Yeah, why do you figure that is?
(post shortened and underline added)
Are you saying that the Congressional investigators have already asked questions about Hillary’s Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Personal E-mail Account during the other Congressional investigations? You should notify Hillary that she no longer has to appear because you’ve found a loophole.
Because she ignored subpoenas and lied about her official activities. So far.
Regards,
Shodan
Because you haven’t been very convincing? Trying speaking with a more authoritative voice. Maybe pound the table occasionally.
Please proceed, Pubbies.
I’m glad they’re finally growing in, but I said “pound the table”. 
Thank you for proceeding.
I did note “RELEVANT” questions. If you need vocabulary lessons, don’t hesitate to attend some.
doorhinge has just said that, to him, “Benghazi” means Secretary Clinton’s* entire tenure in office*. That makes everything she’s said or done in this Administration “relevant” to a partisan fishing trip. Just like “Whitewater” meant a blowjob.
You offered me questions about whether Hillary should answer **all **the committee’s questions and whether I think they should leave her alone. Is there no third option?
But you seem fine with an indeterminate fishing expedition to look for answers for questions you can’t articulate.
Thanks for proving my point by stating the assumption that if she doesn’t jump through every hoop from now to eternity it’s because she “already acts as if she has the power of Executive Privilege”. Never mind whether the demands are reasonable or proportionate or have anything to do with anything - any refusal or challenge will automatically be assumed to be arrogance at best and an admission of guilt at worst. Regardless of the truth of the matter, neither you nor the Congressional Republicans will ever accept any outcome that doesn’t reflect poorly upon her. And if the committee isn’t investigating in good faith, how long should she put up with this farce?
“There are too many police shootings of black civilians.”
“Oh, so you’re perfectly okay with black criminals shooting policemen!”
Or:
“Jesus must either be a liar, a lunatic, or The Lord. There are no other possibilities.”
Or indeed we either think Hillary should answer every question every investigation asks her ever or we’re having a “LEAVE BRITTANY ALONE” moment.
(post shortened)
You’re free to provide a third, fourth, fifth, etc. option. I would like to know if you believe Hillary should answer all of the questions put to her by the Congressional Committee. I would also like to know if you believe that the Congressional Committee should leave her alone. I’m also interested in any other opinions you may have. There was no intention of confusing you with an unintended excluded middle.
Your assumption that I will not accept the outcome of the Congressional Committee is only your assumption. I have no problem accepting the outcome.
What ever happened to Executive Privilege?
This thread is now just bad comedy.
And we hope for even further improvement in the near future!
No comment on her refusing to answer questions about her email usage in 2012?
Yes, this thread is comedy. It’s hilarious to see furious spinning in her defense when people don’t even know if she’s worth defending. We saw it on Day 1. Heck, surrogates were complaining about it! “How can we defend her without talking points! Wahhh!”
No more than the absurdity of demanding to know what’s in her emails without any evidence that there is anything of any interest in those emails.
You’re attacking her…without knowing she’s worth attacking.
At very least, those of us defending her have a revered legal principle backing us up: innocent until proven guilty.
Where’s your proof?
This isn’t a trial. It’s an election. Politicians need to prove they are honest. Clinton’s ratings on honesty are quite low, deservedly so. She’s got other things going for her, but trying to defend her honesty is like trying to defend Bill’s fidelity. It’s pointless and absurd. And it arguably has done the damage it’s going to do. She is who she is and some voters are comfortable with that, which is fine.
As I said above, Executive Privilege should be invoked.