# How does an anthropologist "date" a stone stone tool ?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-does-an-anthropologist-date-a-stone-stone-tool/490404>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [March 23, 2009, 1:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-does-an-anthropologist-date-a-stone-stone-tool/490404 "2009-03-23T01:02:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![astro](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/9dc877/32.png) [@astro](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/astro)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2009, 1:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-does-an-anthropologist-date-a-stone-stone-tool/490404/1 "2009-03-23T01:02:19Z")

</div>

[Per this story](http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/05/060531-hobbits.html) re the island “hobbit” people where they found stone tools dating to 800,000 years ago, if it 's “stone” how are you going to differentiate it age-wise from a random rock?

> [@](#):
>
> Discovered in 2004, the hobbits survived until about 12,000 years ago, and stone implements have been found alongside remains that date from about that time.
> 
> But new analysis of strikingly similar tools found at a nearby site called Mata Menge has dated the Mata Menge implements to 800,000 years ago, according to the study.
> 
> The similarity suggests that H. floresiensis humans—who had tiny, grapefruit-size brains—were capable craftspeople who inherited their toolmaking tradition from ancestors who evolved on Flores, researchers said. (See “‘Hobbit’ Brains Were Small but Smart, Study Says” [March 2005].)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dolphinboy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dolphinboy/32/330_2.png) [@dolphinboy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dolphinboy)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2009, 1:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-does-an-anthropologist-date-a-stone-stone-tool/490404/2 "2009-03-23T01:08:51Z")

</div>

I believe they can date a rock based on the other fossils they find buried with it. Also, if there is carbon in or around the rock they could possibly do carbon dating.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Exapno\_Mapcase](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/exapno_mapcase/32/1051_2.png) [@Exapno\_Mapcase](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Exapno_Mapcase)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2009, 1:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-does-an-anthropologist-date-a-stone-stone-tool/490404/3 "2009-03-23T01:15:04Z")

</div>

> [@dolphinboy](#):
>
> I believe they can date a rock based on the other fossils they find buried with it. Also, if there is carbon in or around the rock they could possibly do carbon dating.

Carbon dating only works to about 60,000 years. There are other [radiometric dating](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiometric_dating) measures that can be applied, though I don’t know which if any would be appropriate here.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2009, 1:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-does-an-anthropologist-date-a-stone-stone-tool/490404/4 "2009-03-23T01:29:10Z")

</div>

[This link](http://books.google.com/books?id=LUq9Rlz-1GcC&pg=PA170&lpg=PA170&dq=mata+menge+dating&source=bl&ots=YYTrjdvKwr&sig=g8gD74_DER-Wo9CO66__ceVJqug&hl=en&ei=a-TGSYnSAcaHtgfNyZHUCg&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=6&ct=result) indicates that these particular tools were dated by fission-track dating of layers of volcanic rocks above and below the site. Uranium in the rocks gradually undergoes radioactive decay, leaving tracks that accumulate since the last time the rock was molten. The density of fission tracks gives the age.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hello\_Again](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/85e7bf/32.png) [@Hello\_Again](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hello_Again)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2009, 1:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-does-an-anthropologist-date-a-stone-stone-tool/490404/5 "2009-03-23T01:31:39Z")

</div>

[Potassium-Argon dating](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potassium-argon_dating) goes back 100,000 yrs and is specifically used to find the age of rocks. Stone tools are made of rocks. 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2009, 1:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-does-an-anthropologist-date-a-stone-stone-tool/490404/6 "2009-03-23T01:45:04Z")

</div>

> [@Hello\_Again](#):
>
> [Potassium-Argon dating](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potassium-argon_dating) goes back 100,000 yrs and is specifically used to find the age of rocks. Stone tools are made of rocks. 😃

However, it will only give you the age of the rock itself, not when it was made into a tool. It also requires that there be volcanic deposits above and below the tools.

Also, because of the long half-life it is most useful for dating rocks _more than_ 100,000 years old, and can date them back billions of years.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nametag](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/nametag/32/406_2.png) [@Nametag](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nametag)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2009, 8:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-does-an-anthropologist-date-a-stone-stone-tool/490404/7 "2009-03-23T08:35:40Z")

</div>

Mostly, artifacts are dated by where they’re found. Stratographic data can be calibrated using isotopic, magnetic, and tree-ring data. Use as tools can be dated by obsidian hydration and thermoluminescence. A good primer is [here](http://id-archserve.ucsb.edu/Anth3/Courseware/Chronology/01_Contents.html).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rigamarole](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/77aa72/32.png) [@Rigamarole](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rigamarole)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2009, 8:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-does-an-anthropologist-date-a-stone-stone-tool/490404/8 "2009-03-23T08:53:04Z")

</div>

Wow. I’m just shocked to learn hobbits were real.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSYoungEsq](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/c6cbf5/32.png) [@DSYoungEsq](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSYoungEsq)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2009, 9:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-does-an-anthropologist-date-a-stone-stone-tool/490404/9 "2009-03-23T09:49:16Z")

</div>

Presumably, the anthropologist buys some flowers, or maybe some candy, engages in a little small talk, then, when the moment is right, ask the stone tool if it wants to go to a movie, and maybe some dinner before…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FRDE](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/e68b1a/32.png) [@FRDE](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FRDE)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2009, 9:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-does-an-anthropologist-date-a-stone-stone-tool/490404/10 "2009-03-23T09:59:36Z")

</div>

If I remember correctly, a few days after the discovery of those ‘Hobbits’ they discovered a modern village nearby full of tiny people wearing T Shirts and trainers.

Something to do with ‘island miniaturization’

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hello\_Again](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/85e7bf/32.png) [@Hello\_Again](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hello_Again)\
**Post date:** [March 25, 2009, 12:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-does-an-anthropologist-date-a-stone-stone-tool/490404/11 "2009-03-25T00:31:45Z")

</div>

First they ask it out for coffee…

Then they ask if it’s going to be at [AIA](http://www.archaeological.org/webinfo.php?page=10096) this year…

_snort_

I kill me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WarmNPrickly](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/d78d45/32.png) [@WarmNPrickly](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/WarmNPrickly)\
**Post date:** [March 25, 2009, 3:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-does-an-anthropologist-date-a-stone-stone-tool/490404/12 "2009-03-25T03:01:57Z")

</div>

If the stone is heated in a fire for some reason, many of the defects created by radiologic processes will “zero-out”. [Thermoluminescence dating](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermoluminescence_dating) will pick up the radiation that the specimen had experience since it was last heated. According to the Wiki sunlight will also “zero out” the defects.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sapo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ec9cab/32.png) [@Sapo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sapo)\
**Post date:** [March 25, 2009, 2:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-does-an-anthropologist-date-a-stone-stone-tool/490404/13 "2009-03-25T14:06:15Z")

</div>

So a lose tool from a collection can no longer be dated, right? You need its environment to date it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Philster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/13edae/32.png) [@Philster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Philster)\
**Post date:** [March 25, 2009, 2:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-does-an-anthropologist-date-a-stone-stone-tool/490404/14 "2009-03-25T14:13:24Z")

</div>

> [@DSYoungEsq](#):
>
> Presumably, the anthropologist buys some flowers, or maybe some candy, engages in a little small talk, then, when the moment is right, ask the stone tool if it wants to go to a movie, and maybe some dinner before…

Really, the anthropologist should get drunk first, so that a stoned tool has a chance of having a personality that could match the stone tool.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Musicat](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/musicat/32/20189_2.png) [@Musicat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Musicat)\
**Post date:** [March 25, 2009, 2:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-does-an-anthropologist-date-a-stone-stone-tool/490404/15 "2009-03-25T14:17:16Z")

</div>

Some dating is done by the style of human modification. If a certain kind of tool was known to be used in a certain era (and that was dated by various coorborating methods), then finding another in a reasonable location might be assumed to be of the same rough age.

Although I have seen some stone “tools” that look more like random rocks than tools, and I think defining those as tools is due to the mindset of the cataloger.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ludovic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/7ab992/32.png) [@Ludovic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ludovic)\
**Post date:** [March 25, 2009, 2:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-does-an-anthropologist-date-a-stone-stone-tool/490404/16 "2009-03-25T14:25:16Z")

</div>

> [@Musicat](#):
>
> Although I have seen some stone “tools” that look more like random rocks than tools, and I think defining those as tools is due to the mindset of the cataloger.

Yeah, anthropologists should have more common sense than to just date a random tool!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lemur866](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lemur866/32/434_2.png) [@Lemur866](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lemur866)\
**Post date:** [March 25, 2009, 3:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-does-an-anthropologist-date-a-stone-stone-tool/490404/17 "2009-03-25T15:37:36Z")

</div>

> [@Sapo](#):
>
> So a lose tool from a collection can no longer be dated, right? You need its environment to date it.

This is pretty much correct. A stone tool with no provenance doesn’t tell you anything except that once upon a time a human being made a tool.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![chappachula](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/d2c977/32.png) [@chappachula](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/chappachula)\
**Post date:** [March 25, 2009, 4:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-does-an-anthropologist-date-a-stone-stone-tool/490404/18 "2009-03-25T16:57:03Z")

</div>

> [@Ludovic](#):
>
> Yeah, anthropologists should have more common sense than to just **date a random tool!**

wow, after a rough day at work, you made my day 🙂  
three words, three puns… …man, I love this place

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kalhoun](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/3bc359/32.png) [@Kalhoun](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kalhoun)\
**Post date:** [March 25, 2009, 5:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-does-an-anthropologist-date-a-stone-stone-tool/490404/19 "2009-03-25T17:10:47Z")

</div>

I dated a stoned tool. I’m glad I got out!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gigi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/a587f6/32.png) [@gigi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gigi)\
**Post date:** [March 25, 2009, 9:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-does-an-anthropologist-date-a-stone-stone-tool/490404/20 "2009-03-25T21:55:20Z")

</div>

But did you get your rocks off?

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-does-an-anthropologist-date-a-stone-stone-tool/490404.md?page=2)
