# How Liz Cheney can hold her seat

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-liz-cheney-can-hold-her-seat/941554>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [May 7, 2021, 12:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-liz-cheney-can-hold-her-seat/941554 "2021-05-07T00:04:09Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pleonast](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pleonast/32/1183_2.png) [@Pleonast](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pleonast)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2021, 3:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-liz-cheney-can-hold-her-seat/941554/41 "2021-05-07T15:21:27Z")

</div>

Liz Cheney is playing the long game. The current morph of the Republican Party is doomed, but there will always be a conservative party in the US. She has name recognition and is establishing herself as having principles. She will land on her feet and will be the party leader once the Trumpists are disempowered.

Don’t cry for her.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Duality](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mr.duality/32/4098_2.png) [@Mr.Duality](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Duality)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2021, 4:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-liz-cheney-can-hold-her-seat/941554/42 "2021-05-07T16:11:29Z")

</div>

I stopped underestimating her after she won election in spite of being a carpetbagger. She ran for election about as soon as legally possible after moving to Wyoming.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DeadTreasSecretaries](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/deadtreassecretaries/32/4817_2.png) [@DeadTreasSecretaries](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DeadTreasSecretaries)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2021, 4:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-liz-cheney-can-hold-her-seat/941554/43 "2021-05-07T16:19:49Z")

</div>

> [@Roger\_That](#):
>
> All minor stuff to be negotiated–what her committee assignments would be, what they would not be, what her votes would be within committee (as opposed to on the floor)–all of this is far better for Liz Cheney than losing her House seat altogether, and better for Dems to keep their majority in the House altogether.

No, if she got a committee assignment at all that would break your logic down. It would mean she would have lots of tiebreaking votes. Which would then mean that she would either have to be openly much more liberal or break her agreement with the dems.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gdave](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gdave/32/3683_2.png) [@gdave](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gdave)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2021, 4:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-liz-cheney-can-hold-her-seat/941554/44 "2021-05-07T16:28:58Z")

</div>

> [@Roger\_That](#):
>
> Ah, here’s the beauty part. In exchange for the Dem endorsement, she agrees to vote her conscience on every single issue EXCEPT if the Dems need her vote to break a tie. The Dems should do this because the alternative will be to have a GOP Congressperson who will vote against them 100% of the time, not 98% of the time.

To the extent that I understand your proposal, and I’m not at all confident that I do, it seems like the deal you’re proposing is that Liz Cheney will vote by her “conscience, constituency, and Constitution” on votes where her single vote won’t make a difference either way, but on votes where it _will_ make difference, she’ll throw out the 3 Cs and just follow the orders of Democratic Party leaders. Is that right?

If it is…what would even be the point? No one in their right mind would agree to that, particularly since no one is going to vote for someone to represent them who’s subject to those rules.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Roger\_That](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/roger_that/32/8505_2.png) [@Roger\_That](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Roger_That)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2021, 8:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-liz-cheney-can-hold-her-seat/941554/45 "2021-05-07T20:53:30Z")

</div>

What is the point of having WY represented by a GOPer who would be as bad for the Dems, and probably much worse, as Liz Cheney could be on her worst day? The house is held by Dems by a hair-thin margin now, and every seat they can maintain in the 2022 election is crucial. It’s like Manchin in the Senate–he’s a piece of garbage, ideologically speaking, but without him, a GOPer wins W. Va easily and the Dems lose their control of the Senate. Same thing here, only the Dems have more leverage over Cheney than they do over Manchin. Big picture, folks. big picture. Hell, if she’s got a brain in her head, she’d do it just to spite the GOP for two years.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gdave](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gdave/32/3683_2.png) [@gdave](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gdave)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2021, 9:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-liz-cheney-can-hold-her-seat/941554/46 "2021-05-07T21:29:58Z")

</div>

No, I get why this deal would be useful for the Democratic Party. What’s the point for _Liz Cheney_? I mean, sure, there’s a lot more to being a Member of Congress than just votes, but that’s still kind of an important bit. Under the terms of your deal, she effectively has no vote. She’s free to vote as she wishes on votes where her vote doesn’t make a difference, but whenever her might actually be decisive, she forfeits her ability to make up her own mind and represent the interests of her constituents. Why would she agree to that?

And even if she would accept that deal, why would anyone in Wyoming vote for her? I’m a Democrat, and I wouldn’t vote for a candidate who committed themselves to subordinating their vote on my behalf to the Democratic leadership in Congress like that. And even if Liz Cheney thought your deal made sense, why would she think Wyoming voters would accept it? And if Wyoming voters wouldn’t accept it, we’re back to, why would Liz Cheney?

And how would this work in practical terms? Is it only 50/50 votes? What if she’s the balance on a 2/3 vote to impeach or override a veto? And how would she know on any vote if she’s the critical vote? Does she forfeit her ability to make up her own mind any time the Democratic Whip thinks a vote might be close? Does the House implement a special rule that the Representative from Wyoming always votes last?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JRDelirious](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jrdelirious/32/9531_2.png) [@JRDelirious](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JRDelirious)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2021, 9:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-liz-cheney-can-hold-her-seat/941554/47 "2021-05-07T21:52:26Z")

</div>

Yea, all that. I’m sorry but the idea **Roger\_That** floats would have to be based entirely and absolutely on Liz Cheney becoming nothing other than a living “F\*\*k You Trump” lawn sign. This is not how Congress works, this is not how real politicians work – and whatever faults she may have, Cheney is a real politician from a family of real politicians, she’s not a troll-who-stumbled-into-it like Marjorie Taylor Greene or Matt Gaetz .

(And good call on what would her vote be worth, **gdave** – under that proposal, her vote would become not unlike the votes of the Territorial Delegates in the “Committee of the Whole” (when the House meets to propose, consider, debate and pass amendments to a reported bill, before it is put to an actual up or down vote). Delegates normally only vote in the committees to which they belong, _but_, when D’s have held the House under Pelosi, a rule has been adopted to have them vote in the Committee of the Whole… as long as their vote is not _decisive_, in which case then it’s not counted. But at least they and their constituents _know_ going in they don’t have a vote that counts.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Roger\_That](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/roger_that/32/8505_2.png) [@Roger\_That](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Roger_That)\
**Post date:** [May 8, 2021, 12:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-liz-cheney-can-hold-her-seat/941554/48 "2021-05-08T00:49:02Z")

</div>

1. It preserves her seniority, or at least an argument towards that seniority, 2) a living “F\*\*k you, Trump” lawn sign is better than being a defeated candidate for Congress–I can see where she would get a kick out of “You tried to kill me and I’m still in Congress”, 3) it’s only for 2 years–this deal would be renegotiated very quickly 4) no one outside of Dem leadership and Ms.Cheney would have to know the terms so keep your shorts-of-outrage on, JRDelirious.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gdave](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gdave/32/3683_2.png) [@gdave](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gdave)\
**Post date:** [May 8, 2021, 1:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-liz-cheney-can-hold-her-seat/941554/49 "2021-05-08T01:22:25Z")

</div>

> [@Roger\_That](#):
>
> 1. It preserves her seniority, or at least an argument towards that seniority,

Does it? I honestly don’t know how that works if you switch parties. But that really seems like putting the cart before the horse. She definitely keeps her seniority if she’s re-elected as a Republican. If she’s defeated, it’s true she loses her seniority, but…it seems like the “defeated” part is what’s important there. I don’t see how her seniority enters as a separate motivation from just keeping her seat.

> [@Roger\_That](#):
>
> 1. a living “F\*\*k you, Trump” lawn sign is better than being a defeated candidate for Congress–I can see where she would get a kick out of “You tried to kill me and I’m still in Congress”,

I suppose, if all Liz Cheney cares about is having a seat in Congress. If she actually cares about principles and integrity, which is what this whole thing is supposedly about, I would think she might get a kick out of standing up for what she believes rather than cutting a deal to try to hold onto her seat. Not to mention which, she’d be cutting a deal to hold onto a powerless seat. She’d have _no_ influence in the Democratic caucus. She’d be reviled as a traitor by Republicans. She couldn’t even leverage her vote on key legislation or procedural votes - by your proposed deal, she’s already sold her vote.

> [@Roger\_That](#):
>
> 1. it’s only for 2 years–this deal would be renegotiated very quickly

So why is _she_ cutting this deal? For two more years in Congress, in a powerless position? Why would Wyoming’s voters elect her under those conditions?

> [@Roger\_That](#):
>
> 1. no one outside of Dem leadership and Ms.Cheney would have to know the terms so keep your shorts-of-outrage on, JRDelirious.

I have no idea what you’re talking about with the “shorts-of-outrage” - @JRDelirious didn’t seem outraged in their post. They just seemed to think this isn’t a plausible, sensible, or workable plan. However, if Liz Cheney did, as you suggest here, make this deal in secret, and campaign under false pretenses, I, personally, would…I guess, take off my shorts of outrage? I’m not clear on how that metaphor works. I’d be outraged, is what I’m saying. And I’m not even one of her constituents.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Exapno\_Mapcase](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/exapno_mapcase/32/1051_2.png) [@Exapno\_Mapcase](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Exapno_Mapcase)\
**Post date:** [May 8, 2021, 2:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-liz-cheney-can-hold-her-seat/941554/50 "2021-05-08T02:12:53Z")

</div>

> [@Roger\_That](#):
>
> no one outside of Dem leadership and Ms.Cheney would have to know the terms so keep your shorts-of-outrage on,

So the deal made with the principled lady is predicated on her outrageously abandoning all principles to get the seat and accomplish nothing other than standing around being ignored by every one of her 434 colleagues for two years. As Rocky said to Bullwinkle, “that trick never works.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Roger\_That](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/roger_that/32/8505_2.png) [@Roger\_That](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Roger_That)\
**Post date:** [May 8, 2021, 2:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-liz-cheney-can-hold-her-seat/941554/51 "2021-05-08T02:14:15Z")

</div>

OK, let’s start with # 4) since that one seems to have you most confused: JRDelirious seems to have his shorts aflame because he thinks the entire world would know and object to the details of the agreement I’m positing Cheney would work out with Pelosi. But it’s to neither Liz’s nor Nancy’s advantage to disclose the nature of the bargain they’ve worked out privately, so that one is effectively kiboshed. THE VOTERS WILL BE OUTRAGED AT THE SCUMMY DEAL!!! But if they never find out it exists, then not so much.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Roger\_That](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/roger_that/32/8505_2.png) [@Roger\_That](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Roger_That)\
**Post date:** [May 8, 2021, 2:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-liz-cheney-can-hold-her-seat/941554/52 "2021-05-08T02:14:45Z")

</div>

Until it does.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gdave](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gdave/32/3683_2.png) [@gdave](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gdave)\
**Post date:** [May 8, 2021, 12:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-liz-cheney-can-hold-her-seat/941554/53 "2021-05-08T12:38:15Z")

</div>

So, yeah, I’m with @Exapno_Mapcase on this one:

> [@Exapno\_Mapcase](#):
>
> So the deal made with the principled lady is predicated on her outrageously abandoning all principles to get the seat and accomplish nothing other than standing around being ignored by every one of her 434 colleagues for two years. As Rocky said to Bullwinkle, “that trick never works.”

You’re actually seriously suggesting that two Members of Congress secretly conspire to deceive the voters of Wyoming and deprive them of honest representation. The fact that you want to conceal this information from them to avoid their outrage is itself outrageous.

And then what happens after two years? Liz Cheney is now radioactive in Republican Party circles. She has _no_ role in Democratic Party circles, since she disagrees with them on just about everything. She can’t even stand as a principled independent, since as part of your deal she has to abandon her publicly stated principles and positions every time there’s a close vote.

And you still haven’t explained how this actually works in practice. How does she know which are the votes when she can freely but impotently vote as her conscience, constituents, and the Constitution dictate, and which are the votes when she has to violate her obligations as the duly elected representative of the people of Wyoming and give Wyoming’s vote to Nancy Pelosi?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Duality](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mr.duality/32/4098_2.png) [@Mr.Duality](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Duality)\
**Post date:** [May 8, 2021, 1:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-liz-cheney-can-hold-her-seat/941554/54 "2021-05-08T13:45:46Z")

</div>

Let it go, @Roger_That. You are like some crazy person making up increasingly unrealistic scenarios to support an original premise that will never fly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Roger\_That](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/roger_that/32/8505_2.png) [@Roger\_That](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Roger_That)\
**Post date:** [May 8, 2021, 1:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-liz-cheney-can-hold-her-seat/941554/55 "2021-05-08T13:54:47Z")

</div>

Call me names in the Pit, please. I have a few for you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JRDelirious](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jrdelirious/32/9531_2.png) [@JRDelirious](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JRDelirious)\
**Post date:** [May 8, 2021, 4:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-liz-cheney-can-hold-her-seat/941554/56 "2021-05-08T16:03:15Z")

</div>

> [@gdave](#):
>
> > [@Roger\_That](#):
> >
> > 1. no one outside of Dem leadership and Ms.Cheney would have to know the terms so keep your shorts-of-outrage on, JRDelirious.
> 
> I have no idea what you’re talking about with the “shorts-of-outrage” - @JRDelirious didn’t seem outraged in their post. They just seemed to think this isn’t a plausible, sensible, or workable plan.

Yeah really, your threshold for detecting garment inflammation seems to be oversensitive. Look, we get it that the concept requires to be taken as axiomatic that nobody ever finds out what deal is it that was made. But we are fighting the hypothetical mostly because it seems based on something that we have no reason to believe _Liz Cheney_ would be willing to do nor Nancy Pelosi willing to offer.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LSLGuy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lslguy/32/5813_2.png) [@LSLGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LSLGuy)\
**Post date:** [May 8, 2021, 5:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-liz-cheney-can-hold-her-seat/941554/57 "2021-05-08T17:13:30Z")

</div>

> [@JRDelirious](#):
>
> But we are fighting the hypothetical mostly because it seems based on something that we have no reason to believe _Liz Cheney_ would be willing to do nor Nancy Pelosi willing to offer.

In general I agree. It’s a silly idea that doesn’t pass the laugh test. But it is the sort of nonsense that somebody totally steeped in the cynical idea that all politics is simply the Game of Thrones and “it’s all just an amoral scam perpetrated upon the good people of the USA.” I wonder where he learned this from?

  
In some Bizarro world where the House majority hangs in the balance by exactly one person 217 to 218, Liz \*might\* try to do something that amounts to selling her allegiance to the highest bidder, be that Speaker Pelosi or the R-side house leader.

At the same time there will be another 20 reps interested in vying for the chance to sell their soul (and political future) to the highest bidder while the two party leaderships compete them down to the lowest most desperate price. Very quickly that turns into a variant the old saw about expensive women: “We’ve already established what you are; now we’re merely haggling over price.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Roger\_That](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/roger_that/32/8505_2.png) [@Roger\_That](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Roger_That)\
**Post date:** [May 8, 2021, 6:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-liz-cheney-can-hold-her-seat/941554/58 "2021-05-08T18:14:27Z")

</div>

So until it happens, it’s impossible, and when it happens, it’s a done deal. Right? Use your imagination. Or buy one.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![What\_Exit](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/what_exit/32/10652_2.png) [@What\_Exit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/What_Exit)\
**Post date:** [May 8, 2021, 6:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-liz-cheney-can-hold-her-seat/941554/59 "2021-05-08T18:49:55Z")

</div>

**Modnote** : Time to dial it back. This is way too much into attacking the poster and not the post. Please do not do this again.

> [@Roger\_That](#):
>
> Use your imagination. Or buy one.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JRDelirious](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jrdelirious/32/9531_2.png) [@JRDelirious](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JRDelirious)\
**Post date:** [May 8, 2021, 8:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-liz-cheney-can-hold-her-seat/941554/60 "2021-05-08T20:49:18Z")

</div>

> [@LSLGuy](#):
>
> In some Bizarro world where the House majority hangs in the balance by exactly one person 217 to 218, Liz _might_ try to do something that amounts to selling her allegiance to the highest bidder, be that Speaker Pelosi or the R-side house leader.
> 
> At the same time there will be another 20 reps interested in vying for the chance to sell their soul (and political future) to the highest bidder while the two party leaderships compete them down to the lowest most desperate price. Very quickly that turns into a variant the old saw about expensive women: “We’ve already established what you are; now we’re merely haggling over price.”

Right, if it ever came down to that, then it stops being about Liz Cheney for the sake of Liz Cheney, and it becomes what Republican, _any_ Republican, is willing to make a deal for actual real power, **AND** then _at the very same time_ McCarthy would be intensely looking for (x+1) Blue Dog Dems to flip the _other_ way w/o ticking off his own troops, for the same purposes.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-liz-cheney-can-hold-her-seat/941554.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-liz-cheney-can-hold-her-seat/941554.md?page=4)
