# How addictive is heroin, REALLY?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-addictive-is-heroin-really/250683>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [June 16, 2004, 4:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-addictive-is-heroin-really/250683 "2004-06-16T16:54:30Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Da\_Cissy\_Pimp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/4af34b/32.png) [@Da\_Cissy\_Pimp](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Da_Cissy_Pimp)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2004, 3:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-addictive-is-heroin-really/250683/21 "2004-06-18T15:07:26Z")

</div>

> [@The Controvert](#):
>
> So… more addictive than SDMB, or less? 😃

Doubtless you speak at least partly with your tongue in your cheek, but I actually have found the whole SDMB experience rather addicting, and I’ve been a guest member for less than a week! Sort of scary, huh?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Da\_Cissy\_Pimp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/4af34b/32.png) [@Da\_Cissy\_Pimp](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Da_Cissy_Pimp)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2004, 3:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-addictive-is-heroin-really/250683/22 "2004-06-18T15:23:27Z")

</div>

> [@Little Cloud](#):
>
> According to Licit and Illicit Drugs published by Consumer Reports, 90% of opiate addicts in this country were women prior to the Harrison Narcotic Act of 1914. It was a ladylike drug used in patent medicines for “female” discomforts. The men would drink alcohol and the ladies would retire to their chambers to treat themselves with Lydia Pinkham’s Elixir or some such. After 1914 the sexual demographics changed radically.

Some interesting facts you mentioned there. Do you know why the sexual demographics of opiate addiction changed so radically after drugs of this type were banned? Also, could this observation be used to support (if perhaps in a weird sort of way) the (re?)legalization of this sort of stuff? After all, the taking of narcotics in such a “genteel” and socially acceptable fashion sounds a helluva lot more attractive than the current situation with regards to the use of heroin and other opiates ie malnourished, disease-ridden junkies taking their drug of choice in squalid surroundings, and supporting their habits with (in many instances) other people’s money. Are there some parallels with the experience of Prohibition to be drawn here?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Da\_Cissy\_Pimp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/4af34b/32.png) [@Da\_Cissy\_Pimp](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Da_Cissy_Pimp)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2004, 3:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-addictive-is-heroin-really/250683/23 "2004-06-18T15:54:01Z")

</div>

Please excuse the rapid succession of postings from me on this subject. I have really only had a chance today to read most of the postings that other members have sent in, and many of them contain things I would like to comment on. Thankyou to everyone who has contributed to this thread so far. You raise some fascinating (if often disturbing) points.

> [@casdave](#):
>
> Heroin causes changes within the brain chemistry…

Anyone (someone who knows a bit about neurochemistry perhaps) like to comment on this, and supply some further information?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Da\_Cissy\_Pimp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/4af34b/32.png) [@Da\_Cissy\_Pimp](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Da_Cissy_Pimp)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2004, 4:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-addictive-is-heroin-really/250683/24 "2004-06-18T16:01:24Z")

</div>

> [@mischievous](#):
>
> While I personally have not tried either drug, experience with friends and family leads me to say that heroin may or may not be trouble, depending on how careful you are, but crack cocaine is one bad, mean, nasty motherfucker.
> 
> mischievous

Ah yes, crack cocaine. Another notorious drug (and perhaps deservedly so). Anyone know anything about _that_ one? Where I come from (Australia), it’s not that big a problem (yet); from various things I’ve heard about it, I should probably hope that the situation remains that way!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Da\_Cissy\_Pimp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/4af34b/32.png) [@Da\_Cissy\_Pimp](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Da_Cissy_Pimp)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2004, 4:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-addictive-is-heroin-really/250683/25 "2004-06-18T16:37:18Z")

</div>

> [@pravnik](#):
>
> The “no worse than a bad case of flu” school of thought is sort of a statement against the pop culture view of withdrawal, as seen in movies like “The Man With the Golden Arm” and “Trainspotting.” Usually withdrawal is depicted as a little overly, shall we say, _dramatic_. The addict raves “Oh God! Just one fix! I gotta haves me some smack, man!” and thrases around like he’s literally on fire, eyes rolling back into his head, mouth foaming, hallucinating dead babies crawling across the ceiling, _etcetera ad nauseum,_ pun intended.

Yes, I saw “Trainspotting” when it came out, and must admit that it didn’t do a great deal for me; my memories of it are of a long, depressing and rather dull movie, and I’d have to say that I found its ending rather annoying too. I find it hilarious, however, how a lot of people criticized it at the time of its release for supposedly “glamourizing” heroin use. Given that it seemed to do anything but, its critics must have been (as vocal critics of controversial movies so often are) people who hadn’t actually seen it. If any recent movie could be accused of glamourizing heroin, it’d have to be “Pulp Fiction”, I’d say (another movie I didn’t like terribly much).

> [@pravnik](#):
>
> Somebody that uses very heavily may possibly be at greater danger of overdosing after cleaning up and relapsing, the reason being if they start using again they are much more likely to overestimate their tolerance to the drug.

A similar hazard I’ve heard of relates to the unreliable purity of heroin (given that it’s illegal and is therefore not subject to any form of quality control whatsoever). I’ve heard tales of users who have been used to taking heavily-cut rubbish, and OD after taking a hit of unusually high purity. I think something like this happened in Australia several years back when Vietnamese gangs (based in places like the Sydney suburb of Cabramatta) started selling _very_ pure stuff (which, perhaps ironically, is better for you in the long-term if you’re going to become addicted to the drug) that was causing junkies to OD in rather alarming numbers.

> [@pravnik](#):
>
> Even the subversiveness of the whole thing can be intoxicating for a while, but there’s another consequence most users have to deal with sooner or later: overdose. Heroin is usually self-adminstered in varying doses under sketchy circumstances, and is a strong CNS depressant. A user, even a casual user or first timer, can quietly slip into unconsciousness, stop breathing, and be dead before anyone notices, even if others are present.

Another danger I’ve been told of involves the way heroin apparently makes people vomit, particularly when they’re taking it for the first time. Apparently, some people shoot up; lie down to enjoy the warm, fuzzy feelings of oneness with the universe or whatever that they’re expecting from the drug; and then, when they’re in a semi-conscious (or unconscious) state, throw up, the result being that they choke on their own chunder. Interestingly, the person who mentioned this to me was a convicted murderer who I used to visit in prison several years back (really for something to do; seeing him became an addicting experience in itself). He also told me that heroin, marijuana and a sleeping pill called Rohypnol were the drugs of choice in his current place of incarceration at the time (the late 1990s). My getting to know him is really a story in itself, but let me just say that, as a way of shocking your parents (since mine found out about my visits to this guy eventually), visiting a murderer in prison sure-as-hell beats the usual boring things kids do to freak out their folks eg having sex, smoking dope etc. I think that mine were particularly horrified by the fact that the person in question was inside for murdering somebody much like myself, and I suppose that, in retrospect, I can’t really blame them!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Da\_Cissy\_Pimp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/4af34b/32.png) [@Da\_Cissy\_Pimp](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Da_Cissy_Pimp)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2004, 4:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-addictive-is-heroin-really/250683/26 "2004-06-18T16:49:54Z")

</div>

> [@AHunter3](#):
>
> I smoked a small amount many years ago (smoked, not mainlined mind you) and although I’m very much the libertarian about drugs I have to admit my gut reaction was “there ain’t no way in hell this oughta be legal”.

Care to elaborate?

Yes, I believe smoking (“chasing the dragon”) is a more respectable way of taking heroin if you decide to experiment with it (apparently the risk of ODing is much less if you smoke the drug rather than inject it, though, sadly, not the risk of becoming addicted!). I did actually see a guy smoke a bit of the stuff recently (at a punk show), and it proved a somewhat humorous sight to behold. He was melting the heroin on a piece of foil and inhaling the resultant fumes through an empty ballpoint casing, but unfortunately the piece of foil was a little too small for his purposes, and he seemed to be getting a burnt thumb and index finger from trying to hold onto it! I was a bit surprised when I first heard that heroin could be smoked (apparently it has to be pretty pure to be taken in this fashion, however), but I suppose I shouldn’t have been. After all, heroin’s ultimate precursor - opium - is usually smoked.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Da\_Cissy\_Pimp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/4af34b/32.png) [@Da\_Cissy\_Pimp](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Da_Cissy_Pimp)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2004, 4:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-addictive-is-heroin-really/250683/27 "2004-06-18T16:57:00Z")

</div>

My last post on this subject (at least for the time being)!

> [@Aeschines](#):
>
> “Heroin” is actually a defunct brand name: Bayre introduced it as a cough medicine in the 1890s.

Yes, I’ve heard this as well. Apparently the name was coined to give people the impression that the drug would convey heroic properties if taken.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AHunter3](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ahunter3/32/368_2.png) [@AHunter3](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AHunter3)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2004, 5:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-addictive-is-heroin-really/250683/28 "2004-06-18T17:21:24Z")

</div>

**Da Cissy Pimp** :

> [@](#):
>
> Originally Posted by **AHunter3** :
> 
> > [@](#):
> >
> > I smoked a small amount many years ago (smoked, not mainlined mind you) and although I’m very much the libertarian about drugs I have to admit my gut reaction was “there ain’t no way in hell this oughta be legal”.
> 
> Care to elaborate?

On the smoking-thereof process, or on my gut reaction?

To smoke it: it was smeared on rolling papers which were subsequently used to roll a marijuana joint.

The gut-reaction thing: mellow, warm, mindless, pleasant, with a nice big “do that again” smilieface welded onto it. More to the point, an awareness that at least for me, personally, I could get really dangerously fond of it real fast. That coupled with the ordinary awareness that it’s known to be addictive and damn hard to kick. Now, I’ve tried other things that have a similar reputation. Crack-smoking, mentioned a couple posts uphill, is one of them. But with crack my general reaction was “big deal, it’s like coffee on steroids and it makes me feel mean as well as easily panicked, maybe it gets addictive if you keep doing it but why would I want to?”, whereas with heroin it was “hmm, got any more of this I can take home with me? Uh oh, I am _so_ not supposed to be thinking that after trying this just for once, good god can you imagine if this stuff was easily available in vending machines?”

I suspect different people have different affinities for different addictive recreational drugs, and for someone else cocaine, speed, crack, etc., would be the dangerously appealing ones; for me the opiates are the Bad Idea Bears.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Psilocybe](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/51bf81/32.png) [@Psilocybe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Psilocybe)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2004, 5:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-addictive-is-heroin-really/250683/29 "2004-06-18T17:29:33Z")

</div>

According to [this](http://www.tfy.drugsense.org/tfy/addictvn.htm), nicotine is the most addictive drug - followed by heroin.

Makes you wonder why tobacco is legal.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Da\_Cissy\_Pimp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/4af34b/32.png) [@Da\_Cissy\_Pimp](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Da_Cissy_Pimp)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2004, 6:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-addictive-is-heroin-really/250683/30 "2004-06-18T18:16:51Z")

</div>

> [@AHunter3](#):
>
> **Da Cissy Pimp** :
> 
> On the smoking-thereof process, or on my gut reaction?
> 
> To smoke it: it was smeared on rolling papers which were subsequently used to roll a marijuana joint.
> 
> The gut-reaction thing: mellow, warm, mindless, pleasant, with a nice big “do that again” smilieface welded onto it. More to the point, an awareness that at least for me, personally, I could get really dangerously fond of it real fast. That coupled with the ordinary awareness that it’s known to be addictive and damn hard to kick. Now, I’ve tried other things that have a similar reputation. Crack-smoking, mentioned a couple posts uphill, is one of them. But with crack my general reaction was “big deal, it’s like coffee on steroids and it makes me feel mean as well as easily panicked, maybe it gets addictive if you keep doing it but why would I want to?”, whereas with heroin it was “hmm, got any more of this I can take home with me? Uh oh, I am _so_ not supposed to be thinking that after trying this just for once, good god can you imagine if this stuff was easily available in vending machines?”
> 
> I suspect different people have different affinities for different addictive recreational drugs, and for someone else cocaine, speed, crack, etc., would be the dangerously appealing ones; for me the opiates are the Bad Idea Bears.

Thanks for sharing your experiences; it’s good to see that you’re willing to try notorious drugs before passing judgement on them. On the subject of addictive things, this reminds me of a story from the comic “Judge Dredd” in 2000 AD magazine. In this story (there were probably several relating to the subject in question), a confectioner known as Uncle Ump makes the perfect candy, a product he dubs Umpty Gum (IIRC). Unfortunately, his invention is so delicious that people eating it become addicted to it and suffer rather frightening withdrawal symptoms if deprived of it. For the Greater Good of Mega City One and its innumerable citizens, the Judges outlaw Umpty Gum, and put its creator on a spaceship that they then send into deep space, so as to prevent anyone from forcing the secret recipe out of him. Unfortunately, however, the usual enterprising criminals (aided by good old fashioned police corruption) go after the spaceship, dock with it, and extract the recipe from Ump. Once they have done so (and dumped the unfortunate Ump into space for his troubles), they bring the knowledge they have obtained back to Earth, where they use it to start up a thriving black market in the contraband confectionery.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![flamingbananas](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/f4b2a3/32.png) [@flamingbananas](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/flamingbananas)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2004, 6:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-addictive-is-heroin-really/250683/31 "2004-06-18T18:26:41Z")

</div>

> [@aruvqan](#):
>
> That is exactly why I stopped the pain killers except for ibuprofin…it was too tempting, and I didn’t want to be addicted. Probably one of the main reasons I have good body days and bad body days - I prefer to handle pain with motrin instead of anything heavier. If I am in a fairly painful day, I just take it really easy. If in a good day, I carry on as normal=)

Good thing (or terribly horrible thing) is that pain killers do the oppisite effect on me, if they do anything at all. I got perscription pain killers for my migraines…and they made them worse. Motrin, ibuprofin, tylonal…all make my headaches worse. So the good thing is I don’t get addicted. Bad thing is…I have to deal with intense pain. Thats just life I guess.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Excalibre](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/898d66/32.png) [@Excalibre](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Excalibre)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2004, 6:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-addictive-is-heroin-really/250683/32 "2004-06-18T18:28:44Z")

</div>

> [@Psilocybe](#):
>
> According to [this](http://www.tfy.drugsense.org/tfy/addictvn.htm), nicotine is the most addictive drug - followed by heroin.
> 
> Makes you wonder why tobacco is legal.

Because, as noted above, the claim that nicotine is more addictive than heroin is _untrue_ - did you read the thread before posting? It’s a pretty baseless piece of propaganda.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Scupper](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b9bd4f/32.png) [@Scupper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Scupper)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2004, 10:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-addictive-is-heroin-really/250683/33 "2004-06-18T22:13:57Z")

</div>

> [@Excalibre](#):
>
> Because, as noted above, the claim that nicotine is more addictive than heroin is _untrue_ - did you read the thread before posting? It’s a pretty baseless piece of propaganda.

Psilocybe’s link is interesting and it’s the only one I’ve seen in this thread that actually contains something other than unsupported statements. I suggest you read it, or provide a link to data that supports your position, as insulting someone who posts a cite without providing one yourself is bad form.

In both of the addiction scales from Psilocybe’s cite, nicotine is listed as one tier (out of six) more serious in causing development of a dependency and one tier lower in the seriousness of withdrawal. Heroin outstrips it in the other categories, but if we’re talking about addiction, I would imagine creation of a dependency and seriousness of withdrawal would be major considerations.

> [@From the link provided by casdave:](#):
>
> … heroin withdrawal is considered less dangerous than alcohol or barbiturate withdrawal.

> [@mischievious](#):
>
> The “nicotine is more addictive than heroin” thing comes from lab mice which were deliberately addicted to one or the other. After withdrawal of the drug, the frequency and duration of the mice requesting the drug (by pressing a lever) was tested. Mice addicted to nicotine pressed the lever more often and for a longer period after withdrawal of the drug.

> [@From Psilocybe's link](#):
>
> … nicotine [is] a very impressive drug … Its urges are very similar to heroin.
> 
> Surveys also indicate that two-thirds to four-fifths of smokers want to quit but cannot, even after a number of attempts.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Charlie\_Tan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/charlie_tan/32/12582_2.png) [@Charlie\_Tan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Charlie_Tan)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2004, 10:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-addictive-is-heroin-really/250683/34 "2004-06-18T22:58:55Z")

</div>

A tangent and direct question to QtM (or anyone else who knows):  
Someone told me that doctors used to be wary about giving to much morphine (and related drugs) to patients, say after surgery, because they didn’t want to make addicts out of them. Same person said that the attitude is more relaxed today, since current science claim that since the drug is curing real pain, the risk of addiction is very small. Or, IOW, the psychological factor behind addiction is taking front seat and some scientists claim that use doesn’t equal addiction. True or not?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![yBeayf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/y/e274bd/32.png) [@yBeayf](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/yBeayf)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2004, 1:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-addictive-is-heroin-really/250683/35 "2004-06-19T01:00:14Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Good thing (or terribly horrible thing) is that pain killers do the oppisite effect on me, if they do anything at all. I got perscription pain killers for my migraines…and they made them worse.

You’re not the only one. Some people (such as myself) are resistant in some manner to opiates. The one period I’ve taken them (while convalescing from my tonsillectomy) I found them to be a mighty unpleasant experience. The morphine given immediately afer I came out of the OR I have little memory of (as I was still waking up from anaesthesia), but the vicodin I was given for the next few weeks did absolutely squat for pain, and caused perpetual headache, bone-dry mouth, and an unpleasant fuzzyness to all my senses (and intestinal pluggery as well!) Given this experience, I’m unlikely to ever try heroin, not because I’m afraid of addiction to it, but because I fully expect it to do nothing but give me a migraine.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/qadgop_the_mercotan/32/83_2.png) [@Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qadgop_the_Mercotan)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2004, 1:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-addictive-is-heroin-really/250683/36 "2004-06-19T01:29:34Z")

</div>

> [@The Gaspode](#):
>
> A tangent and direct question to QtM (or anyone else who knows):  
> Someone told me that doctors used to be wary about giving to much morphine (and related drugs) to patients, say after surgery, because they didn’t want to make addicts out of them. Same person said that the attitude is more relaxed today, since current science claim that since the drug is curing real pain, the risk of addiction is very small. Or, IOW, the psychological factor behind addiction is taking front seat and some scientists claim that use doesn’t equal addiction. True or not?

There is little danger in addicting someone physically by using opiates for acute pain from significant trauma (like surgery). There are more problems associated with causing (or maintaining) addiction by using it for chronic non-malignant pain.

That whole discussion is a textbook in itself. I’m currently putting together a presentation for about 50 physicians and assorted health professionals next month on just when (and when not) to use opiates to treat chronic non-malignant pain. The correct answer appears to be “not often, and NOT as a first-line choice”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![flamingbananas](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/f4b2a3/32.png) [@flamingbananas](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/flamingbananas)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2004, 1:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-addictive-is-heroin-really/250683/37 "2004-06-19T01:56:34Z")

</div>

> [@yBeayf](#):
>
> You’re not the only one. Some people (such as myself) are resistant in some manner to opiates. The one period I’ve taken them (while convalescing from my tonsillectomy) I found them to be a mighty unpleasant experience. The morphine given immediately afer I came out of the OR I have little memory of (as I was still waking up from anaesthesia), but the vicodin I was given for the next few weeks did absolutely squat for pain, and caused perpetual headache, bone-dry mouth, and an unpleasant fuzzyness to all my senses (and intestinal pluggery as well!) Given this experience, I’m unlikely to ever try heroin, not because I’m afraid of addiction to it, but because I fully expect it to do nothing but give me a migraine.

Not only am I resistant to painkillers, but I’m immune to every antibiotic out there but 2 I believe. So I have to be careful to watch for infections, on account of I can’t really take anything to clear it up.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ralph124c](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/8797f3/32.png) [@ralph124c](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ralph124c)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2004, 7:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-addictive-is-heroin-really/250683/38 "2004-06-19T07:35:33Z")

</div>

The Harrison Act (1914) which made opiate-base drugs like heroin and morphine illegal in the USA (exceptby a doctor’s prescription), was in response to a big upsuge in addiction. However, I have never read anything that describes what drug addicts of the early 1900’s were up to-were they robbing people and murdering old ladies tosupport their habit?  
I get the impression that opiates are fairly cheap drugs to produce…I’ve been told that a “maintainence” dose of herion for a typical addict would cost about $10.00/week. In any case, since patent medicines 9containing high percentages of opiates) were readily available back then, were addicts a big percentage of the population? Was IV drug use commo 😕 n as well?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![casdave](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/c6cbf5/32.png) [@casdave](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/casdave)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2004, 8:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-addictive-is-heroin-really/250683/39 "2004-06-19T08:02:44Z")

</div>

Looking at Psilocybes link, it just goes counter to everything that addicts tell me.

I have to ask myself who is likely to know most about the relative addictive properties of hard drugs, some researchers using what appear to be subjective tests, or actually speaking to drug users themselves.

Nowhere in that cite does it mention anything about talking to drug users, a bit of a weakness in the research I think.

The withdrawal symptons from heroin are of a completely differant order, and the social reinforcement mechanism for smoking as compared to heroin are far far differant.

Smokers can come under huge pressure to take up the habit again by advertisers, or by just being around places where smoking is common, and there are far more places where smoking routinely occurs than heroin.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ralph124c](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/8797f3/32.png) [@ralph124c](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ralph124c)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2004, 8:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-addictive-is-heroin-really/250683/40 "2004-06-19T08:27:16Z")

</div>

CASDAVE: does the UK still allowregitered addicts to obtain heroin by prescription? I read once that this had been tried…is the program still on going? And doesit reduce addiction rates?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-addictive-is-heroin-really/250683.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-addictive-is-heroin-really/250683.md?page=3)
