# How "high class" is Hyacinth

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-high-class-is-hyacinth/438527>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [February 21, 2008, 6:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-high-class-is-hyacinth/438527 "2008-02-21T06:35:11Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ximenean](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/x/aca169/32.png) [@Ximenean](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ximenean)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2008, 3:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-high-class-is-hyacinth/438527/21 "2008-02-21T15:45:08Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Labrador Deceiver]  
This bears repeating.  
[/QUOTE]

That Best British Sitcom poll caused much scratching of heads round here at the time. Vicar of Dibley at number 3? You had to wonder who was voting. It seemed skewed towards cosy old school sitcoms.

Among 90’s British sitcoms, Keeping Up Appearances is nowhere near the best remembered here, with shows such as One Foot in the Grave and Men Behaving Badly and others being ahead of it. Which makes it odd that it is apparently quite popular elsewhere.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hippy\_Hollow](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hippy_hollow/32/4841_2.png) [@Hippy\_Hollow](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hippy_Hollow)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2008, 8:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-high-class-is-hyacinth/438527/22 "2008-02-21T20:22:52Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=irishgirl]  
If you want funny, try _The Mighty Boosh_.  
[/QUOTE]

For some reason the idiots that control programming for BBC America never give us enough of the _good_ stuff. They’re like the foreign friend of yours that only lets you have the “gringo” food and drink, because you can’t handle the native stuff…

Here’s a list of truly brilliant British shows that were either showed entirely too briefly, or not at all, in the US:  
[ul]  
[li]All of the Harry Enfield shows[/li][li]A Bit of Fry and Laurie (my PBS station aired a season or so, but there were at least 4 in Britain)[/li][li]The Fast Show (momentarily aired as “Brilliant!”)[/li][li]Nighty Night (aired on Lifetime)[/li][li]Peep Show (actually, in all fairness, BBC America did show it quite a bit… can’t wait until the fifth season!)[/li][li]EastEnders (sure, some of you think it’s soap trash, and it is, but they’ll show Footballers Wives over EE? It’s aired on some PBS stations in America, though.)[/li][/ul]  
If Brits could explain the appeal of The Mighty Boosh, I’d appreciate it. I get recommendations for shows - Black Books, Bo Selecta!, Spaced - and they are enormous let-downs. BB and Spaced aren’t horrible, they’re just not as funny as people say they are. Now Peep Show, on the other hand, is possibly the funniest show I’ve seen in the past five years (except for Nighty Night, which might be the funniest thing I’ve ever seen on telly, ever).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AuntiePam](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/f19dbf/32.png) [@AuntiePam](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AuntiePam)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2008, 8:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-high-class-is-hyacinth/438527/23 "2008-02-21T20:47:34Z")

</div>

I liked _Keeping Up Appearances_ because I like watching people who try to be high and mighty get their comeuppance, and it’s even funnier when they don’t know they’re getting their comeuppance.

Hyacinth was infuriating. She was rude, demanding, thoughtless, and delusional, and nobody ever called her on it. But the one time that Richard put his foot down, I felt sorry for her. I think Hyacinth’s a great character. I loved Onslow and Daisy too – they had a great relationship.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Labrador\_Deceiver](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/7c8e57/32.png) [@Labrador\_Deceiver](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Labrador_Deceiver)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2008, 8:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-high-class-is-hyacinth/438527/24 "2008-02-21T20:56:56Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Usram]  
That Best British Sitcom poll caused much scratching of heads round here at the time. Vicar of Dibley at number 3? You had to wonder who was voting. It seemed skewed towards cosy old school sitcoms.

Among 90’s British sitcoms, Keeping Up Appearances is nowhere near the best remembered here, with shows such as One Foot in the Grave and Men Behaving Badly and others being ahead of it. Which makes it odd that it is apparently quite popular elsewhere.  
[/QUOTE]

Regardless, the show was created in Britain, and gained a certain amount of popularity there. The idea that Americans, more than the English, are silly for liking the show is a little bizarre.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GorillaMan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/50afbb/32.png) [@GorillaMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GorillaMan)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2008, 9:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-high-class-is-hyacinth/438527/25 "2008-02-21T21:17:34Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Labrador Deceiver]  
Regardless, the show was created in Britain, and gained a certain amount of popularity there.  
[/QUOTE]

We can’t deny that. But shows it got ranked above included:

The Office  
Phoenix Nights  
Steptoe and Son  
The Royle Family  
Drop the Dead Donkey  
Hi-de-Hi  
The Likely Lads  
The Young Ones  
Hancock’s Half Hour

😕

[QUOTE=Hippy Hollow]  
If Brits could explain the appeal of The Mighty Boosh, I’d appreciate it.  
[/QUOTE]

I wish I could. It took me a while to take to it, I’ll admit. Some of the surreal loopiness is perhaps an onwards progression from The Young Ones through Father Ted and The League of Gentleman. It’s got a very clever fast-paced script. But what about it that really clicks with me is, still, a mystery.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miss\_Purl\_McKnittington](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/e9a140/32.png) [@Miss\_Purl\_McKnittington](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miss_Purl_McKnittington)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2008, 10:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-high-class-is-hyacinth/438527/26 "2008-02-21T22:27:23Z")

</div>

I think this is the perfect thread to express my disgust that BBC America is currently showing Dancing with the (freaking) Stars for many hours every night. I’d rather they showed every episode of All Creatures Great and Small (or whatever the series based on the James Herriott books was called) back to back than Dancing with the Stars. So. Damn. Stupid.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Capt.Ridley\_s\_Shooting\_Party](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/cc9497/32.png) [@Capt.Ridley\_s\_Shooting\_Party](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Capt.Ridley_s_Shooting_Party)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2008, 10:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-high-class-is-hyacinth/438527/27 "2008-02-21T22:56:06Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> I get recommendations for shows - Black Books, Bo Selecta!, Spaced - and they are enormous let-downs.

Who told you Bo Selecta! was funny? Perhaps the worst shit to ever have graced our screens in recent years. Completely unfunny, yet strangely popular 😕

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![irishgirl](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/8edcca/32.png) [@irishgirl](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/irishgirl)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2008, 11:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-high-class-is-hyacinth/438527/28 "2008-02-21T23:04:03Z")

</div>

_The Mighty Boosh_ is about a jazz nerd, his ultra-trendy friend and their mates, a stoner alien shaman and his familiar who is a talking gorilla called Bollo. The show charts their weird adventures…I’m not selling this very well, am I?

It’s just surreal, bizarre and incredibly funny.  
Oh, and the songs are awesome, especially the crimping.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TWDuke](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/e495f1/32.png) [@TWDuke](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TWDuke)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2008, 11:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-high-class-is-hyacinth/438527/29 "2008-02-21T23:22:48Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=GorillaMan]  
We can’t deny that. But shows it got ranked above included:

The Office  
Phoenix Nights  
Steptoe and Son  
The Royle Family  
Drop the Dead Donkey  
Hi-de-Hi  
The Likely Lads  
The Young Ones  
Hancock’s Half Hour

😕  
[/quote]  
Well, you can’t blame American tastes for a British survey.

You also can’t blame us for not liking shows we’ve never seen. I live in one of the biggest TV markets in the U.S. and I don’t think I’ve seen any of these except _The Office_ and _The Young Ones_. I don’t know why some shows never make it to PBS and some never leave (Are You Being Served?), but I certainly don’t have any control over it. But keep in mind that PBS is not BBC1. A “hit” on public television here is still only being seen by a small fraction of the television audience. And at least in my area, “Britcoms” are usually shown between 9 and 11 on Fridays and Saturdays when competition is thin and the audience probably skews older than usual.

I have no idea why everything that that Hugh Laurie ever appeared in isn’t being broadcast during every pledge drive. Maybe it would be too expensive, or maybe the sight of Dr. House as an upper-class twit would be too traumatic for American viewers.

I’ve caught bits of _Eastenders_. It seems to be one of those shows you have to take time to get into, and it didn’t look worth the effort. I’ve also caught a little of Black Books and I really _wanted_ to like it. He’s crabby and cynical and surrounded by books! But I didn’t.

[Quote=mbh]

Oddly enough, my mom likes the show, too.  
[/quote]  
Probably because she recognizes some of herself in Hyacinth (who’s not altogether unsympathetic to the degree of, say Basil Fawlty or Blackadders 1-3). There aren’t many American sitcoms where the leads (virtually the entire cast, actually) are of such advanced years and are not cosmetically or surgically disguised as younger.

> [@Giles](#):
>
> (Yes, there is a class system in the US: partly based on money, partly based on heredity [who your parents were], and partly based on “race”.)

Socioeconomic status in the U.S. is not at all comparable to the traditional British class system. A multimillionaire NBA starting center descended from slaves has a higher status than a minimum wage clerk whose ancestors came over on the Mayflower – not that there’s anything wrong with that.

Until relatively few years ago, most members of the upper house of Parliament held office by virtue of their birth. U.S. Senators and Representatives frequently come from previously undistinguished backgrounds. The U.S. Constitution expressly forbids hereditary titles. The British social system until quite recently was built around them.

Much is made of the fact that you have to be rich, white and male to be president (although at least one of those may be subject to revision soon), but, with one or two exceptions, our head of state has never been a hereditary position. A few of them have actually come from humble beginnings.

Here’s a relevant [L.A. Times article](http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003670811_prince18.html) from way back in 2007:

> [@](#):
>
> Now that Prince William’s fairy-tale romance with commoner Kate Middleton is royally kaput, it’s time for the sages to weigh in. And weigh in they have, in the place the English always have drawn their lines. Kate was, sorry to say, way too middle class… Carole Middleton, who runs a party-supply business with her husband and made enough to buy a $2 million house in Berkshire and send her daughter to prestigious Marlborough College, said “toilet” instead of “lavatory.” She said “pardon” when she couldn’t hear what someone had just said. (“What?” is more posh.) … By Tuesday, the papers were publishing “cut-and-keep” guides on “how to be posh,” and the Telegraph had a take-at-home quiz on “what class are you?”
> 
> Upper-class clues
> 
> Clue: Does your house have a number, rather than a name? Do you propose toasts such as “Cheers” over drinks? Do your children have a PlayStation 3, rather than a dressing-up box? Get a better life. … That one-third of inner-city Londoners live in low-income households, while the average house in Kensington sells for $1.6 million, seems to inspire far less collective angst than the anonymous quotes from courtiers who revealed that mates of William’s would snicker “doors to manual,” a reference to her mother’s former airline job, when Kate entered the room. … Snobby acronyms such as NSIT (“Not Safe In Taxis”) and OTT (Over The Top) date to Peter York and Ann Barr’s famous 1982 guide to Sloane Square preppies, “The Official Sloane Ranger Handbook.”

The article also includes evidence that the class system is morphing if not breaking down entirely, but it certainly exists.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GorillaMan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/50afbb/32.png) [@GorillaMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GorillaMan)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2008, 11:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-high-class-is-hyacinth/438527/30 "2008-02-21T23:43:15Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=TWDuke]  
You also can’t blame us for not liking shows we’ve never seen. I live in one of the biggest TV markets in the U.S. and I don’t think I’ve seen any of these except _The Office_ and _The Young Ones_. I don’t know why some shows never make it to PBS and some never leave (Are You Being Served?), but I certainly don’t have any control over it.  
[/quote]

No doubt it boils down to which shows they bought the rights to show repeats of without forking out more cash.

As for the list I gave there, it was a deliberately wide spread from the historic (Hancock, Steptoe) through to the modern (Royle Family, Phoenix Nights, both worth searching out if The Office was to your liking). And they’re all, at least IMO 🙂 , far far superior in so many ways than Keeping Up Appearances, plus my amazement that not one of them got above the latter in the poll, given the mix of popular modern shows and cherished classics.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ximenean](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/x/aca169/32.png) [@Ximenean](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ximenean)\
**Post date:** [February 22, 2008, 12:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-high-class-is-hyacinth/438527/31 "2008-02-22T00:19:53Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=TWDuke]  
Here’s a relevant [L.A. Times article](http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003670811_prince18.html) from way back in 2007:  
The article also includes evidence that the class system is morphing if not breaking down entirely, but it certainly exists.  
[/QUOTE]

The LA Times article is spurious rubbish, based on British tabloid tittle-tattle. If anything, there is an inverse class system in operation in Britain these days. High flying politicians such as Michael Ancram and even Tony Blair are careful to conceal any traces of poshness.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TWDuke](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/e495f1/32.png) [@TWDuke](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TWDuke)\
**Post date:** [February 22, 2008, 12:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-high-class-is-hyacinth/438527/32 "2008-02-22T00:27:17Z")

</div>

They couldn’t take pains to conceal distinctions if those distinctions didn’t exist.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GorillaMan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/50afbb/32.png) [@GorillaMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GorillaMan)\
**Post date:** [February 22, 2008, 12:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-high-class-is-hyacinth/438527/33 "2008-02-22T00:36:06Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=TWDuke]  
They couldn’t take pains to conceal distinctions if those distinctions didn’t exist.  
[/QUOTE]

I agree. Perceptions of class persist, and it’s crazy to pretend they don’t. I find myself grappling with it on a daily basis, with the entrenched lack of ambition and aspiration it creates among large sections of poorer classes. It really is a ‘not for the likes of us’, stay-in-one’s-place attitude.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BellRungBookShut-CandleSnuffed](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/bcef8e/32.png) [@BellRungBookShut-CandleSnuffed](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BellRungBookShut-CandleSnuffed)\
**Post date:** [February 22, 2008, 12:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-high-class-is-hyacinth/438527/34 "2008-02-22T00:48:21Z")

</div>

Yeah, I think the show’s kind of amusing, but it’s pretty damn formulaic. I used to like Are You Being Served?, but then I realized that Mrs. Slocombe was going to say something about her pussy, and then I realized it wasn’t actually funny.

PBS needs Fawlty Towers (all six of 'em), A Bit of Fry and Laurie, and Jeeves and Wooster if they want to show some classic Brit comedy that’s actually funny.

WTF PBS MF OMG.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![descamisado](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e480ec/32.png) [@descamisado](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/descamisado)\
**Post date:** [February 22, 2008, 12:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-high-class-is-hyacinth/438527/35 "2008-02-22T00:55:24Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=GorillaMan]  
I agree. Perceptions of class persist, and it’s crazy to pretend they don’t. I find myself grappling with it on a daily basis, with the entrenched lack of ambition and aspiration it creates among large sections of poorer classes. It really is a ‘not for the likes of us’, stay-in-one’s-place attitude.  
[/QUOTE]  
I am totally not up on the dynamics of any class system, traditional (UK) or pretend-to-be-non-existent (U.S.), but could the UK system engender an attitude of “we’re locked in, so why try”?

I also used to love _KUA_, but the repetitiveness got stale, although I’ll still watch if I have nothing else to do.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ximenean](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/x/aca169/32.png) [@Ximenean](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ximenean)\
**Post date:** [February 22, 2008, 12:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-high-class-is-hyacinth/438527/36 "2008-02-22T00:58:29Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=TWDuke]  
They couldn’t take pains to conceal distinctions if those distinctions didn’t exist.  
[/QUOTE]

How’s it different from a president who comes from a preppy old maoney background making out that he’s just some hick from Texas?

Anyway, plenty of British PMs have come from modest backgrounds. Major, Thatcher, Callaghan, Wilson… The so-called upper house, the House of Lords, is a sideshow. The House of Commons is where it’s at. It’s not like the Senate vs. the Representatives.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GorillaMan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/50afbb/32.png) [@GorillaMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GorillaMan)\
**Post date:** [February 22, 2008, 1:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-high-class-is-hyacinth/438527/37 "2008-02-22T01:02:17Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=5-4-Fighting]  
I am totally not up on the dynamics of any class system, traditional (UK) or pretend-to-be-non-existent (U.S.), but could the UK system engender an attitude of “we’re locked in, so why try”?  
[/QUOTE]

Not really, more a state of mind which doesn’t look beyond the familiar and the traditional. Perhaps the very reason for its continued existence is the _lack_ of a sense of actually being ‘locked in’.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ximenean](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/x/aca169/32.png) [@Ximenean](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ximenean)\
**Post date:** [February 22, 2008, 1:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-high-class-is-hyacinth/438527/38 "2008-02-22T01:15:49Z")

</div>

That is not a class system as I understand it, i.e. a system of widespread prejudices and conventions which keeps people “in their place” regardless of their ambition and ability. What you’re talking about seems like the sort of despair that afflicts poorer people in all societies. Individuals thinking that university, say, is “not for the likes of them” is not the same as a class system.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TWDuke](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/e495f1/32.png) [@TWDuke](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TWDuke)\
**Post date:** [February 22, 2008, 1:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-high-class-is-hyacinth/438527/39 "2008-02-22T01:26:26Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Usram]  
How’s it different from a president who comes from a preppy old maoney background making out that he’s just some hick from Texas?  
[/QUOTE]  
The older Bush was a New Englander and sounded like it. The younger’s history is a little more complicated. He was born in New Haven, raised in Midland and Houston, attended a prep school in Andover, went on to Yale, “served” in the Texas and Alabama Air National Guards, attended Harvard, and lived in Texas for most of the next 20 years. Seems like he had plenty of opportunity to acquire an authentic Texan accent. In any case, there’s very little difference between an old money background and a new money background over here.

Aw, geez, you made me defend the president.

> [@](#):
>
> Anyway, plenty of British PMs have come from modest backgrounds. Major, Thatcher, Callaghan, Wilson…

I thought the monarch was the head of state.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GorillaMan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/50afbb/32.png) [@GorillaMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GorillaMan)\
**Post date:** [February 22, 2008, 1:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-high-class-is-hyacinth/438527/40 "2008-02-22T01:31:23Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Usram]  
That is not a class system as I understand it, i.e. a system of widespread prejudices and conventions which keeps people “in their place” regardless of their ambition and ability. What you’re talking about seems like the sort of despair that afflicts poorer people in all societies. Individuals thinking that university, say, is “not for the likes of them” is not the same as a class system.  
[/QUOTE]

Maybe the two are so intertwined in Britain that it’s impossible to talk about one without the other being involved? Situations I’m talking about include clear statements by people that a particular school is ‘too posh’ for their children to go to, which I could only interpret as meaning ‘too middle-class’. It also happens to be one of the best comprehensives in the country. This kind of thing comes across to me, at least in part, as being a ‘know their place’ situation, that they’ll make do with something else.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-high-class-is-hyacinth/438527.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-high-class-is-hyacinth/438527.md?page=3)
