# How did early Christians reconcile divinity of the bible with it's human authors?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-did-early-christians-reconcile-divinity-of-the-bible-with-its-human-authors/826751>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [December 26, 2018, 7:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-did-early-christians-reconcile-divinity-of-the-bible-with-its-human-authors/826751 "2018-12-26T19:57:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EscAlaMike](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/escalamike/32/4177_2.png) [@EscAlaMike](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EscAlaMike)\
**Post date:** [December 28, 2018, 6:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-did-early-christians-reconcile-divinity-of-the-bible-with-its-human-authors/826751/121 "2018-12-28T18:14:09Z")

</div>

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> edited to add: What kind of access do you have that allows you to find this website but not do a search?

I’m at work, I have limited internet access.

I don’t know why this site is not blocked. Maybe the IT guy is a Doper.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [December 28, 2018, 6:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-did-early-christians-reconcile-divinity-of-the-bible-with-its-human-authors/826751/122 "2018-12-28T18:16:01Z")

</div>

> [@EscAlaMike](#):
>
> The Catholic Church has been analyzing Paul’s letters for almost 2,000 years, and they don’t seem to have a problem with this alleged “two Jesuses”.

Its not like they have an ulterior motive to making sure that no problem is found, right? Analysis of what the Catholic Church holds to be true, done by the Catholic Church-you see _no_ problem here?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [December 28, 2018, 6:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-did-early-christians-reconcile-divinity-of-the-bible-with-its-human-authors/826751/123 "2018-12-28T18:18:41Z")

</div>

> [@EscAlaMike](#):
>
> I’m at work, I have limited internet access.
> 
> I don’t know why this site is not blocked. Maybe the IT guy is a Doper.

You have no access to any search engines. How is that even done?  
“Maybe the IT guy is a Doper”? Your forgot to add “lol”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EscAlaMike](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/escalamike/32/4177_2.png) [@EscAlaMike](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EscAlaMike)\
**Post date:** [December 28, 2018, 6:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-did-early-christians-reconcile-divinity-of-the-bible-with-its-human-authors/826751/124 "2018-12-28T18:22:39Z")

</div>

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> You have no access to any search engines. How is that even done?  
> “Maybe the IT guy is a Doper”? Your forgot to add “lol”.

I have access to Google. I can do a search and the results come up, but then most of the links are blocked when I try to follow them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [December 28, 2018, 6:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-did-early-christians-reconcile-divinity-of-the-bible-with-its-human-authors/826751/125 "2018-12-28T18:25:27Z")

</div>

> [@EscAlaMike](#):
>
> I have access to Google. I can do a search and the results come up, but then most of the links are blocked when I try to follow them.

When you get home, do a search and see if what you and your sect believe is as “universal” as you assume it to be.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EscAlaMike](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/escalamike/32/4177_2.png) [@EscAlaMike](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EscAlaMike)\
**Post date:** [December 28, 2018, 6:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-did-early-christians-reconcile-divinity-of-the-bible-with-its-human-authors/826751/126 "2018-12-28T18:25:52Z")

</div>

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> Its not like they have an ulterior motive to making sure that no problem is found, right? Analysis of what the Catholic Church holds to be true, done by the Catholic Church-you see _no_ problem here?

Yes of course there is a potential conflict of interest.

But considering the elements of both diabolical evil and saintly people that the Church hierarchy has pretty much always been comprised of, I don’t see an intentional deception like that as being sustainable.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EscAlaMike](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/escalamike/32/4177_2.png) [@EscAlaMike](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EscAlaMike)\
**Post date:** [December 28, 2018, 6:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-did-early-christians-reconcile-divinity-of-the-bible-with-its-human-authors/826751/127 "2018-12-28T18:32:17Z")

</div>

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> When you get home, do a search and see if what you and your sect believe is as “universal” as you assume it to be.

I will look it up.

Let me make a prediction :rolleyes:

The more historically rooted ‘sects’, as you call them, that _don’t_ believe in a “rapture” (Catholic, older Protestant denominations, etc) will basically have the same interpretations, while the less historically-rooted Protestant denominations that believe in a “rapture” will have vastly different ones.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [December 28, 2018, 6:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-did-early-christians-reconcile-divinity-of-the-bible-with-its-human-authors/826751/128 "2018-12-28T18:32:57Z")

</div>

> [@EscAlaMike](#):
>
> Yes of course there is a potential conflict of interest.
> 
> But considering the elements of both diabolical evil and saintly people that the Church hierarchy has pretty much always been comprised of, I don’t see an intentional deception like that as being sustainable.

It doesn’t take “diabolical evil” or “saintly people” to maintain status quo. It just takes a hierarchy resistant to any change that might lead others to ask questions.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EscAlaMike](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/escalamike/32/4177_2.png) [@EscAlaMike](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EscAlaMike)\
**Post date:** [December 28, 2018, 6:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-did-early-christians-reconcile-divinity-of-the-bible-with-its-human-authors/826751/129 "2018-12-28T18:38:46Z")

</div>

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> It just takes a hierarchy resistant to any change that might lead others to ask questions.

That’s a mischaracterization.

The Church has never been afraid of questions. The university and modern science were invented in a Catholic world.

There have always been people in the hierarchy who are very anxious for change, for better or for worse.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [December 28, 2018, 6:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-did-early-christians-reconcile-divinity-of-the-bible-with-its-human-authors/826751/130 "2018-12-28T18:42:55Z")

</div>

> [@EscAlaMike](#):
>
> I will look it up.
> 
> Let me make a prediction :rolleyes:
> 
> The more historically rooted ‘sects’, as you call them, that _don’t_ believe in a “rapture” (Catholic, older Protestant denominations, etc) will basically have the same interpretations, while the less historically-rooted Protestant denominations that believe in a “rapture” will have vastly different ones.

Your “prediction” depends on how you view sects other that your own, so I leave you to it.  
BTW, I use the terms “sects” and “religious sects” to maintain equality when referring to them. Using inside vernacular like “The Church”, “Historically rooted” and the like assumes a superiority that I do not believe is justified. It is not an insult-it is an acceptance that all such sects are equally valid in my eyes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EscAlaMike](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/escalamike/32/4177_2.png) [@EscAlaMike](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EscAlaMike)\
**Post date:** [December 28, 2018, 6:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-did-early-christians-reconcile-divinity-of-the-bible-with-its-human-authors/826751/131 "2018-12-28T18:51:41Z")

</div>

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> BTW, I use the terms “sects” and “religious sects” to maintain equality when referring to them.

Fair enough.

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> Using inside vernacular like “The Church”, “Historically rooted” and the like assumes a superiority that I do not believe is justified.

But if a ‘sect’ makes a truth claim, don’t you want to know what that claim is based on? What if it’s based on something illogical or inconsistent? Wouldn’t that sect have less credibility?

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> It is not an insult-it is an acceptance that all such sects are equally valid in my eyes.

I understand your point and take no offense, but don’t you think you’re being purposefully naive? You don’t believe that one religion can be objectively better than another?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [December 28, 2018, 7:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-did-early-christians-reconcile-divinity-of-the-bible-with-its-human-authors/826751/132 "2018-12-28T19:04:30Z")

</div>

> [@EscAlaMike](#):
>
> Fair enough.
> 
> But if a ‘sect’ makes a truth claim, don’t you want to know what that claim is based on? What if it’s based on something illogical or inconsistent? Wouldn’t that sect have less credibility?

Remember the response you gave me when I asked you for the good evidence you claimed to have?

> [@EscAlaMike](#):
>
> I understand your point and take no offense, but don’t you think you’re being purposefully naive? You don’t believe that one religion can be objectively better than another?

I will take a look at any good evidence presented to me by any sect, then decide their veracity according to the amount of good evidence presented. Which reminds me-Remember the response you gave me when I asked you for the good evidence you claimed to have?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [December 28, 2018, 7:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-did-early-christians-reconcile-divinity-of-the-bible-with-its-human-authors/826751/133 "2018-12-28T19:06:57Z")

</div>

> [@EscAlaMike](#):
>
> I understand your point and take no offense, but don’t you think you’re being purposefully naive? You don’t believe that one religion can be objectively better than another?

He’s a diehard atheist, who makes a habit of JAQ in all of these threads. But if you do the same to his religion, conversion atheism, he gets angry and defensive.

I doubt the sincerity of his JAQ.

JAQ “just asking questions”

> **[Just asking questions](https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Just_asking_questions)**
>
> Just asking questions (also known as JAQing off, or as emojis: "🤔🤔🤔"\[1\]) is a way of attempting to make wild accusations acceptable (and hopefully not legally actionable) by framing them as questions rather than statements. It shifts the burden of...

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EscAlaMike](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/escalamike/32/4177_2.png) [@EscAlaMike](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EscAlaMike)\
**Post date:** [December 28, 2018, 7:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-did-early-christians-reconcile-divinity-of-the-bible-with-its-human-authors/826751/134 "2018-12-28T19:09:07Z")

</div>

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> Remember the response you gave me when I asked you for the good evidence you claimed to have?

I doubt you will accept it as evidence, but I consider:

All four Gospel accounts, the Acts, Paul’s epistles, the witness of the Apostles, the writings of the early Church fathers, the tradition of the Catholic Church, and their consistency with each other, among other things, to be good evidence supporting the divinity of Jesus.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [December 28, 2018, 7:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-did-early-christians-reconcile-divinity-of-the-bible-with-its-human-authors/826751/135 "2018-12-28T19:15:51Z")

</div>

> [@EscAlaMike](#):
>
> I doubt you will accept it as evidence, but I consider:
> 
> All four Gospel accounts, the Acts, Paul’s epistles, the witness of the Apostles, the writings of the early Church fathers, the tradition of the Catholic Church, and their consistency with each other, among other things, to be good evidence supporting the divinity of Jesus.

We have had many threads in the past on the _in_consistencies of the gospels, other sects have traditions that support and are consistent with their own interpretations-can you maybe tighten the answer up a bit and give two or three specific pieces of what you consider to be good evidence?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [December 28, 2018, 7:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-did-early-christians-reconcile-divinity-of-the-bible-with-its-human-authors/826751/136 "2018-12-28T19:22:04Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> He’s a diehard atheist, who makes a habit of JAQ in all of these threads. But if you do the same to his religion, conversion atheism, he gets angry and defensive.
> 
> I doubt the sincerity of his JAQ.
> 
> JAQ “just asking questions”  
> [Just asking questions - RationalWiki](https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Just_asking_questions)

Google can’t find the term “Conversion Atheism”-Where did you come across it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [December 28, 2018, 7:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-did-early-christians-reconcile-divinity-of-the-bible-with-its-human-authors/826751/137 "2018-12-28T19:46:47Z")

</div>

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> Google can’t find the term “Conversion Atheism”-Where did you come across it?

Odd, I can. But it means atheists that want to convert others to their beliefs. They proselytise .

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [December 28, 2018, 7:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-did-early-christians-reconcile-divinity-of-the-bible-with-its-human-authors/826751/138 "2018-12-28T19:53:18Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> Odd, I can. But it means atheists that want to convert others to their beliefs. They proselytise .

Not happening here. I am just asking for evidence of claims that have been made-that’s how I find out things.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [December 28, 2018, 8:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-did-early-christians-reconcile-divinity-of-the-bible-with-its-human-authors/826751/139 "2018-12-28T20:04:07Z")

</div>

Before the New Testament existed as the collection of documents we now have, there were those who depended on word-of-mouth and various missives from various peoples to sustain their beliefs…but is there any evidence that what self-declared Christians believed before the establishment and acceptance of said New Testament was a _shared_ belief?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EscAlaMike](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/escalamike/32/4177_2.png) [@EscAlaMike](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EscAlaMike)\
**Post date:** [December 28, 2018, 8:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-did-early-christians-reconcile-divinity-of-the-bible-with-its-human-authors/826751/140 "2018-12-28T20:09:42Z")

</div>

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> We have had many threads in the past on the _in_consistencies of the gospels, other sects have traditions that support and are consistent with their own interpretations-

I think that view misconstrues what the Gospels are, what they are intended to convey, and what we should expect of them.

Imagine a scenario in which four different people wanted to write their own biography on a subject, emphasizing certain attributes of the subject that may have been important or significant to them. Two of the biographers knew the subject personally, while two only knew people who knew the subject.

Each biographer set out to accomplish their task. In so doing, they interviewed different sets of people who may have known the subject personally or at least witnessed some significant event or events in the subject’s life.

That’s what the Gospels are. Some inconsistencies in minor details due to either differing perspectives or differing emphases, etc. should be expected. Considering that each writer had their own distinct message they were trying to convey, I would say it’s quite remarkable how consistent they are with each other.

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> can you maybe tighten the answer up a bit and give two or three specific pieces of what you consider to be good evidence?

In all four Gospels, Jesus claims divinity (though in different ways). In all four Gospels, he rose from the dead.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-did-early-christians-reconcile-divinity-of-the-bible-with-its-human-authors/826751.md?page=6)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-did-early-christians-reconcile-divinity-of-the-bible-with-its-human-authors/826751.md?page=8)
