I never said any such thing, and do not believe this. I don’t know where you got it, but it ain’t so.
I only said that if you allow yourself to interpolate evidence “between the lines” – Judas survived his hanging and went on to live for a few more days – then you can justify or prove or defend anything.
Jesus might have survived, been cut down, and lived a few more days. If one is a permitted interpolation, the other must also be.
These seems like problematic solutions; for the first, it would mean that we would also need to treat Luke’s and Mark’s totals at other times as not meant to be comprehensive, and so questionable. For the second, it’s a bigger problem; if gospel writers felt no big issue about referring to angels as merely “men”, then again, this is an approach we’d need to apply to the rest of their writing; that references to “men” may well have actually been to angels in human form, and moreover, that no specificity was seen as needed.