How close to fascism is Russia, really ?

Ok, so will this be the fair summation of your position?

Axelrod “probably” never explained to President Obama that Al Sharpton was an ideologue of a Jewish pogrom.
President Obama himself also “probably” doesn’t know that Al Sharpton was an ideologue of a Jewish pogrom.

While the Crown Heights riots were a tragedy, calling them a pogrom is a gross exaggeration and an insult to the Jews who died in actual pogroms.

Moreover, while I’m not a fan a of Al Sharpton, Yankel Rosenbaum, the only Jew killed in this so-called pogrom, was murdered prior to his infamous “diamond merchants” speech.

Please stop pissing on his grave as well as that of Gavin Cato.

Thanks in advance.

Might start tomorrow or Monday.

http://www.starpulse.com/news/index.php/2015/10/10/antiislam-protests-to-be-staged-across

They start killing Muslims on Monday? Once they do, please provide us a link. Thank you.

Tell that to John Taylor, who correctly points out that "“Not only were Jews singled out for attack — a necessary but not a sufficient condition for a pogrom — but just as happened during Kristallnacht, the anti-Semitic rampage seemed to the Jews on the streets to have official sanction. Police on patrol in Crown Heights, threatened with suspension if they moved from their designated positions, at times did nothing to stop the violence they observed. It is a frightening enough experience to be in danger and feel that the people who are supposed to protect you are present but will not protect you.”

Ah, yes! There was only one Jew killed! Yippey! Agreed, let’s classify it as “small-scale riot”, as per your and Ramira insistence.

I’m sure as Yankel Rosenbaum was being stabbed to death for the crime of being a Jew, his final thoughts were all about how his experience was so much more pleasant than that of other Jews, who were killed in similar “riots” in other places and times in history.

Is there no end to insane bigotry and rationalization in this topic?
“Well, President Obama has a Jewish advisor, so that kinda evens out him having an avowed anti-Semite or two as other advisors. In fact, they’re not even avowed anti-Semites…They’re kinda casual, run-of-the-mill anti-Semites”.
“It wasn’t really a pogrom, it was a small riot, the people who got beaten and killed, and whose property was destroyed, should be careful calling their experience a “pogrom””

Now that must be the lamest attempt at avoiding to answer an unpleasant question in a long time. You need a quote to remember your own question? Here you are:

To wich you received this answer:

Your reaction to that was:

Enough quotes for you? Apparently you do not understand how Little Nemo can arrive at the conclusion that the US are not close to Nazism at all. (And apparently telling you about Nazism did not really help there either.)

Well acording to the definition of fascism by Alkash, Russia is very close to it. A quick look at this wiki page has some interesting quotes.

Neither assertions are true, so Axelrod and Obama probably don’t believe them.

Nationalism and patriotism in Russia is very strong. Being Nationalist Conservadox Jew is one of the reasons I do not fit into Russian society.

In many ways Russian society is much much better then USA society. There is no liberal intolerance. Russian penal system is much much more humane then US penal system.

Many Russians and Russian Jews have a very strong phobia for anything authoritarian.

After 70 years of Socialism many people from Russia would become physically sick from any authoritarian leftist agenda.

Socialism and communism are not nearly the same thing. There have been decades of socialism in Europe, along with a lot of prosperity. It’s communism that was the problem in Russia, not socialism.

No, my position is that calling the Crown Heights riots a pogrom is absurd and perverse.

I am 100% for Scandinavian Socialism – they really care for people.

This has gotten bogged down in arguments over what fascism is and whether antisemitism is an integral part of it.

I prefer to say that Russia is now an autocratic state based on nationalism. It is likely to stay that way for many years to come, under Putin and his successors (who may well be worse than Putin). And the Russian people as a whole seem to like it that way.

After 70 years with experience of liberalism in the form of Communism, many people in Russia became very conservative.

Communist Party of Russian Federation never gets more then 20% of votes, while Vladimir Putin gets at least 60% in all elections.

Many liberals still do not believe anyone who opposes them should have free speech.

Liberalism and communism don’t have much to do with each other. So far your characterization of liberals and liberalism leads me to believe that you know very little about it except the fantasy-liberalism that comes from right-wing radio and similar media.

“Though I must admit, the common everyday usage has rendered “fascism” into a shorthand for almost anything in a regime that is authoritarian/totalitarian but not marxist-leninist, and in some cases just anything that is illiberal, or even just anything political they don’t like.”

Yeah I hate that.

Suspecting secret Nashi agents want to throw off debate about Putin by resurrecting old Al Sharpton fights.

Um, no. Russians are (with good reason) very hostile to liberalism. They’re not particularly hostile to ‘authoritarian leftism’: a large plurality of people would prefer the communist Soviet system to either western capitalist democracy or what they have now. Liberalism and communism are two very different things, and the second one is much more popular (in Russia) than the former.

From the Levada Centre: