How effective are NATO anti-tank weapons in Ukraine right now?

Rediscovered by Mazer Rackham in the Second Formic War.

Exactly - if you target the guy who seems to be the recipient and originator of many calls, then you are taking out the guy directing the others. (Or you are taking out the town gossip, their major back channel of information, which is equally likely to lower morale…)

This is analogous to all those Law & Order type cop shows - nobody does wiretaps any more. They dump cellphone records and tell the suspect “we know you called Fred an hour before he was murdered, then Bob 20 times immediately after the murder… why?” The metadata is almost as relevant.

If the claim is accurate, hitting a one meter target from 1000’ with an unguided, drone-dropped bomb is pretty impressive. I suspect that might be under ideal conditions that rarely exist in war.

I honestly don’t know why you still have the idea that Ukrainian TB2 drone munitions are unguided. They are not, as has been pointed out a few times.

Reread my earlier post, the two of you are talking about two different drone and weapon system combinations. You are talking about TB2 drone which use PGMs. MikeF is talking about civilian drones dropping RKG-1600 anti-tank hand grenades.

Regarding their accuracy, my gut feeling is that the claim is indeed under ideal conditions. The only alleged combat footage of it in use that I’ve seen is grainy IR camera footage on propagandish sites. It is after all just dropping a hand grenade with a drogue parachute from 1000’ using the hand controls of a quadcopter.

The next question is why MikeF is talking about civilian drones dropping RKG-1600s. Are they being used in Ukraine?

I don’t have the link handy but there is a Twitter feed (or whatever the correct term is) that keeps track of weapons being used by both sides with videos and still photos. They say that RKG 1600s are being used by Ukraine. I I don’t know why you think I was talking about TB2 drones. I never mentioned them.

The video is embedded in the second link from my prior post, here.

Right, you are! That’s the one.

In Red Storm Rising, the NATO anti-tank weapons were BGM-71 TOW, primarily Jeep mounted. Technically man-portable, but pretty unwieldy. Much better fired from a vehicle or helicopter.

Oh, the hours I wasted on that and Gunship

Without 3G/4G capability, those encrypted apps cannot work, and the Russians targeted civilian 3G/4G communications early on. This is what happened with the FSB officer trying to call home to report on the death of his general - his encrypted VOIP app failed because it used 3G/4G: ideal for peacetime situations using roaming across European networks, but useless in a war-zone. They should have shifted to using Russian military comms networks (I assume the Russians have military satellite communications), but fell back to an un-encrypted cellphone call using a Ukrainian SIM card across Ukrainian network providers, and got intercepted.

Not literally nobody, there are still wiretaps.

Sure they do. All that meta data can paint a pretty good circumstantial picture but there’s still nothing quite like the words actually coming out of the accused’s mouth. Of course, actual proof isn’t necessary when dropping bombs during war.

Rob Lee’s account perhaps? I’ve checked in on that occasionally and I can see that yes, more tanks getting blasted to pieces.