Sure, this checks all the boxes.
ACLU lawyer with a lot of influence, right? Why is that influence being wasted on taking racially charged, misogynist potshots at a beloved children’s book author whose popularity has only grown in the last few years? When there are so many other issues that energy could go toward?
And global fascism, really? It’s very a high school way of arguing a position. No one finds this convincing except others who engage in this performative loudmouthery.