Hmm. As someone who knows very little about basball and even less about economics, I might have been swayed to your POV if you’d taken the time to explain. However, since you instead decided to be a pompous, condescending asshole, I guess I’ll just have to accept the OP’s description of the Cubs as evil.
EVVIIIILLL!!!
Sorry, change that to “I’ll have to accept the OP’s description of the Cubs as EVVIIIILLL!!!”
I apologize for any confusion my previous post may have caused.
Dumb question: when did they start revenue sharing in baseball? Does that mean the Reds will get some of the TRULY EVIL Yankees’ jack now?
They have for years. Revenue sharing went in with (I think the 1998 season. The Yankees may pay over $40 Million dollars this year.
See, that’s what I get for moving overseas in 1998. I missed all the good stuff. But at least I avoided Survivor, Who Wants to be a Millionaire and the Spice Girls’ 15 minutes.
On a separate note: then why is Carl Linder, who is anyway a billionaire (and banana mogul) being such a cheap prick about getting some pitching?
Because he likes profits rather than winning.
Pretty straightforward there, isn’t it?
Hey! This isn’t the Snappy Answers thread!
The $225 seats at Great American are the Diamond Club seats. Includes bar and grill, lounge, and other crap not having much to do with the game. For entertaining people not watching the baseball, basically.
Wow, that was classy. Thanks for dropping by.
I don’t think it was a decision.
No I got the point, but couldn’t give a rat’s patootie about the “coffers of Major League Baseball”. Many teams have been gaming the system for decades, it is about time the Cubbies did too. Other teams are free to set up similar schemes, except most of them can’t sell their tickets at face value. Only the teams that really have worked hard to put a good product out there can run this gambit. Does it bother me that the lazy Florida Marlins owner Jeffry Luria (who ruined the Expos, and ran a back office scheme to get the Marlins) doesn’t get some free $$, not at all.
Let the Red Sox, Cubs and Yankees et al of the world reap the advantage of actually trying to win.
Whoa, hold on a second. Worked hard to put a product out there? The Cubs? They live off selling out a tiny stadium. They don’t have a huge incentive to put out a quality product, because they know the fans will come regardless.
What other teams “game” the system to this extent?
They’ve been side-stepping the revenue sharing system for decades? Hasn’t it only been going since '98?
18 of the 30 clubs sold 2 million plus tickets last year.
And the Cubbies are trying to win?
Yankees for one. Any team which has worked out a sweet deal on regional cable TV. As MLB is an unincorporated association run by and for the owners, with a nice congressional anti-trust exemption in place, so all sorts of interesting book-keeping has gone on forever- so long the MLB idiots even tried to use their phony numbers on Congress- until Forbes magazine came out with much different numbers.
Here is a few fun cites:
http://www.forbes.com/free_forbes/2003/0428/064.html
and
http://www.angelfire.com/ok5/pearly/htmls/bush-sec5.html
http://cbs.sportsline.com/u/ce/multi/0,1329,5182192_52,00.html
http://msn.espn.go.com/mlb/news/2002/0329/1360060.html
and
From: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/baseball/news/2002/03/29/forbes_ap/
And in regards to the jokes about the Cubs-- underpants!