There was a case in the Tennessee legislature where the GOP held one house by a single seat. The Dems all voted for a moderate Republican as speaker who was not the person the GOP caucus themselves had decided to support. The Dems choice as speaker then voted for himself, giving him the speakership by one vote.
Except that Officer isn’t defined in the Constitution. I think my main point stands though - the order of succession after VP is created by Congress, and could be changed by Congress - there’s nothing the Constitution that sets the order of succession.
No, the minority party nominates its party leader, and the minority members vote for the same, but of course they lose. Assuming the Democratic caucus of the incoming House of the 112th Congress chooses to retain Pelosi as party leader, she will be nominated and lose. Boehner has “run” in the previous two elections and lost.
Hasn’t it also become a tradition the the reverse is not true? That Speakers who lose the majority resign from their leadership position rather than serve as minority leader?
Hastert did not run for minority leader in 2007 and Joseph Martin was replaced by Charles Halleck in 1959. (Tom Foley wasn’t eligible to be minority leader because he was voted out of office as well as losing the majority in 1994.) And many people think that Pelosi will be replaced rather than serve as minority leader.
Democrat James Traficant once voted for Republican Dennis Hastert as Speaker. He was stripped of all of his committee assignments and was later expelled from the House after being convicted of bribery charges.