UK may constitute an offence under Terrorism legislation.”
> 
> Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe explained that while viewing the video was technically a crime, his officers would be more focused on tracking down those who shared the footage or glorified it.

[Link](http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11047088/Viewing-or-sharing-beheading-video-could-be-a-criminal-offence-police-warn.html)

That’s some Orwellian bullshit right there, if they’ve criminalised _being communicated to_.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Steophan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/steophan/32/9595_2.png) [@Steophan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Steophan)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2014, 5:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/helpful-u-s-government-warned-james-foleys-parents-prosecution-for-ransom-fundraising/698370/8 "2014-09-13T17:17:46Z")

</div>

> [@Grumman](#):
>
> That’s some Orwellian bullshit right there, if they’ve criminalised _being communicated to_.

No, they’ve criminalised actively choosing to view banned material. Every government censors to some degree, and whilst I strongly disagree with this particular law, it’s not criminalising being passively communicated to.

On topic for this thread, paying a ransom is funding terrorism, directly. Not something that should be encouraged, to put it mildly, and something that should be illegal - not that a prosecution for attempting to raise ransom money should happen either.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PastTense](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pasttense/32/14550_2.png) [@PastTense](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/PastTense)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2014, 10:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/helpful-u-s-government-warned-james-foleys-parents-prosecution-for-ransom-fundraising/698370/9 "2014-09-13T22:29:43Z")

</div>

So why shouldn’t be against the law to pay a ransom for any kidnapping?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Typo\_Negative](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/typo_negative/32/484_2.png) [@Typo\_Negative](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Typo_Negative)\
**Post date:** [September 15, 2014, 6:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/helpful-u-s-government-warned-james-foleys-parents-prosecution-for-ransom-fundraising/698370/10 "2014-09-15T18:52:45Z")

</div>

As long as we are not going to prosecute people who are so crazy with fear and grief that they will do _anything_ they can to help their loved ones even if ill-advised…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lemur866](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lemur866/32/434_2.png) [@Lemur866](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lemur866)\
**Post date:** [September 15, 2014, 10:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/helpful-u-s-government-warned-james-foleys-parents-prosecution-for-ransom-fundraising/698370/11 "2014-09-15T22:43:33Z")

</div>

You can’t send money to terrorists, not even if they’re holding your son hostage. I understand that it’s different when it’s your kid. That doesn’t mean we should allow people to do it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Morgenstern](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f9ae1b/32.png) [@Morgenstern](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Morgenstern)\
**Post date:** [September 15, 2014, 10:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/helpful-u-s-government-warned-james-foleys-parents-prosecution-for-ransom-fundraising/698370/12 "2014-09-15T22:49:14Z")

</div>

I get it. The US doesn’t pay ransoms nor does it allow ransoms to be paid. That’s a good policy and one everyone who volunteers for work in that area of the world should be made aware of before they head overseas.

I totally sympathize with the parents and their desire to help.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Siam\_Sam](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/d78d45/32.png) [@Siam\_Sam](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Siam_Sam)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2014, 1:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/helpful-u-s-government-warned-james-foleys-parents-prosecution-for-ransom-fundraising/698370/13 "2014-09-16T01:42:15Z")

</div>

> [@Grumman](#):
>
> Most hostages that are killed come from the country that pays the most ransoms. Paying ransoms rewards ISIL for taking hostages, and encourages them to continue to do so.
> 
> Paying ransoms also means you are actively supporting their campaign of genocide and slavery, because that’s where your money would be going: to murder Shia children.

This. I have to say I agree with the law but acknowledge it feels squicky enforcing it in practice.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Khendrask](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/3e96dc/32.png) [@Khendrask](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Khendrask)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2014, 11:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/helpful-u-s-government-warned-james-foleys-parents-prosecution-for-ransom-fundraising/698370/14 "2014-09-16T11:41:44Z")

</div>

> [@Morgenstern](#):
>
> I get it. The US doesn’t pay ransoms nor does it allow ransoms to be paid. That’s a good policy and one everyone who volunteers for work in that area of the world should be made aware of before they head overseas.

Well, sometimes. But Obama decided it was a great idea to swap 5 terrorists for Bergdahl back in May. That sounds like paying a ransom to me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![garygnu](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/garygnu/32/2924_2.png) [@garygnu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/garygnu)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2014, 4:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/helpful-u-s-government-warned-james-foleys-parents-prosecution-for-ransom-fundraising/698370/15 "2014-09-16T16:13:16Z")

</div>

Hasn’t the government denied giving the families this warning?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ravenman](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ravenman/32/2929_2.png) [@Ravenman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ravenman)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2014, 4:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/helpful-u-s-government-warned-james-foleys-parents-prosecution-for-ransom-fundraising/698370/16 "2014-09-16T16:16:53Z")

</div>

> [@Khendrask](#):
>
> Well, sometimes. But Obama decided it was a great idea to swap 5 terrorists for Bergdahl back in May. That sounds like paying a ransom to me.

That’s just a straight-up prisoner exchange. It’s been done in probably every war, ever.

> [@garygnu](#):
>
> Hasn’t the government denied giving the families this warning?

The President’s Chief of Staff said this weekend that there was no intent to threaten or intimidate, but the government simply had the responsibility to let the family know what the law is. On that count, I totally agree with **Siam Sam**.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Great\_Antibob](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e47c2d/32.png) [@Great\_Antibob](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Great_Antibob)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2014, 4:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/helpful-u-s-government-warned-james-foleys-parents-prosecution-for-ransom-fundraising/698370/17 "2014-09-16T16:25:59Z")

</div>

> [@Ravenman](#):
>
> That’s just a straight-up prisoner exchange. It’s been done in probably every war, ever.

Plus there was at least a token effort to make sure those guys don’t go right back to being terrorists.

Can’t do that with cash. Too fungible.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![garygnu](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/garygnu/32/2924_2.png) [@garygnu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/garygnu)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2014, 4:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/helpful-u-s-government-warned-james-foleys-parents-prosecution-for-ransom-fundraising/698370/18 "2014-09-16T16:35:17Z")

</div>

> [@Ravenman](#):
>
> …  
> The President’s Chief of Staff said this weekend that there was no intent to threaten or intimidate, but the government simply had the responsibility to let the family know what the law is. On that count, I totally agree with **Siam Sam**.

I see, thank you. I agree as well.

It’s harder to say don’t give a mouse a cookie when the mouse has a gun to your loved one’s head.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Grumman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/43a26b/32.png) [@Grumman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Grumman)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2014, 5:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/helpful-u-s-government-warned-james-foleys-parents-prosecution-for-ransom-fundraising/698370/19 "2014-09-16T17:08:02Z")

</div>

> [@garygnu](#):
>
> It’s harder to say don’t give a mouse a cookie when the mouse has a gun to your loved one’s head.

The mouse also has a gun to the head of a hundred other people and will pull the trigger if you give him the cookie, but fuck those guys, I guess.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rachellelogram](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/rachellelogram/32/8689_2.png) [@Rachellelogram](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rachellelogram)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2014, 8:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/helpful-u-s-government-warned-james-foleys-parents-prosecution-for-ransom-fundraising/698370/20 "2014-09-16T20:26:18Z")

</div>

> [@Lemur866](#):
>
> You can’t send money to terrorists, not even if they’re holding your son hostage. I understand that it’s different when it’s your kid. That doesn’t mean we should allow people to do it.

I agree that this should be the law. And, in the shoes of the parents, I would go to every length within my power to break it.
