# Housing prices:Who the hell is buying all these houses anyway?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/housing-prices-who-the-hell-is-buying-all-these-houses-anyway/301871>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [April 30, 2005, 5:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/housing-prices-who-the-hell-is-buying-all-these-houses-anyway/301871 "2005-04-30T17:30:09Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jpeg\_Jones](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/4bbf92/32.png) [@Jpeg\_Jones](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jpeg_Jones)\
**Post date:** [May 2, 2005, 9:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/housing-prices-who-the-hell-is-buying-all-these-houses-anyway/301871/41 "2005-05-02T21:14:08Z")

</div>

> [@Metacom](#):
>
> Also, I’m surprised that you’d list modulars–what region are you in? Around here, nearly all the available lots have deed restrictions that specify site-built homes.

GAAAHHHH!

Modulars ARE NOT MOBILE HOMES! They are built to the same code as site-built homes. They just happen to built off-site and assembled later onto a permanent foundation.

In fact, there are pretty good arguments that they’re even better than site-built. And if you custom-design your own, you can be sure it won’t _look_ like a double wide too.

They’re built in factories, where they won’t get rained on in the framing stage. They have to be extra-tough and reinforced to withstand the road trip. The construction is well-supervised and often built to higher standards than your typical site-built spec home.

Nevertheless, there’s a lot of negative bias towards modulars just because “it came in on a truck”.

I’m building one right now in Los Angeles. Even though my loan-to-value is just fine, it could be even better if that negative bias would evaporate.

I’m spending $300k on a house that will appraise for $380. The appraiser handicapped our value by $55,000 just because it’s not site-built. That means it really _should_ appraise for $425,000.

Anyway, ranting aside, it’s the only way I could get my family in on the housing market. There’s no way we could afford an existing home.

By the way, the factory is building our 4 modules for about $65/sf, and we’re going to put a lot of our own sweat into the finish work.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Debaser](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/3da27b/32.png) [@Debaser](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Debaser)\
**Post date:** [May 2, 2005, 9:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/housing-prices-who-the-hell-is-buying-all-these-houses-anyway/301871/42 "2005-05-02T21:24:18Z")

</div>

Good luck, **jpeg**. Watch out for those subcontractors. They’ll eat you alive if you let 'em. You’re 100% right about modulars, BTW. They are better in many respects. I’m very pleased with my new project.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ChockFullOfHeadyGoodness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chockfullofheadygoodness/32/511_2.png) [@ChockFullOfHeadyGoodness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ChockFullOfHeadyGoodness)\
**Post date:** [May 2, 2005, 9:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/housing-prices-who-the-hell-is-buying-all-these-houses-anyway/301871/43 "2005-05-02T21:41:11Z")

</div>

> [@ITR champion](#):
>
> Just out of curiosity, does anyone have any data on how many of the loans being given out these days are interest-only, as opposed to traditional 20-80?

This [newspaper article](http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-afford3apr03,0,4296610.story?coll=la-home-headlines) claims that in 2004, 48% of the loans in California and 33% nationwide were interest-only. That’s up from 2% in 2001.  
This article makes the case that the price increases are driven by the easier to obtain loans.

> [@Los Angeles Times](#):
>
> “If you can fog a mirror, you can get a home loan,” said mortgage analyst

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![minty\_green](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f6c823/32.png) [@minty\_green](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/minty_green)\
**Post date:** [May 2, 2005, 10:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/housing-prices-who-the-hell-is-buying-all-these-houses-anyway/301871/44 "2005-05-02T22:30:27Z")

</div>

> [@LouisB](#):
>
> I bought a tract house in Plano, TX back in 1962 for $14.5K; I wonder what it would go for now?

If you remember the address, you can find out its appraised tax value [right here](http://www.collincad.org/search.php).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sam\_Stone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecccb3/32.png) [@Sam\_Stone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sam_Stone)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2005, 4:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/housing-prices-who-the-hell-is-buying-all-these-houses-anyway/301871/45 "2005-05-03T04:12:52Z")

</div>

While there is no doubt that a real-estate bubble exists in some places, it’s by no means universal.

For example, [Here’s what $200,000 will get you in Edmonton](http://www.mls.ca/PropertyDetails.aspx?vd=&SearchURL=%3fPage%3d7%26Mode%3d0%26vs%3d1%26rlt%3d%26cp%3d%26pt%3d20%26mp%3d175000-225000-0%26mrt%3d-1-0-0%26Beds%3d0-0%26Baths%3d0-0%26f%3d%26ft%3dall%26o%3dA%26of%3d1%26ps%3d10%26ptgid%3d1%26aid%3d6394%26MapURL%3d%253fAreaID%253d6394&Mode=0&PropertyID=3531740). That’s Canadian dollars - about $160,000 US.

[$300K gets you something like this](http://www.mls.ca/PropertyDetails.aspx?vd=&SearchURL=%3fPage%3d3%26Mode%3d0%26vs%3d1%26rlt%3d%26cp%3d%26pt%3d0%26mp%3d275000-325000-0%26mrt%3d-1-0-0%26Beds%3d0-0%26Baths%3d0-0%26f%3d%26ft%3dall%26o%3dA%26of%3d1%26ps%3d10%26ptgid%3d1%26aid%3d6394%26MapURL%3d%253fAreaID%253d6394&Mode=0&PropertyID=3530386)

[$400K](http://www.mls.ca/PropertyDetails.aspx?vd=&SearchURL=%3fMode%3d0%26Page%3d1%26vs%3d1%26rlt%3d%26cp%3d%26pt%3d0%26mp%3d375000-425000-0%26mrt%3d-1-0-0%26Beds%3d0-0%26Baths%3d0-0%26f%3d%26ft%3dall%26o%3dA%26of%3d1%26ps%3d10%26ptgid%3d1%26aid%3d6394%26MapURL%3d%253fAreaID%253d6394&Mode=0&PropertyID=3528363)

While real-estate has gone up over 20% in the past three years, it’s still quite affordable. With interest rates being as low as they are, it’s more affordable to own a house now than at any time in the past 20 years. That’s why home sales are skyrocketing. This is not necessarily a bad thing, even if people are borrowing. Look at it this way: At a time when the country has low-cost money available, people are choosing to take advantage of it by building homes, which improve the infrastructure. These homes will last 50-100 years. They increase the aggregate wealth of the country. Perhaps a home-buying spree was exactly the right thing for the ccountry to do at this point in time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![manhattan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/manhattan/32/7_2.png) [@manhattan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/manhattan)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2005, 4:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/housing-prices-who-the-hell-is-buying-all-these-houses-anyway/301871/46 "2005-05-03T04:36:47Z")

</div>

> [@ChockFullOfHeadyGoodness](#):
>
> This [newspaper article](http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-afford3apr03,0,4296610.story?coll=la-home-headlines) claims that in 2004, 48% of the loans in California and 33% nationwide were interest-only. That’s up from 2% in 2001.

I’m still trying to nail down that stat. The Wall Street Journal estimated it at 10-15% of new home loans and the Mortgage Banker’s Association is using a figure of about 2% of _all_ mortgages, which would translate to something like 5-7% of all purchases and a slightly higher percentage of all first-time purchases. So while the LA Times is on the high side of the estimates I’ve seen, candidly I don’t know who to believe just yet – for all I know they may be low. I will say that ARMs generally are still increasing, something not usual for this point in the interest rate cycle.

> [@](#):
>
> This article makes the case that the price increases are driven by the easier to obtain loans.

Well, it says that, and that’s undoubtedly part of it, but not all. There are a lot of other factors, including increasing willingness on the part of buyers to dedicate a large stream of their incomes to home ownership.

People want to own homes. In particular, people who might have accumulated some money in a 401-K and seen it shrink might want to own a home. Also, in areas like California, Florida and Texas we’re seeing that immigrants want to own their own homes more quickly than prior waves of immigrants did. There’s a lot more going on here than the sudden availability to moderate-income people of a product previously reserved for the rich.

So: The answer to the OP? Well, a lot of them are record numbers of first-time home buyers along with the standard crew of move-ups, empty-nesters, etc. The percentage of American households who own their own homes is over 69%, a record. Innovative products and lower credit standards are a not-small part of what drives the increase, but also contributing are the increased uncertaintly in financial markets (making home ownership seem more attractive by comparision), decreased availability of non-mortagage deductions among AMT payers, higher personal incomes, the desire for security in an uncertain world and, frankly, some panic on missing out on a seemingly good thing.

Another batch is speculators or investors, or both, depending on how you classify them. The percentage of homes sold for investment purposes rather than inhabitance purpose is up to 9% from 6% last year. It’s getting to the point where in some areas some homebuilders are requiring buyers to certify that they are not investors and that they intend to actually live in the homes they are buying.

Still another batch is second-home buyers. These buyers might also reasonably be described as investors (none of them is thinking “Sure, that shore house is going to be worth a lot less later, but what the hell”), but they’re distinct from the guys in the last paragraph in that they do not intend to “flip” the house (sell it quickly) or realize meaningful rental income during their holding periods. I’m still trying to get the numbers on this for you. Keep in mind all those well-off baby boomers you eep reading about in articles like “The Coming Intergenerational Transfer of Wealth” or “The Coming Crisis in Long-Term Care” or whatever. Those guys are reaching their Florida condo age – a lot of them are buying the condo _and_ keeping the old homestead. At least for now.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spoke](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a88e57/32.png) [@Spoke](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spoke)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2005, 1:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/housing-prices-who-the-hell-is-buying-all-these-houses-anyway/301871/47 "2005-05-03T13:10:41Z")

</div>

And one more factor is foreign investment. I read an article recently about how the real estate boom in Florida is being driven in part by Europeans taking advantage of the weak dollar to buy condos.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![msmith537](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/d9b06d/32.png) [@msmith537](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/msmith537)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2005, 3:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/housing-prices-who-the-hell-is-buying-all-these-houses-anyway/301871/48 "2005-05-03T15:46:24Z")

</div>

> [@Debaser](#):
>
> I don’t think that high home prices are a bad thing. Sure, it sucks to not be in the market, but there are still ways to get in. Plus, home ownership is at record highs right now, so obviously it’s not preventing people from buying in.

It becomes an issue if and when the housing prices drop and people are left with homes that are worth less than the mortgage.

Also, the problem with a lot of those interest only loans is that the payments often increase substantially after a few years. Combine the two and all of a sudden you have a house you can’t afford to make payments on that you can’t sell for what you bought it for.

Unfortunately (or fortunately depending on your perspective) housing prices never seem to drop. As they say, the best investment is land since they aren’t making any more of it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sam\_Stone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecccb3/32.png) [@Sam\_Stone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sam_Stone)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2005, 3:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/housing-prices-who-the-hell-is-buying-all-these-houses-anyway/301871/49 "2005-05-04T03:04:11Z")

</div>

> [@spoke-](#):
>
> And one more factor is foreign investment. I read an article recently about how the real estate boom in Florida is being driven in part by Europeans taking advantage of the weak dollar to buy condos.

Not necessarily a bad deal for Americans either. Back during the Japan boom, the Japanese started buying American property willy-nilly. Remember the breathless talk about how Japan was going to ‘own’ the United States? It was supposed to be the new economic catastrophe for the U.S.

Anyway, the demand for U.S. real-estate led to it being sold at highly inflated values. Then later when Japan’s economy crashed and the margin calls came in, they sold the properties back to Americans at a steep discount.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Loopydude](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/e56c9b/32.png) [@Loopydude](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Loopydude)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2005, 3:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/housing-prices-who-the-hell-is-buying-all-these-houses-anyway/301871/50 "2005-05-04T03:59:38Z")

</div>

Metro Boston. Nuts. Shit, Metro Worcester is nuts these days. Oi-yoi-yoi.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rjung](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/45deac/32.png) [@rjung](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/rjung)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2005, 6:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/housing-prices-who-the-hell-is-buying-all-these-houses-anyway/301871/51 "2005-05-04T06:13:39Z")

</div>

> [@Sam Stone](#):
>
> Anyway, the demand for U.S. real-estate led to it being sold at highly inflated values. Then later when Japan’s economy crashed and the margin calls came in, they sold the properties back to Americans at a steep discount.

So folks who can’t afford a home in the US should just hang tight and wait for the European economy to collapse on itself, eh? Pardon me if I don’t think “Waiting for someone else to screw up” is a very viable plan…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shalmanese](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/45deac/32.png) [@Shalmanese](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shalmanese)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2005, 12:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/housing-prices-who-the-hell-is-buying-all-these-houses-anyway/301871/52 "2005-05-04T12:45:27Z")

</div>

I want to know what the banks think theyre going to get out of this in the end. Surely banks can’t possibly think that all these no-interest loans are going to be paid back. If the housing market collapses, then theyre going to be massively overextended.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spoke](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a88e57/32.png) [@Spoke](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spoke)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2005, 1:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/housing-prices-who-the-hell-is-buying-all-these-houses-anyway/301871/53 "2005-05-04T13:42:07Z")

</div>

> [@msmith537](#):
>
> Unfortunately (or fortunately depending on your perspective) housing prices never seem to drop.

Let’s not forget about the 1920s-style [Florida Land Boom](http://fcit.coedu.usf.edu/florida/lessons/ld_boom/ld_boom1.htm).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spoke](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a88e57/32.png) [@Spoke](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spoke)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2005, 1:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/housing-prices-who-the-hell-is-buying-all-these-houses-anyway/301871/54 "2005-05-04T13:58:11Z")

</div>

The 1920s Florida land boom was arguably a unique case, but there have been crashes in more traditional markets:

> [@](#):
>
> Housing booms in some parts of the country have led to catastrophic busts. That was the case in the oil-patch states - Texas, Louisiana and Oklahoma - in the 1980s. The markets in parts of California and New England took a beating in the early 1990s.

[Cite.](http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/homes/html/bubble12.html)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shalmanese](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/45deac/32.png) [@Shalmanese](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shalmanese)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2005, 2:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/housing-prices-who-the-hell-is-buying-all-these-houses-anyway/301871/55 "2005-05-04T14:26:10Z")

</div>

> [@msmith537](#):
>
> Unfortunately (or fortunately depending on your perspective) housing prices never seem to drop. As they say, the best investment is land since they aren’t making any more of it.

Try telling that to people living in Hong Kong or Tokyo.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spoke](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a88e57/32.png) [@Spoke](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spoke)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2005, 2:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/housing-prices-who-the-hell-is-buying-all-these-houses-anyway/301871/56 "2005-05-04T14:36:16Z")

</div>

Yeah, almost forgot the [Japanese real estate crash](http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0NTN/is_50/ai_111506874):

[quote]  
Japan has always been heavily populated and short of land. Only about 28 percent of Japan’s land mass is inhabitable, so it’s no surprise that one of Japan’s most precious commodities today is real estate

It comes as somewhat of a surprise that such a precious resource could devalue so drastically in just 12 years. From a peak in 1990, **property prices in Japan have plummeted over 60 percent on average, and have dropped almost 80 percent in Tokyo**.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Steve\_MB](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/steve_mb/32/5339_2.png) [@Steve\_MB](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Steve_MB)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2005, 3:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/housing-prices-who-the-hell-is-buying-all-these-houses-anyway/301871/57 "2005-05-04T15:52:09Z")

</div>

> [@spoke-](#):
>
> Let’s not forget about the 1920s-style [Florida Land Boom](http://fcit.coedu.usf.edu/florida/lessons/ld_boom/ld_boom1.htm).

I recall a show about the run-up to the Crash of 1929, with a clip of Groucho Marx as the real estate promoter in _Cocoanuts_ ("…You can get stucco. Oh, can you get stucco…") and a description of his putting his money into the market.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Steve\_MB](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/steve_mb/32/5339_2.png) [@Steve\_MB](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Steve_MB)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2005, 3:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/housing-prices-who-the-hell-is-buying-all-these-houses-anyway/301871/58 "2005-05-04T15:53:48Z")

</div>

> [@Shalmanese](#):
>
> > [@](#):
> >
> > As they say, the best investment is land since they aren’t making any more of it.
> 
> Try telling that to people living in Hong Kong or Tokyo.

Or Holland…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dob](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b2d939/32.png) [@Dob](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dob)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2005, 3:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/housing-prices-who-the-hell-is-buying-all-these-houses-anyway/301871/59 "2005-05-04T15:59:38Z")

</div>

It is a sad state no doubt. I live outside DC in Northern VA, bought my house 4 years ago. The last county assesment cements the fact that if I sold my house I couldnt afford to live anywhere near where I am now!

They have townhomes in my area selling for 300k+…a freaking townhouse! Its insane.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2005, 4:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/housing-prices-who-the-hell-is-buying-all-these-houses-anyway/301871/60 "2005-05-04T16:26:59Z")

</div>

> [@Dob](#):
>
> It is a sad state no doubt. I live outside DC in Northern VA, bought my house 4 years ago. The last county assesment cements the fact that if I sold my house I couldnt afford to live anywhere near where I am now!
> 
> They have townhomes in my area selling for 300k+…a freaking townhouse! Its insane.

I hear that. There is a town house development a few blocks down the road from me, where they _start_ at $290K. And my next door neighbor wanted to cash out on his equity and move to another house in the same area. He could sell his house in about ten minutes, but he couldn’t find a house with the features he wanted that he could afford.

Of course, people expect a heckofa lot more from their houses than they used to. My “starter house” was a two bedroom, one bathroom single story with an unfinished basement that was built in 1926. My nephew wouldn’t look at anything with less than four bedrooms when they bought their first house.

Regards,  
Shodan

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/housing-prices-who-the-hell-is-buying-all-these-houses-anyway/301871.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/housing-prices-who-the-hell-is-buying-all-these-houses-anyway/301871.md?page=4)
