# How can we tell whether the European Union is corrupt? **URL:** \ **Category:** Great Debates\ **Created:** [August 13, 2002, 4:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-can-we-tell-whether-the-european-union-is-corrupt/123711 "2002-08-13T16:34:17Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 20\ **Page:** 2
**Author:** ![SuaSponte](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/67e7ee/32.png) [@SuaSponte](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SuaSponte)\ **Post date:** [August 13, 2002, 10:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-can-we-tell-whether-the-european-union-is-corrupt/123711/21 "2002-08-13T22:15:31Z")
::sigh:: I miss the old days, **december.** Back then, I would actually have to do research to refute the tripe you posted. Nowadays, there’s just no challenge. The thrill is gone. But duty beckons. Let’s get this over with quickly - I’m hungry. Your “analysis” is as follows: **1. Arafat has $1.3 billion.** Response: Unproven. You have one unsubstantiated source, and that source has a self-interest in trying to cast Arafat as corrupt. But let’s assume _arguendo_ that Arafat has $1.3 billion. On to “analysis” point 2: **2. Arafat obtained that money illicitly** Response: Utterly unsubstantiated. Interestingly, in the article you linked, even Gen. Ze’evi does not make that assertion. But let’s keep playing the game. We will assume _arguendo_ that Arafat has $1.3 billion and he obtained illicitly. **3. The illicit behavior through which Arafat obtained his $1.3 billion was embezzlement of donations.** Response: Unsubstantiated. Based on the “evidence,” Arafat could be a cocaine kingpin. But we continue, _arguendo_ \*\*4. The “only possible source” of the donations Arafat could have embezzled is the EU’s aid to the PA. Response Ludicrous. Arafat has been head of al-Fatah since 1964 and the PLO since 1969 (IIRC). In those 38 years, al-Fatah and the PLO has received billions in donations from innumerable sources, primarily (i) the Gulf states, (ii) the Soviet Bloc, and (iii) the Palestinian Diaspora. Since the founding of the PA, the US has donated $238 million, and the UN has also given aid. Arafat could have had his entire wealth (prior to investment income and interest) before the EU donated a penny to the PA. But, _arguendo, arguendo_ we move on. \*\*5. To embezzle portions of the EU’s donations, Arafat must be paying off EU officers. \*\* Response: Assumes facts not in evidence. To wit - it assumes that (i) the EU knows that Arafat is embezzling EU donations and (ii) the EU would cut off donations if they knew, unless Arafat paid off EU officers. In sum, _if_ Arafat has $1.3 billion, and _if_ Arafat gained that $1.3 billion through embezzlement of donations, the money could have been stolen from any of at least six different sources, or combinations thereof. Yet you only accuse the EU of having their money embezzled, and to top it off, you accuse them of complicity in the theft of their own funds. Why is that, I wonder? Sua ---
**Author:** ![Sparc](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/65b543/32.png) [@Sparc](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sparc)\ **Post date:** [August 13, 2002, 10:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-can-we-tell-whether-the-european-union-is-corrupt/123711/22 "2002-08-13T22:29:19Z")
Bigotry. ---
**Author:** ![december](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/838e76/32.png) [@december](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/december)\ **Post date:** [August 13, 2002, 11:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-can-we-tell-whether-the-european-union-is-corrupt/123711/23 "2002-08-13T23:13:16Z")
\<\\> Actually the OP said, “a thought comes to mind that some of that money \*\*may \*\*be finding its way to the EU decision-makers.” As I said, the thought of corruption comes from living in New Jersey, a state where last year’s economic downturn was so severe that organized crime had to lay off three judges. And, that discussion was a lead-in to ask about controls against corruption within the EU. **Sparc** mentioned Enron, which was an instance of corporate corruption. If asked what controls exist to fight corporate corruption, I would mention internal auditors, the Board of Directors, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, the independent auditors, the SEC, and (in some businesses) state or federal regulators. (Of course, these controls sometimes fail, as they did in the case of Enron.) I was looking for a comparable list for EU managment. ---
**Author:** ![wring](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/838e76/32.png) [@wring](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wring)\ **Post date:** [August 13, 2002, 11:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-can-we-tell-whether-the-european-union-is-corrupt/123711/24 "2002-08-13T23:20:27Z")
and, of course, he blissfully ignores all the other posts and aspects - which demonstrated (If I followed it) that damn near all of his premisi (plural of premise ya know), were at best undeterminable, at worst flat out false, and **even if all were true** , his conclusion was unsupported. Next, ladies and gentlemen, watch with awe and wonderment as we demonstrate conclusively that might = right, two wrongs **do** equal one right, and the earth is flat. ---
**Author:** ![Sparc](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/65b543/32.png) [@Sparc](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sparc)\ **Post date:** [August 14, 2002, 12:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-can-we-tell-whether-the-european-union-is-corrupt/123711/25 "2002-08-14T00:04:08Z")
> [@](#): > > _december_ > > Sparc mentioned Enron, which was an instance of corporate corruption. […] I was looking for a comparable list for EU managment. Read those two sentence. Now find the error. december, **THE EU IS NOT A CORPORATION** THE EU IS A PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRATIC FEDERATION (in the making) It has the same checks and balances against corruption as most parliamentary democracies. See my previous post for the most basic overview. Above and beyond that we have auditors and a European court, and so on and etc. THE SAME AS MOST PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY SUCH AS FOR INSTANCE THE US Stop the EU bashing! Just stop! Give up! Stop! Desist! Don’t do it anymore! STOP! Please stop… If you must do it; do it with some brains. Sparc ---
**Author:** ![micilin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/8c91f0/32.png) [@micilin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/micilin)\ **Post date:** [August 14, 2002, 12:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-can-we-tell-whether-the-european-union-is-corrupt/123711/26 "2002-08-14T00:43:48Z")
> [@](#): > > \*Originally posted by december \* > Actually the OP said, “a thought comes to mind that some of that money \*\*may \*\*be finding its way to the EU decision-makers.” Actually the OP said > [@](#): > > Yasser Arafat has personal assets estimated at a value of $1.3 billion. Where did he get all that money? The only possible source is that he stole it, from donations intended for the benefit of the poor Palestinian people. These donations are made by the UN and by the EU. _Every statement_ in your OP has been refuted. Your questions are meaningless in light of this. There is no debate. To echo **Sparc** > [@](#): > > Just stop! Give up! Stop! Desist! Don’t do it anymore! STOP! Please stop… ---
**Author:** ![Henry\_B](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/d78d45/32.png) [@Henry\_B](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Henry_B)\ **Post date:** [August 14, 2002, 3:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-can-we-tell-whether-the-european-union-is-corrupt/123711/27 "2002-08-14T03:02:05Z")
**December** , one thing I have to say for You: If You weren’t here all debates would miss some colour. You seem to be as I am, in business. You know as I know, that there is a lot of corruption in business (feedbacks). Nobody can totally control feedbacks. I will explain: Let us assume, that I am selling 10.000 cbm of logs to a company from the company I work for. The buying company says to me, that if I “compress” the price with two dollars, they give me 1 dollar per cbm. This is called “feedback”. I worked 2,5 year for EU in a small project. I do not like EU. It is a body where many people tries to grab as much as they can. But not directly as bribes, as far as I know. Example: In a conference in Rome, the Italian guys asked the whole Finnish delegation: “Do You want to know a very good restaurant. We are going there anyhow?” Of course the delegation went. The Italians said that everybody is naturally paying for themselves. Of course. So, then was the time to pay. The Italian guys said to the waiter: “Please give the sums for everyone (separately). Then everyone collected the money and the Italian guys said: You do not need a receipt, do You?” and asked the waiter to put everything on one receipt. And took the receipt. Naturally the Finns understood that the Italian guys would make a report that they have had dinner with the Finnish delegation… And then made a report what conclusions they came to etc. etc. (Even if, to the Finnish guys ashtonishment, the Italians did not adress them with a word though the whole dinner). And then the EU pays the reportmaker for the whole dinner. So, I have seen it on this level. The other level: Finland makes a Eu project in Russia. The budget can be, let’s say, 100.000 USD. - The whole adminis-tration for this project is situated in Finland. - The Finnish guys goes to Russia, more or less weekly. He gets about 3.000 USD per month in salary. And for every day he spends there, his costs are covered by EU. And he gets a daily taxfree payment “for being abroad”. And what did the Russians get? The Russian directors got good dinners. “Pavel and Igor” got nothing. What did EU get? They got A4-reports about "the co-ordinating of … and mutual … and how the work together should be laid out… And an application for a “following project”, with a budget, let’s say 150.000 USD and so on… It is a very long story, but I critizised the system. I got kicked. Personally I hope Finland gets out of EU as soon as possibly. And that the “EU-A4-project coordinators” are sent to Siberia, “for further investigasions” for let’s say 5 years. I think this kind of shit is everywhere, but Siberia is big, so begin send Your corrupted A4-guys to Siberia. And in a few yaers we get very well educated people, on the subject; “How to cooperate with the Russians”. Henry ---
**Author:** ![Andy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/aeb1de/32.png) [@Andy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Andy)\ **Post date:** [August 14, 2002, 8:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-can-we-tell-whether-the-european-union-is-corrupt/123711/28 "2002-08-14T08:03:03Z")
> [@](#): > > How can we tell whether the European Union is corrupt? In response the this alone, simple, ask Marta Andreasen, the chief accountant to the commission 🙂 > [@](#): > > The European commission was embroiled in a furious row yesterday with its suspended chief accountant, Marta Andreasen, who claimed that its £63bn budget was “massively open to fraud” because it lacked even Enron’s accountancy safeguards. > Ms Andreasen, who accused the commission of a cover-up, said in London: “Unlike the issues surrounding Enron and WorldCom, where you can at least trace transactions and accounts, you cannot do so within the EU accounts as there is no system in place for tracing adjustments and changes to figures presented.” > > She added: “Fraud can therefore lie hidden within the system, undetected and untraced.” > > The commission, which suspended her in May, launched a ferocious counter-attack, saying it had been mistaken to employ her in the first place. Maybe she was just mental or something ---
**Author:** ![cjb](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/a4c791/32.png) [@cjb](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/cjb)\ **Post date:** [August 14, 2002, 9:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-can-we-tell-whether-the-european-union-is-corrupt/123711/29 "2002-08-14T09:16:30Z")
It is hard to believe this thread. Doesn’t everyone know that politicians lie? All you can do is look at their actions to get some idea of what is important to them. Based on what the protagonists are doing (and have done) my take is this: Arrafat has not got $1.3b. This is a huge figure - about 1/20 of Bill Gates fortune. If Arrafat had this sort of money he would not be sitting in Palestine - he would be sitting in the South of France or Calafornia. He would probably be playing golf with Bush - $1.3b buys you a lot of friends on Capitol Hill. The European Commission have not given Arrafat $1.3b for illegal purposes. If they are honourable they would not, and if they are corrupt - why would they give $1.3b away? They would be the ones sitting on deck-chairs by the swimming pool. ---
**Author:** ![jjimm](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/ba8739/32.png) [@jjimm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jjimm)\ **Post date:** [August 14, 2002, 9:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-can-we-tell-whether-the-european-union-is-corrupt/123711/30 "2002-08-14T09:33:40Z")
Interestingly, a Cuban exile I met in the US told me the same story about Castro. ---
**Author:** ![Sparc](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/65b543/32.png) [@Sparc](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sparc)\ **Post date:** [August 14, 2002, 10:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-can-we-tell-whether-the-european-union-is-corrupt/123711/31 "2002-08-14T10:17:49Z")
A short message from our sponsors: _ **Timmy’s Tinfoil Hats - The Ultimate In Mental Insulation** _ \*\*Timmy’s - The premiere source for conspiracist and crackpot supplies. \*\* Appointed special supplier to the UFO Society of America “Fighting the Federal Cabal is hard work; without Timmy’s it would be impossible,” says _Anonymous_ of the Montana Freemen ---
**Author:** ![december](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/838e76/32.png) [@december](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/december)\ **Post date:** [August 14, 2002, 2:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-can-we-tell-whether-the-european-union-is-corrupt/123711/32 "2002-08-14T14:20:00Z")
> [@](#): > > ## \*Originally posted by Andy \* \*\*quote: > > The European commission was embroiled in a furious row yesterday with its suspended chief accountant, Marta Andreasen, who claimed that its £63bn budget was “massively open to fraud” because it lacked even Enron’s accountancy safeguards. > Ms Andreasen, who accused the commission of a cover-up, said in London: “Unlike the issues surrounding Enron and WorldCom, where you can at least trace transactions and accounts, you cannot do so within the EU accounts as there is no system in place for tracing adjustments and changes to figures presented.” > > She added: “Fraud can therefore lie hidden within the system, undetected and untraced.” > > ## \*\*The commission, which suspended her in May, launched a ferocious counter-attack, saying it had been mistaken to employ her in the first place. \*\* Thank you, **Andy**. If this happened to an American corporation, the SEC would investigate and also a class-action lawsuit would be immdeicately filed. The fraud (if any) would likely be unearthed. If this happened to a governmental entity, there’s a fair chance that it would be investigated by another branch of gorernment or that the opposing political party would make a fuss. However, in many cases, both parties conspired to keep the lid on a scandal, as in the huge Savings and Loan scandal of the 1980’s. Suppose the top EU people simply stonewall, as in the above example. Deny that there’s a problem. Fire the whistle-blower and attack her ferociously. (That helps deter other whistle-blowers.) **Question: What checks an balances exist in the EU to deal with this problem? What group has the power and the interest to fight the EU leaders and to force the facts out? What sort of additional controls are needed?** BTW, some posters didn’t want to believe the report about Arafat’s wealth. From today’s [New York Post](http://www.nypost.com/news/worldnews/54744.htm), > [@](#): > > August 14, 2002 – JERUSALEM - Yasser Arafat has secretly amassed at least $1.3 billion in “personal assets,” Israel’s chief of military intelligence said yesterday. > Maj. Gen. Aharon Zeevi’s comments were **based on financial documents and other evidence confiscated earlier this year from the PLO chairman’s headquarters in Ramallah and other Palestinian Authority offices** in the West Bank. > \ > But a high-ranking Israeli official said the confirmed $1.3 billion is believed to be only a fraction of Arafat’s true holdings. > > **A 1994 British intelligence report allegedly put the figure at more than $10 billion.** > \ > > - Arafat’s wealth is held in bank accounts, real estate and other assets that can easily be made liquid. > > - The bank accounts are spread about in Europe, Arab countries, the Far East - and even the United States - under different companies controlled by Arafat. > > - Arafat has made some of his top deputies, including Abu Ala, Abu Mazen and Nabil Shaath, very rich. > > “Arafat took care of his closest aides. Some of them have tens of millions of dollars,” > \ The intricate network of numbered bank accounts and hidden assets is believed to be so complex that only Arafat, Rashid and one or two other Palestinians know their extent. > > **[color=red]The main source of Arafat’s wealth is believed to be the approximately $6 billion contributed by the United States, Japan and European countries as financial aid to the authority from 1993 to 2000, sources said.** > > “The Palestinian people’s money is Arafat’s personal money,” a high-ranking Israeli official said. “That’s the way he treats it. Everything belongs to him.” > \ > In addition to aid from governments, Arafat’s inner circle is believed to have received millions of dollars in business graft based on imports of valued goods. > > “The kickbacks work this way,” a top Israeli official said: > > “A group of Palestinians gets a monopoly on gasoline or cigarettes or cement or something. The Palestinian consumer then pays an inflated price for his gas, because the price includes a special fee that goes in the hands of Arafat’s people.” ---
**Author:** ![jjimm](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/ba8739/32.png) [@jjimm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jjimm)\ **Post date:** [August 14, 2002, 3:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-can-we-tell-whether-the-european-union-is-corrupt/123711/33 "2002-08-14T15:06:03Z")
Enough with the colours already! You’ll give me a migraine. So the NYP quotes the same Israeli intelligence/propaganda report that you did. But now it’s $10 billion! Gates had better watch out. Or is it $6 billion? Or $1.3 billion? (You’d think with all that wonga sloshing around, that “the man behind the suicide bombings” would be able to fund them a bit better…) Note that it says “A 1994 British intelligence report allegedly put the figure at more than $10 billion” rather than “A 1994 British intelligence report alleged the figure was more than $10 billion”. This suggest the reporter hasn’t actually seen the report. Note also the phrases “a knowledgeable Israeli source”, “a high-ranking Israeli official”, “is believed” (five times!). I’ve worked as a journalist, and am well aware of the manner in which one can create a story out of no proper evidence. I’m not familiar with the quoted publication, but are the epithets “sensationalist”, “poor research” and “tabloid” ever attached to it? On your comments re. the EU - yes, I think I would agree that, on the face of it, there is less transparency than the US government. ---
**Author:** ![UDS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/ecae2f/32.png) [@UDS](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/UDS)\ **Post date:** [August 14, 2002, 3:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-can-we-tell-whether-the-european-union-is-corrupt/123711/34 "2002-08-14T15:18:39Z")
Well, the NY Post report doesn’t really add a lot to the earlier report. It’s clearly based on the same sources. All we have is the assessment of an Israeli military officer based on documents which the Israelis say they seized from PA headquarters. They don’t appear to have published the documents. Forgive us if we don’t take this as the definitive last word on the subject. The “British Intelligence Report” which “allegedly” put Arafat’s wealth at in excess of $10bn in 1994 doesn’t really add much. If it is correct, Arafat had built up a huge fortune by 1994, and it seems unlikely that all, or even most, of this could have come from donations to the PA starting in 1993. For what it’s worth, I’m quite willing to believe that Arafat is hopelessly corrupt. What puzzles me is **december’s** attempt to use this to argue that the EU must be corrupt. On the one hand, the NY Post article which he cites mentions not only the EU but also the US and Japan (which **december** quotes) as sources of Arafat’s wealth as well as Saudi Arabia, Iraq and the oil sheikdoms of the Persian Gulf (which he doesn’t). The article also makes it clear that much of Arafat’s personal wealth did not come from the coffers of the PA (and therefore did not come indirectly from EU donations) but from other sources (direct payments to Arafat, payments to the PLO, the establishment of trading monopolies, etc). Any link between Arafat’s corruption and EU corruption is extremely tenuous. **December** hasn’t bothered to try to fill in the essential but missing links so clearly set out in **SuaSponte** ’s cogent post. On the other hand, if all that is in issue here is EU corruption, five minute’s research would yield abundant evidence of concern about this, evidence to suggest that it happens, etc. If **december** was remotely interested in this subject, he would know of this. It is a matter of very public discourse and considerable controversy. It’s just that none of the evidence or allegations that I have seen or heard of suggests that payments to the PA were influenced by corruption, so maybe **december** isn’t interested it it. ---
**Author:** ![Sparc](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/65b543/32.png) [@Sparc](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sparc)\ **Post date:** [August 14, 2002, 3:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-can-we-tell-whether-the-european-union-is-corrupt/123711/35 "2002-08-14T15:25:01Z")
> [@](#): > > _december_ > > Thank you, Andy. > > If this happened to an American corporation, the SEC would investigate and also a class-action lawsuit would be immdeicately filed. The fraud (if any) would likely be unearthed. > > If this happened to a governmental entity, there’s a fair chance that it would be investigated by another branch of gorernment or that the opposing political party would make a fuss. However, in many cases, both parties conspired to keep the lid on a scandal, as in the huge Savings and Loan scandal of the 1980’s. > > Suppose the top EU people simply stonewall, as in the above example. Deny that there’s a problem. Fire the whistle-blower and attack her ferociously. (That helps deter other whistle-blowers.) Absolute hogwash and utter fucking crock from beginning to end. Conjecture, facile conclusions, hasty judgment and false analogies as is to be expected from the posting member. First of all Marta Andreasen’s criticism does not indicate that there is in fact reason to believe there have been irregularities, but that accounting practices are not transparent enough – that’s no smoking gun of disappearing funds, only an indication that _if_ that would be the case it would be hard to trace the transactions. Second of all the irregularities she uncovers has naught to do with what Arafat might have done with money forwarded to the PA. Second of all the analogy to the US is dimwitted beyond belief. Corporations in the EU are subject to the same scrutiny as in the US, the insider laws are not as harsh but otherwise it is pretty much the same. Vivendi Universal and Deutsche Telekom provide fantastic examples of the same. As re government bodies, the member’s over belief in the ‘honesty’ of American politicians is pitiful. Since we have used the Enron example so far let’s continue; how many members of congress had to abstain from participating in the investigation of the Enron debacle due to having received campaign funds? IIRC it was over sixty. Has the White House supplied the papers and notes pertaining to Dick Cheney’s meetings and dealings with Enron in regards energy regulation? No they haven’t. We could go on, but I think that suffices. As for the last bit about us, the poor misguided fools of Europe and our desperate inability to wipe our own ass… yeah, that right. Jesus Christ. The fact that the Andreasen story is getting as much attention as it is speaks against that we let our government ‘just stonewall’ matters like these. In fact Marta wasn’t fired, she was reassigned not that I agree with that practice, the commission gave a semi-valid reason for this though. Their logic was that they couldn’t have a senior servant that chooses to go public with criticism of the democratic process rather than play it through the democratic channel. Meanwhile the Parliament and the Council acknowledge the problem and have initiated a review of accounting principles, and announced that there will be changes – they did this before Marta ‘blew the whistle’. Although I commend that sort of behavior myself, sometimes you have to be able to see when people are serving the greater good or just engaging in ‘political grandstanding’. It is noteworthy that the whole affair comes out of arguments about how the EU agricultural and fishery subsidies are distributed and that Marta’s home state, Spain is one of the parties that is bringing criticism on this level, since they feel they’ve been dealt a low blow by France in this matter. There is no doubt that the EU needs to better itself in many respects, like any government and in some ways more. I would however recommend the readership to not take Mr. december’s analysis for anything other than it is… opinionated grandstanding. And yes… thank you Andy! Sparc ---
**Author:** ![Sparc](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/65b543/32.png) [@Sparc](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sparc)\ **Post date:** [August 14, 2002, 3:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-can-we-tell-whether-the-european-union-is-corrupt/123711/36 "2002-08-14T15:31:07Z")
> [@](#): > > _december_ > > Thank you, Andy. > > If this happened to an American corporation, the SEC would investigate and also a class-action lawsuit would be immdeicately filed. The fraud (if any) would likely be unearthed. > > If this happened to a governmental entity, there’s a fair chance that it would be investigated by another branch of gorernment or that the opposing political party would make a fuss. However, in many cases, both parties conspired to keep the lid on a scandal, as in the huge Savings and Loan scandal of the 1980’s. > > Suppose the top EU people simply stonewall, as in the above example. Deny that there’s a problem. Fire the whistle-blower and attack her ferociously. (That helps deter other whistle-blowers.) Absolute hogwash and utter fucking crock from beginning to end. Conjecture, facile conclusions, hasty judgment and false analogies as is to be expected from the posting member. First of all Marta Andreasen’s criticism does not indicate that there is in fact reason to believe there have been irregularities, but that accounting practices are not transparent enough – that’s no smoking gun of disappearing funds, only an indication that _if_ that would be the case it would be hard to trace the transactions. Second of all the irregularities she uncovers has naught to do with what Arafat might have done with money forwarded to the PA. Second of all the analogy to the US is dimwitted beyond belief. Corporations in the EU are subject to the same scrutiny as in the US, the insider laws are not as harsh but otherwise it is pretty much the same. Vivendi Universal and Deutsche Telekom provide fantastic examples of the same. As re government bodies, the member’s over belief in the ‘honesty’ of American politicians is pitiful. Since we have used the Enron example so far let’s continue; how many members of congress had to abstain from participating in the investigation of the Enron debacle due to having received campaign funds? IIRC it was over sixty. Has the White House supplied the papers and notes pertaining to Dick Cheney’s meetings and dealings with Enron in regards energy regulation? No they haven’t. We could go on, but I think that suffices. As for the last bit about us, the poor misguided fools of Europe and our desperate inability to wipe our own ass… yeah, that right. Jesus Christ. The fact that the Andreasen story is getting as much attention as it is speaks against that we let our government ‘just stonewall’ matters like these. In fact Marta wasn’t fired, she was reassigned not that I agree with that practice, the commission gave a semi-valid reason for this though. Their logic was that they couldn’t have a senior servant that chooses to go public with criticism of the democratic process rather than play it through the democratic channel. Meanwhile the Parliament and the Council acknowledge the problem and have initiated a review of accounting principles, and announced that there will be changes – they did this before Marta ‘blew the whistle’. Although I commend that sort of behavior myself, sometimes you have to be able to see when people are serving the greater good or just engaging in ‘political grandstanding’. It is noteworthy that the whole affair comes out of arguments about how the EU agricultural and fishery subsidies are distributed and that Marta’s home state, Spain is one of the parties that is bringing criticism on this level, since they feel they’ve been dealt a low blow by France in this matter. There is no doubt that the EU needs to better itself in many respects, like any government and in some ways more. I would however recommend the readership to not take Mr. december’s analysis for anything other than it is… opinionated grandstanding. And yes… thank you Andy! Sparc ---
**Author:** ![december](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/838e76/32.png) [@december](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/december)\ **Post date:** [August 14, 2002, 4:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-can-we-tell-whether-the-european-union-is-corrupt/123711/37 "2002-08-14T16:08:21Z")
> [@](#): > > **Sparc** > In fact Marta wasn’t fired, she was reassigned not that I agree with that practice, the commission gave a semi-valid reason for this though. OK, so Marta was reassigned with only a “semi-valid” reason, meaning that the reason was also _semi-invalid._ **Sparc** , to his credit, disagrees with the practice. I assume **Sparc** also disapproves of the attacks against Marta. The question is: _What can **Sparc** do about his disagreement?_ More realistically: \*Is there some organization that shares **Sparc’s** concerns and which has the power to investigate? \*Or, is the EU leadership essentially self-policing? I’ve had a lot dealings with Lloyd’s of London. For hundreds of years, they were exempt from normal UK insurance regulation, for historical reasons and because they had such a good reputation. Their leaders were considered to be top-drawer. Well, about 15 -20 years ago, the sh\*t hit the fan. It turned out that some Lloyd’s biggies were scum. Others were letting scummy practices continue. The loss to investors was just staggering – many billions of Pounds Sterling. A number of investors committed suicide – over 30 IIRC. **jjimm** posted earllier, _“BTW, Chris Patten is a very, very scrupulous man, an even-handed analyst”_ I have no reason to disagree. However, Patten’s successor might not be as reliabile. what controls does the EU offer, beyond confidence in the individual? Are there adequate checks and balances? ---
**Author:** ![jjimm](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/ba8739/32.png) [@jjimm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jjimm)\ **Post date:** [August 14, 2002, 4:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-can-we-tell-whether-the-european-union-is-corrupt/123711/38 "2002-08-14T16:39:47Z")
I fail to see how an extremely archaic London institution such as Lloyds has any bearing whatsoever on the relatively young EU constitution, which has its own checks and balances, as well as an independent judiciary. Re. Patten - you trust him now I told you he’s a conservative, eh? 😉 Seriously though, he’s an _adviser_. Following his analysis, they can vote, or they can appoint another adviser if they don’t trust his analysis, or they can vote against. What’s your beef here? It’s how all governments work. ---
**Author:** ![UDS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/ecae2f/32.png) [@UDS](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/UDS)\ **Post date:** [August 14, 2002, 4:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-can-we-tell-whether-the-european-union-is-corrupt/123711/39 "2002-08-14T16:53:35Z")
Not only does **december** do no research into questions which supposedly interest him, but he doesn’t read (or reads but doesn’t understand, or reads and instantly forgets) the posts in the threads which he himself has started on these questions. > [@](#): > > _Is there some organization that shares **Sparc’s** concerns and which has the power to investigate? Or, is the EU leadership essentially self-policing?_ As **jjimm** has already pointed out in this thread, the EU Commission (which implements all the EU’s spending) was sacked by the EU parliament in 1999 precisely because of concerns about corruption. We can deduce from this that the EU Commission (which implements all the EU’s spending) is not self-policing, but is answerable to the Parliament. And, yes, **December** , before you ask, the Parliament is elected by the people. That was in **jjimm** ’s post too, but I dare say you may have missed it. The Parliament also approves (or, if it wishes, doesn’t approve) the EU budget prepared by the Commission and the Council, another fact which **december** might have deduced from **jjimm** ’s post without too much effort. In short, the EU Commission is controlled by the Parliament in two ways. The Parliament can (and does) fire the Commission if they’re not happy with it. And the Parliament can refuse to authorise expenditure if they’re not happy with it. There’s also the Court of Auditors, which **december** would know about if he’d looked into the matter. It audits EU revenue and expenditure to make sure it is lawful and proper and ensures that financial management is sound. It reports any irregularities to the European Parliament, so Parliament is not exactly in the dark in supervising expenditure by the Commission. ---
**Author:** ![Montezuma](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/3be4f8/32.png) [@Montezuma](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Montezuma)\ **Post date:** [August 14, 2002, 8:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-can-we-tell-whether-the-european-union-is-corrupt/123711/40 "2002-08-14T20:00:58Z")
The concept of american democracy is illusion, quite frankly, it’s a 2 party dictatorship. [Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-can-we-tell-whether-the-european-union-is-corrupt/123711.md?page=1) [Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-can-we-tell-whether-the-european-union-is-corrupt/123711.md?page=3)