$700k+ (so the reserve is probably around 750k) for a place that’s unliveable as-is. In my neighbourhood 400k will get you a 2 bedroom townhouse, a nice 2 bedroom apartment, or maybe a fixer-upper 2 bedroom house with no carpark and no backyard.
Rents are going up too, so lots of renters who are trying to save for a house deposit are getting shafted twice.
Some of my co-workers panicked and bought “just to get into something.” One bought a condo conversion and is having a number of problems she can’t get the builder to fix; plus the builder can’t seem to sell the rest of the condos so is dropping the price. Which means, of course, that she’s watching the “value” of her condo dropping.
Another interesting problem - for the people who bought starter homes in southern California when prices were only moderately insane - what do you do if you want to move up to better housing? There’s that increase in the value of what you bought - but the better stuff has gone way up in price too. Factor in the real estate agent’s commission and there’s a question of whether you’d be able to afford something equivalent to what you have now.
Same potential problem come retirement, if you want to stay in the area.
That home “investment” might not seem so sweet if you’re locked into it.
Ho do young, first time buyers do it, anyway? The average home price in America is $339,000. So if you avoid risky, no down, variable rate loans and stick to a straight, 30 year fixed rate mortage with 20% down, that’s over $65,000 in cash, not including closing costs. How long does it take new college graduates, with education loans to repay, to save that kind of down payment? I am amazed anyone under the age of 40 can buy a house at all.
Agreed. Before people jump up and down because their house is worth “3 X what we paid for it!” that will only really pay off if they move and start renting again or move to another lower priced market. They forget that prices are relative and while their house went up 3x it’s value so did everbody elses. And I’m not sure why people think equity = free money? Equity is more like collateral for loans that you still have to pay back and still have to pay interest on (and note the interest is tax “deductable”, not tax “refundable”, big difference) and again equity is only worth something when you either cash out a house or move to a lower valued market.
Well, as a young, potential first-time buyer (hopefully not in a place like California, though) I am hoping that the subprime market will completely collapse, causing a ton of foreclosures and flooding the market. Of course, I don’t have any loans to pay (aside from a small amount of credit card debt which I can clear or almost clear by the time I’m out of grad school), meaning that any money I make in a job can go into saving for said 20% down payment.
Well, you’re looking at the AVERAGE price. That means at least half of all homes are selling below that price. Here in Metro Detroit, you can get a nice starter home for less than 150K if you shop well.
No downpayment loans might be risky, but there are a slew of low-down loans (5%) that are not bad at all. Sure, you pay PMI for a while, but that’s better than trying to come up with a 30K downpayment while still slogging through college debt.
If there were three homes on the market, 100K, 200K and $1.2M, the median price is $200K and the average price is $500K.
Very important in understanding income numbers, since an increase in average income might be the result of the rich getting richer, while a rise in median income might well be better for Joe Average.
Well, reading the article, it appears it was misquoted anyhow, the median price is 239,000 not 339,000. But it is the MEDIAN price, not the MEAN price, as you are speaking about. Mean and median are both regularly used to represent averages, which is why it’s important to ask which one is being used in your discussion.
Quibble all you wish, for a $239,000 home you would still need $47,800 for a 20% down payment. How long would it take the average (mean, median or mode) new college graduate to save that much, while paying back college loans, plus rent and monthy expenses?
Also I’m sure population plays a huge role. We have twice the population in L.A. that we had a generation ago, and everyone still wants to live as close to the water as possible. Which is understandable, because that still seems to be where most of the jobs are, meaning shorter commutes, it’s where almost all the worthwhile attractions and cultural resources are, and anything that makes living in SoCal worthwhile beyond not having to shovel snow in February. Nobody wants to live inland, and they only do it so they can afford houses, it seems. Some wag once mocked that the only thing ‘imperial’ about the Inland Empire is Dairy Queen and Burger King. And I still need to be convinced he was wrong.
I’ll just choose $45K as an average, which is a bit high, and assumes an even division of majors, but I’ll assume no raises to make up for it. Double it to $90K, because no single 20-something college graduate needs to own his own house. No reason a couple of college graduates couldn’t save $10K a year on that income without too much trouble, which puts a house 5 years away. If they were really motivated, I’m sure they could do it in 3.
Pah. You couldn’t pay me to live in LA County, much less the city. I’ll take the Inland Empire any day (you can keep San Bernardino of course. That city is a cesspool.). It’s a pain to drive in to Dodger Stadium, this is true. But the Quakes are 30 minutes away, and cost 1/10 the price of decent seats in Chavez Ravine.
Right, and they can show very different things, as I demonstrated. Around here, most reporters use either indiscriminately. They get the numbers from people who understand the difference, but the reporters themselves don’t seem to. It wouldn’t surprise me at all if your source used average incorrectly - and my statistics book equates average and arithmetic mean.
Your absolutely right. And with a 4-year degree you graduate around 22-23 years old. Five years after that your 27-28 years old. Get married, buy a house, and start a family in your 30’s.
I don’t know how young people who get married when they’re 21 and have 2 kids immediately can make it these days. Seems like they’d be stuck in a hole they could never dig out of.