# How long would Charlie Kirk have lasted here?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-long-would-charlie-kirk-have-lasted-here/1023044>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [September 14, 2025, 9:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-long-would-charlie-kirk-have-lasted-here/1023044 "2025-09-14T21:59:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sciurophobic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/cab0a1/32.png) [@sciurophobic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sciurophobic)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2025, 9:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-long-would-charlie-kirk-have-lasted-here/1023044/1 "2025-09-14T21:59:40Z")

</div>

_Poll ([view on site](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-long-would-charlie-kirk-have-lasted-here/1023044/1))_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Velocity](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/velocity/32/18006_2.png) [@Velocity](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Velocity)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2025, 10:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-long-would-charlie-kirk-have-lasted-here/1023044/2 "2025-09-14T22:01:01Z")

</div>

All depends on how he responds to warnings. He’d have gotten several sooner or later. Up to him as to whether he modified his ways.

I think he would remain active and unbanned, but frequently Pitted.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sherrerd](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sherrerd/32/8_2.png) [@Sherrerd](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sherrerd)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2025, 10:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-long-would-charlie-kirk-have-lasted-here/1023044/3 "2025-09-14T22:10:09Z")

</div>

I haven’t seen enough of his “debates” to be any kind of expert, but I don’t think he would have found online back-and-forth to be satisfying. With in-person interactions he somewhat relied on seeming like “the calm guy,” and that tactic might not have translated to the screen.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johnny\_L.A](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnny_l.a/32/1084_2.png) [@Johnny\_L.A](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johnny_L.A)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2025, 10:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-long-would-charlie-kirk-have-lasted-here/1023044/4 "2025-09-14T22:13:32Z")

</div>

After multiple threads, I think he would be banned for playing out the long line.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Railer13](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/railer13/32/9742_2.png) [@Railer13](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Railer13)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2025, 10:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-long-would-charlie-kirk-have-lasted-here/1023044/5 "2025-09-14T22:23:44Z")

</div>

> [@Sherrerd](#):
>
> With in-person interactions he somewhat relied on seeming like “the calm guy,” and that tactic might not have translated to the screen.

He also was damn quick with a comeback, spouting data that may or may not have been true. That tactic certainly would not have translated to the Dope.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sherrerd](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sherrerd/32/8_2.png) [@Sherrerd](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sherrerd)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2025, 10:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-long-would-charlie-kirk-have-lasted-here/1023044/6 "2025-09-14T22:29:50Z")

</div>

> [@Railer13](#):
>
> He also was damn quick with a comeback, spouting data that may or may not have been true. That tactic certainly would not have translated to the Dope.

Yeah. In-person, the game is ‘_dominate, even if you’re making stuff up_.’ And ‘_making stuff up_’ is not well-received in serious online venues such as this one.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Railer13](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/railer13/32/9742_2.png) [@Railer13](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Railer13)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2025, 10:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-long-would-charlie-kirk-have-lasted-here/1023044/7 "2025-09-14T22:33:22Z")

</div>

> [@Sherrerd](#):
>
> In-person, the game is ‘_dominate, even if you’re making stuff up_.’

Which is just what his last words were. He was asked about mass shootings, and his comeback was something like “are we including gang shootings?”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Slithy\_Tove](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/slithy_tove/32/18248_2.png) [@Slithy\_Tove](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Slithy_Tove)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2025, 10:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-long-would-charlie-kirk-have-lasted-here/1023044/8 "2025-09-14T22:37:09Z")

</div>

“This was the story of ~~Howard Beale~~ Charlie Kirk: The first known instance of a man who was killed because he had ~~lousy ratings~~ logical fallacies.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sherrerd](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sherrerd/32/8_2.png) [@Sherrerd](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sherrerd)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2025, 10:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-long-would-charlie-kirk-have-lasted-here/1023044/9 "2025-09-14T22:37:40Z")

</div>

Yeah–always change the subject to one that advances your position (in this case, Kirk reminding people that Gangs = non-whites, and they are bad and dangerous!)

Just as a few seconds before the interchange you mention, someone had asked about ‘trans shooters’:

> About 20 minutes in, a young audience member stepped up to the microphone to try to do just that.
> 
> “Do you know how many transgender Americans have been mass shooters over the last 10 years?” he asked.
> 
> “Too many,” Kirk quipped. The crowd clapped and cheered.

“Too many” of course implying a substantial number. Complete hogwash–but it fit Kirk’s political stance.

> **[Charlie Kirk’s final hours: How a stage for debate became a scene of tragedy...](https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/12/us/charlie-kirk-shooting-death-final-hours)**
>
> The conservative firebrand set up shop at Utah Valley University to face his admirers and adversaries. His journey there began more than a decade earlier.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2025, 11:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-long-would-charlie-kirk-have-lasted-here/1023044/10 "2025-09-14T23:02:35Z")

</div>

> [@Velocity](#):
>
> All depends on how he responds to warnings. He’d have gotten several sooner or later. Up to him as to whether he modified his ways.

This, it would depend how badly he wanted to post here.

His opinion on trans people, for example, would get him banned. He didn’t believe that they were the gender they identified as, and taking that position here is a bannable offense. So the question is, would he say “I want to debate these liberals badly enough to do it by their rules”, or would he say “let me become a free speech Martyr” or whatever?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Joey\_P](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/919ad9/32.png) [@Joey\_P](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Joey_P)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2025, 11:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-long-would-charlie-kirk-have-lasted-here/1023044/11 "2025-09-14T23:17:12Z")

</div>

> [@Railer13](#):
>
> He also was damn quick with a comeback, spouting data that may or may not have been true

And if he relies on the conversation moving faster than the other person can think, I expect that not to work well on a message board where people have time to compose their replies.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Railer13](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/railer13/32/9742_2.png) [@Railer13](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Railer13)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2025, 11:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-long-would-charlie-kirk-have-lasted-here/1023044/12 "2025-09-14T23:31:18Z")

</div>

> [@Joey\_P](#):
>
> And if he relies on the conversation moving faster than the other person can think,

Which is exactly what he did.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Joey\_P](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/919ad9/32.png) [@Joey\_P](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Joey_P)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2025, 11:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-long-would-charlie-kirk-have-lasted-here/1023044/13 "2025-09-14T23:42:46Z")

</div>

That and he’s exploiting a group of people (college students) that feel very passionately about things, but don’t have the experience to defend those things. From the handful of very short clips I’ve seen of him (and that South Park episode), the people he’s talking to don’t know to demand he back up his statements. They don’t know to keep him on topic. They don’t know how to call out fallacies, if they even recognize them.  
Also, from what I understand, what he’s publishing is edited in his favor.

I wonder if he’d get different results debating grad students.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HMS\_Irruncible](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hms_irruncible/32/7394_2.png) [@HMS\_Irruncible](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/HMS_Irruncible)\
**Post date:** [September 15, 2025, 12:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-long-would-charlie-kirk-have-lasted-here/1023044/14 "2025-09-15T00:02:31Z")

</div>

Kirk is the type who would’ve racked up a bunch of warnings early on, and then learned how to work the system to his advantage like some of our other longer-running conservative trolls. In particular the rule against calling out lies would serve him exquisitely well.

However, Kirk used his Twitter preference to gin up controversy to spread his name far and wide, and then used in-person engagements to cultivate the more tame youth-pastor debate-lord persona that got him in with the evangelical types. I don’t think SDMB would give him the volume or type of engagement needed to feed that particular grift.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![I\_Love\_Me\_Vol.I](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/i_love_me_vol.i/32/521_2.png) [@I\_Love\_Me\_Vol.I](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/I_Love_Me_Vol.I)\
**Post date:** [September 15, 2025, 12:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-long-would-charlie-kirk-have-lasted-here/1023044/15 "2025-09-15T00:14:51Z")

</div>

Kirk wouldn’t have adhered to the rules of all-Lefty, all-the-time that this board demands of its users so he would be banned pretty swiftly–whether he deserved it or not. There is no longer any room for arguing against Leftist politics here. Tis a shame.

He could have been nothing but a gentleman and followed all the rules yet he still would have been ushered out real quick-like.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [September 15, 2025, 12:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-long-would-charlie-kirk-have-lasted-here/1023044/16 "2025-09-15T00:20:39Z")

</div>

> [@I\_Love\_Me\_Vol.I](#):
>
> Kirk wouldn’t have adhered to the rules of all-Lefty, all-the-time that this board demands of its users so he would be banned pretty swiftly–whether he deserved it or not. There is no longer any room for arguing against Leftist politics here. Tis a shame.

To which the only calm, rational response is:

Huh?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![crowmanyclouds](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/crowmanyclouds/32/19884_2.png) [@crowmanyclouds](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/crowmanyclouds)\
**Post date:** [September 15, 2025, 12:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-long-would-charlie-kirk-have-lasted-here/1023044/17 "2025-09-15T00:34:19Z")

</div>

> [@I\_Love\_Me\_Vol.I](#):
>
> There is no longer any room for arguing against Leftist politics here.

Curious that you didn’t say 'There is no longer any room for arguing for Rightist politics here."  
Tis a shame.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zakalwe](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/zakalwe/32/270_2.png) [@Zakalwe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zakalwe)\
**Post date:** [September 15, 2025, 1:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-long-would-charlie-kirk-have-lasted-here/1023044/18 "2025-09-15T01:00:16Z")

</div>

> [@I\_Love\_Me\_Vol.I](#):
>
> There is no longer any room for arguing against Leftist politics here. Tis a shame.

To be translated as: “People can’t lie and misrepresent things around here. That fucking sucks, because that’s all the right has remaining to it.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dereknocue67](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/6de8d8/32.png) [@Dereknocue67](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dereknocue67)\
**Post date:** [September 15, 2025, 7:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-long-would-charlie-kirk-have-lasted-here/1023044/19 "2025-09-15T07:59:20Z")

</div>

I don’t believe Kirk would consider coming here because he could not manipulate his words by later editing them. By this, I mean Kirk would record his college “debates” and then work his magic in the editing room. The altered versions were designed to go viral, that miraculously reveal Kirk as a skillful and knowledgeable debater while his opponents appear uninformed and misguided. That approach is more difficult in a forum setting.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kanicbird](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/5f8ce5/32.png) [@kanicbird](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kanicbird)\
**Post date:** [September 15, 2025, 10:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-long-would-charlie-kirk-have-lasted-here/1023044/20 "2025-09-15T10:44:51Z")

</div>

> [@Babale](#):
>
> His opinion on trans people, for example, would get him banned. He didn’t believe that they were the gender they identified as, and taking that position here is a bannable offense

I agree. In my opinion, if he were posting on today’s version of the board, he would have tripped too many of the boards’ circuit breakers and ended up banned. The board of years past, however, was far more tolerant, and perhaps the posters were too, and we often maintained those kinds of discussions—I know because I was often on his side of many such debates back then. If he could have stuck around, he might have developed a better grasp of genuine debate than he showed in his final days. In those days, even topics like trans issues were explored more deeply than today, when many have grown weary of threads that almost always end the same way.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-long-would-charlie-kirk-have-lasted-here/1023044.md?page=2)
