# Home library catalog(ue)s

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/home-library-catalog-ue-s/526929>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [January 29, 2010, 7:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/home-library-catalog-ue-s/526929 "2010-01-29T19:18:44Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 11\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Giles](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/giles/32/60_2.png) [@Giles](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Giles)\
**Post date:** [January 29, 2010, 7:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/home-library-catalog-ue-s/526929/1 "2010-01-29T19:18:44Z")

</div>

Has anyone here used one of those sites that you can use to catalogue your home library? I’m aware of three:  
[Library Thing](http://www.librarything.com/)  
[Goodreads](http://www.goodreads.com/)  
[Shelfari](http://www.shelfari.com/)

Of those, I used Library Thing for a while, until it made a mess of a file of ISBNs that I gave it, and I couldn’t be bothered to go through sorting out the mess. But, if you don’t try to over-automate the process, it seems to work well.

Have any dopers used any of these, or anything similar? Any pros or cons, or other general advice?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![steadierfooting](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/43a26b/32.png) [@steadierfooting](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/steadierfooting)\
**Post date:** [January 29, 2010, 8:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/home-library-catalog-ue-s/526929/2 "2010-01-29T20:08:19Z")

</div>

I use Library Thing, but only log in about 2x a year. I mainly use it to find people who overlap a large percentage of books I’ve read to see if there are any similar books to read.

Oh, and I maintain my own list of all the books I’ve read since 1999. So that’s why I use it infrequently.

Overall when it comes to books, I’m interested in keeping track of

1. names of books - so I won’t read the same book unintentionally.
2. year book was read - so I can trend how many books a year I’ve read
3. short description - so I can remind myself of things I didn’t like. It’s also useful for when a friend asks me for a recommendation I can read some of the titles and think if they would enjoy it. I go to the library a lot so I can’t just consult a bookshelf.

I think the advantage of librarything that my own list does not directly list is:

1. as i’ve said, recommendations based on readers with similar interests
2. quickly searching of books by your favorite authors that you have not read. I’ve read about 2/3 of Kurt Vonneguts books but have trouble remembering which ones.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kayT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kayt/32/3633_2.png) [@kayT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kayT)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2010, 5:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/home-library-catalog-ue-s/526929/3 "2010-02-05T05:45:47Z")

</div>

I too need lists to keep from buying multiple copies of books. I wonder if anyone has a recommendation for a database software (free) to use or a format in Excel? or how to organize this list. I see software that does these things but it’s more complex than I need. I used to use a really basic database program called I think PCFiler (not sure of that one) long ago and it was great, very simple to use. I once tried to look at Microsoft Access? oooh how horrible that was. A free or cheap basic database program would work for me; suggestions?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nava](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/da6949/32.png) [@Nava](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nava)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2010, 8:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/home-library-catalog-ue-s/526929/4 "2010-02-05T08:09:31Z")

</div>

We just made lists in Excel, to organize Mom’s library.

I don’t have the file here, but it was:

1. One sheet per room, plus we may make a temporary “global” one occasionally. We save the file with the rooms separated, though.
2. Each line is something like:  
Room-Location within room-Author-Title-Editorial-Collection-Number within Collection

We didn’t bother with ISBN or any of that. As of last count she had managed to stay below 4K books. When I started the list, she thought she had “about 2K:” nope, turned out to be more than 3K.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bibliophage](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bibliophage/32/7615_2.png) [@bibliophage](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bibliophage)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2010, 3:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/home-library-catalog-ue-s/526929/5 "2010-02-05T15:02:52Z")

</div>

I’ve been very happy with Library Thing. It made it a snap to arrange all my non-fiction books (close to a thousand of them) by the Library of Congress cataloging system. No more hunting around for books for a half hour because I can’t remember where I shelved them under my previous idiosyncratic system. I don’t often need it any more, but I downloaded a copy of my catalog to my Kindle to help with the hardest-to-find titles.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Giles](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/giles/32/60_2.png) [@Giles](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Giles)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2010, 3:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/home-library-catalog-ue-s/526929/6 "2010-02-05T15:12:24Z")

</div>

Thanks for the replies. It looks like most dopers either don’t have many thousands of books, or have a photographic memory so that they don’t need to catalogue them 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![breaking-reality](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/a8b319/32.png) [@breaking-reality](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/breaking-reality)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2010, 6:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/home-library-catalog-ue-s/526929/7 "2010-02-05T18:44:49Z")

</div>

I’ve used Library Thing but found that I like Goodreads, better, so I use that far more often. I have cataloged the books I own, books I’ve read, and books I want to read, which is quite an extensive list at the moment.

I like Goodreads because it’s more user friendly (for me anyway) to have lists, read reviews, rate books, and connect with other readers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Maeglin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/8baadc/32.png) [@Maeglin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Maeglin)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2010, 6:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/home-library-catalog-ue-s/526929/8 "2010-02-05T18:56:29Z")

</div>

> [@Giles](#):
>
> Thanks for the replies. It looks like most dopers either don’t have many thousands of books, or have a photographic memory so that they don’t need to catalogue them 🙂

You are excluding the most obvious alternative:

“Fuck, I could have **sworn** I had that book around here somewhere!”

Perhaps that’s just me, though. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2010, 7:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/home-library-catalog-ue-s/526929/9 "2010-02-05T19:39:10Z")

</div>

I joined Library Thing back when it was still beta testing. But I admit I never made a good effort to keep my list updated.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kelly5078](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/6f9a4e/32.png) [@kelly5078](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kelly5078)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2010, 8:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/home-library-catalog-ue-s/526929/10 "2010-02-05T20:00:46Z")

</div>

Having a library catalog is absolutely useless if you can’t find the book.

We can never find the bloody book.

My wife is a librarian.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Voyager](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voyager/32/133_2.png) [@Voyager](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Voyager)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2010, 8:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/home-library-catalog-ue-s/526929/11 "2010-02-05T20:25:00Z")

</div>

> [@Giles](#):
>
> Thanks for the replies. It looks like most dopers either don’t have many thousands of books, or have a photographic memory so that they don’t need to catalogue them 🙂

My photographic memory got overexposed about 30 years ago. 🙂

I started using the Star Office Database, version 5, but they have changed it around so much as to be unusable. None of the library oriented ones work for me since half my collection is magazines. I finally decided to just use a spreadsheet, which is excellent for my magazines, since I can cut and paste the information for years worth of runs in a few seconds, and then just check to see if the publisher screwed up the numbering.  
I have no trouble finding stuff on my shelves, my problem is remembering whether or not I own something I haven’t read yet.

Another advantage of the spreadsheet format is that I can write Perl scripts after I’m done entering stuff to build want lists. I can also move it to the web, where I can check what I’m missing using my Droid. That’s the ultimate.
