Hilary Clinton and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Personal E-mail Account

They’re only tragic of they don’t derail Hilary’s chances to win the election. That would mean they died in vain.

You’re entitled to your opinion. Unfortunately for you, the Congressional Committees do not agree with your opinion. The Congressional investigation continues.

Once again, were Ol’ Hillary’s Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Personal E-mails included in the previous Congressional investigations? Is the answer still NO? Then I guess the Congressional investigation will continue.

It’s telling that others have not answered this general question.

And thank *them *for proceeding, too!

Never interrupt your enemy when he’s making a mistake.

If you say so. After all, what difference, at this point, does it make?

There’s that out-of-context, deliberately misinterpreted quote again. You people couldn’t be more transparent, really.

Context. It can be your best friend oryour worst enemy. Learn it, understand it, use it.

You’re welcome.

Great! You both want the Congressional Committee to continue the investigation, and so do I. I love it when a plan comes together. All together now -
Kum ba yah, my lord, Kum ba yah!
Kum ba yah, my lord, Kum ba yah!
Kum ba yah, my lord, Kum ba yah.
O Lord, Kum ba yah

Quote? Did you see quotation marks, or did you just want to see quotation marks?

No, not all that tragic, not at all. :rolleyes:

You’re claiming originality?

Of course, you want it to continue because you’re uninformed about what has come before, and that there are no grounds for it to continue. Basically, you’ve believed the lies RW media has been feeding you.

The posters above want it to continue, because it’s obvious that it’s nothing more than an attempt to sling mud on the backs of dead Americans. It’s sickening, and it shows how utterly bereft of thought, dignity and morals the GOP is. Any lie will do, if it convinces some poor dupe to pull the lever in November.

Great. It’s once again shown that Ol’ Hillary made it clear that it is the government’s job to figure out what happened.

It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator. Now, honestly, I will do my best to answer your questions about this, but

And Ol’ Hillary also said she would do her best to answer the Congressional Committee’s questions.

And they have. And if you don’t know that at this point, isn’t the fault of anyone else in this thread.

And she did. And she complied with the laws.

Whose else would it be? That comment makes no sense.

Questions about Benghazi, yes. And the committee found nothing that she hadn’t answered to their satisfaction about the attacks or their context (yes, that word again). The fact that the answers didn’t include something crippling to her Presidential aspirations does not mean they were not just what she said they’d be. Or that another round of the same questions would accomplish that goal.

Please proceed with proceeding. And do please proceed with that inane “Ol’ Hillary” stuff; it does lend the proper gravitas to a discussion of the tragedy of the four men’s deaths. :rolleyes:

Then Ol’ Hillary won’t have any reason not to answer all of the questions put to her by the Congressional Committee.

She did answer the questions. You’re saying she needs to give them emails that she legally deleted.

I’m saying, again, that Ol’ Hillary needs to answer all of the questions put to her by the Congressional Committee.

You may disagree with what I’ve actually said. You may disagree with what you think I’ve said. You may disagree that Ol’ Hillary needs to answer all of the questions put to her by the Congressional Committee. You may not believe in government transparency. Life goes on, and so does the Congressional investigation.

Question: Do you actually know there were previous Benghazi hearings where bi-partisan groups found nothing untoward, and in fact found that much of how RW media was reporting it was outright false?