These would do more damage, and enough of them would do the trick - eventually. But recall that thse aren’t really designed to penetrate armor either, just the side of an aircraft carrier. It’s entirely possible that they might actually breack up and fail to function effectively, if they were to hit straight on to armor. OTOH, if they do detonate properly, they’re going to strip a lot of topside fittings away. These are the only extant cruise missiles I’d give a chance of actually sinking a battle wagon with any kind of reasonable numbers. But you’d still need a lot of 'em.
No, instead, they’d “only” render it combat-incapable, and fairly quickly, I imagine.
Well, yes and no. Remember, battleships were designed to resist plaunging fire by 1200kilo armor-piercing shells. What’s a GBU? It’s plunging fire. So, how did the IJN mess up the ships at Pearl? By strapping fins on naval shells, and dropping them from really high, getting higher velocities than normal. That, and the fact that the ships weren’t at GW, and so couldn’t effectively engage in damage control until the damage had largely already been done. So… Are there ain equivalents to that in teh world’s aresenals? Why, yes, yes there are… GBU bunker busters. Those would fuck up a battlehip in very, very short order.
Stranger On A Train, you might also ask the crews of the USS Missouri and the HMS Gloucester. Two silkworms, much more capable missiles than the Exocet, were fired at the Missouri. One failed to make it to engagement distance, crashing instead, and the other was quite handily shot out of the air by the Gloucester. So much for the Chinese missiles efficacy. Anti-cruise missile defenses do work, if they’re up and running. I don’t know about the Sheffield, but the Stark did NOT have their defenses up and running, so cannot be used in argumant for or against the efficacy of such defenses when prepared and ready. IIRC, the Sheffield didn’t even posses such defenseise, but I could be wrong. Anyway, navies have since become acutely aware of the threat of sea-skimmers, and so such attacks are much less likely to go undetected (as happened with the Sheffield).
Edit:
Oh, great quote about the aluminum - I thought the Pentagon Wars was a wonderful bit of work, especially since my father knew some of those people personally, and agreed with the assesment IRT the Bradley’s vulnerability.
Further edit:
A cruise missile isn’t going to reach a magazine ona battleship. they’re deep in the hull, and very well protected. Even ready-use ammunition is well protected, and isn’t sent up to the gun mount until it’s to be loaded. You need to set off an explosion inside the turret to get to the ready-use magazine, and even that won’t sink a battleship, as wintnessed buy the Missouri explosion.