How does evolution make the eye?

I don’t see anything magical about the eye…

As others point out - start with alight-sensitive spot.
A lot of evolution consists of accidental doubling and re-doubling of genetic instructions. We still get the occasional sixth finger or sixth toe instance… Crustacea like lobsters, or even insects, are a great example. Start with a simple organism, double up, double up again, to get multiple segments - eventually specific segments evolve specialized limbs for specific tasks. So one light sensitive spot becomes two or more… If they are in an indent, then this assists in determining directionality - another advantage.

When I was particularly badly sunburned (or stove-burned) I got blisters, which were water-filled blobs under my surface layer of skin. It’s not hard to imagine this as a logical evolution of “how does the body protect the critical light-sensitive spots?” The organisms whose eye coverings best shape like the appropriate lens have sharper vision, a survival attribute.

the ability to move the top of this light-sensitive pit gives a bit more precision to the evolving vision. So just as you can wiggle your nose or ears, or smile, the muscles that can move the “eyehole” can significantly improve ability to quickly change direction of view, without moving the whole body. Some more primitive animals have eyes on stalks, but a critical survival capacity means the eye should be less vulnerable, should not stick out. So an eyehole that can be moved internally gives an advantage; so imagine an animal can point the eye pit sort of like how you can wiggle your nose to point your nostrils slightly one way or the other. Or… move your tongue inside your mouth to point where you want…

And of course, evolution likes to take a good idea and run with it. Eventually an aimable pit lined with light sensitive nerves becomes a more rounded ball-like structure with far greater ability to aim. more than one light-sensitive spot becomes tens of thousands.

And of course, the neural networks in the brain that interpret the images have evolved with the quality of the eyes… from simple “am I in the light or hidden?” to recognizing familiar shapes and analyzing what is seen.

There are dozens of other “design” decisions that evolution has made. The closer the eyes are to the brain, the shorter the nerve connection, the less likely an accident will cause blindness; if your eyes were in your fingers, any bad accident could damage them and make you blind, a severe evolutionary disadvantage. It’s a lot easier to get by with a few fingers missing than to go blind. Eye placement evolves according to need - horses or chickens that need to see enemies coming in any direction have eyes that cover 360 degrees; animals that jump form tree to tree or onto their prey have better advantages with depth perception provided by side-by-side eyes… and so on.

What makes weirder in trying to get your head around this fish (as it were) is that what you think are its eyes are its nostrils.
Sort of like this.

I seem to recall that the light sensitive spots evolved into eyes in animals but into chloroplasts (the photosynthetic organelles) in plants. Evolution works in wondrous ways. Amazingly the eye has apparently evolved about 40 times in different groups of animals.

Something about that fish seemed familiar; then I remembered this picture from Codex Seraphinianus.

Great stuff. I’m glad I didn’t just wiki it. If eyes developed at different times independently that’s indicative of a logic to it.

I’m trying to get past how long there had to be things without eyes before there were. Imagine waiting for evolution to happen? And it does and someone else wants to watch the price is right or something.

Lalla and Richard were introduced to each other by Douglas Adams at his (Douglas’s) 40th birthday party.

[/sidetrack]

Only human eyes.
Many animals are nocturnal, and their eyes are adapted to see very well at night (compared to humans). Some examples: many birds, like owls, hunters like foxes & raccoons, cats, some dogs (though they use smell even more), horses, etc.

You can often recognize these animals because their eyes are big (compared to their size) and because their eyes seem to glitter in the dark (due to a reflecting layer in their eyes).

Plus even worms sleep

Mind. Boggled. So cool!

This question reminds me of a book from some years back - Life’s Solution by Simon Conway Morris. In it, he points out :

As I recall, he shows that the vertebrate and cephalopod eyes are anatomically similar but derive from very different embryonic tissues. As noted above the eye has evolved independently many times.

I’m talking about the early development of eyes and sleep. And nocturnal animals still sleep.

I certainly understand how photosensitive cells give an evolutionary advantage, but what kind of cells did those cells evolve from?

Ironically, it’s having experiencied sequentially the differences that corneal disease (and donor corneas), glaucoma, and macular damage from a lupus med have made to my vision that’s helped me understand the functions of the various parts and mechanisms of the eye better than I could have if I were still fully sighted or had been born blind. Pretty freaking incredible.

I hope not to understand the complex functioning of other organs the same way. :slight_smile:

Depends who’s eye you are talking about, for us humans they came from Cilia and in other lines from Flagella.

Interesting (if long and highly technical) page on the origin of opsins.

I’m fairly sure Conway Morris is wrong. Eyes have evolved into very different types and in different tissues, but they have a monophyletic origin, since they all share the pax6 gene and use the same chemistry. The origin of light-sensitive organs goes back a lot further than Conway Morris seems to think. But I think he is wrong about a lot of things.

This might’ve gotten lost in the thread, but before eyes and with just a bunch of photosensitive molecules, the whole point (well, a whole point) was that organisms could see that night and day actually was a thing, and to thrive upon that.

For all those in this thread (and elsewhere) I cannot recommend highly enough the endlessly fascinating and beautifully diagrammed and illustrated book Animal Eyes, by Land and Nilsson.