# How do Europeans and American conservatives think of each other?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-do-europeans-and-american-conservatives-think-of-each-other/709305>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [January 8, 2015, 1:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-do-europeans-and-american-conservatives-think-of-each-other/709305 "2015-01-08T13:15:36Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 14\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BOOM](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/c4cdca/32.png) [@BOOM](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BOOM)\
**Post date:** [January 10, 2015, 12:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-do-europeans-and-american-conservatives-think-of-each-other/709305/21 "2015-01-10T12:24:28Z")

</div>

> [@scrotchy](#):
>
> It’s because alot of people vote on single issues, against their best interest. “Useful idiots”.
> 
> Things like tribalism, racism, religion, abortion, etc. are immediate quantifiable issues that sway votes. Long term affects of unraveling the power of labor are more nuanced and can’t be comprehended by the majority of the right wing rubes. There have been many polls conducted showing that most of the basic positions of the Dem party are supported by the majority, yet the Reps are still viable. Why is that? I am certain that if the US was less multi-cultural then its politics and business laws would be more liberal.
> 
> Citizens United was a big deal, and is the driver in the back rooms of the Republican party. They only use the rubes to get there. Unlimited in campaigns from the groups with the most $ and most to gain, to spread BS and make the rubes feel threatened by ‘others’, is the order of the day. The problem I see with this, and you allude to above, is that this is not sustainable long term. If rights and income of labor and the middle class continue to be driven downward, which is an inherent trait of capitalism, then something eventually has to give.

That’s helpful. Thanks.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jonathan\_Chance](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jonathan_chance/32/701_2.png) [@Jonathan\_Chance](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jonathan_Chance)\
**Post date:** [January 10, 2015, 1:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-do-europeans-and-american-conservatives-think-of-each-other/709305/22 "2015-01-10T13:39:24Z")

</div>

> [@RickG](#):
>
> Another factor in the anemic recovery of the Eurozone is the fact that they have monetary union without fiscal union, and monetary policy is driven by the debt-phobic-to-the-point-of-pathology Germans. An argument can be made that fiscal austerity has been a large contributor to Eurozone economic problems since the financial collapse. Keynesianism, and all. (Not that a lot of problems of the European South aren’t self-inflicted, mind you, but sunk costs are sunk costs.)

I’ve gotta agree, Shodan, that while the structural issues behind hiring are there, the larger cause of the difference in the recoveries between Europe and the United States centers on the central bank’s responses to the hell that was 2007-2009. The Fed’s approach to QE and QE2 freed up a lot more capital to spur a recovery - now well underway - than the ECB’s approach of enforced austerity. While reigning in spendthrift governments is a worthy cause the way the EuroZone is set up makes it very difficult to coordinate an overall response to recent events. Not fun at all.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BOOM](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/c4cdca/32.png) [@BOOM](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BOOM)\
**Post date:** [January 10, 2015, 2:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-do-europeans-and-american-conservatives-think-of-each-other/709305/23 "2015-01-10T14:13:54Z")

</div>

Three helpful charts on US debt vs. others:

> **[How bad are US debt levels?](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-24541140)**
>
> The US debt position is creating global economic uncertainty, but how much money does the US owe, and how does it compare with other major economies?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Qin\_Shi\_Huangdi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/f04885/32.png) [@Qin\_Shi\_Huangdi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qin_Shi_Huangdi)\
**Post date:** [January 11, 2015, 8:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-do-europeans-and-american-conservatives-think-of-each-other/709305/24 "2015-01-11T20:49:35Z")

</div>

Excepting the big difference of the general acceptance of universal healthcare and certain other aspects of the social welfare state along with a few anciliary social issues (ie death penalty), European and American conservatives do broadly share great similarities especially in their enthusiasm for neoliberal/austerity measures with regards to the economy as well as enthusiasm for tax cuts, privatization, rollback of social welfare programs and so forth. Even on social issues there’s strong opposition to gay marriage (most of Cameron’s party broke with him on that issue while UMP was also strongly against homosexual marriage in France and Merkel at the least is in no hurry to support gay marriage) and to a varying extent on foreign immigration.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![puddleglum](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/puddleglum/32/137_2.png) [@puddleglum](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/puddleglum)\
**Post date:** [January 12, 2015, 8:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-do-europeans-and-american-conservatives-think-of-each-other/709305/25 "2015-01-12T20:28:17Z")

</div>

European countries generally have a parliamentary system which moves much faster than the american system. This meant they went much further down the socialist road went that was popular. This means that most European countries have a GDP per capita about 70-75% of America’s and are growing slower so the divide will grow over time. They also have a much higher natural rate of unemployment due to rigid labor laws so unemployment levels that would cause panic in America is just accepted as part of daily life. The Euro was a horrible idea that will be hamstringing the european economies for the foreseeable future.  
Crime rates used to be much higher in America but have been falling for almost 25 years and are about a third of what they used to be. Crime rates have fallen much more slowly in most of Europe.  
Apparently Europe was jealous that America had a race problem and decided to import one. Now many European countries have large communities of poor people of a different culture and since they do not have have America’s history of diversity they will have a harder time integrating those communities into the nation.  
Neoliberal reforms such as done by Thatcher in the 80s, Sweden in the 90s, and Germany in the 2000s could really help but even though Europe as a whole is about to go into a triple dip recession, in most countries serious reform is still politically impossible. Sad to see Europe choose a long decline, but at least it has brought us lower gas prices.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Qin\_Shi\_Huangdi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/f04885/32.png) [@Qin\_Shi\_Huangdi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qin_Shi_Huangdi)\
**Post date:** [January 12, 2015, 10:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-do-europeans-and-american-conservatives-think-of-each-other/709305/26 "2015-01-12T22:06:15Z")

</div>

> [@puddleglum](#):
>
> European countries generally have a parliamentary system which moves much faster than the american system. This meant they went much further down the socialist road went that was popular. This means that most European countries have a GDP per capita about 70-75% of America’s and are growing slower so the divide will grow over time. They also have a much higher natural rate of unemployment due to rigid labor laws so unemployment levels that would cause panic in America is just accepted as part of daily life. The Euro was a horrible idea that will be hamstringing the european economies for the foreseeable future.

Not “socialist” in most cases (excepting a few instances such as post-war Labour government’s nationalization of various sectors of industry) as opposed to creation of extensive systems of social welfare. Paul Krugman actually looked at GDP per capita and found that the difference between Europe and the USA largely disappears once one takes into account working hours. Not to mention, of course, that in Europe basic social services such as health care are guaranteed. The same fact makes unemployment less disastrou for people.

> [@](#):
>
> Crime rates used to be much higher in America but have been falling for almost 25 years and are about a third of what they used to be. Crime rates have fallen much more slowly in most of Europe.

Crime rates tend to fall more slowly when there is far lower rate to fall from-as a measure of comparison murder rates in the US are still over the double of the Western European country with the highest murder rate.

> [@](#):
>
> Apparently Europe was jealous that America had a race problem and decided to import one. Now many European countries have large communities of poor people of a different culture and since they do not have have America’s history of diversity they will have a harder time integrating those communities into the nation.

So Europe shouldn’t be allowing refugees from wars in? I agree though that a better job of assimilation can be done and multiculturalism (as opposed to multiracialism) is a dangerous policy.

> [@](#):
>
> Neoliberal reforms such as done by Thatcher in the 80s, Sweden in the 90s, and Germany in the 2000s could really help but even though Europe as a whole is about to go into a triple dip recession, in most countries serious reform is still politically impossible. Sad to see Europe choose a long decline, but at least it has brought us lower gas prices.

Neoliberal reforms (as in the US) worsened income inequality and has generally alienated a large section of the working-class and its austerity policies in Europe which has made recovery there far slower and weaker compared to here.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![puddleglum](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/puddleglum/32/137_2.png) [@puddleglum](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/puddleglum)\
**Post date:** [January 13, 2015, 8:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-do-europeans-and-american-conservatives-think-of-each-other/709305/27 "2015-01-13T20:24:12Z")

</div>

> [@Qin\_Shi\_Huangdi](#):
>
> Not “socialist” in most cases (excepting a few instances such as post-war Labour government’s nationalization of various sectors of industry) as opposed to creation of extensive systems of social welfare. Paul Krugman actually looked at GDP per capita and found that the difference between Europe and the USA largely disappears once one takes into account working hours. Not to mention, of course, that in Europe basic social services such as health care are guaranteed. The same fact makes unemployment less disastrous for people.
> 
> Neoliberal reforms (as in the US) worsened income inequality and has generally alienated a large section of the working-class and its austerity policies in Europe which has made recovery there far slower and weaker compared to here.

The main reasons Europe has fewer working hours both have to do with government policy. First, high taxes discourage people working extra hours, when Europe had similar tax rates as the US hours worked per person were similar. When European tax rates went up, hours worked per person went down. I’m sure Krugman has read Phelps on this and just forgot to mention it in his column. Secondly, labor laws that make it harder to fire people also depress hirings. This means a much higher unemployment rate. Currently the unemployment rate for the EU is twice that of the US. By excluding a couple of milion people it makes the productivity stats for the rest look better in comparison to the US. However, for the millions mired in unemployment and poverty, the inflated productivity per worker stats must be cold comfort. Even if unemployment in Europe is less disastrous.  
As for neoliberalism, it has increased growth every where it has been tried. Growth is what gets people out of poverty, not income equality. Austerity is not a part of neo-liberalism, but if you look at places such as the US and the UK which have their own currency and the ability to do effective monetary policy they have grown despite so called austerity measures, while Europe stagnates economically because of their inability or unwillingness to do effective monetary policy. Every conservative I know thought that the single currency was a bad idea and the European Union was going to lead to ruin although most of us did not expect to be proven right so quickly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Baron\_Greenback](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/baron_greenback/32/48_2.png) [@Baron\_Greenback](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Baron_Greenback)\
**Post date:** [January 13, 2015, 10:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-do-europeans-and-american-conservatives-think-of-each-other/709305/28 "2015-01-13T22:05:14Z")

</div>

> [@puddleglum](#):
>
> high taxes discourage people working extra hours,

I’m not sure how that follows?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BOOM](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/c4cdca/32.png) [@BOOM](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BOOM)\
**Post date:** [January 13, 2015, 10:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-do-europeans-and-american-conservatives-think-of-each-other/709305/29 "2015-01-13T22:43:52Z")

</div>

High taxes? Tax on income in the UK:

£0 - £10,000 = zero tax  
£10,000 - £31,866 = 20%  
£31,867 - £150,000 = 40%

What you got?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Baron\_Greenback](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/baron_greenback/32/48_2.png) [@Baron\_Greenback](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Baron_Greenback)\
**Post date:** [January 13, 2015, 10:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-do-europeans-and-american-conservatives-think-of-each-other/709305/30 "2015-01-13T22:59:08Z")

</div>

> [@BOOM](#):
>
> High taxes? Tax on income in the UK:
> 
> £0 - £10,000 = zero tax  
> £10,000 - £31,866 = 20%  
> £31,867 - £150,000 = 40%
> 
> What you got?

Aimed at me?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BOOM](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/c4cdca/32.png) [@BOOM](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BOOM)\
**Post date:** [January 13, 2015, 11:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-do-europeans-and-american-conservatives-think-of-each-other/709305/31 "2015-01-13T23:54:56Z")

</div>

No!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Baron\_Greenback](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/baron_greenback/32/48_2.png) [@Baron\_Greenback](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Baron_Greenback)\
**Post date:** [January 13, 2015, 11:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-do-europeans-and-american-conservatives-think-of-each-other/709305/32 "2015-01-13T23:58:38Z")

</div>

> [@BOOM](#):
>
> No!

Phew! 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![puddleglum](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/puddleglum/32/137_2.png) [@puddleglum](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/puddleglum)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2015, 9:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-do-europeans-and-american-conservatives-think-of-each-other/709305/33 "2015-01-15T21:25:19Z")

</div>

> [@Baron\_Greenback](#):
>
> I’m not sure how that follows?

[Substitution effec](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substitution_effect)t. Here is the paper by Prescott. [pdf](https://www.minneapolisfed.org/research/qr/qr2811.pdf)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Qin\_Shi\_Huangdi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/f04885/32.png) [@Qin\_Shi\_Huangdi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qin_Shi_Huangdi)\
**Post date:** [January 16, 2015, 2:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-do-europeans-and-american-conservatives-think-of-each-other/709305/34 "2015-01-16T02:42:44Z")

</div>

> [@puddleglum](#):
>
> The main reasons Europe has fewer working hours both have to do with government policy. First, high taxes discourage people working extra hours, when Europe had similar tax rates as the US hours worked per person were similar. When European tax rates went up, hours worked per person went down. I’m sure Krugman has read Phelps on this and just forgot to mention it in his column.

Correlation does not always equal causation-especially since (as I forgot to mention), many European countries also guarantee vacation often for several weeks. Additionally many European countries seem more culturally open to striking a work-life balance compared to America. Not saying that high tax rates aren’t a factor at all, but these other aspects have to be taken into account too.

> [@](#):
>
> Secondly, labor laws that make it harder to fire people also depress hirings. This means a much higher unemployment rate. Currently the unemployment rate for the EU is twice that of the US.

This is very much distorted by the few European countries (ie Spain or Greece) which have extremely high unemployment rates right now.

> [@](#):
>
> By excluding a couple of milion people it makes the productivity stats for the rest look better in comparison to the US. However, for the millions mired in unemployment and poverty, the inflated productivity per worker stats must be cold comfort. Even if unemployment in Europe is less disastrous.

Nobody said Europe is perfect-much of economic policy undoubtedly involves trade-offs but on the whole some place like Germany or the Netherlands has a better socioeconomic formulation than we do.

> [@](#):
>
> As for neoliberalism, it has increased growth every where it has been tried. Growth is what gets people out of poverty, not income equality.

The effect of neoliberalism are pretty disputed to say the least and many have tied to an increase in poverty, unemployment, and the like.

> [@](#):
>
> Austerity is not a part of neo-liberalism, but if you look at places such as the US and the UK which have their own currency and the ability to do effective monetary policy they have grown despite so called austerity measures, while Europe stagnates economically because of their inability or unwillingness to do effective monetary policy. Every conservative I know thought that the single currency was a bad idea and the European Union was going to lead to ruin although most of us did not expect to be proven right so quickly.

Austerity is the standard prescription for neoliberals to deal with recessions-look at what the EU has been mandating for its member countries or what World Bank/IMF has been imposing on various Third World countries for the last generation. The US, at least, has been pursuing a very much anti-austerity expansionary monetary policy, partially why we are doing quite well in this recession. Additionally there are plenty of leftist critics of the Euro, and those on the centre-left who do support the one currency also argue for a common fiscal policy to match with the single currency.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-do-europeans-and-american-conservatives-think-of-each-other/709305.md?page=1)
