# "Hold it!" Your Favorite Photographers?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hold-it-your-favorite-photographers/103080>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [April 11, 2002, 7:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hold-it-your-favorite-photographers/103080 "2002-04-11T19:13:07Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Eve](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/9e8a1a/32.png) [@Eve](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Eve)\
**Post date:** [April 11, 2002, 7:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hold-it-your-favorite-photographers/103080/1 "2002-04-11T19:13:07Z")

</div>

I saw with great delight that Ruth Harriet Louise is FINALLY getting some recognition: a coffee-table book and a traveling exhibit. She was the only female studio photographer during the old Hollywood yeas, working at MGM from 1925–30. She took some of the most gorgeous photos of Joan Crawford, Greta Garbo, Ramon Novarro, Norma Shearer. She was much better—I think—than Clarence Sinclair Bull and George Hurrell, but no one remembers her. [http://www.sbmuseart.org/exhibition/upcoming.html](http://www.sbmuseart.org/exhibition/upcoming.html)

Also, Robert Mapplethorpe—his FLOWER photos, that is. Not that I have anything against his other photos, but . . . [http://www.postershop.com/Mapplethorpe-Robert/Mapplethorpe-Robert-Flowers-4203207.html](http://www.postershop.com/Mapplethorpe-Robert/Mapplethorpe-Robert-Flowers-4203207.html)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ShibbOleth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/848f3c/32.png) [@ShibbOleth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ShibbOleth)\
**Post date:** [April 11, 2002, 7:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hold-it-your-favorite-photographers/103080/2 "2002-04-11T19:24:04Z")

</div>

I lived in Cincinnati during the Mapplethorpe controversy. Everything else aside, he really was a brilliant photographer. His flowers, even in monochrome, were incredible. But his photo that had (and still has) it’s deepest impact on me was one of a young girl, about 7 years old, sitting on a step. She is wearing a sundress, but no panties. The photo is taken from below so that you can see her crotch.

This was one of the photos that the “authorities” in Cincinnati found pornographic. But for me this photo was a profound statement on the way we tend to objectify women in (real) pornography. I don’t believe it was salacious, although that is in the eye of the beholder, I suppose. The juxtaposition of such an innocent and the angle of the shot was genius.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/stoid/32/272_2.png) [@Stoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stoid)\
**Post date:** [April 11, 2002, 8:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hold-it-your-favorite-photographers/103080/3 "2002-04-11T20:14:15Z")

</div>

Richard Avedon

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Eve](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/9e8a1a/32.png) [@Eve](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Eve)\
**Post date:** [April 11, 2002, 8:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hold-it-your-favorite-photographers/103080/4 "2002-04-11T20:36:32Z")

</div>

I think Richard Avedon was (is) a brilliant FASHION photographer. But he is—aside from, perhaps, the insanely over-rated Annie Liebowitz—the WORST portrait photographer the profession has ever produed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![booklover](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/85f322/32.png) [@booklover](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/booklover)\
**Post date:** [April 11, 2002, 9:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hold-it-your-favorite-photographers/103080/5 "2002-04-11T21:05:58Z")

</div>

I’ve always enjoyed Edward Steichen. Darn it—there was a British photog whose worked showed up on Antiques Roadshow a while back who I keep meaning to look up–his name escapes me (maybe 1940s).

And I actually like some of Annie Leibovitz’s work (for instance, the series of her parents and of Keith Haring).

Not a single photographer, but the Family of Man book, which I discovered to my delight has a few companion volumes (Family of Woman, the World’s Family).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kase](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/a5b964/32.png) [@kase](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kase)\
**Post date:** [April 11, 2002, 9:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hold-it-your-favorite-photographers/103080/6 "2002-04-11T21:26:26Z")

</div>

Gay Block

[Anton Corbijn](http://www.corbijn.co.uk/photo_index.htm)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![voguevixen](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/b5ac83/32.png) [@voguevixen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/voguevixen)\
**Post date:** [April 11, 2002, 9:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hold-it-your-favorite-photographers/103080/7 "2002-04-11T21:59:44Z")

</div>

Dezo Hoffman, but I might just like the subject matter, heh heh.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fish\_in\_the\_sky](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/7ba0ec/32.png) [@fish\_in\_the\_sky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/fish_in_the_sky)\
**Post date:** [April 11, 2002, 10:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hold-it-your-favorite-photographers/103080/8 "2002-04-11T22:15:33Z")

</div>

I’ve always been fond of [Julia Margaret Cameron](http://www.masters-of-photography.com/C/cameron/cameron_mrs_herbert_duckworth.html) and [Imogen Cunningham](http://www.masters-of-photography.com/C/cunningham/cunningham_magnolia.html)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kamandi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/5daacb/32.png) [@Kamandi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kamandi)\
**Post date:** [April 11, 2002, 10:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hold-it-your-favorite-photographers/103080/9 "2002-04-11T22:54:05Z")

</div>

Being somewhat of a nature photographer myself, I’d be remiss in not nominating [Ansel Adams](http://www.anseladams.com/). An exhibit “[Ansel Adams at 100](http://www.anseladams.com/taag/webpage.cfm?WebPage_ID=234&DID=8)” is currently at the Art Institute of Chicago, and will tour Chicago, London, Berlin, Los Angeles and San Francisco through 2003.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nacho4Sara](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/3d9bf3/32.png) [@Nacho4Sara](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nacho4Sara)\
**Post date:** [April 12, 2002, 1:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hold-it-your-favorite-photographers/103080/10 "2002-04-12T01:56:26Z")

</div>

Irving Penn has always done it for me. I have two books: a collection of his still lifes and a career retrospective. I am begging everyone to get me his new nudes book, which has amazing photos he took in 1949, for my birthday. (There’s an exhibit in New York right now, but I don’t think I’ll make it).

I am not a photography buff; I have no interest in it as a hobby. But somehow I just seem to get Penn. His photos can be sensual, playful, or purposely artistic, but they all appeal to me, I think because I sense a clear representation of his personality in all of them. He is just an absolute genius in my eyes. So detailed and precise, but uncannily…I want to say open, loose, meaning he allows his subjects to be themselves, albeit stamped with his interpretation. His understanding of his subjects and his awareness of their unique qualities just astounds me. His precense in his photographs, which I think becomes truly clear when you see a lot of his work together, never overshadows what he is trying to say or show about his subject. Most of all, I think, is the sense that he appreciates what is unique. I don’t think it is hard to find beauty in Brad Pitt, as Ms. Leibowitz does, but Penn manages to glorify and celebrate an overweight, Rubenesque figure that most would consider ugly or grotesque.

I hope that made sense.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/stoid/32/272_2.png) [@Stoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stoid)\
**Post date:** [April 12, 2002, 3:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hold-it-your-favorite-photographers/103080/11 "2002-04-12T03:16:08Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Eve \*  
> \*\*I think Richard Avedon was (is) a brilliant FASHION photographer. But he is—aside from, perhaps, the insanely over-rated Annie Liebowitz—the WORST portrait photographer the profession has ever produed. \*\*

Well, now, Eve, I’m just gonna HAVE to DISAGREE with you there.

And because I’m too lazy to do so creatively, I’ll let others do it for me:

> [@](#):
>
> * * *
> 
> In PORTRAITS, Avedon shows how. . . a close look at the truth will set us free. If we want to see America redefined in terms of a particularly avid and distinctive sensibility, we need look no further."  
> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; John Russell, NEW YORK TIMES
> 
> “(But) Avedon is closer in his total work to Julia Margaret Cameron, the great Victorian. Like him, she was attracted to the rich and famous; also like him, she depicted them without remorse, leaving behind a superbly objective record of her subjects’ inner strengths and weaknesses. Avedon need not be ashamed if he does the same, in pursuit of a goal proper to photography–and long since beyond painting.”  
> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Douglas Davis, NEWSWEEK
> 
> \*\*

And finally…

> [@](#):
>
> * * *
> 
> “These (photographs of Jacob Israel Avedon) are not portraits of an individual but anatomies of aging, suffering and fear of death; they are almost unbearably painful. Avedon is the most conceptual of photographic portraitists–all his portraits express ideas about humanity rather than the particulars of personality. . . .”  
> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Janet Malcolm, THE NEW YORKER  
> \*\*

To which I say: Damn straight. It doesn’t get much better than that. He’s a serious and wildly talented artist whose portraits are \* real \* portraits, in that they portray something about the subject, not just a pretty picture of the subject.

Considering your choice (a glamour photographer), and the fact that you like Avedon’s fashion work but not the portraits, and Mapplethorpes flowers, I think it’s obvious you value conventional ideas of beauty in your photography, and there’s no question that Avedon’s portrait work is not at all about that. So if that’s what you like, then it makes sense you wouldn’t like Avedon. But that doesn’t make him a bad portrait photographer, it makes him a photographer you don’t like. Enormous difference.

And by the way, I think **Annie Leibovitz** is rated just as she oughta be. If for nothing else than her astonishing and perfect shot of [John and Yoko](http://images.amazon.com/images/P/0060923466.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg) which is now familiar to us, but is no less excellent for being so.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KarlGauss](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/karlgauss/32/3713_2.png) [@KarlGauss](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/KarlGauss)\
**Post date:** [April 12, 2002, 3:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hold-it-your-favorite-photographers/103080/12 "2002-04-12T03:20:38Z")

</div>

[Diane Arbus](http://masters-of-photography.com/A/arbus/arbus.html). Simply amazing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jodi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/7feea3/32.png) [@Jodi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jodi)\
**Post date:** [April 12, 2002, 3:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hold-it-your-favorite-photographers/103080/13 "2002-04-12T03:40:44Z")

</div>

Ansel Adams. As a child of the West, I absolutely love the way he captured the beauty of the half of the U.S. I consider my home. And there’s a whiff of regret in many of his works, because the beautiful places he photographed just don’t exist anymore, at least not as he shot them – they’ve become victims to Progress. And although my friends and I mock pretentious _artistes_ by saying in lock-jawed Bostonian accents – “Dahling, don’t you _love_ his use of light?” the truth is . . . I think A.A.'s use of light was amazing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thren0dy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/b19c9b/32.png) [@thren0dy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/thren0dy)\
**Post date:** [April 12, 2002, 4:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hold-it-your-favorite-photographers/103080/14 "2002-04-12T04:31:01Z")

</div>

Hard to choose just one, as in love as I am with photography . . .

Sally Mann.  
Diane Arbus.  
Mappelthorpe.  
Joel-Peter Witkin.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![El\_Elvis\_Rojo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/898d66/32.png) [@El\_Elvis\_Rojo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/El_Elvis_Rojo)\
**Post date:** [April 12, 2002, 10:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hold-it-your-favorite-photographers/103080/15 "2002-04-12T10:14:12Z")

</div>

Howard Schantz (although I’m sure I mispelled his name). I love his underwater work, that stuff is simply amazing. This is the guy who REALLY makes me wish I knew how to be a professional photographer.

Herb Ritts is another one of my favorite. All the Playboys I own are simply because he did the photography for the big “special guest photos.” Lame, huh?

I also really like Joyce Tennison. The cryptic, fuzzy portraits she takes are often just simply breathtaking.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fenris](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fenris/32/498_2.png) [@Fenris](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fenris)\
**Post date:** [April 12, 2002, 10:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hold-it-your-favorite-photographers/103080/16 "2002-04-12T10:15:21Z")

</div>

Harold “Doc” Edgerton:  
The guy who invented high-speed photography and had the artistic and athetic sensiblities to show us the beauty of events too quick to notice.

From his famous [milk-drop splash](http://www.agallery.com/edgerton.html) photograph, to his stunning picture of [a bursting balloon](http://web.mit.edu/edgerton/main.html)  
to his dramatic image of the first microsecond of [a nuclear explosion](http://www.cmp.ucr.edu/exhibitions/edgerton/edgerton.html) to the beauty of [url=“[http://www.eyestorm.com/find/AR6\_product.asp?sku=DED00990](http://www.eyestorm.com/find/AR6_product.asp?sku=DED00990)”]a pigeon in flight[/url}, Doc Edgerton is one of the unsung greats of photography.

Unfortunately, most of his on-line galleries have been taken down, so the images I linked are pretty small.

Fenris

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Eve](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/9e8a1a/32.png) [@Eve](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Eve)\
**Post date:** [April 12, 2002, 1:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hold-it-your-favorite-photographers/103080/17 "2002-04-12T13:12:52Z")

</div>

I must apologize to Stoid—I realized after I left last night that it was rather rude to dogpile her fave photog choice like that, this being a Polite Artistic Discussion.

I still feel, though, that Avedon’s portraits are deliberately vicious and ugly (Mercedes Ruehl is a FOAF, and I know she cried for a week after her Avedon portrait appeared in The New Yorker). As for Annie Liebowitz . . . I just think that a photographer should have SOME grasp of lighting and composition, which seem to be closed books to her. I also know she treats her assistants very shabbily, which makes me less charitable toward her.

I do agree hearily with the choices of Steichen, Cameron and Arbus, and I look forward to linking to some of the others I’m not as familiar with!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![El\_Kabong](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/el_kabong/32/496_2.png) [@El\_Kabong](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/El_Kabong)\
**Post date:** [April 12, 2002, 1:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hold-it-your-favorite-photographers/103080/18 "2002-04-12T13:49:47Z")

</div>

I lean towards the street photographers of the '40’s -70’s; Weegee, Robert Frank, Cartier-Bresson, Elliot Erwitt, Lee Friedlander…

Diane Arbus was great.

Dorothea Lange and Walker Evans, of course.

Recent photographers, Richard Billingham (_Ray’s a Laugh_), maybe.

Sandy Skodlund’s bizarre photographed installations.

I find Thomas Demand’s stuff pretty interesting.

I’m forgetting a whole bunch of others.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![El\_Kabong](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/el_kabong/32/496_2.png) [@El\_Kabong](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/El_Kabong)\
**Post date:** [April 12, 2002, 1:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hold-it-your-favorite-photographers/103080/19 "2002-04-12T13:52:40Z")

</div>

Er, Sandy Skoglund, actually.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![plnnr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/7ea924/32.png) [@plnnr](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/plnnr)\
**Post date:** [April 12, 2002, 2:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hold-it-your-favorite-photographers/103080/20 "2002-04-12T14:33:50Z")

</div>

I like the “warts and all” approach that Avedon takes, particularly given his usual subject matter.

Herb Ritts and Helmut Newton get my vote for the erotic, with Newton being the equivalent of a Jackie Collins novel - great trash.

Eudor Welty, beside being an author, was also something of an amateur photographer and her pictures, like her novels, are charming little slices of the South.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hold-it-your-favorite-photographers/103080.md?page=2)
