I’ve mentioned many times that she never actually steps over the line into illegality, or at least makes sure she can’t be caught if she does. But I don’t think she deleted the emails to cover up a crime. She did it to cover up embarrassing emails that could be used against her in the coming campaign.
But that’s neither here nor there. She is non-transparent, and she lies. A lot. That’s the immediate cause of her plunging poll numbers and I can live with that. I neither need nor want her to go to jail or drop out of the race.
Or she did it because there was no compelling reason to keep them. You are assuming she committed nefarious deeds because you want her to be a bad guy.
Specific examples? Is this gonna be about the sniper?
Sure. I’m betting the idea of an actually accomplished person going up against the clownfarts stumblefucking through the GOP primary season isn’t in the least disheartening for someone who intends to cast a check in the box marked R.
And you are assuming she simply deleted them because there was no need to keep them, and that she had a private server because she had nothing to hide. If I actually believed you were that naive, it would be cute.
Her excuses for the private server-“I wanted the convenience of one device”. She had multiple devices.
“The private emails were things like correspondence with my husband”. Her husband doesn’t use email. He’s sent two in his life.
But thanks for the Bosnia thing, and the “Dead broke” comment also comes to mind. THe public does not view her as honest and I doubt she can overcome that trust gap.
Experience has almost always been a losing argument in elections for all but incumbents. Integrity and change always beat experience.
I assume that she turned over what was required. Prove otherwise.
What devices and when. Specific answers. I don’t want what Hannity told you to quip. I want actual data. Did she have two phones on her at all times when she took the SOS position? Or did she have a phone, a laptop and a tablet?
I have a phone and a laptop and a tablet. I do not have two phones. If you don’t understand the difference, I suspect you’re not trying. I often don’t have my tablet or laptop. I almost always have my phone. Is this starting to make sense?
I’m betting that he can be reached by email if you send an email to one of his assistants.
She is not the judge of what is required. The State Department is. She chose what to turn over, which isn’t shady at all.
It doesn’t matter if the devices did email. And frankly it wouldn’t matter if she had just one, since one device can manage multiple accounts. Most normal people have a work account and a personal account. Tell your job that you’re going to not use the work email, but only your personal email for official business and tell me how that works out for you. Once again we have a different standard for the powerful and the little guy. That never looks good in an election.
“Some”? She provided 30,000 emails. Clearly she’s holding out on us.
I have a co-worker that uses the exact same argument to support his belief in alien abductions. He has no evidence at all that it does happen and all current scientific evidence and theories are against him, but as long as it can’t be definitively disproven he’s convinced it must be happening.
But the regulations in force at the time permitted the head of each agency to determine the specific procedures the agency would use. In other words, if you had a good reason to use a personal e-mail address, the agency head could give you permission to do so.
Amazing. That seems to be the same impression the current Congressional investigators have. That must be why Hillary is being requested, for the 3rd time, to testify before the Congressional Committees. The Congressional investigators have unanswered questions.
I also have unanswered questions about Hillary’s actions as Sec. of State, and her reluctance to fully cooperate with the Congressional Committees. Maybe the Congressional investigators will get the answers I seek.
Or are you suggesting that Hillary provided “all” of the documents requested by the Congressional investigators?
The fact that the Congressional investigators are requesting more documents, and are requesting access to Hillary’s personal server suggest that Hillary has not turned over what was required to satisfy the needs of the investigators.
Hillary has also stated that some emails on her personal have been deleted.
Your assumption is your assumption, but Hillary has not turned over what was required by the Congressional investigators.
Of course, it’s quite likely that “the needs of the investigators” in this case involve finding some way, any way, to discredit and humiliate an individual they personally and politically despise. Those needs will never be met until they can dance on her corpse. They’d settle for doing so figuratively.
Or, as been repeatedly pointed out, the Congressional investigators will simply never be satisfied.
Cool. What are the questions? I seem to have missed your listing them the last time you were asked.
Of course not. But as I said, it’s quite likely they’ll never be satisfied as long as nothing supports their pre-existing narrative.
It’s much like Barack Obama’s birth certificate - no matter what he provides the Birthers always want more, rejecting the evidence they’ve been given as insufficient. Do you think this is a reasonable approach to an investigation?
Usually, the best way to end speculation, and innuendo, is to quickly, and fully, comply with the investigators. The longer a Hillary, or a Christie, or some other poor shmuck, drags their feet complying with an investigation, the more suspicious, and guilty the public believes they look.
The last time Hillary appeared before the Congressional committee, she implied that she wanted to get to the bottom of everything Benghazi. She didn’t say she was going to share that information with the investigators, or the public. And it appears that she hasn’t.
Remember, Hillary is a private citizen. She currently holds no government position. She does not have the power of Executive Privilege to cover her activity. (Not yet, anyway.)
There is no reason that Hillary can not be questioned by the media, the public, or by Congressional Committees. The demand that Hillary must not be questioned, is itself, questionable.
The Benghazi debacle took place. The public, and Congress, wanted an explanation as to why four Americans, including a U.S. Ambassador, had been murdered. The WH and State dept proved reluctant to provide information. The investigation eventually led to Hillary’s private server. Hillary has proven that she was storing government documents on her private server. The investigation continues.
As does the “LEAVE BRITTANY ALONE!”-style sturm und drang of Hillary’s fanboys.
What government documents are still on Hillary’s personal server?
What government documents has Hillary deleted from her personal server?
The Congressional investigators are free to ask Hillary questions that they do not yet have answers to. I still do not have access to their list of questions.
