Unless you’re suggesting the possibility Magic Johnson is a woman, I’m confused by what you’re saying.
Could be a three way thing with Magic, Susie, and Frank. Just speculating.
You would think it’s straightforward, but homosexual activity is not necessary identified as “gay” by some. For example, some find that being the "top " is not gay, while being the “bottom” is.
And CNN/ESPN columnist L.Z. Granderson (link goes to a short column he wrote about being both gay and black).
I can understand how a person can say they’re not gay even if they’ve had sex with a person of the same gender. But to say the sex itself wasn’t gay sex? If two men or two women are having sex with each other, that’s gay sex.
if a person was bisexual then it would be bi sex.
No, the people involved may be bisexual or homosexual or heterosexual. But, in my opinion, the sexual act itself is gay - it’s a singular act that doesn’t have a wider context.
so a bisexual person has both straight and gay sex depending on the person they are with?
what if multiple people are there and they are a sandwich between a male and female?
It’s a very complicated and controversial subject in LGBT/alt sexuality/sexual identity circles, but the basic gist is that, according to some people/theories, “gay” is only an appropriate label if the person desires, seeks out or engages in romantic *relationships *with partners of the same gender and/or self identifies as gay. Some folks hold it entirely possible for straight men to have sexual experiences with other men and not be gay. http://www.straightguise.com/
Also, Kinsey et. al. always held that sexual orientation is not fixed, and that a person can be gay at one stage of their life, straight at another, asexual at a third…
I don’t remember exactly why I wrote what I wrote back in February, but as I recall, there were a few gender/sexuality identity threads going on at the time, so it was a bit of tongue in cheek reference to the debate(s) happening elsewhere on the board.
I’ll concede it gets complicated when more than two people are involved. But I’m standing by what I said as far as one-on-one sex goes. If it’s a man and a woman, it’s straight sex. If it’s a man and a man or a woman and a woman, it’s gay sex. The people involved may be gay or straight or something else in a larger context, but the sex itself is what it is.
I’m one of “those people,” and yes, there’s still plenty of anger. Especially toward certain communities (e.g. African-American) that are still in denial.
Why is there a good chance of getting a tear on the skin if you have as big dick? How is it different to those who having a small dick? (I have concerns for my not well endowed brethren).
Cause my jaw only opens so far. Small dicks leave room for me to wrap my lips around my teeth.
which is why I pick up babes at the denture clinic.
or female hockey goalies.
Obviously, to somebody, it does.
Well while everyone is wildly speculating couldn’t he also secretly be an IV drug user who got it from unsafe injection?
Sorry I don’t have a cite but I recall an article where survey questions can be misunderstood if slang of a subculture isn’t used. The same people who would say they had not engaged in gay sex would say yes if asked if they had “tagged a sissy”.
Playing the post.
Tagged a sissy sounds like they played a game of tag with a wimpy kid as a child.