# How can a DUI be enforced?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-can-a-dui-be-enforced/157854>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [February 27, 2003, 10:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-can-a-dui-be-enforced/157854 "2003-02-27T10:40:02Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 6\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![UncleBill](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/d26b3c/32.png) [@UncleBill](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/UncleBill)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2003, 1:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-can-a-dui-be-enforced/157854/21 "2003-02-27T13:08:30Z")

</div>

Let me know when you can take a voluntary action to remove responsibility for one’s actions, I have some people I need to “talk” to. You may have had impaired Judgement, but your Responsibility was not impaired at all.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![In\_Conceivable](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/4bbf92/32.png) [@In\_Conceivable](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/In_Conceivable)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2003, 1:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-can-a-dui-be-enforced/157854/22 "2003-02-27T13:56:10Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by lite \*  
> \*\*Monty,
> 
> You didn’t see the truck, nor the damage. Trust me, it was after all a home 120 feet from my front door, he was happy to get the body work done. \*\*

Happy his truck was hit?? Happy to get the body work done?? Happy?? :smack:

Yes, your judgement in impared when you are drunk. However having impared judgement does not take any responsibility for your actions.

I am sorry I robbed that store, but I was drunk at the time so not responsible for my judgement. I am sorry I killed a man, but I was on crack and had poor judgement. See? It doesn’t work that way.

Driving with BAL over a certain amount is against the law. You are legally responsible for breaking the law even if your judgement was impared.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sofa\_King](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/58956e/32.png) [@Sofa\_King](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sofa_King)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2003, 3:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-can-a-dui-be-enforced/157854/23 "2003-02-27T15:28:51Z")

</div>

Well, **lite** , I’d say you’re a prime example of why drunk driving is illegal.

_You_ made the original decision to drive to your own bachelor party, knowing full well that there was a high probability you would drink too much.

_You_ made the original decision to drink, knowing full well that alcohol impairs judgment.

_You_ made the decision to drive, knowing only half well (thanks to the booze) that you were taking a risk.

_You_ wrecked your car into a parked vehicle, which luckily for you is just about _the very best_ thing you can possibly crash into while drunk driving. Anything else you happen to hit in an automobile at speed is likely to give more than a parked car and die, or give less and kill you.

There aren’t any mitigating circumstances here. Your “friends” leaving you to your own devices (which could have included a cab, or a hotel, or the alley, but did not) is irrelevant. Your family tragedy is irrelevant. Your impending wedding was irrelevant. The arresting officer later being accused of the same crime is irrelevant. The fact that you almost got away with it is irrelevant. There [are common defenses](http://www.expertlaw.com/library/pubarticles/Criminal/Drunk.html#Q23) to drunk driving charges, but you don’t appear to meet any single one of them.

You put yourself and others at risk, and _proved_ that’s exactly what you were doing by totaling your car–single vehicle accidents are some of the best evidence for drunk driving. **And exactly because there are people out there like you who refuse to accept responsibility for their own actions** , the state is hitting you as hard as it can where they know it hurts you the most: your wallet. One of the easiest ways to keep an unrepentant drunk off the road is to make that drunk unable to afford the luxury of driving.

By the way, I got myself a DWI, accepted full responsibility for it, paid out more money than I thought I had, and proceeded to rearrange my entire life so that I could walk and use public transportation to survive, _for six years_, until I felt I was responsible enough to take back to the road. I would suggest that one of the reasons I had to pay such a heavy price for my indiscretion is because there are _still_ people like you out there who refuse to accept the consequences of their own actions, and then (hopefully unlike you) go out and do it again and again.

I have my problems with the overzealous crusade against drinking and driving, but it’s because I see so many people getting caught in the crossfire between the MADDers and people who blatantly flaunt even the most unreasonable drinking and driving laws. I sincerely hope you recover from this series of reversals, but I also just as fervently hope you learn the simplest lesson about DWI: you can’t get busted if you don’t do it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Robb](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/a183cd/32.png) [@Robb](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Robb)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2003, 3:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-can-a-dui-be-enforced/157854/24 "2003-02-27T15:59:46Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> [39-08-01.](http://www.state.nd.us/lr/cencode/T39C08.pdf) (Effective through July 31, 2003) Persons under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any other drugs or substances not to operate vehicle - Penalty.
> 
> 1. A person may not drive or be in actual physical control of any vehicle upon a highway or upon public or private areas to which the public has a right of access for vehicular use in this state if any of the following apply:  
> a. That person has **an alcohol concentration of at least ten one-hundredths of one percent by weight** at the time of the performance of a chemical test within two hours after the driving or being in actual physical control of a vehicle.  
> b. That person is **under the influence of intoxicating liquor**.  
> c. That person is under the influence of any drug or substance or combination of drugs or substances to a degree which renders that person incapable of safely driving.  
> d. That person is under the combined influence of alcohol and any other drugs or substances to a degree which renders that person incapable of safely driving.  
> The fact that any person charged with violating this section **is or has been legally entitled to use alcohol or other drugs or substances is not a defense against any charge for violating this section,** unless a drug which predominately caused impairment was used only as directed or cautioned by a practitioner who legally prescribed or dispensed the drug to that person.

I’m assuming you were prosecuted in North Dakota, since you list there as your location.

As to why you are prosecuted for losing your mental faculties due to alcohol, when everyone knows that alcohol diminishes your judgement. First of all, you did it to yourself. Voluntary intoxication is not generally a defense to criminal actions - when you decided to get intoxicated you accepted the risk that you might commit a crime later. You get prosecuted because you wre sober and presumably in control of your mental faculties when you took that first drink. That things went downhill from there is your problem, not the Legislature’s problem. Secondly, everyone knows that alcohol ruins your judgment. If you can’t make plans accordingly, it’s your problem, not the Legislature’s. (which really is point #1, rehashed).

In summary, voluntary intoxication is rarely a defense, and it isn’t a defense to DUI. It can be a defense to certain specific-intent crimes, but you’ll see that the DUI law isn’t written with regard to your mental state. The law doesn’t care what, or if, you are thinking. It only matters that you operated a vehicle under the influence of alcohol.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tony\_Montana](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/278dde/32.png) [@Tony\_Montana](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tony_Montana)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2003, 4:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-can-a-dui-be-enforced/157854/25 "2003-02-27T16:18:30Z")

</div>

Waitaminit rewind…

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by lite \*  
> \*\*(My LeBaron Convertable was totaled) \*\*

And you admit to having one of these on a mssg board?

BWaaahaaaahahaha…  
OK carry on…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bibliophage](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bibliophage/32/7615_2.png) [@bibliophage](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bibliophage)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2003, 6:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-can-a-dui-be-enforced/157854/26 "2003-02-27T18:27:45Z")

</div>

Inasmuch as this was ever a factual question, it has been answered, so I’ll close this thread. If you want to debate, Great Debates is the forum for that. If you want to rant, the BBQ Pit is the forum for that.

bibliophage  
moderator GQ

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-can-a-dui-be-enforced/157854.md?page=1)
