# Holy shit the chick in the consumertips.org ads on sdmb is hot as hell

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/holy-shit-the-chick-in-the-consumertips-org-ads-on-sdmb-is-hot-as-hell/539829>\
**Category:** Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share\
**Created:** [May 17, 2010, 10:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/holy-shit-the-chick-in-the-consumertips-org-ads-on-sdmb-is-hot-as-hell/539829 "2010-05-17T22:59:32Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Inner\_Stickler](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/inner_stickler/32/318_2.png) [@Inner\_Stickler](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Inner_Stickler)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2010, 12:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/holy-shit-the-chick-in-the-consumertips-org-ads-on-sdmb-is-hot-as-hell/539829/21 "2010-05-18T00:38:15Z")

</div>

I know I’m going to regret asking this but why do you think it is sheer hell to be a woman?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Autolycus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/22d042/32.png) [@Autolycus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Autolycus)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2010, 12:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/holy-shit-the-chick-in-the-consumertips-org-ads-on-sdmb-is-hot-as-hell/539829/22 "2010-05-18T00:39:26Z")

</div>

**AClockworkMelon** , your post is like a bizarro version of mine!

Covered in bees, sleeps  
With butterflies and it’s hell  
Hell being a man

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sparky\_1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/77aa72/32.png) [@sparky\_1](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sparky_1)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2010, 12:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/holy-shit-the-chick-in-the-consumertips-org-ads-on-sdmb-is-hot-as-hell/539829/23 "2010-05-18T00:41:35Z")

</div>

I was going to post this very thread a few hours ago.

She has a very good complexion, as seen in the topless pic provided by Google (that I accidentally clicked on, yeah, that’s it).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Beerman1963](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/2acd7d/32.png) [@Beerman1963](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Beerman1963)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2010, 12:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/holy-shit-the-chick-in-the-consumertips-org-ads-on-sdmb-is-hot-as-hell/539829/24 "2010-05-18T00:41:48Z")

</div>

Everyone please calm down let me end this debate by saying that they are both way way attractive. 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Bith\_Shuffle](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/ce73a5/32.png) [@The\_Bith\_Shuffle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Bith_Shuffle)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2010, 12:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/holy-shit-the-chick-in-the-consumertips-org-ads-on-sdmb-is-hot-as-hell/539829/25 "2010-05-18T00:42:00Z")

</div>

> [@Sleeps\_With\_Butterflies](#):
>
> Really? My comment thoroughly confounds you? Well, okay.
> 
> It must be hell to have it programmed in your psyche to have such a reaction to a halfway decent looking girl on the internet.\*
> 
> \*Of course women notice good looking men so let’s not have a dozen or so comments about how WOMEN DO IT TOO!!!11. I’m just surprised how often I see men talk about a “hot chick” in an ad, a commercial, etc etc.

This is a really silly comment, IMO. First, she is not “halfway decent looking”. And second, it is not “hell” to have a very positive reaction to an image of a gorgeous woman.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Covered\_In\_Bees](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/7ab992/32.png) [@Covered\_In\_Bees](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Covered_In_Bees)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2010, 12:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/holy-shit-the-chick-in-the-consumertips-org-ads-on-sdmb-is-hot-as-hell/539829/26 "2010-05-18T00:43:23Z")

</div>

> [@sparky\_1](#):
>
> I was going to post this very thread a few hours ago.
> 
> She has a very good complexion, as seen in the topless pic provided by Google (that I accidentally clicked on, yeah, that’s it).

When I accidentally clicked on that picture I got a malware warning, did you not?

And yes I said she was meh, but as far as I could tell, her boobies were far nicer to look at than her face.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FloatyGimpy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/floatygimpy/32/7750_2.png) [@FloatyGimpy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FloatyGimpy)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2010, 12:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/holy-shit-the-chick-in-the-consumertips-org-ads-on-sdmb-is-hot-as-hell/539829/27 "2010-05-18T00:43:40Z")

</div>

> [@Slithy\_Tove](#):
>
> [and this is what her husband looks like](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Jamel_Debbouze_C%C3%A9sars.jpg)

ew

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Amblydoper](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/fbc32d/32.png) [@Amblydoper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Amblydoper)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2010, 12:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/holy-shit-the-chick-in-the-consumertips-org-ads-on-sdmb-is-hot-as-hell/539829/28 "2010-05-18T00:43:41Z")

</div>

> [@Covered\_In\_Bees](#):
>
> As I said, the woman the OP is talking about is definitely meh.
> 
> But what if we were talking about an [_actually_ attractive female](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14Kv-KYpD10&feature=PlayList&p=7883EA26AF5F40EC&playnext_from=PL&index=19)?
> 
> Yes, I mostly am posting so I can link to that commercial. That girl, damn! I won’t even make it to my bunk before giving in to temptation! 😛

Agreed. She is a solid 10. the girl in the OP’s advertisement is just an average 7, maybe 7.5.

… And girls don’t need an online college to go to class in their PJs. I’ve seen plenty of chicks in PJs for 8am classes. they usually don’t smell pretty.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sleeps\_With\_Butterflies](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/bb73d2/32.png) [@Sleeps\_With\_Butterflies](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sleeps_With_Butterflies)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2010, 12:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/holy-shit-the-chick-in-the-consumertips-org-ads-on-sdmb-is-hot-as-hell/539829/29 "2010-05-18T00:52:54Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Bith\_Shuffle](#):
>
> This is a really silly comment, IMO. First, she is not “halfway decent looking”. And second, it is not “hell” to have a very positive reaction to an image of a gorgeous woman.

You really think that everyone thinks she’s a gorgeous woman? Talk about a silly comment! There’s this thing called opinions and they vary. What’s sad to me is that you think the OP making a post on a messageboard to declare how hot she is from seeing one picture of her in an advertisement is a positive reaction.

Thank you, your comment has made this whole thread worthwhile.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Inner\_Stickler](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/inner_stickler/32/318_2.png) [@Inner\_Stickler](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Inner_Stickler)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2010, 12:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/holy-shit-the-chick-in-the-consumertips-org-ads-on-sdmb-is-hot-as-hell/539829/30 "2010-05-18T00:53:33Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Bith\_Shuffle](#):
>
> This is a really silly comment, IMO. First, she is not “halfway decent looking”. And second, it is not “hell” to have a very positive reaction to an image of a gorgeous woman.

This is a really silly thread, IMO.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![armedmonkey](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/d6d6ee/32.png) [@armedmonkey](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/armedmonkey)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2010, 12:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/holy-shit-the-chick-in-the-consumertips-org-ads-on-sdmb-is-hot-as-hell/539829/31 "2010-05-18T00:53:35Z")

</div>

> [@Amblydoper](#):
>
> Agreed. She is a solid 10. the girl in the OP’s advertisement is just an average 7, maybe 7.5.

No, the chick in the college commercial just looks like she’s ten… as in ten years of age. The chick in the OP looks like a woman. Maybe it’s just me, but I’m not all that attracted to teenagers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sleeps\_With\_Butterflies](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/bb73d2/32.png) [@Sleeps\_With\_Butterflies](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sleeps_With_Butterflies)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2010, 12:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/holy-shit-the-chick-in-the-consumertips-org-ads-on-sdmb-is-hot-as-hell/539829/32 "2010-05-18T00:55:54Z")

</div>

> [@Covered\_In\_Bees](#):
>
> As I said, the woman the OP is talking about is definitely meh.
> 
> But what if we were talking about an [_actually_ attractive female](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14Kv-KYpD10&feature=PlayList&p=7883EA26AF5F40EC&playnext_from=PL&index=19)?
> 
> Yes, I mostly am posting so I can link to that commercial. That girl, damn! I won’t even make it to my bunk before giving in to temptation! 😛

She’s much prettier, IMHO. For a second or two I was taken aback because she looks _a lot_ like a girl I know.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Covered\_In\_Bees](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/7ab992/32.png) [@Covered\_In\_Bees](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Covered_In_Bees)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2010, 12:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/holy-shit-the-chick-in-the-consumertips-org-ads-on-sdmb-is-hot-as-hell/539829/33 "2010-05-18T00:56:29Z")

</div>

> [@A Monkey With a Gun](#):
>
> No, the chick in the college commercial just looks like she’s ten… as in ten years of age. The chick in the OP looks like a woman. Maybe it’s just me, but I’m not all that attracted to teenagers.

Good, you keep your monkey and your gun away from her then. Go run along with your plain Jane barbie doll.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/zoid/32/336_2.png) [@zoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/zoid)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2010, 1:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/holy-shit-the-chick-in-the-consumertips-org-ads-on-sdmb-is-hot-as-hell/539829/34 "2010-05-18T01:09:50Z")

</div>

> [@Covered\_In\_Bees](#):
>
> As I said, the woman the OP is talking about is definitely meh.
> 
> But what if we were talking about an [_actually_ attractive female](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14Kv-KYpD10&feature=PlayList&p=7883EA26AF5F40EC&playnext_from=PL&index=19)?
> 
> Yes, I mostly am posting so I can link to that commercial. That girl, damn! I won’t even make it to my bunk before giving in to temptation! 😛

Your original comment was a bit out of left field.  
Why would it be hell to find someone attractive?

Actually **this** comment thoroughly confounds me.  
The girl in your link is WAY to young. I’d feel creepy oogling her.  
And when she grows up she’ll be a solid 5. 6 at best.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ostrya](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/35a633/32.png) [@Ostrya](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ostrya)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2010, 1:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/holy-shit-the-chick-in-the-consumertips-org-ads-on-sdmb-is-hot-as-hell/539829/35 "2010-05-18T01:37:54Z")

</div>

OMG, **Sailboat** , you are totally my hero! And you too, **Cubsfan** for starting this thread. Holy sjhit!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ostrya](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/35a633/32.png) [@Ostrya](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ostrya)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2010, 1:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/holy-shit-the-chick-in-the-consumertips-org-ads-on-sdmb-is-hot-as-hell/539829/36 "2010-05-18T01:44:14Z")

</div>

I just attempted to click on a pic which then prompted the message - \* “Warning: this website might harm your computer”\* …and I thought for a second, “do I want to see this woman running on the beach topless? or possibly need to replace my computer?” (I mean, I can get another one just like this one at walmart, right?)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AHunter3](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ahunter3/32/368_2.png) [@AHunter3](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AHunter3)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2010, 2:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/holy-shit-the-chick-in-the-consumertips-org-ads-on-sdmb-is-hot-as-hell/539829/37 "2010-05-18T02:45:40Z")

</div>

> [@Sleeps\_With\_Butterflies](#):
>
> Really? My comment thoroughly confounds you? Well, okay.
> 
> It must be hell to have it programmed in your psyche to have such a reaction to a halfway decent looking girl on the internet.\*

(\* or off of it and/or anywhere you can see them.)

YES IT IS, actually, now that you mention it. Stupid male sexuality.

Yeah seriously. I don’t see how I benefit from finding someone yummy based on what they look like. Unless the people I find yummy based on what they look like were as inclined as not to have sex with me because I, a total stranger, fund them to be quite yummy to look at. Which is not the case, experience has shown them to be thoroughly uninclined to do anything of the sort, and actually tend to find expressions of such interest from total strangers to be annoying and creepy.

Some would say “well you need to get to know this person, THEN you can move on her”, or something to that general effect. But I have no reason to think she’s the kind of person I want to get to know, all I know about her is that she looks totally yummy. Pardon me, but that is NOT a good reason to get to know someone! It has NOTHING to do with what she’s like.

I don’t know who designed male sexuality but it must’ve been on a hungover Monday.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Arrendajo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/e0b2c6/32.png) [@Arrendajo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Arrendajo)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2010, 4:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/holy-shit-the-chick-in-the-consumertips-org-ads-on-sdmb-is-hot-as-hell/539829/38 "2010-05-18T04:56:40Z")

</div>

> [@Sailboat](#):
>
> Quail before my mighty Google-Fu!  
> [Melissa Theuriau](http://www.google.com/images?hl=en&source=imghp&q=Melissa+Theuriau&gbv=2&aq=f&aqi=g2&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=)

Meh - she’s not as good looking as my Peruvian mistress.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elelle](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/f0a364/32.png) [@elelle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elelle)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2010, 5:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/holy-shit-the-chick-in-the-consumertips-org-ads-on-sdmb-is-hot-as-hell/539829/39 "2010-05-18T05:04:29Z")

</div>

I don’t need any, umm, “seed refreshing”, but wonder, what’s the scoop on the IPads here? Deal or Dud?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![toofs](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/4491bb/32.png) [@toofs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/toofs)\
**Post date:** [May 18, 2010, 6:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/holy-shit-the-chick-in-the-consumertips-org-ads-on-sdmb-is-hot-as-hell/539829/40 "2010-05-18T06:29:12Z")

</div>

> [@Arrendajo](#):
>
> Meh - she’s not as good looking as my Peruvian mistress.

Pics, dude.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/holy-shit-the-chick-in-the-consumertips-org-ads-on-sdmb-is-hot-as-hell/539829.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/holy-shit-the-chick-in-the-consumertips-org-ads-on-sdmb-is-hot-as-hell/539829.md?page=3)
