I agree. I was about to bitch about not having enough choices (having no imagination I didn’t think of selecting “Other”).
The poll needs to be redone with a proper set of choices. Don’t forget panspermia as well (not saying that I would pick that; just that it should be included).
Evolution is not a theory of the origin of life. Evolution has nothing to do with the origin of life. Evolution only explains what happened after life had already begun. Abiogenesis is a separate phenomoneon from evolution. The correct answer to the poll is “none of the above,” but there’s no reason to believe it was supernatural, and there are multiple naturalistic models which work.
Have to go with “Other” because as I understand it, evolution has nothing to do with how life began. Well… perhaps not NOTHING because I suppose there was an “evolution” from non-living to living things. But I don’t think that is what the OP meant by “Evolution”.
Maybe this has already been hashed over. I posted this before reading any of the responses.
I put old earth creationism–but I’m really not sure how to answer–because I think the “origin of life” is a totally separate issue from “evolution” which I believe is a system God created to allow life (which he created) to change and interact in a multitude of exciting ways.