# Hillary's coattails suck. Only Trump's are worse. Who would have been better? **URL:** \ **Category:** Politics & Elections\ **Created:** [October 26, 2016, 2:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hillarys-coattails-suck-only-trumps-are-worse-who-would-have-been-better/769774 "2016-10-26T14:54:17Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 72
**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\ **Post date:** [October 28, 2016, 4:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hillarys-coattails-suck-only-trumps-are-worse-who-would-have-been-better/769774/72 "2016-10-28T16:40:01Z")
> [@Damuri\_Ajashi](#): > > Do you know what’s in the speeches? No? Then how do you know its bogus? The stuff we’ve seen leaked so far hasn’t been doing her campaign any good. > > What she did with her emails at the State department would have gotten anyone else fired, some of those things were beyond foot faults or minor ethical breaches (particularly deleting emails (or wiping them with a cloth) after the subpoena). Nothing bogus about that. > > And since when does criticizing Hillary mean I’m not a Democrat? A significant minority of Democrats have an unfavorable view of her. Actually quite a bit of them have been leaked. Wikileaks has carefully combed them for the worst bits and released them. Two words.\* Ho\* and\* Hum.\* Actually the wikileaks doesnt seem to have hurt. Nope. I had to handle classified info myself. What she did would get here reprimanded and she would have had to retake training. Not nothing but not that big a deal. _Sure, during the Primary you support your favorite. But afterwards, you put your big boy pants on and support the Parties and People’s favorite- like Sanders did._ \*\*Right now, you are campaigning for Trump. \*\* Dont give me this “we” stuff. --- _[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hillarys-coattails-suck-only-trumps-are-worse-who-would-have-been-better/769774)._