# Hillary Clinton and Mysogyny

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hillary-clinton-and-mysogyny/975482>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [November 24, 2022, 7:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hillary-clinton-and-mysogyny/975482 "2022-11-24T07:37:10Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 11

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2022, 1:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hillary-clinton-and-mysogyny/975482/201 "2022-11-29T13:16:34Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Librarian](#):
>
> Show me an example of skillful spinning/politicking by Hillary’s campaign.

Can you show me your cogent political advice that you offered to Clinton’s campaign in summer 2016, instead of showing your ability to Monday quarterback in 2022?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JKellyMap](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jkellymap/32/15880_2.png) [@JKellyMap](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JKellyMap)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2022, 1:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hillary-clinton-and-mysogyny/975482/202 "2022-11-29T13:54:04Z")

</div>

> [@veryfrank](#):
>
> In brief so as not to derail this any more than is necessary, I’d guess Watergate.

Yes, and the same year of the Watergate break-in, the release of the _Free to Be You and Me_ album – even more directly influential (seriously) on then-young minds that women are as capable as men, and should be treated with respect.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BlankSlate](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/blankslate/32/80_2.png) [@BlankSlate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BlankSlate)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2022, 1:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hillary-clinton-and-mysogyny/975482/203 "2022-11-29T13:57:59Z")

</div>

Clinton lost for a lot of reasons, and sure, misogyny was one of them.

When was the last time a democrat won the White House after a two-term (or multi-term) democratic president? Harry Truman. It’s a hard road with a fickle electorate.

Why did we get Trump? The republicans ran two establishment guys, McCain and Romney, and they lost to a charismatic democrat. The lesson wasn’t run a better candidate, it was win at all costs. Eight years of peace and prosperity enraged the rubes simply because of who was in the WH. It was a backlash and yes, a whitelash. Being a far better qualified candidate really didn’t matter: see Al Gore.

The only reasonable conclusion is half of our country is batshit insane. They wanted vengeance, and they got it. They’re not motivated by the economy or international relations. Above all, they want non-whites and women kept in their place. Sure, they’re racist and misogynist, but far more problematic, they’re batshit insane. And were stuck with them.

The even bigger problem: the electoral college. Clinton should have coasted to victory, but we’re stuck with antiquated system that is the enemy of democracy. The ‘founding fathers’ were oh so brilliant, eh?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JRDelirious](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jrdelirious/32/9531_2.png) [@JRDelirious](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JRDelirious)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2022, 4:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hillary-clinton-and-mysogyny/975482/204 "2022-11-29T16:24:35Z")

</div>

> [@BlankSlate](#):
>
> we’re stuck with antiquated system that is the enemy of democracy. The ‘founding fathers’ were oh so brilliant

From their own writings, they did not _want_ democracy which they considered mob rule. We The People was We The Free White Male Educated Landowning Christian People.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eschereal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eschereal/32/18939_2.png) [@eschereal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/eschereal)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2022, 4:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hillary-clinton-and-mysogyny/975482/205 "2022-11-29T16:51:48Z")

</div>

> [@BlankSlate](#):
>
> Eight years of peace and prosperity enraged the rubes

The “prosperity” part was (is) rather circumstantially subjective. A vast fraction of the country were/are quite marginal, and it is almost trivial to manipulate their frustration into outright anger which then can be directed against their own best interests. The Chicago School has been working this hand for decades.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chefguy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chefguy/32/138_2.png) [@Chefguy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chefguy)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2022, 4:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hillary-clinton-and-mysogyny/975482/206 "2022-11-29T16:56:24Z")

</div>

I’ve seen Hillary on the campaign stage, on the book tour stage, and in person during a presidential visit in Africa. The difference between her campaign persona and her demeanor in the other two venues is really striking. Person-to-person, she is charming and personable, someone you’d like to be friends with. Same with her book tour presence. But her hard-core campaign persona can be off-putting, particularly in debates, and in the past her advisors have tried to convince her to take the edge off a bit and to inject more of her natural warmth into her delivery. Honestly, she seemed incapable of doing that, possibly because of all the attacks on her in the past. I think she would have been an outstanding president, just as she was an outstanding senator. I remember that election night vividly, as several of us were gathered together to celebrate our first woman in the White House. I will never forget the shock and disbelief as the results came in.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Acsenray](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/acsenray/32/4519_2.png) [@Acsenray](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Acsenray)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2022, 5:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hillary-clinton-and-mysogyny/975482/207 "2022-11-29T17:00:58Z")

</div>

> [@eschereal](#):
>
> The “prosperity” part was (is) rather circumstantially subjective. A vast fraction of the country were/are quite marginal, and it is almost trivial to manipulate their frustration into outright anger which then can be directed against their own best interests. The Chicago School has been working this hand for decades.

But it’s also true that affluent whites strongly supported Trump. It’s not that economic desperation drove them into his arms.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sylvanz](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/fbc32d/32.png) [@Sylvanz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sylvanz)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2022, 6:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hillary-clinton-and-mysogyny/975482/208 "2022-11-29T18:07:58Z")

</div>

Yep, I threw my phone across the room, and pulled the covers over my head. The memory gives me the creeps.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thorny\_locust](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thorny_locust/32/431_2.png) [@thorny\_locust](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/thorny_locust)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2022, 7:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hillary-clinton-and-mysogyny/975482/209 "2022-11-29T19:33:44Z")

</div>

I went to bed early, in order to keep a tiny bit of hope until the morning.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![peccavi](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/peccavi/32/388_2.png) [@peccavi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/peccavi)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2022, 7:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hillary-clinton-and-mysogyny/975482/210 "2022-11-29T19:55:24Z")

</div>

> [@Acsenray](#):
>
> But it’s also true that affluent whites strongly supported Trump. It’s not that economic desperation drove them into his arms.

I took a class in business negotiation once. It is a trait of many people that they will walk away from a profitable deal if another party would make a larger profit from the deal. They’d rather receive nothing if through taking the deal, the other party gets an “unfair” share.

In the case of the “affluent whites” it wasn’t enough that they prospered, they needed _those people_ to **not** prosper.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![k9bfriender](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/k9bfriender/32/3283_2.png) [@k9bfriender](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/k9bfriender)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2022, 8:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hillary-clinton-and-mysogyny/975482/211 "2022-11-29T20:15:45Z")

</div>

> [@peccavi](#):
>
> In the case of the “affluent whites” it wasn’t enough that they prospered, they needed _those people_ to **not** prosper.

I once asked my father if he would take $20 if it meant that someone else would get $20. He asked who it was. I assured him it would not be going to terrorists or criminal organizations, but other than that, he wouldn’t know.

He was adamant that he wouldn’t take the deal unless he knew who it was going to.

I finally said, “It’ll go to the Democratic Party.” He said, “In that case, no, I wouldn’t take the deal.” I said, “Fine with me, I guess I’m donating $40 to the Democratic Party.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Acsenray](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/acsenray/32/4519_2.png) [@Acsenray](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Acsenray)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2022, 8:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hillary-clinton-and-mysogyny/975482/212 "2022-11-29T20:18:11Z")

</div>

> [@k9bfriender](#):
>
> I finally said, “It’ll go to the Democratic Party.” He said, “In that case, no, I wouldn’t take the deal.” I said, “Fine with me, I guess I’m donating $40 to the Democratic Party.”

What did he say to that?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![k9bfriender](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/k9bfriender/32/3283_2.png) [@k9bfriender](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/k9bfriender)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2022, 8:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hillary-clinton-and-mysogyny/975482/213 "2022-11-29T20:22:11Z")

</div>

He thought it wasn’t fair as I didn’t say that was part of the deal. To be honest, I hadn’t thought of it when I first proposed the thought experiment, and came up with the idea of donating to an organization he would oppose, and donating the total of the offer to them in the event that he refused on the fly.

I simply said, “You said you wouldn’t take the money, so you don’t get to say how I should spend it.” And then we fumed in silence for most of the rest of the ride home.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BlankSlate](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/blankslate/32/80_2.png) [@BlankSlate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BlankSlate)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2022, 8:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hillary-clinton-and-mysogyny/975482/214 "2022-11-29T20:48:33Z")

</div>

I smoked a big fat blunt of really good weed and didn’t get high at all. Not a good night.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pleonast](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pleonast/32/1183_2.png) [@Pleonast](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pleonast)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2022, 8:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hillary-clinton-and-mysogyny/975482/215 "2022-11-29T20:55:17Z")

</div>

Lots of people _say_ their opinions about Hillary Clinton are not based on misogyny, but to hear them talk, it sure _feels_ misogynistic to me. They find nits that they don’t even look for in male politicians.

My shortcuts to figure out someone’s politics are simple. If they’re positive about Trump, they’re racist. If they’re negative about Hillary, they’re sexist. They’ll have to work to convince me otherwise. It’s not subtle, but it works well enough for me.

> [@Monty](#):
>
> It’s complete and utter bullshit that Ms. Clinton “fucked up” her campaign againt Tan the Conman. She won, she fucking won the popular election. That can’t happen if you’ve fucked campaign away. She ran a good campaign and the majority of voters agreed that she should be in the White House. Our asinine system is what put that asinine festering fistule of a traitor in office.

> [@Monty](#):
>
> Oh, and the absolute worst thing she had done–and this really sticks in the republicans’ craw–is that she actually practiced the Christianity they demand everyone, besides themselves of course, practice. She had the temerity, the gall to forgive someone who trespassed against her. And she’s a Democrat and a woman. Can’t be letting those commie dems get away with showing the pubbies up like that.

These posts succinctly describe my feelings as well.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![slicedalone](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/slicedalone/32/12515_2.png) [@slicedalone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/slicedalone)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2022, 9:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hillary-clinton-and-mysogyny/975482/216 "2022-11-29T21:00:17Z")

</div>

> [@JRDelirious](#):
>
> holding up her knowledge and experience could not dent the long-engineered antipathy among those who were listening to those messengers.

Also every campaign shared her problem to some degree–she had people in the other party demonizing her, making her out to be the worst person on the planet, the Devil herself. But so does every candidate, and to withdraw on that basis --“People hate me!!”-- is to indulge in the most self-pitying reason to drop out ever. If she did that, at any stage, the word would be “Only a woman would have paid the slightest attention to that crap.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![slicedalone](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/slicedalone/32/12515_2.png) [@slicedalone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/slicedalone)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2022, 9:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hillary-clinton-and-mysogyny/975482/217 "2022-11-29T21:03:14Z")

</div>

You know, to doubt that she lost due to misogyny on some serious level strikes me as one of the more misogynistic ideas of all.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2022, 9:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hillary-clinton-and-mysogyny/975482/218 "2022-11-29T21:13:30Z")

</div>

> [@Pleonast](#):
>
> If they’re negative about Hillary, they’re sexist. They’ll have to work to convince me otherwise. It’s not subtle, but it works well enough for me.

That’s remarkable. I’m negative about Hillary–and Bill, and Gore, and Kerry, and Obama, and Biden–for the same reason: they’re too conservative for my tastes. I’m positive about Warren and Ocasio-Cortez and Abrams and Sanders because they work to advance the leftist policies that I believe will make the world better. I think your test is entirely too unsubtle.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Acsenray](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/acsenray/32/4519_2.png) [@Acsenray](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Acsenray)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2022, 9:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hillary-clinton-and-mysogyny/975482/219 "2022-11-29T21:26:48Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> That’s remarkable.

It’s not remarkable to me at all. If someone says “I disagree with her on X, Y, and Z policy positions,” the that’s one thing.

That’s a disagreement. That’s not dislike, which usually implies something about that person’s personality and character, rather than just a disagreement over opinions.

And disliking a woman because of her personality or personal physical traits or mannerisms—especially along the lines of “I can’t put my finger on it, but she just rubs me the wrong way” or “her voice is annoying” or “she seems like a person that I wouldn’t like”— assuming that misogyny is involved makes perfect sense to me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2022, 9:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hillary-clinton-and-mysogyny/975482/220 "2022-11-29T21:29:23Z")

</div>

> [@Acsenray](#):
>
> It’s not remarkable to me at all. If someone says “I disagree with her on X, Y, and Z policy positions,” the that’s one thing.
> 
> That’s a disagreement. That’s not dislike, which usually implies something about that person’s personality and character, rather than just a disagreement over opinions.

I guess it depends on what being “negative about Hillary” means.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hillary-clinton-and-mysogyny/975482.md?page=10)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hillary-clinton-and-mysogyny/975482.md?page=12)
