And you would have done it by secret e-mail. 
Go ahead. Explain the State Dept. actions leading up to the day of the attack, and the State Dept. actions after the attack. You could also explain why Congress isn’t allowed to see what government documents are on Ol’ Hillary’s private server.
Where is Hillary Clinton’s long-form email? The fact that they have found nothing to implicate her just shows how deep the corruption runs! Grassy consulate!
You *could *actually read the reports. Ever considered it?
Does the report include the emails that were hidden on Ol’ Hillary’s private server?
Please keep making this about Benghazi, conservatives.
So that would be “No, I haven’t read anything that wouldn’t contain the conclusion I wish it would”. Gotcha.
And you would be wrong.
I thought this thread was about Ol’ Hillary refusing to fully cooperate with Congressional investigators?
That’s OK. Ol’ Hillary will soon be given another chance to tell Congressional investigators, and We the Voters that we don’t deserve to know what government employees, such as herself, are doing on the taxpayers dime.
No, it’s about telling yet another Republican fishing trip to fuck off. And it’s about their Benghazi obsession too.
They just keep on digging through that pile, convinced there’s a pony in there somewhere.
It’s necessary if they want a judge to uphold it.
Otherwise, it’s just a polite request, which can be politely declined.
Or a *rude *request, which can be *rudely *declined. As is the case here.
That’s an interesting phrase. In principle, yes, it does. Now…what are the limitations and parameters? You can’t just yell, “Congressional Oversight of Government” and then send a U-Haul trailer to demand every file in every department in the entire administration. The principle doesn’t allow Congress to read every email ever sent by every cabinet member.
I might just as well say “Executive Privilege” and pretend it exempts the President from any such Oversight. Dueling slogans. The courts have already put down a number of guidelines, during the Watergate and Whitewater investigations. Demanding Clinton’s entire email record goes outside of those established guidelines.
Actually it was about Hillary keeping her State emails on a private server. But now it isn’t, and the more you try to tie this to Benghazi the less people will pay attention. This is a scandal in its own right, but everybody knows that Benghazi wasn’t. So if you tie this to that - as conservatives have been doing - you make everyone assume there’s no scandal here either.
Not correct. In most cases, the Judicial branch declines to intervene at all, leaving it alone as a “political question” that is outside of their purview.
She followed the laws in place at the time. And your devotion to Behghazi as a scandal only shows that you’re very poorly informed by RW media.
“There’s no controlling legal authority”, right? Where have we heard that before?
So you admit that there was no requirement for her to use a state server? I just want to be clear that you’re lambasting her for doing nothing wrong.